Londonderry

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and effects of nerandomilast in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) who have previously completed treatment with nerandomilast in earlier studies. The study aims to understand how well participants tolerate nerandomilast over time, and whether it helps improve lung function, delays symptom worsening, reduces hospital visits, or impacts survival. This is a Phase 3 open-label extension trial. Participants take nerandomilast tablets daily for up to 1 year and 10 months while continuing their usual pulmonary fibrosis treatments. The study follows an open-label design where all participants receive nerandomilast. There are no placebo or comparator groups in this extension phase. Throughout the study, participants regularly visit their doctors for health assessments and lung function tests. Doctors monitor any health problems or side effects experienced during treatment. The main outcome measured is whether participants experience any adverse events up to the final follow-up visit, which occurs at week 99. This close monitoring helps evaluate the long-term safety and potential benefits of nerandomilast in this patient group.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of pelacarsen (TQJ230), given as a monthly injection under the skin, in people with mild to moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis. This study aims to see if pelacarsen can safely slow the progression of this heart valve condition compared to a placebo. The trial is a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at multiple centers. Participants will receive either pelacarsen 80 mg or a matching placebo once a month. Before starting the treatment, they must have elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and be optimally treated for existing cardiovascular risk factors. The study focuses on those aged 50 to under 80 years with mild or moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis. During the 36 months of participation, researchers will monitor changes in peak aortic jet velocity and aortic valve calcium score to assess disease progression. Safety, tolerability, and the impact of the treatment will be evaluated. Participants will undergo regular assessments, including laboratory tests and clinical evaluations, to track heart valve condition and overall health throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of two doses of inhaled pirfenidone (called AP01) compared to a placebo in people with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). This Phase 2b study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, involving up to 300 participants who will continue their standard care during the 52-week trial. The goal is to see how well AP01 works and how safe it is when added to usual treatments for PPF. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: high-dose AP01, low-dose AP01, or placebo. All treatments are given as an oral inhalation solution twice daily. The study will last for 52 weeks, during which researchers will monitor and compare the effects of these treatments on lung function and disease progression. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including lung function tests and clinical evaluations to track their respiratory health. Researchers will check for changes in lung capacity and symptoms and monitor safety throughout the treatment period. The main outcome measured is the impact of AP01 doses compared to placebo after 52 weeks of treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of eloralintide, a drug given by injection, in adults who are obese or overweight but do not have type 2 diabetes. This Phase 3 study includes both a main phase and an extension phase to understand the drug's impact on body weight and overall health in this population. The study aims to compare eloralintide with a placebo to see how well it works in reducing weight. Participants will receive either eloralintide or a placebo, both administered under the skin once a week. The main study phase will last about 75 weeks, during which participants will be regularly monitored. Those participants who have prediabetes will have the option to continue into an extension phase lasting an additional 2 years to further assess long-term effects. During the study, participants will have their body weight measured at the start and throughout the trial, with the primary outcome being the percent change in body weight at week 64 compared to baseline. Researchers will also monitor safety and any side effects. Participants will be asked about their weight history and health conditions, and they must maintain stable body weight before joining. The total involvement time for most participants will be about 75 weeks, with longer follow-up for some.

Researchers are evaluating sacituzumab tirumotecan alone and combined with pembrolizumab compared to the treatment chosen by a physician for people with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer that cannot be removed by surgery or has spread to other parts of the body. This study focuses on participants whose cancer has progressed despite prior endocrine therapy, including treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The main goal is to see if these treatments improve progression-free survival, which means the length of time the cancer does not worsen, over up to approximately 38 months. Participants receive sacituzumab tirumotecan as an intravenous infusion, either alone or combined with intravenous pembrolizumab. The comparison group receives the treatment of physician's choice, which may include intravenous paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, liposomal doxorubicin, or oral capecitabine. The study is open-label and randomized, meaning participants are assigned to different treatment groups openly. Treatments are administered according to the study protocols, with ongoing monitoring during the treatment period. Throughout the study, participants are monitored regularly to assess their cancer status and overall health. This includes evaluations by blinded independent central review using RECIST 1.1 criteria to measure tumor progression. Researchers also assess safety, organ function, and performance status. The total participation time may last up to around 38 months to track progression-free survival and other outcomes. Careful monitoring helps ensure participant safety and collects data on treatment effectiveness and side effects.

This trial studies adults aged 18 years and older with lung fibrosis caused by systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases who have not shown lung function improvement after standard immunosuppressant treatment. It evaluates how the medicine nerandomilast affects lung disease associated with these conditions. The study is a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial designed to test nerandomilast's safety and efficacy over at least 26 weeks. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either nerandomilast tablets or placebo tablets twice daily for a period of at least 26 weeks and up to 1 year. Alongside this, participants continue their ongoing immunosuppressant treatments for their rheumatic disease. The study involves two groups receiving either the active drug or placebo to compare outcomes between them. During the 7.5 to 13 months of participation, individuals visit the study site about 9 to 10 times for lung function tests, chest imaging at select visits, and to complete questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life. Researchers monitor changes in lung disease using high-resolution CT scans and assess safety by recording any side effects. The main outcome is the change in lung fibrosis score after 26 weeks of treatment.

Researchers are evaluating how Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors can measure changes in spinal mobility and function in people with active axial spondyloarthritis who are starting biologic therapy. This study aims to correlate changes seen in MRI scans of the spine and sacroiliac joints with sensor-based measurements to better understand the effects of the treatment on spinal inflammation and movement. The study will include 20 participants who will have MRI scans and various patient-reported outcome assessments before and after starting biologic therapy. Participants will undergo IMU sensor tests both in the clinic and at home to measure the maximum range of motion and perform standardized functional tests across the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine regions. During the study, participants will complete several questionnaires about disease activity, function, and physical activity, and blood tests like ESR and CRP will be taken. Researchers will monitor spinal mobility changes using the sensor data alongside MRI and clinical assessments over four months. The main outcome is the change in a composite sensor-based metrology index after this period.

Researchers are investigating the use of EEG-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology to detect awareness and enable communication in individuals with disorders of consciousness, including unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), minimally conscious state (MCS), and locked-in syndrome (LIS). The study explores whether these patients can imagine movements and use brain activity patterns to communicate, aiming to improve diagnostic accuracy and provide alternative communication methods for those unable to produce consistent motor responses. Participants undergo a three-phase study involving EEG-based BCI assessments and training. Phase I (sessions 1-2) evaluates the ability to imagine movements and produce detectable brain activity. Phase II (sessions 3-6) involves motor imagery BCI training with neurofeedback to help participants learn to modulate brain activity. Phase III (sessions 7-10) assesses the ability to use imagined movements to answer yes/no questions across various categories such as biographical and situational awareness. The BCI system uses combinations of imagined movements (left arm, right arm, feet) to represent answers. During the study, participants complete about 10 sessions of approximately 1.5 hours each, involving training and assessment tasks. Researchers monitor changes in performance accuracy using the BCI before and after training and evaluate the ability to consistently communicate yes/no responses over multiple sessions. Assessments include brain activity recordings, neurofeedback, and responses to structured questions. The study also examines how BCI technology may complement clinical assessments and potentially offer therapeutic benefits.

This research investigates the effectiveness and safety of combining capivasertib with CDK4/6 inhibitors and fulvestrant in adults with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer that is locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic. It includes a Phase Ib dose-finding portion to establish safe dosages for the triple combination, followed by a Phase III study comparing this combination to CDK4/6 inhibitors plus fulvestrant alone. The study focuses on patients who have not received prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease and aims to assess added benefit in a high-risk population. During Phase Ib, participants receive capivasertib orally twice daily for 4 days followed by 3 days off each week, combined with fulvestrant injections and one of the CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib) at varying doses to find the recommended dose for Phase III. In Phase III, participants are randomized to receive capivasertib plus fulvestrant and a CDK4/6 inhibitor at the established dose or fulvestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor alone, with dosing schedules maintained over 28-day cycles. Participants undergo regular monitoring including scans for tumor assessment, blood tests, and safety evaluations over extended periods—up to 47 months for progression-free survival assessment. Researchers track adverse events, serious side effects, and treatment tolerability throughout. Mandatory tumor and blood samples are collected for biomarker analysis. The study evaluates key outcomes such as dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-related adverse events, and progression-free survival, supporting long-term safety and effectiveness evaluation.

Researchers are conducting a two-part, phase 2b/3 study to evaluate CSL300 (Clazakizumab) in adults with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis who have systemic inflammation and either atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes. The study aims to determine the best dose of CSL300 and assess its effects on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in this population. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial targets patients with elevated inflammation markers and significant health risks due to their conditions. In the first part (phase 2b), the study focuses on finding the appropriate dose of CSL300 compared to placebo. CSL300 is given through intravenous (IV) administration. The second part (phase 3) evaluates the impact of CSL300 on cardiovascular events such as heart attack or cardiovascular death over approximately 5 years, continuing to compare CSL300 to placebo for safety and efficacy. The placebo matches CSL300's excipient content but lacks the active drug. Participants will undergo baseline and regular assessments for inflammation markers like high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) up to 12 weeks in phase 2b, and long-term monitoring for cardiovascular outcomes in phase 3. The study involves ongoing safety evaluations and efficacy measurements during the entire follow-up period. This comprehensive approach helps researchers understand how CSL300 affects inflammation and cardiovascular health in patients with ESKD on dialysis.