Springdale

Researchers are studying intismeran autogene combined with pembrolizumab to see if it can stop advanced melanoma, a type of skin cancer that has spread and cannot be removed by surgery, from growing or spreading. This Phase 2 study compares this combination to pembrolizumab with a placebo, aiming to find out if the new treatment helps people live longer without cancer progression. Immunotherapy, which helps the immune system fight cancer, is a standard treatment for advanced melanoma, and intismeran autogene is designed to boost the immune response against a person's specific cancer. Participants receive either intismeran autogene or a placebo through intramuscular injection, along with pembrolizumab given as an intravenous infusion. The study is randomized, double-blind, and controlled, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who gets the active treatment or placebo. This design helps to better understand the effects of intismeran autogene when combined with pembrolizumab. During the study, researchers will monitor participants for up to about 36 months to measure progression-free survival, which means the length of time participants live without the cancer worsening. Assessments include imaging scans to track tumor changes, tumor tissue collection for biomarker analysis, and documentation of any side effects. Participants may also have their mutation status checked and will be observed for safety throughout the study period.

Researchers are looking for new ways to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD). Available standard (usual) treatments for NVAMD, such as aflibercept, may not work for every person. Researchers want to learn if a trial medicine called tiespectus (also called MK-8748 or EYE201) can treat NVAMD. The goal of this trial is to learn if tiespectus works as well as aflibercept to treat NVAMD.

Researchers are conducting a first-in-human phase 1 study to evaluate MEN2312, a lysine acetyltransferase 6 (KAT6) inhibitor, in adults with advanced breast cancer. This study focuses on participants whose cancer has recurred locally or metastasized and who have limited treatment options after prior therapies. The trial aims to assess the safety and appropriate dosing of MEN2312, alone or combined with elacestrant, an oral drug also being studied. Participants will receive MEN2312 tablets orally, either as a single treatment or alongside elacestrant tablets. The study allows participants who have undergone up to six prior systemic therapies for advanced disease, including chemotherapy or antibody drug conjugates. The study involves careful selection of participants based on genetic alterations in their tumor tissue related to PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN genes. Throughout the trial, researchers will monitor participants for dose-limiting toxicity over the first 28 days and determine the recommended phase 2 dose by six months. Safety assessments, treatment response, and side effects will be tracked closely. Participation requires ongoing evaluations to measure how the participant's cancer responds and to ensure safety while receiving the study treatments.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

The trial investigates the use of volrustomig in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) who have not shown disease progression after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in this patient population. Participants have tumors that express PD-L1 and the study is conducted as a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center global trial. Participants are assigned to receive either volrustomig as sequential therapy following cCRT or to an observation group. The treatment period involves monitoring participants who have completed definitive cCRT but remain unresected and have no evidence of metastatic disease. The study focuses on participants with Stage III, IVA, or IVB LA-HNSCC according to AJCC criteria, who have not undergone tumor resection before cCRT and have not been treated with radiotherapy alone. During the study, participants are regularly evaluated for progression-free survival, with follow-up lasting up to approximately 8 years to assess long-term outcomes. Researchers will monitor safety and disease progression closely. The overall participation duration includes screening, treatment or observation, and extended follow-up to capture both efficacy and safety data over time.

This research aims to establish a clear vaccination protocol for children and young adults under 21 years old who have been treated for B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma (B-ALL/Ly). The study evaluates how well these patients retain protective immunity from routine childhood vaccinations after receiving the immunotherapy drug blinatumomab. It also compares immunity persistence between patients who received immunotherapy and those who did not, to understand how treatment affects vaccine protection and whether revaccination is needed. Patients in the study are those diagnosed with B-ALL/Ly who have completed their primary childhood vaccinations. Blinatumomab, a drug that targets abnormal B-cells by activating T-cells, is a common treatment for B-ALL and may impact the body's immune memory. Since intensive chemotherapy and immunotherapy can reduce antibody levels, the study will evaluate if revaccination can restore protective immunity in affected patients. No specific interventions are detailed, as this is an observational study focusing on immune response after treatment. Participants will undergo testing to measure protective antibody levels at least six months after completing blinatumomab therapy. Researchers will assess whether antibody titers remain protective or if revaccination is necessary to regain immunity. The study involves follow-up antibody testing to monitor immune status over time, aiming to inform vaccination guidelines for this vulnerable group. Participation duration is based on post-treatment immune monitoring rather than a fixed treatment period.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) with or without durvalumab compared to the investigator's choice chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab in patients who have PD-L1 positive locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This Phase III, randomized, open-label, international study aims to see if adding durvalumab to Dato-DXd can help patients live longer without their cancer worsening or simply live longer compared to standard chemotherapy with pembrolizumab. The study also examines how the treatments and cancer impact patients' quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: Dato-DXd plus durvalumab, Dato-DXd alone, or investigator's choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or gemcitabine plus carboplatin) combined with pembrolizumab. All treatments are given by intravenous infusion. The study design includes stratification based on geographic location, disease-free interval history, and prior PD-1/PD-L1 treatment for early-stage TNBC. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor their disease status using RECIST 1.1 criteria and undergo imaging reviewed by blinded independent central review. Researchers will track progression-free survival, quality of life, safety, and other health measures over an anticipated period of up to 33 months. Participants must provide tumor samples for PD-L1 testing, and safety monitoring will continue throughout the study.

This research aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of BMS-986504, a selective PRMT5 inhibitor, when combined with Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine, compared to a placebo combined with Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine. The study focuses on participants with untreated metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who have a specific genetic alteration called homozygous MTAP deletion. This is a randomized Phase 2/3 trial designed to explore treatment options for this patient population. Participants will be assigned to receive either BMS-986504 at specified doses on certain days along with Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine, or a placebo with the same chemotherapy drugs. The treatments are given according to protocol schedules. Some participants may have received up to one cycle of Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine before starting the study treatment, provided they did not experience disease progression or intolerable side effects. The initial cycle must be completed before randomization. During the study, researchers will monitor participants for progression-free survival and overall survival for up to three years after the last participant is randomized. Assessments include measuring tumor response using established criteria (RECIST v1.1). Participants will undergo evaluations to track safety, treatment effects, and disease status throughout the trial period.

Researchers are studying the effects of two experimental drugs, pozelimab and cemdisiran, in adults aged 50 to 85 who have Geographic Atrophy (GA) caused by Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), a condition that affects central vision. The study aims to compare how quickly GA progresses in patients treated with cemdisiran alone, a combination of pozelimab and cemdisiran, or a placebo. Additional goals include monitoring possible side effects, measuring drug levels in the blood, and checking for antibodies that might reduce drug effectiveness or cause side effects. Participants receive subcutaneous injections of either pozelimab combined with cemdisiran, cemdisiran alone, or a placebo. The study is randomized, double-masked, and placebo-controlled, conducted at multiple centers. Treatment schedules and dosing are managed as described in the protocol, with vaccinations for meningococcal and pneumococcal infections required prior to participation. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular clinic visits where eye imaging using Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) tracks the progression of GA lesion area over 52 weeks. Researchers also monitor safety, side effects, and immune responses, ensuring adherence to study procedures. The main outcome measured is the growth rate of the GA lesion area over one year, helping to evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the study drugs.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of a combination treatment including adagrasib, pembrolizumab, and platinum-doublet chemotherapy compared to a placebo combined with pembrolizumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy. This study focuses on adults with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has a KRAS G12C mutation. The trial is a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study designed to provide insights into treatment options for this specific lung cancer type. Participants receive either adagrasib plus pembrolizumab alongside platinum-doublet chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin and pemetrexed, or they receive a placebo plus pembrolizumab and the same chemotherapy regimen. The dosages and schedules of these drugs are specified and administered on predetermined days. The trial compares these two treatment groups to understand better the impact of adding adagrasib to the existing pembrolizumab and chemotherapy treatment. Throughout the study, participants are closely monitored for progression-free survival and overall survival, assessed up to seven years using standardized criteria for tumor response. Regular imaging scans such as CT or MRI are used to measure disease status. Safety and tolerability are also evaluated during the study, with ongoing assessments to track adverse effects and treatment response. The total duration of follow-up allows for long-term observation of treatment outcomes and participant health.