Beverly Hills

This research aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the FloStent, a medical device used for treating men experiencing symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia BPH. The study compares the FloStent implant procedure to a sham procedure without deploying the device. It involves men aged 45 and older with symptomatic BPH to better understand how this device may impact urinary symptoms. Participants will undergo a flexible cystoscopy procedure. Those randomized to the treatment group will receive the FloStent implant during this procedure, while those in the control group will have the cystoscopy without the implant deployment, serving as a sham treatment. The study is randomized, double-blind, and includes parallel groups to compare outcomes over time. Throughout the study, participants will be assessed on changes in their International Prostate Symptom Score IPSS over 12 months. Researchers will monitor symptom improvements at 3, 6, and 12 months to evaluate response rates. Participants will complete study visits and follow the protocol to help researchers gather data on the devices safety and impact on urinary symptoms.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, efficacy, and optimal dosing of a combination of two investigational treatments, BNT323 trastuzumab pamirtecan and BNT327 pumitamig, in people with advanced breast cancer. This includes those with hormone receptor-positive or -negative, HER2-positive, HER2-low, HER2-ultralow, HER2-null breast cancer, or triple-negative breast cancer. The study is a Phase III multi-site, open-label trial with a focus on advanced breast cancer treatment options. The study has two parts. Part 1 involves dose escalation of BNT323 combined with BNT327 to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose using six different dose levels. Part 2, which begins after Part 1 completion, includes dose optimization and exploratory cohorts. Cohort 1 in Part 2 uses randomization into four treatment arms, including combination therapy at different doses and monotherapies of either BNT323 or BNT327. Other cohorts receive the recommended dose without randomization. Participants will undergo assessments including tumor scans and cardiac function tests, with monitoring for side effects and tumor response up to 36 months. Researchers will track dose-limiting toxicities and treatment-emergent adverse events during early treatment cycles and monitor objective response rates and disease control over time. Safety and efficacy data will be collected through scheduled visits and tumor assessments during and after treatment to evaluate the study drugs effects and tolerability.

Researchers are evaluating the combination of BNT324, a B7-H3 antibody-drug conjugate, with BNT327, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1 and VEGF, in participants with advanced, metastatic, or relapsed small cell lung cancer SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC. This multi-part study aims to find safe doses, optimize treatment, assess preliminary effects, and confirm clinical efficacy in different lung cancer groups. The study includes participants with confirmed lung cancer who have measurable disease and meet specific health criteria. Participants will receive intravenous infusions of BNT324 combined with BNT327 in a dose escalation design to establish two recommended dose levels RP2D and RP2D-1. The study has two parts Part 1 focuses on dose finding in NSCLC and SCLC Part 2 compares these doses in treatment-naive and relapsed lung cancer cohorts, with some randomized groups. Additional participants may join at the optimal dose to further evaluate safety and effectiveness. Participants will undergo screening, followed by treatment, safety follow-up, and long-term survival monitoring. Researchers will assess dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events, treatment interruptions, and response rates using standardized criteria. Outcomes include objective response rate, disease control, progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall survival, with evaluations continuing up to 87 months. Safety is closely monitored during and after treatment, and participants health status is regularly assessed.

Researchers are studying a trial medicine called MK-7262 to lower the level of Lipoproteina or Lpa in the blood. This trial also looks at another medicine named enlicitide, which lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol LDL-C. The study aims to find out if taking MK-7262 alone or together with enlicitide works better than a placebo in lowering Lpa and LDL-C levels. The safety and tolerability of these medicines are also being evaluated. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups. One group will take both MK-7262 and enlicitide placebos, the second will take enlicitide with an MK-7262 placebo, the third will take MK-7262 with an enlicitide placebo, and the fourth will take both MK-7262 and enlicitide. All treatments are oral tablets taken once daily for about 12 weeks. During the study, participants will have their Lpa and LDL-C levels measured at baseline and at weeks 8 and 12 to assess changes. Researchers will monitor any adverse events and whether participants stop treatment due to side effects, with safety observed for up to approximately 20 weeks. The study also tracks other related outcomes like percentages of participants reaching specific Lpa levels. Overall participation lasts up to about 12 weeks of treatment plus follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating a preservative-free version of Bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.01% YSBP compared to Lumigan4 bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.01% in adults with primary open-angle glaucoma POAG or ocular hypertension OH. The study aims to determine if the preservative-free formulation is not worse than the existing treatment in controlling these eye conditions. This is a Phase 3 clinical trial sponsored by YS Life Science Co., Ltd., focused on treatment effectiveness and safety. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either the preservative-free Bimatoprost YSBP or Lumigan4 eye drops. The treatments are administered as eye drops, and the study uses a parallel design with two groups treated simultaneously. The trial is double-masked, meaning neither participants nor investigators know which treatment is given. The primary treatment period lasts 12 weeks, during which intraocular pressure IOP is closely monitored. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including IOP measurements at baseline and Week 12. Visual acuity is also evaluated to ensure participants meet vision criteria. The study monitors adherence to the treatment and any side effects. The main outcome measured is the change in intraocular pressure at Week 12 to assess the treatments effect on eye pressure control. The total study duration extends through the treatment period and concludes by December 2027.

Researchers are evaluating AV-380, an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody designed to bind human growth differentiation factor 15 GDF-15, a cytokine involved in cancer-induced cachexia. This phase 1B open-label dose escalation study aims to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of AV-380 in cancer patients who have cachexia and elevated GDF-15 levels. Participants have metastatic solid tumors and are actively receiving standard of care chemotherapy. Participants receive AV-380 through intravenous infusion in ascending dose cohorts alongside their standard chemotherapy treatments. The study includes a dose escalation phase where the safety and appropriate dosage of AV-380 are evaluated. This phase allows researchers to monitor the effects of increasing doses of AV-380 over a study period of up to 4 months while patients continue their usual cancer therapies. During the study, participants will undergo assessments including monitoring for adverse events, toxicity, and laboratory abnormalities from enrollment until about 60 days after the last dose. Pharmacokinetic measures such as maximum concentration Cmax, time to maximum concentration Tmax, and area under the curve AUC will also be evaluated. The total involvement includes regular evaluations to track safety, drug behavior in the body, and immune responses to AV-380.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 at levels of 1% or higher. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study aims to compare these treatments to improve outcomes for this patient group. Participants will receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab, each given intravenously on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle, combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy either carboplatin or cisplatin also given on Day 1 of each cycle for up to four cycles. After chemotherapy cycles, patients continue with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab monotherapy combined with pemetrexed maintenance. The study follows patients for up to approximately six years to monitor treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size, blood tests to evaluate organ function, and questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life. Researchers monitor overall survival and progression-free survival as primary outcomes, alongside other measures such as response duration and physical functioning. Safety is closely observed throughout, with study visits scheduled regularly during treatment and follow-up periods, lasting up to six years in total.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig combined with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer mNSCLC whose tumors express programmed death-ligand 1 PD-L1. This Phase III global study focuses on patients with PD-L1 tumor cell expression of 1% or higher and aims to determine which treatment provides better overall and progression-free survival. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two study groups one group will receive rilvegostomig plus carboplatin and either paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy, while the other group will receive pembrolizumab plus the same chemotherapy options. Rilvegostomig and pembrolizumab are both given intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, with chemotherapy given up to 4 cycles. Nab-paclitaxel may be administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment continues with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab until disease progression or other criteria are met. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response, laboratory tests to monitor organ function, and patient questionnaires about physical function and quality of life. Researchers will track overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, and duration of response for up to approximately 6 years. Safety and immune response to rilvegostomig will also be evaluated. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

This trial studies adults aged 50 to under 80 with mild or moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis and elevated lipoproteina levels. Researchers are assessing the safety, tolerability, and ability of pelacarsen TQJ230 given once monthly by injection to slow the progression of this heart valve condition. The study compares pelacarsen to a placebo in a randomized, double-blind design. Participants receive either pelacarsen 80 mg or a matching placebo as a subcutaneous injection monthly. They continue treatment and monitoring for up to 36 months to observe changes in heart valve narrowing and calcium buildup. The study also tracks lipoproteina levels and clinical heart-related events during this period. Throughout the study, participants will have regular assessments including imaging to measure aortic valve function and calcium score, blood tests for lipoproteina, and monitoring for safety. The main outcomes analyzed after 36 months include changes in valve jet velocity and calcium score, alongside clinical events. Participants remain under medical care while being observed for any effects of the study drug or placebo.

Researchers are evaluating VENT-03 in adults with active cutaneous lupus erythematosus CLE, including those who may also have systemic lupus erythematosus SLE. This Phase 2a clinical trial aims to determine if VENT-03 affects the activity and severity of CLE and to assess its safety and how the body processes the drug. Participants will be compared to a placebo group to better understand VENT-03s effects. Participants will take either VENT-03 tablets or a placebo for the first 4 weeks. After this double-blind phase, all participants switch to taking VENT-03 for an additional 8 weeks in an open-label extension. The study uses a randomized, double-blind design with monthly clinic visits for checkups and tests throughout the treatment periods. During the study, participants will visit the clinic once a month for assessments including physical exams and tests to monitor the drugs effects and safety. Researchers will evaluate changes in interferon gene signature in the skin, CLE disease severity, skin biopsy markers, and record any treatment-emergent adverse events. Blood samples will be collected to study the drugs concentration over time. The total treatment duration is 12 weeks with ongoing safety and efficacy monitoring.