Munsterlingen

Researchers are evaluating the combination of adagrasib, pembrolizumab, and platinum-doublet chemotherapy compared to placebo plus pembrolizumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy in adults with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC carrying the KRAS G12C mutation. This Phase 3 trial aims to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of these treatment combinations in this specific patient group. Participants will receive either adagrasib plus pembrolizumab combined with platinum-doublet chemotherapy or placebo plus pembrolizumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Treatments involve specified doses administered on scheduled days, with the chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin or cisplatin along with pemetrexed. Participants are randomly assigned to one of the two study groups and treatments are blinded to ensure unbiased assessment. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular evaluations including imaging scans to measure tumor response and progression-free survival, as well as assessments of overall survival. Safety is closely monitored by recording adverse events for up to 90 days after the last dose. Quality of life and symptom assessments are also conducted using validated questionnaires. The study duration includes follow-up for up to seven years to gather comprehensive data on treatment outcomes and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding sacituzumab tirumotecan to pembrolizumab after surgery improves treatment outcomes for adults with resectable non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC who do not achieve a complete response after initial therapy. This Phase 3 trial compares the combination of sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab against pembrolizumab alone, focusing on disease-free survival assessed by a blinded independent central review. The study is sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC and targets participants with specific stages of NSCLC who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy and surgery but still have residual disease. Participants first receive neoadjuvant therapy consisting of pembrolizumab combined with double-platinum chemotherapy tailored to the tumor type for up to 12 weeks before surgery. After surgery, those not achieving pathological complete response are assigned to either receive sacituzumab tirumotecan infusions every two weeks for up to 24 weeks alongside pembrolizumab monotherapy every six weeks for approximately 42 weeks, or pembrolizumab monotherapy alone on the same schedule. Rescue medications to manage infusion reactions may be given as needed during the study. Throughout the trial, participants undergo assessments including radiological scans, tumor tissue analysis for markers like PD-L1 and TROP2, and monitoring for adverse events and quality of life changes. Key outcomes include disease-free survival, overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and lung cancer-specific survival, with evaluations continuing for up to nearly 10 years. Safety and tolerability are closely monitored, and questionnaires assess physical functioning, symptoms like cough and chest pain, and overall health status during and after treatment.

Researchers are comparing the effectiveness of two different combinations of immunotherapy drugs with chemotherapy for adults with stage IV or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer that has PD-L1 expression of 1% or higher. This phase 3, randomized study focuses on participants who have not previously received systemic treatment for advanced disease. The goal is to determine which combination better improves overall survival and other outcomes in this patient group. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Nivolumab plus Relatlimab combined with chemotherapy or Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy. The chemotherapy drugs used include Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, or Cisplatin, given in specified doses on scheduled days. Treatment is given as first-line therapy for their cancer, with dosing details managed throughout the study period. During the study, participants will undergo imaging scans like CT or MRI to measure disease status, and blood tests to monitor safety and side effects. The main outcome measured is overall survival over up to five years, along with progression-free survival, response rates, duration of response, and adverse events. Researchers will also assess symptoms related to lung cancer over two years. Participants are monitored regularly to track these outcomes and ensure safety throughout the study duration, which may last several years.

Researchers are evaluating Pumitamig compared to Durvalumab in adults with unresectable stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC who have completed concurrent chemoradiation therapy. This phase 3 study aims to assess which treatment better controls cancer progression and improves survival outcomes in this patient population. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either Pumitamig or Durvalumab at specified doses on designated days. Both treatments are administered following at least two cycles of platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a radiation dose of at least 54 Gy. The study focuses on patients who have no progressive disease after this initial treatment and have good performance status. Throughout the trial, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival and other outcomes such as overall survival, objective response, disease control rate, and duration of response over several years. Assessments include imaging reviewed by independent central reviewers and investigators according to standardized criteria. The study involves regular evaluations to track cancer status and safety, with follow-up extending up to approximately nine years to understand long-term effects.

This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AZD5335 compared to standard treatments in women with high-grade, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. The study focuses on whether AZD5335 improves progression-free survival PFS among participants with either high or low levels of folate receptor alpha FR. Approximately 1100 adult women will be enrolled and divided into two groups based on their FR levels. Participants will be randomized within each group to receive either AZD5335 or the relevant standard treatment. Those with high FR levels will receive AZD5335 or mirvetuximab soravtansine, while those with low FR levels will receive AZD5335 or a chemotherapy agent chosen by the investigator, including paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan. Treatments are given intravenously, and participants will continue treatment until disease progression or other reasons for stopping. During the study, participants will undergo regular tumor assessments to monitor disease status. Researchers will follow all participants over time to evaluate overall survival. Safety and efficacy data will be reviewed periodically by an independent committee. The primary outcome is progression-free survival, measured for up to about five years. The study completion is expected by late 2029.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of continued nutritional support after hospital discharge compared to usual care in medical patients at nutritional risk. This trial focuses on adults who have experienced malnutrition, a condition linked to higher risks of death, rehospitalization, and loss of function, especially among elderly and multi-ill patients. Previous studies showed that in-hospital nutritional support helps reduce complications and mortality, but the long-term benefits after discharge remain unclear. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. The intervention group receives customized nutritional support from an experienced dietician to meet their individual energy and protein needs, including oral nutritional supplements as needed. The control group receives general advice on healthy eating habits at discharge without ongoing nutritional support. Follow-up includes regular phone calls every 2 to 4 weeks to monitor adherence and adjust dietary plans as necessary. During the study, participants are monitored for up to three years. Researchers assess key outcomes such as time to death from any cause, hospital readmissions, major complications, and changes in functional status using the Barthel index. Quality of life is measured with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions index and a visual-analogue scale at regular intervals by phone. This comprehensive follow-up helps determine whether sustained nutritional support after discharge improves long-term health and recovery.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, to the standard maintenance therapy in women diagnosed with estrogen-receptor ER positive epithelial ovarian cancer, including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. This study focuses on both low and high grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancers at FIGO Stage II-IV, whose cancer has not progressed after primary surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. The main goal is to determine if letrozole can increase progression-free survival compared to the current standard maintenance treatment with placebo. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either letrozole 2.5 mg daily or a placebo tablet once daily for up to five years or until toxicity symptoms or disease progression occur. This randomized, double-blinded, multicenter phase III trial involves 540 eligible women who will be monitored throughout the treatment period. The study also includes a sub-study focusing on low grade ovarian cancer LOGOS. Treatment adherence and tolerability will be assessed during regular visits. Participants will undergo health assessments including blood tests, physical and gynecological exams, and possibly imaging during routine follow-ups every 12 weeks for the first two years, then every 24 weeks for three additional years. Quality of life will be evaluated using specific questionnaires, and participants will wear an activity tracker for one week before visits. Researchers will measure progression-free survival as the primary outcome and also evaluate overall survival, time to next treatment, and quality-adjusted survival. Follow-up data will be collected for up to 12 years, including up to seven years after treatment ends to monitor long-term outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the feasibility and potential effects of a nurse-led physical activity program called OncoMoveNurse for people with cancer receiving outpatient care. The study focuses on improving physical activity behavior, self-efficacy, well-being, and mood during systemic cancer treatment. This mixed-methods study is conducted in an oncology day clinic setting and aims to understand how nurses can promote an activity-friendly culture to help patients stay active despite treatment challenges. The OncoMoveNurse program consists of five key components a modular exercise catalogue, safety protocols, communication strategies, team collaboration, and person-centered care. Supporting materials such as posters, videos, and exercise tools have been developed. The study spans 15 months, including preparation, implementation, and evaluation phases. Nurses lead the implementation with training and feedback sessions, and the program is integrated into routine outpatient care. Data collection includes patient-reported outcome measures and qualitative methods like digital storytelling and focus groups involving patients and healthcare professionals. Participants will be engaged during their outpatient visits where they receive support from oncology nurses to increase physical activity safely. Researchers will collect quantitative data on physical activity levels, self-efficacy, and quality of life, alongside qualitative feedback. All data are anonymized and analyzed to assess program feasibility and effects. The study runs from October 2024 through December 2025, with patient data collected mainly between June and September 2025. This research aims to inform future physical activity promotion in oncology outpatient care.

Researchers are observing adults with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia CLL who are receiving the drug venetoclax, either alone or combined with other medications such as rituximab, obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, or acalabrutinib. The study aims to understand how these treatments work in real-life settings, focusing on the effectiveness, costs related to health economics, and outcomes reported by the patients themselves. Participants receive venetoclax as prescribed by their doctors following local medical guidelines. They may receive it alone or alongside one of the other drugs mentioned. This study does not assign treatments but observes patients as they undergo therapy according to routine clinical practice across several countries. During the study, participants are monitored for their response to treatment, with the main focus on the best overall response rate within 12 months. Researchers collect data on health outcomes, costs, and patient experiences to better understand the impact of these therapies. The study spans several years, allowing long-term observation of treatment effects and outcomes.

Gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours GEP-NETs are rare cancers arising from the neuroendocrine cells in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. These tumours share common clinical features but their cell biology and mechanisms are not well understood, limiting targeted treatments. The SwissNET registry is designed to collect detailed information to better understand GEP-NETs and improve management strategies in Switzerland. This study collects data prospectively from patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumours confirmed by tissue analysis, regardless of the tumours original location. Data entry is anonymized and gathered from hospitals and general practitioners across Switzerland. A study nurse visits contributing centers to review patient files, and a review board addresses conflicting information. The registry monitors treatment approaches including surgery, medical therapy, and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy. Participants provide informed consent for their data to be included. Researchers regularly evaluate patient outcomes such as tumour-related mortality and hospitalisation rates every five years. The registry also tracks the incidence of GEP-NETs in Switzerland and the effects of different treatments over time. This ongoing data collection aims to improve understanding and guide future care for patients with neuroendocrine tumours.