Milton Keynes

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study to see if it can reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-PLUS) in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study compares AZD0780 to a placebo and monitors participants from randomization until the primary analysis censoring date, followed by a final study closure visit. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 or an oral placebo once daily. The treatment period lasts until the primary analysis censoring date, after which a study closure visit will occur. The study is event-driven and designed to assess the time to the first major cardiovascular event during treatment. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with various assessments to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes and safety over approximately 54 months. Researchers will track the time to first event of any component of MACE-PLUS and collect data to assess the effect of AZD0780 compared to placebo. The study includes regular visits and evaluations to ensure participant safety and adherence to treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of brenipatide compared to placebo for people with opioid use disorder. This study focuses on participants who are also using buprenorphine, with or without naloxone, as part of their treatment. The trial includes two parts, each with separate groups of participants, to better understand how brenipatide works alongside current therapies in early recovery from opioid use disorder. The study has two parts: Part A involves a double-blind treatment phase followed by an open-label extension, while Part B offers an open-label treatment only. Brenipatide and placebo are given as subcutaneous injections, and buprenorphine is administered either sublingually or buccally. Participants will be enrolled in only one part of the study, with treatment durations potentially lasting up to 144 weeks in Part A and 116 weeks in Part B, depending on enrollment timing and study progress. Participants will regularly attend study visits where they will be assessed through urine drug screens and self-reports to measure abstinence from opioid use. They will also maintain study diaries and complete questionnaires to track adherence and effects. The main outcomes measured include the percentage of weeks participants remain abstinent from opioids between weeks 13 and 24, verified by negative drug tests and no self-reported opioid use. Safety and long-term effectiveness will be monitored throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of calderasib combined with pembrolizumab as a first treatment in adults with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has a specific KRAS G12C mutation and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or higher. This Phase 3 trial aims to test if the combination of calderasib and pembrolizumab improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared to pembrolizumab with a placebo. Participants receive oral calderasib tablets or placebo along with pembrolizumab given by intravenous infusion. The study compares these two treatment groups to see which provides better outcomes. Treatments continue during the study, and there are no additional interventions described beyond these drugs. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including scans and tests to monitor their cancer's progression and overall health. The main outcomes measured are progression-free survival for up to about 42 months and overall survival for up to about 56 months. Safety is monitored throughout, and participants are followed for several years to evaluate long-term effects of the treatments.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of verekitug (UPB-101) in adults with moderate-to-severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), a long-term inflammatory lung condition. This global, multicenter Phase 2b study aims to understand how well verekitug works compared to a placebo, alongside participants' usual COPD medications. Participants must have a confirmed COPD diagnosis and meet specific lung function and symptom criteria to join the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of two doses of verekitug or a matching placebo, in addition to their regular COPD background treatments. The study includes a screening period of about 4 weeks, followed by treatment lasting between 60 and 108 weeks. After treatment, there is a 16-week follow-up period to monitor participants after their last dose. Throughout the study, participants will undergo various assessments including lung function tests and symptom evaluations. Researchers will track the annual rate of moderate or severe COPD flare-ups from the start of treatment through week 108. Safety and tolerability will be closely monitored during the treatment and follow-up periods to ensure participants' well-being over the course of the trial.

Researchers are investigating the effects and safety of two different doses of rilzabrutinib in adults aged 18 to 75 years who have Graves' disease, with or without Graves' orbitopathy. This Phase 2 study aims to measure how these treatments impact thyroid hormone levels and assess their safety in this patient population. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups receiving either rilzabrutinib dose 1 or rilzabrutinib dose 2, both given orally as tablets. The study includes a screening period lasting up to 4 weeks, followed by a treatment period of up to 16 weeks, and a 4-week follow-up period. During the study, participants will attend up to 13 visits. Throughout the trial, participants will have their thyroid hormone levels, specifically FT4, monitored to assess changes from baseline at week 16. Safety and treatment effects will be closely observed, with various clinical evaluations including ophthalmic exams for those with orbitopathy. The total duration of participation can be up to about 24 weeks including screening, treatment, and follow-up.

This research aims to evaluate how well and how safely rimegepant works when taken during the peri-menstrual period to prevent menstrual migraine attacks in women with this condition. The study focuses on women aged 18 to 45 who have a history of menstrual migraines and regular menstrual cycles. It is a Phase 3 clinical trial comparing rimegepant to a placebo. Participants will receive either rimegepant 75 mg oral disintegrating tablets or matching placebo tablets for 7 days during the peri-menstrual period. In addition, they may use rimegepant or standard care medications as needed for acute migraine treatment. The study is double-blind and parallel group, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who receives the active drug or placebo during the treatment phase. During the study, researchers will monitor the average change from baseline in the number of migraine days occurring per 5-day peri-menstrual period over five menstrual cycles. Participants will be assessed regularly to track migraine frequency, safety, and medication use. The total study duration covers multiple menstrual cycles to observe effects over time and ensure participant safety.

Researchers are evaluating whether avoiding further axillary treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is as effective as standard axillary treatment for patients with early stage breast cancer who initially had cancer in the lymph nodes confirmed by needle biopsy but show no residual cancer in the lymph nodes after NACT. The study aims to determine if skipping axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy (ART) affects disease free survival (DFS) and whether it reduces the risk of lymphoedema five years after treatment. This phase 3, open-label, randomized trial includes patients with T1-3N1M0 breast cancer and confirmed nodal metastases who have undergone sentinel node biopsy removing at least three lymph nodes post-NACT.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lunsekimig compared with a placebo in adults aged 40 to 80 years who have inadequately controlled Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) characterized by an eosinophilic phenotype. This Phase 2b/Phase 3 study focuses on patients with COPD who have specific lung function criteria, prior exacerbations, and blood eosinophil counts, aiming to better manage their condition using a new subcutaneous treatment. Eligible participants will receive subcutaneous injections of either lunsekimig or a matching placebo during a randomized intervention period lasting approximately 48 weeks. The study includes a screening period of up to 4 weeks before treatment and a follow-up period of about 8 weeks after treatment, making the total study duration up to 60 weeks. Participants remain in one of three study arms throughout this timeline. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to measure the annualized rate of moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations from baseline up to 48 weeks. Researchers will assess safety, tolerability, lung function, and other health outcomes. The study collects data on participants' lung function, exacerbation frequency, and blood markers, along with adherence to treatment and safety follow-up over the entire study period.

Researchers are investigating the combination of lasofoxifene and abemaciclib compared to fulvestrant and abemaciclib to treat women and men with locally advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer that has an ESR1 mutation. This phase 3 study includes patients who have previously received treatment with ribociclib or palbociclib and aims to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of these treatment combinations. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral lasofoxifene at 5 mg daily combined with oral abemaciclib 150 mg twice a day, or intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg on specific days followed by monthly doses plus oral abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily. The treatment schedules are designed to compare how well these combinations work in managing the cancer. During the study, participants will be closely monitored for progression-free survival over approximately three years. Researchers will assess the cancer's response to treatment, track any side effects, and evaluate safety and tolerability. Regular evaluations and follow-ups will ensure comprehensive data collection to understand the impact of these therapies on advanced breast cancer.

Researchers are evaluating the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which can be a serious complication after an acute stroke. This study is focused on immobile stroke patients who cannot walk without help and aims to compare two methods to prevent VTE during a 90-day follow-up period. The study compares the current standard treatment, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC), with a medical device called the geko17; device, which uses neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve blood flow and potentially reduce VTE risk. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the IPC treatment, which involves air-filled cuffs squeezing the lower legs, or the geko17; device stimulating the peroneal nerve. Both treatments will be applied until the patient can walk independently or for up to 30 days. Leg compression Doppler scans will be done at 7 days (optional) and 14 days (mandatory) after randomisation. At 14 days, patients will also complete a questionnaire about device comfort and provide health information. Additional data on symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) will be collected from medical records at 30 days. During the study, participants will be monitored through scans, questionnaires, and medical record reviews to track any occurrences of DVT or PE. A final follow-up call at 90 days will assess the patient's recovery, health status, mobility, and quality of life. The main outcome measured is the frequency of symptomatic or asymptomatic DVT in the leg veins or any PE from randomisation up to 30 days. This comprehensive monitoring aims to provide clear information about which prevention method may better support immobile stroke patients.