Biala Podlaska

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are investigating how CDR132L, a potential new medicine, affects the structure and function of the heart in people living with heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction and left ventricular hypertrophy. This Phase 2 study compares CDR132L to a placebo, where participants receive either treatment randomly. The study aims to evaluate changes in a specific biomarker, microRNA-132-3p, over 24 weeks, with the total study duration lasting about 60 weeks. Participants will receive either CDR132L or a placebo through an intravenous infusion once every 4 weeks for a total of 48 weeks. The treatments are given under a double-blind design, meaning neither the participants nor the researchers know who receives which treatment until the study ends. This allows for a fair comparison of the effects of CDR132L versus placebo on heart structure and function. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including laboratory tests to measure heart-related biomarkers and imaging tests such as echocardiography to monitor heart structure and function. Researchers will track changes from baseline to week 24 in microRNA-132 levels and continue monitoring participants through the 60-week study period to evaluate safety and treatment effects. Ongoing clinical evaluations and safety checks will help ensure participant well-being throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have previously received an anti-CD38 antibody and lenalidomide. The study compares the effectiveness of talquetamab combined with pomalidomide (Tal-P), talquetamab combined with teclistamab (Tal-Tec), and investigator's choice between two standard regimens: elotuzumab with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (EPd), or pomalidomide with bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd). This Phase 3 trial aims to understand which combination best controls the disease progression. Participants will receive talquetamab as a subcutaneous injection, pomalidomide orally, teclistamab as a subcutaneous injection, elotuzumab intravenously, dexamethasone either orally or intravenously, and bortezomib as a subcutaneous injection. The study involves comparing these combinations with varying administration routes. The trial includes multiple treatment arms to assess different drug combinations in patients who have undergone 1 to 4 prior therapies. During the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival up to 3 years and 5 months. Researchers will regularly assess disease status, treatment response, and safety. Participants' performance status will be evaluated, and adherence to treatment and potential side effects will be carefully tracked. This long-term observation will help determine how well each treatment combination controls the disease over time.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of zanidatamab combined with a physician's choice of chemotherapy compared to trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy in treating adults with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. This study focuses on participants whose cancer has progressed or who cannot tolerate previous treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). The study is a phase 3 randomized trial aiming to assess progression-free survival and other important outcomes such as patient-reported tolerability and physical functioning. Participants receive either zanidatamab or trastuzumab through intravenous infusion, alongside chemotherapy drugs chosen by their physician from eribulin, gemcitabine, vinorelbine (all intravenous), or oral capecitabine. The study includes detailed monitoring of drug safety and how the body processes zanidatamab. The treatments continue until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. During the study, participants undergo regular evaluations including scans to measure cancer progression according to RECIST guidelines. Researchers also monitor safety through laboratory tests and heart function assessments. Participants are followed for up to approximately 44 months to measure progression-free survival and overall treatment outcomes. Long-term follow-up and patient-reported outcomes help provide a complete understanding of the treatments' effects.

Researchers are comparing how long participants with KRAS/NRAS and BRAF wild-type recurrent, unresectable, or metastatic colorectal cancer remain disease-free and their overall survival time when treated with two different regimens. This phase 3 study focuses on patients who have previously received chemotherapy. The study aims to evaluate progression-free survival and overall survival in participants receiving amivantamab plus FOLFIRI versus cetuximab or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI. The study involves two treatment groups: one receiving amivantamab combined with chemotherapy drugs 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium or levoleucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI), and the other receiving either cetuximab or bevacizumab with the same chemotherapy regimen. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of these treatment arms. The treatments will be administered according to protocol to assess their effects on the cancer. Participants will be monitored for up to 2 years and 1 month to measure progression-free survival through blinded independent central review and followed for overall survival for up to 4 years and 4 months. The study includes assessments of tumor response, safety, and other clinical evaluations. Tissue samples and detailed clinical data will also be collected. This comprehensive monitoring will help determine the comparative effectiveness of the treatment options over time.

This trial is focused on adults with KRAS/NRAS and BRAF wild-type unresectable or metastatic left-sided colorectal cancer. It compares the length of time participants remain free from disease progression when treated with amivantamab combined with chemotherapy regimens (mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI) versus cetuximab combined with the same chemotherapy regimens. The study is a randomized, open-label Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate progression-free survival over a period of up to 4 years and 2 months. Participants receive either amivantamab with chemotherapy drugs including 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium or levoleucovorin, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan hydrochloride, or cetuximab with the same chemotherapy regimens (mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI). Treatments are administered as first-line therapy for their colorectal cancer. The trial assesses how these treatments affect disease progression and survival. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly through assessments and evaluations to measure progression-free survival. Researchers will gather data via blinded independent central review to ensure unbiased assessment of disease status. Participants are followed up for safety and treatment efficacy over the study duration, which may last over four years.

This research aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of iza-bren, a bi-specific antibody-drug conjugate targeting EGFR and HER3 with a topoisomerase inhibitor, compared to the treatment of physician's choice (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin plus gemcitabine, or capecitabine). The study focuses on patients with previously untreated, locally advanced, recurrent inoperable, or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or estrogen receptor (ER)-low, HER2-negative breast cancer who are not eligible for anti-PD(L)1 or endocrine therapies. The trial is conducted in two phases, phase 2 and phase 3, to thoroughly assess these treatments.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of pirtobrutinib (LOXO-305) compared to ibrutinib in adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). The study includes participants who may have had prior treatment as well as treatment-nave participants with a specific genetic deletion (17p deletion). The study is a Phase 3, open-label, randomized trial designed to assess these treatments in different patient groups over varying durations. Participants receive either oral pirtobrutinib or oral ibrutinib. Part 1 compares these two drugs in participants with or without prior therapy, and participation can last up to six years. Part 2 focuses on pirtobrutinib alone in treatment-nave participants with 17p deletions, with participation lasting up to two years. The study carefully monitors responses to treatment, including complete and partial remissions. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments to track their response to therapy, including measuring overall response rates from the start of treatment until disease progression or new treatments begin. Safety and organ function are monitored, and laboratory tests help evaluate blood counts and kidney function. The study aims to provide detailed information on how well the treatments work and their safety over the long term.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not candidates for or do not plan to have autologous stem cell transplant as initial therapy. The study compares the effectiveness of two new combination treatments: teclistamab with daratumumab and lenalidomide (Tec-DR), and talquetamab with daratumumab and lenalidomide (Tal-DR), against the standard treatment of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DRd). This is a Phase 3 randomized study designed to assess which treatment better controls the disease. Teclistamab, talquetamab, and daratumumab are given as subcutaneous injections, while lenalidomide is taken orally. Dexamethasone can be given either orally or by intravenous injection. Participants receive one of the three treatment combinations as assigned by the study. The treatments are administered regularly over the study period, with close monitoring and follow-up to evaluate outcomes. The study includes up to 9 years of follow-up to track disease progression and survival. Participants will undergo regular assessments including monitoring for disease progression and treatment response. Key measures include progression-free survival from the time of randomization and the presence of minimal residual disease-negative complete response at 12 months. Safety and tolerability are also tracked throughout the study. Total participation time includes treatment and extended observation to assess long-term outcomes and side effects.