Kuala Selangor

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

The trial investigates the use of volrustomig in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) who have not shown disease progression after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in this patient population. Participants have tumors that express PD-L1 and the study is conducted as a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center global trial. Participants are assigned to receive either volrustomig as sequential therapy following cCRT or to an observation group. The treatment period involves monitoring participants who have completed definitive cCRT but remain unresected and have no evidence of metastatic disease. The study focuses on participants with Stage III, IVA, or IVB LA-HNSCC according to AJCC criteria, who have not undergone tumor resection before cCRT and have not been treated with radiotherapy alone. During the study, participants are regularly evaluated for progression-free survival, with follow-up lasting up to approximately 8 years to assess long-term outcomes. Researchers will monitor safety and disease progression closely. The overall participation duration includes screening, treatment or observation, and extended follow-up to capture both efficacy and safety data over time.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of combining durvalumab and domvanalimab compared to durvalumab plus placebo in adults with locally advanced (Stage III), unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease has not worsened after definitive platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study involves multiple centers. Participants receive intravenous infusions of durvalumab and domvanalimab or durvalumab and placebo. The treatments are given after patients have completed concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy with a total radiation dose of approximately 60 Gy. The study monitors patients over time to assess treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor tissue analysis for PD-L1 status, performance status assessments, and monitoring of organ and marrow function. The main outcome measured is progression-free survival up to 8 years after randomization. Researchers also monitor for any adverse effects and disease progression throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of various new drug combinations, including novel agents combined with standard treatments, for people with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This open-label, multicenter trial focuses on sub-study 2, which examines rilvegostomig combined with standard platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without ramucirumab, in participants with advanced NSCLC. The study aims to identify optimal doses and expand cohorts to better understand treatment safety and tumor response. The trial involves two parts: Part A includes safety run-in groups to test different dose levels of rilvegostomig and establish the recommended Phase 2 dose if not already known. Part B expands to larger groups to assess treatment effects. Rilvegostomig and other study drugs such as cisplatin, carboplatin, pemetrexed, paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, and ramucirumab are given by intravenous infusion according to the study protocol. Sub-study 1 was canceled and will not take place. Participants will undergo assessments including tumor tissue sampling, disease measurement scans, and laboratory tests to monitor organ function and treatment effects. Researchers will track adverse events, serious adverse events, dose-limiting toxicities, and tumor responses over approximately 46 months. Safety, tolerability, and anti-tumor activity are key outcomes, with follow-up to ensure participant well-being and gather comprehensive data on these novel treatment combinations.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of Saruparib (AZD5305) compared to placebo when added to a standard radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) regimen in men with high-risk and very high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer who have a BRCA gene mutation. This phase III study aims to assess whether Saruparib can improve metastasis-free survival in this population. About 700 adult male participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Saruparib or placebo along with ADT. There are two groups: Cohort A includes 400 participants with newly diagnosed high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer treated with primary RT or with high-risk biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy receiving salvage RT. Cohort B includes 300 participants with very high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer receiving primary RT combined with ADT and abiraterone. Saruparib and placebo will be given orally, and standard ADT and abiraterone with prednisone/prednisolone will be administered as per the regimen. Participants will be followed for up to about 93 months to monitor metastasis-free survival and overall safety. Assessments include imaging scans like CT, MRI, bone scans, and PSMA-PET to confirm disease status. The study also monitors organ function, performance status, and treatment adherence. An independent committee will review safety and efficacy data throughout the trial to ensure participant well-being and study integrity.

This research aims to evaluate the effects of EYU688 on dengue viral load, fever clearance time, and clinical signs and symptoms in patients diagnosed with dengue fever. It is a phase 2 randomized, participant- and investigator-blinded, placebo-controlled study that investigates both the efficacy and safety of orally administered EYU688 compared with a matching placebo. The study includes two parallel cohorts with different pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling schedules: an intensive PK cohort and a sparse PK sampling cohort. Participants will receive either EYU688 or placebo capsules administered orally. The treatment is given to patients who have confirmed dengue fever symptoms and a positive dengue test, with the onset of fever within 48 hours prior to starting treatment. The two cohorts run simultaneously but differ based on the frequency and intensity of PK blood sampling to assess drug behavior in the body. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for changes in viral load measured at 48 hours after treatment begins, as well as fever duration and clinical symptoms. Assessments include laboratory tests to evaluate safety and efficacy, with careful monitoring for any adverse effects. The total duration of participation includes screening, treatment, and follow-up evaluations to ensure comprehensive data collection on the drug's impact and participant safety.

Researchers are evaluating the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and immune response of MB12, a proposed pembrolizumab biosimilar, compared to Keytruda® in patients with advanced stage IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study involves patients who have not received prior systemic treatment for metastatic NSCLC and includes a range of international centers. The trial focuses on patients without EGFR activating mutations or ALK translocations and measures outcomes up to 24 weeks. Participants receive either MB12, EU-sourced Keytruda®, or US-sourced Keytruda®, each given as a 200 mg intravenous infusion every 3 weeks on Day 1. These immunotherapy drugs are combined with chemotherapy agents pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1) and either carboplatin (area under the curve 5 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4 cycles) or cisplatin (75 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4 cycles). The combination treatment is administered as a first-line therapy for metastatic NSCLC. During the study, patients are monitored for drug levels in the blood, treatment effectiveness, safety, and immune response. Regular assessments include imaging to measure tumor lesions using RECIST 1.1 criteria and evaluations of overall health and organ functions. The study aims to confirm that MB12 is similar to Keytruda® in how it is processed by the body and in its treatment results. Participants are followed for at least 24 weeks to collect data on these outcomes.

Researchers are investigating the safety and effectiveness of Dato-DXd combined with osimertinib or alone compared to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in treating adults with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This Phase III, open-label study includes participants whose disease has worsened despite prior osimertinib treatment. The goal is to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) over up to 2.5 years. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: Dato-DXd plus osimertinib, Dato-DXd alone, or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Dato-DXd and chemotherapy drugs (pemetrexed, carboplatin, or cisplatin) are given by intravenous infusion, while osimertinib is taken orally. Treatment continues until the cancer progresses based on imaging, unacceptable side effects occur, or other reasons require stopping treatment. After stopping the study drugs, participants will have an end-of-treatment visit within 35 days and safety follow-up about one month later. During the trial, researchers will monitor participants with radiological scans and assess progression-free survival. Safety evaluations will continue after treatment ends to detect any side effects. The study includes adults aged 18 to 130 years with good performance status and adequate organ function who have progressed on prior osimertinib therapy. The total study duration includes treatment and follow-up periods to ensure thorough assessment of treatment effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety of asciminib treatment in patients who have completed a previous Novartis-sponsored asciminib study and are considered by their doctors to benefit from continued treatment. This open-label, multi-center, global roll-over study focuses on patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) or Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) who need ongoing therapy but cannot access it outside the study. The study is part of a phase 4 trial to monitor safety during extended treatment. Participants receive asciminib either as a single agent or in combination with drugs such as imatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, or dasatinib. Asciminib is taken orally twice daily or once daily in fasting conditions, with a special pediatric formulation dosed by body weight. Other drugs are taken once or twice daily with specified meal conditions. The study continues treatment similarly to the participants' parent study but offers access when treatment is otherwise unavailable. During the study, participants are monitored for adverse events over an eight-year period. Researchers track safety outcomes and participants' compliance with treatment plans and scheduled visits. The study includes various assessments to ensure ongoing treatment benefits and to observe any side effects. Participation involves long-term follow-up to evaluate the safety of continued asciminib use in this patient population.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, effectiveness, how the body processes the drug (pharmacokinetics), and immune response to AZD0901, both alone and combined with other anti-cancer drugs. The study focuses on adults with advanced or metastatic solid tumors that express the protein Claudin18.2, including gastric, gastroesophageal junction, biliary tract, and pancreatic cancers. This trial is an open-label, multi-center Phase II study with several sub-studies targeting different cancer types. Participants receive AZD0901 through intravenous infusion. In Sub study 1, AZD0901 is given alone to patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms. Sub study 2 includes a safety run-in phase followed by a dose expansion phase where AZD0901 is combined with various chemotherapy drugs to treat pancreatic cancer. Sub study 3 also tests AZD0901 alone in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. During the trial, researchers monitor participants for side effects, serious side effects, and any events that cause stopping the treatment, including 30 days after treatment ends and for 90 days after stopping AZD0901. They evaluate the objective response rate from the first dose until disease progression or up to about two years. Participants undergo laboratory tests, vital sign checks, ECGs, physical exams, and regular safety assessments. The total study duration varies by sub-study and participant response.