Torrejon De Ardoz

Researchers are evaluating the combination of BNT324, a B7-H3 antibody-drug conjugate, with BNT327, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1 and VEGF, in participants with advanced, metastatic, or relapsed small cell lung cancer SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC. This multi-part study aims to find safe doses, optimize treatment, assess preliminary effects, and confirm clinical efficacy in different lung cancer groups. The study includes participants with confirmed lung cancer who have measurable disease and meet specific health criteria. Participants will receive intravenous infusions of BNT324 combined with BNT327 in a dose escalation design to establish two recommended dose levels RP2D and RP2D-1. The study has two parts Part 1 focuses on dose finding in NSCLC and SCLC Part 2 compares these doses in treatment-naive and relapsed lung cancer cohorts, with some randomized groups. Additional participants may join at the optimal dose to further evaluate safety and effectiveness. Participants will undergo screening, followed by treatment, safety follow-up, and long-term survival monitoring. Researchers will assess dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events, treatment interruptions, and response rates using standardized criteria. Outcomes include objective response rate, disease control, progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall survival, with evaluations continuing up to 87 months. Safety is closely monitored during and after treatment, and participants health status is regularly assessed.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of remibrutinib in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis SPMS. This is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study involving approximately 1275 participants. The study aims to provide important data on remibrutinibs effect on disability progression in SPMS and includes both a Core Part and an Extension Part for further assessment. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either remibrutinib or a matching placebo as oral film-coated tablets during the Core Part. The Core Part includes double-blind treatment, followed by an Extension Part where all participants receive open-label remibrutinib tablets. Treatment is taken orally, and the study is event-driven, continuing until required endpoints are met. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments of disability progression using the Expanded Disability Status Scale EDSS, Timed 25-Foot Walk, 9-Hole Peg Test, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test, among others. Brain imaging and safety monitoring for adverse events are performed throughout up to approximately five years. Researchers track changes in brain lesions and atrophy, and follow participants for safety and treatment effects over time.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of tulisokibart in participants with moderately to severely active Crohns disease. This program includes two studies Study 1 involves both induction and maintenance treatment phases, while Study 2 focuses only on induction treatment. The main goal is to determine if one or more doses of tulisokibart are more effective than placebo in achieving clinical remission and endoscopic response at various time points up to Week 52. Participants are randomly assigned to receive different dosing regimens of tulisokibart or placebo. These regimens include high or low doses administered intravenously followed by subcutaneous injections, or subcutaneous injections alone. Some participants may continue in an extension phase receiving subcutaneous doses after completing their original treatment arm if they meet specific requirements. The studies use a double-blind design to compare tulisokibarts effects against placebo. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments to measure clinical remission, endoscopic response, and other health outcomes using tools like the Crohns Disease Activity Index and stool frequency with abdominal pain scores. Safety evaluations include monitoring adverse events and treatment discontinuations. The studies last up to 52 weeks for Study 1 and 12 weeks for Study 2, with multiple visits to assess treatment effects and participant health under medical supervision.

This research aims to evaluate the long-term safety and explore the efficacy of astegolimab in adults aged 40 to 90 years with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease COPD. It focuses on participants who have completed a 52-week placebo-controlled treatment period in previous studies GB43311 or GB44332. The study is a phase 3, open-label extension to gather extended safety information on this drug in COPD patients. Participants from the parent studies who qualify will receive subcutaneous injections of astegolimab every two weeks throughout the study until it ends. This open-label extension allows all participants to receive the active drug without placebo comparison. The study continues treatment beyond the initial 52-week period to monitor long-term effects. During the study, participants will be monitored for adverse events up to 12 weeks after their last dose of astegolimab. Researchers will collect safety data to understand the incidence of any side effects. The study involves regular assessments and follow-ups to ensure participant well-being, with the total duration lasting until July 2034.

Researchers are evaluating the combined use of vicadrostat and empagliflozin in adults with chronic heart failure who have a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF below 40%. Participants must have had chronic heart failure diagnosed at least three months before starting the study. The trial aims to find out if this combination helps people with symptomatic heart failure classified as New York Heart Association classes II to IV. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups, with an equal chance of receiving either vicadrostat plus empagliflozin tablets or placebo plus empagliflozin tablets. The study medicines are taken once daily for approximately six months up to about 3.5 years. During this time, participants may continue their usual heart failure treatments, excluding certain medications. The trial includes a double-blind design, meaning neither participants nor study staff know who receives the active drug or placebo. Throughout the study, participants visit the study site regularly, with the number of visits depending on how long they stay enrolled. Some visits may occur by phone. They answer questions about their well-being, and doctors monitor health status, record any heart failure worsening, hospitalizations, or deaths. The main outcome is the time until cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or urgent heart failure visit, which is compared between groups. Safety and side effects are also closely followed during the trial.

The BEATRIX study focuses on healthy pregnant women aged 49 or younger between 24 and 36 weeks of pregnancy to evaluate the safety and immune response of a group B streptococcus GBS vaccine. Researchers aim to understand how this vaccine works in pregnant women and their babies, assessing various safety measures and immune responses related to GBS. This study is a Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial sponsored by Pfizer. Participants will receive a single injection of either the GBS vaccine or a placebo saline. After birth, a subset of infants will receive routine vaccines according to each countrys immunization schedule, including vaccines for diphtheria, pneumococcal disease, and others. Some infants will have blood samples taken after completing their primary and toddler vaccine doses to evaluate immune responses. Pregnant participants will visit the study site at least three to four times, with some visits possibly conducted by phone, and may stay involved for up to 14 months, including six months after delivery. Their babies will be followed for about 12 months, with a subset participating for up to 19 months. Researchers will monitor local and systemic reactions, adverse events, and antibody levels in both mothers and infants to assess safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the use of Tumor Treating Fields TTFields delivered by the NovoTTF-200T device together with pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC. This phase 3 randomized study, called LUNAR-2, aims to assess overall survival and progression-free survival, comparing this combination treatment to pembrolizumab and chemotherapy alone. Secondary goals include analyzing outcomes based on lung cancer subtypes and PD-L1 expression levels. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one group receives TTFields using the portable NovoTTF-200T device along with pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy, while the other group receives pembrolizumab and chemotherapy without TTFields. The NovoTTF-200T delivers electric fields continuously at 150kHz to disrupt cancer cell division. Treatments are administered concurrently during the study period. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for survival outcomes up to six years, including overall survival and progression-free survival measured by standard criteria. Researchers will also track response rates, duration of response, disease control rates, and adverse events. Participants will undergo regular evaluations to assess treatment effects and safety, with follow-up continuing for up to six years after treatment begins.

Researchers are conducting a Phase III, multisite, randomized, double-blinded trial to compare pumitamig BNT327 combined with chemotherapy etoposide and carboplatin against atezolizumab combined with the same chemotherapy in participants with previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer ES-SCLC. The study aims to evaluate treatment safety and effectiveness, including overall survival and progression-free survival. The study includes two stages Stage 1 has two treatment arms with different doses of pumitamig and one control arm receiving atezolizumab, while Stage 2 has one treatment arm with a different pumitamig dose and a control arm. Treatment involves intravenous infusions of the study drugs and chemotherapy. Participants may switch from carboplatin to cisplatin if carboplatin is not tolerated. Each stage consists of a screening period, an induction and maintenance treatment period lasting up to 2 years or until disease progression or other endpoints, followed by a safety and survival follow-up phase. Participants undergo screening for eligibility before randomization. During the study, researchers monitor overall survival up to approximately 46 months, progression-free survival, response rates, adverse events, and quality of life through questionnaires. Safety follow-up visits occur after treatment ends. The total participation time may extend over several years, including treatment and follow-up assessments to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating whether a new medicine called PF-08634404, given with chemotherapy, works better than the current standard treatment of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy for adults with a type of lung cancer known as non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC. This study focuses on participants with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who are not candidates for surgery or curative chemoradiotherapy and have no known actionable genomic alterations. The study is a Phase 3 randomized trial with double-blind masking to compare these treatments. Participants are assigned to one of two parts based on their tumor type those with squamous NSCLC are in Part 1, and those with non-squamous NSCLC are in Part 2. Each participant is randomly placed into one of two treatment groups the experimental group receives PF-08634404 plus chemotherapy, while the control group receives pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Treatments are given through intravenous infusions in cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with either PF-08634404 or pembrolizumab, depending on the part of the study. Participants continue treatment as long as it helps and side effects are manageable. During the study, participants attend regular visits for treatment and health assessments. Cancer response is checked every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks and then every 12 weeks after that. Researchers monitor overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rates, duration of response, adverse events, lab abnormalities, and quality of life measures. The study includes detailed tracking of drug levels and immune responses. Participation may last up to approximately 39 months, with continuous safety and effectiveness monitoring.

Researchers are studying adults aged 18 to 60 years with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia Ph-negative ALL. The study evaluates treatment outcomes based on measurable residual disease MRD status and genetic testing done at the start. The goal is to tailor therapy after initial consolidation to improve survival and remission rates. Patients initially receive a four-drug induction chemotherapy regimen including vincristine, prednisone, pegylated asparaginase, and daunorubicin. Those who do not respond may receive a second induction with fludarabine, cytarabine, G-CSF, and idarubicin. Patients with good MRD clearance and favorable genetics continue with early and delayed consolidation, reinduction, and maintenance chemotherapy using pediatric-type protocols. Others may proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation alloHSCT. Participants will undergo regular assessments of MRD after induction and consolidation phases, along with monitoring for complete remission at 4 to 8 weeks. Researchers will track overall survival for 3 years. Safety and treatment responses are evaluated throughout, with ongoing follow-up. The total study duration includes treatment periods and observation to assess long-term outcomes under the guidance of the PETHEMA Foundation.