Monza

Researchers are evaluating how well measuring symphysis fundal height (SFH) alone compares to SFH combined with point of care ultrasound measuring fetal abdominal circumference (POC-US-AC) in detecting babies who are smaller or larger than normal for their gestational age among low-risk pregnant women after 35 weeks. This study aims to find the most accurate way to identify abnormal fetal growth, which is linked to problems for both mother and baby. The study is an open-label randomized controlled trial involving two groups to compare these screening methods, with further confirmation by formal obstetric ultrasound when abnormalities are suspected. Women in the study will be randomly assigned to either SFH measurement alone or SFH plus POC-US-AC during routine antenatal visits at 35-38, 40, 41, and beyond 41 weeks of pregnancy. Midwives trained in both methods will perform the measurements. If growth abnormalities or abnormal amniotic fluid levels are suspected based on these screenings, a formal ultrasound by a specialist will be done for confirmation. All participants will receive a POC-US at 41 and 41+ weeks to check amniotic fluid regardless of their group. Participants will be assessed through ultrasound evaluations, medical history reviews, and fetal growth measurements during scheduled visits. Birthweights will be compared to prenatal findings to classify infants as small, appropriate, or large for gestational age. The primary outcome is the number of infants identified as small or large for gestational age from enrollment until about one year after birth. Safety and fetal growth will be closely monitored throughout the pregnancy with detailed measurements and follow-ups.

Researchers are creating a national registry in Italy for multiple myeloma, a type of blood cancer that makes up about 1.3% of all tumor diagnoses in men and 1.2% in women. This registry aims to track current clinical practices and describe how patients with multiple myeloma are diagnosed and treated across various hematology centers in Italy. The study also includes a patient-powered registry to encourage patient involvement and better understand treatment patterns and outcomes. The study is observational, meaning it will not involve any experimental treatments but will collect data on routine care and outcomes for patients diagnosed with active or symptomatic multiple myeloma since January 1, 2019. Both physicians and patients will contribute information to the registry, which will help monitor standard care practices nationwide. Participants will be followed to measure important outcomes such as overall survival and the time until the next treatment over a three-year period. The registry will collect data to analyze treatment approaches, patient characteristics, and survival, helping to identify changes and differences in care across Italy. Patients aged 18 years and older who can provide informed consent are eligible to participate, and there are no exclusion criteria.

Researchers are evaluating sotatercept as a potential treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a condition where blood vessels in the lungs thicken and narrow, causing high blood pressure in the lungs and overworking the heart. PAH symptoms include difficulty breathing and reduced ability to be active. Current standard treatments address symptoms but do not stop disease progression. This Phase 3 study focuses on the long-term safety and tolerability of sotatercept when added to standard PAH therapy. Participants in this long-term follow-up study receive sotatercept through subcutaneous injections every three weeks. Only individuals who completed prior sotatercept PAH studies without early discontinuation may join. This study continues the observation and assessment of participants over an extended period to learn about the effects and safety of sotatercept combined with background PAH treatments. During the study, participants will be regularly monitored for adverse events, treatment discontinuations, and the presence of anti-drug antibodies for up to approximately 90 months. Laboratory tests will evaluate blood components such as platelets, hemoglobin, creatinine, bilirubin, and liver enzymes. Changes from baseline in body weight, blood pressure, and electrocardiogram readings will also be tracked. The study involves adherence to visit schedules and compliance with study procedures to ensure comprehensive long-term safety data collection.

Researchers are evaluating a chemo-free combination of rituximab and golcadomide (CC-99282) as a front-line treatment for older, frail patients newly diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (DLBCL). This phase II, multicenter study focuses on patients aged 80 or older who are considered frail based on a simplified geriatric assessment (sGA) and are not eligible for standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of this treatment approach in this vulnerable population. Participants will receive an induction phase of up to six 28-day cycles consisting of golcadomide, rituximab, and dexamethasone only during the first cycle. Response to treatment will be evaluated after four and six cycles to identify patients who are responding. Those achieving at least a partial response will continue as planned, while non-responders will stop protocol treatment and switch to alternative regimens. After induction, involved site radiotherapy is permitted for PET-positive disease. Patients with at least partial response at the end of induction may then enter a consolidation phase with up to six additional 28-day cycles of golcadomide. Interim response checks during consolidation will identify disease progression, leading to treatment discontinuation if needed. Throughout the study, participants will undergo assessments including PET/CT or CT scans to evaluate disease and sarcopenia at baseline and end of treatment. Quality of life will be measured at study entry, during treatment, and follow-up. Follow-up visits will occur every three months for the first year and every six months in the second year, with a total follow-up duration of 24 months. Progression-free survival at 24 months is the primary outcome. Patients with disease progression will be considered treatment failures and followed for survival until study completion.

Researchers are conducting an international multicenter retrospective observational study to better understand the progression and clinical outcomes in patients with Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) who have the JAK2V617F mutation and later develop Polycythemia Vera (PV). The study follows updated 2022 diagnostic criteria for these myeloid blood disorders and includes two parts: a nested case-control study and a comparative retrospective cohort study. In the first part, patients who progressed from ET to PV by the end of 2020 are matched 1:1 with ET patients who have the same mutation but did not progress, based on year and age at ET diagnosis and disease duration. The second part compares patients with newly diagnosed PV who never had ET, matched similarly by year and age at diagnosis and disease duration, ensuring at least 5 years of follow-up for these patients. Participants' medical records will be reviewed retrospectively to compare clinical features and outcomes up to their baseline dates. The study aims to clarify phenotypic changes and clinical results in these patient groups. No interventions are administered, and the study focuses on analyzing existing data to assess progression and outcomes in these blood conditions.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a condition in which the immune system mistakenly destroys platelets, the cells that help stop bleeding. This leads to a low platelet count, making it easier to bruise or bleed. The trial investigates the long-term safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of mezagitamab in adults with chronic primary ITP who have previously participated in certain mezagitamab studies. It also examines how the body processes mezagitamab over time. Participants who completed the previous mezagitamab studies TAK-079-3002 or TAK-079-1004 and meet specific criteria will receive mezagitamab as a subcutaneous injection during this continuation study. The study is open-label and multicenter, focusing on continued treatment based on protocol requirements. The medication is given under medical supervision, and participants return to the study clinic several times throughout the study. During their participation, individuals will undergo regular assessments including monitoring for treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events up to approximately 108 weeks. Researchers will track safety by noting any adverse events that lead to permanent withdrawal from mezagitamab. The study includes physical evaluations, laboratory tests, and ongoing safety monitoring to understand how well participants tolerate the treatment and how effective it is over the long term.

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and effects of nerandomilast in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) who have previously completed treatment with nerandomilast in earlier studies. The study aims to understand how well participants tolerate nerandomilast over time, and whether it helps improve lung function, delays symptom worsening, reduces hospital visits, or impacts survival. This is a Phase 3 open-label extension trial. Participants take nerandomilast tablets daily for up to 1 year and 10 months while continuing their usual pulmonary fibrosis treatments. The study follows an open-label design where all participants receive nerandomilast. There are no placebo or comparator groups in this extension phase. Throughout the study, participants regularly visit their doctors for health assessments and lung function tests. Doctors monitor any health problems or side effects experienced during treatment. The main outcome measured is whether participants experience any adverse events up to the final follow-up visit, which occurs at week 99. This close monitoring helps evaluate the long-term safety and potential benefits of nerandomilast in this patient group.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are studying adults with confirmed Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) and cirrhosis, a scarring of the liver caused by damage to bile ducts. PBC is a slowly progressing disease that causes bile acid buildup and further liver damage, which can lead to cirrhosis. This study aims to evaluate if elafibranor, a daily medication, can prevent worsening clinical outcomes such as the need for liver transplant or death, compared to a placebo. It also looks at the safety of long-term elafibranor use and its effect on symptoms like itching and tiredness. Participants will take either an 80 mg tablet of elafibranor or a matching placebo once daily for up to 3.5 years in a double-blind setup, meaning neither the participants nor researchers know who receives which treatment. This long-term treatment period is designed to monitor the drug's impact over time. The study includes two groups: one receiving elafibranor and the other receiving placebo, with treatment lasting up to approximately 42 months. During the study, participants will be regularly assessed from the start until 4 weeks after treatment ends, with a maximum involvement of 3.5 years. Researchers will measure event-free survival, tracking if participants avoid clinical events indicating disease worsening. Safety monitoring will include tracking side effects and overall health, while symptom impact will be evaluated. Participants will provide informed consent and follow the study protocol throughout this extended observation period.