Meldola

Researchers are evaluating the use of lutetium (177Lu) edotreotide (Lu-Dotatoc) in patients with certain neuroendocrine tumors and other SSTR-positive cancers that are not currently approved for treatment with LUTATHERA. This includes tumors like bronchopulmonary, ovarian, renal NETs, neuroendocrine carcinomas, pheochromocytomas, paragangliomas, meningiomas, and some other malignancies. The study aims to expand knowledge on the effectiveness and safety of 177Lu-DOTATOC in treating these diseases, focusing on tumor response and safety outcomes in a phase II trial setting. Participants receive four cycles of 177Lu-DOTATOC therapy administered by slow intravenous infusion over 30 minutes using a dedicated pump. Dosage is set at 7.4 GBq for those without risk factors and 5.5 GBq for those with risk factors. The study includes only patients with tumors showing significant uptake on 68Ga PET-CT imaging and disease progression despite standard treatments. All disease stages are allowed, and concurrent somatostatin analog therapy is maintained at the same dose as before progression. During the study, patients undergo assessments including tumor imaging to confirm receptor positivity and measurable disease. Researchers monitor disease control rate over 32 months as the primary outcome. Participants must have adequate organ function and life expectancy over six months. Safety and treatment responses are closely followed throughout the treatment cycles and study period. Overall participation starts with screening, followed by treatment and long-term monitoring of disease control and safety.

This research investigates adult patients with a subtype of B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) known as "triple negative" or Ph-/-/-, which lacks the most common gene rearrangements seen in adult B-ALL. The study aims to better understand this group, which represents about 61% of adult B-ALL cases and is associated with poor prognosis and limited targeted therapies. A key focus is on the role of the CRLF2 gene, often altered in this leukemia subtype, to identify patient clusters and potential biomarkers for new treatments. The study is non-interventional and translational, involving analysis of patient samples collected during routine clinical care without influencing treatment decisions. Biological samples, including peripheral blood, bone marrow, and saliva, will be examined using conventional methods and advanced techniques such as next-generation sequencing, flow cytometry, gene expression profiling, and copy number alteration analysis. These analyses will help characterize the disease and assess diagnostic tools like a cytofluorimetric assay to detect triple negative subgroups rapidly and economically. Participants will be followed for 36 months during which clinical data will be collected and stored in a dedicated database. The study evaluates biological markers associated with the leukemia subtype and monitors patient status through standard clinical assessments. This approach aims to improve understanding of triple negative adult B-ALL and support the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Researchers are studying whether combining calderasib, a targeted therapy for the KRAS G12C mutation, with subcutaneous pembrolizumab can treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study aims to determine if people receiving calderasib with pembrolizumab live longer without their cancer growing or spreading compared to those receiving pembrolizumab with chemotherapy. This is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial focusing on participants with advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC carrying the KRAS G12C mutation. Participants will receive one of two treatment combinations. One group will take calderasib orally along with subcutaneous pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa injections. The other group will receive subcutaneous pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy drugs pemetrexed and a platinum-based drug, either carboplatin or cisplatin, administered by intravenous infusion. These treatments are given as first-line therapy, and the study evaluates their safety and effectiveness. During the study, researchers will monitor participants for progression-free survival, especially focusing on those with at least 1% PD-L1 tumor proportion score, for up to approximately 48 months. Participants will undergo regular assessments to track cancer progression and response to treatment. Safety and efficacy data will be collected throughout the study to understand how well the treatments work and their side effects over time.

Researchers are investigating new treatments for metastatic cervical cancer, which is cancer that has spread from the cervix to other parts of the body. This Phase 3 study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of combining sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT), an antibody drug that targets cancer cells, with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab. The study seeks to find out if this combination can help people live longer or keep their cancer from worsening compared to standard treatments. The study has two parts. In Part 1, participants receive sac-TMT together with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab to assess safety. In Part 2, after standard initial treatment, those whose cancer does not progress will be randomly assigned to maintenance treatment with either pembrolizumab alone or sac-TMT plus pembrolizumab. Bevacizumab may be added during maintenance treatment based on the doctor's decision. All treatments are given through intravenous infusions, and participants may receive rescue medications to manage side effects before sac-TMT infusion. Participants will be monitored for adverse events and treatment tolerability over several months. The study measures include progression-free survival and overall survival, assessed by independent review. Safety and treatment continuation rates are tracked during Part 1 for up to approximately 66-69 months, while Part 2 outcome measures extend up to 48-60 months. Various assessments, including laboratory tests and evaluations of cancer status, will be performed throughout the study to understand treatment effects and participant well-being.

Researchers are investigating treatments for women with recurrent endometrial cancer that expresses different levels of the HER2 protein. The study has two groups based on the tumor's HER2 score: Cohort 1 includes patients with HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+ who have previously received immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy, while Cohort 2 includes patients with HER2 IHC 3+. The purpose is to compare the effectiveness and safety of the investigational drug BNT323 (also called DB-1303) against chemotherapy in Cohort 1 and to evaluate BNT323 alone in Cohort 2. The study also looks at how the drug affects the immune system, the body's handling of the drug, quality of life, and potential side effects. Participants in Cohort 1 are randomly assigned to receive either BNT323 via intravenous infusion or a chemotherapy drug chosen by the investigator (doxorubicin, paclitaxel, or docetaxel if paclitaxel is unsuitable). Treatment continues until the cancer progresses, unacceptable side effects occur, or the participant withdraws consent. Those in Cohort 2 receive BNT323 alone until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria are met. The study includes a screening period, a treatment period expected to last about six months, followed by safety monitoring, efficacy follow-up, and long-term survival follow-up lasting up to approximately 53 months. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response by RECIST criteria, safety monitoring for adverse effects, and evaluations of quality of life. Researchers also study the pharmacokinetics of BNT323 and the immune response. The main outcomes measured are progression-free survival in Cohort 1 and objective response rate in Cohort 2. Safety follow-up ensures ongoing monitoring after treatment to evaluate longer-term effects and participant wellbeing.

Researchers are looking for ways to treat germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GCB DLBCL). DLBCL is a fast-growing blood cancer that affects B-cells. GCB is a type of DLBCL that affects young B-cells that are still maturing. The goal of this study is to learn if more people who receive zilovertamab vedotin (MK-2140) and R-CHP have the cancer respond (go away) than those who receive polatuzumab vedotin and R-CHP.

Researchers are conducting a phase III randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant cemiplimab immunotherapy in patients with surgically removed stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior platinum-based chemotherapy. The study focuses on patients whose tumors express PD-L1 at 1% or higher. The main goal is to measure disease-free survival, tracking the length of time patients remain free from cancer recurrence or death for up to about 59 months. Participants receive cemiplimab intravenously at 350 mg every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by 700 mg every 6 weeks for six cycles, continuing until cancer relapse or unacceptable side effects occur. The treatment is compared to observation without additional adjuvant therapy. The study involves careful dosing schedules and monitoring to assess the impact of cemiplimab as a post-surgical treatment option. During the study, participants undergo brain imaging for staging, tumor PD-L1 testing, and regular pregnancy tests for women of childbearing potential. Researchers monitor disease recurrence and adverse effects throughout treatment and follow-up. Patients must meet specific health criteria, including recovery from surgery and adequate organ function, and agree to use contraception during treatment and for four months afterward. The total participation period includes treatment cycles and long-term follow-up to evaluate disease-free survival and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

Researchers are exploring how machine learning can improve the prediction of early disease recurrence in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), a complex blood cancer. Despite advances in treatment that have improved survival and deep clinical responses, some newly diagnosed MM patients still face a higher risk of disease progression within 12 months of starting therapy. Current risk scores use limited clinical and biological information, so this study aims to develop more accurate predictive models by integrating clinical, genomic, and imaging data through advanced machine learning techniques. The study is observational and non-interventional, conducted across multiple centers nationally. It will collect and analyze diverse data from MM patients using machine learning to identify patterns and clusters that correlate with early progression or relapse. By combining tumor and immune biomarkers from high-throughput and omics technologies, the study hopes to create models that better stratify patients based on their individual risk profiles without changing their treatment. Participants will be monitored to measure their overall response rate to therapy at 12 months after starting treatment. The study focuses on gathering detailed patient information to support improved clinical decision-making and personalized treatment approaches. Results could help identify patients at high risk upfront, potentially guiding more effective management and benefiting the healthcare system through tailored care strategies.

Researchers are evaluating a phase 1/2 open-label study to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical effects of an oral drug called Enzomenib (DSP-5336) in patients with acute leukemia, including relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), ambiguous lineage acute leukemia, and in certain sites, high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The study also examines Enzomenib combined with standard AML treatments such as venetoclax plus azacitidine and the intensive chemotherapy 7+3 regimen in patients newly diagnosed with AML who have specific genetic mutations (MLL rearrangement or NPM1 mutation). Participants receive oral Enzomenib either alone or combined with other drugs: venetoclax and azacitidine for a nonintensive treatment group, gilteritinib for a certain relapsed AML group, or intensive chemotherapy with cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3) for newly diagnosed AML patients. The study includes dose escalation and expansion phases to determine recommended doses for phase 2. Treatment schedules and doses are adjusted based on response and safety, with some patients enrolled in specialized cohorts according to their genetic markers. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments including clinical exams, laboratory tests, bone marrow samples for genetic analysis, and monitoring for adverse events. Researchers measure safety outcomes such as adverse and serious adverse events, determine optimal dosing for phase 2, and evaluate treatment effectiveness by tracking complete response rates. Safety is monitored up to 30 days after the last dose, with dose recommendations made within four months of treatment start and response assessed around six months. The total participation time varies based on individual treatment and study phase.