Mission Viejo

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and tolerability of intermittent use of elismetrep in adults who experience acute migraine attacks. This Phase 3 study aims to monitor adverse events and overall safety during an average of one year of treatment. The study is conducted by Kallyope Inc. and compares two doses of elismetrep with a placebo using a randomized, triple-blind design. Participants will receive oral doses of elismetrep at either 10 mg or 20 mg, or a matching placebo. The study focuses on intermittent use during acute migraine episodes. Participants must have completed a prior acute treatment trial of elismetrep and meet compliance criteria. Treatment and assessments continue through the study duration, averaging one year. During the trial, participants will be monitored for any treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, and events leading to discontinuation. They will use a personal smartphone to complete eDiary check-ins and questionnaires, including assessments at 2 and 4 hours post-dose during migraine attacks. Safety and tolerability data will be collected throughout, with study participation lasting approximately one year.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of a triple therapy inhaler combining budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate BGF MDI 32014.49.6 g compared to a dual therapy inhaler with glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate GFF MDI 14.49.6 g on heart and lung outcomes in adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease COPD who have a higher risk for heart and lung events. This Phase III study is randomized, double-blind, and conducted at multiple centers, focusing on participants with COPD and elevated cardiopulmonary risk. Participants will receive either the triple therapy inhaler or the dual therapy inhaler, both administered twice daily. The study compares these two inhalers over a period of up to three years, monitoring for serious cardiac or COPD events. The trial includes careful evaluation of various heart and lung-related health events during this period. During the study, participants will be closely monitored through regular visits, assessments, and tests to measure lung function, heart events, and COPD exacerbations. Researchers will track the time until the first severe cardiac or COPD event and evaluate other cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes over up to three years. Participants will also be assessed for their ability to properly use the inhaler and adherence to the study protocol throughout the trial.

This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib at different doses for adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis AD who have not responded well to dupilumab treatment. AD is a skin condition causing rash and itching due to inflammation. The study includes approximately 200 adults aged 18 to less than 64 years, all current dupilumab users with a history of inadequate response. The trial is conducted in two periods to compare upadacitinib 15mg to dupilumab 300mg and adjust doses based on clinical response. In Period 1, participants are randomly assigned to receive either upadacitinib 15mg tablets once daily or dupilumab 300mg subcutaneous injections every two weeks for eight weeks. Participants on upadacitinib 15mg may have their dose increased to 30mg after two weeks depending on response. Period 2 lasts 24 weeks, during which participants continue or adjust doses based on their Eczema Area and Severity Index EASI response at Week 8. Participants may remain on their assigned dose or switch doses accordingly. Participants attend regular visits at hospitals or clinics during the 35-day screening, 8-week Period 1, and 24-week Period 2, plus a 30-day follow-up. Assessments include medical exams, blood tests, monitoring for side effects, and questionnaires. Researchers measure outcomes such as the percentage achieving at least a 90% reduction in eczema severity EASI 90 at Week 8. The study monitors treatment effects and safety carefully throughout the 32-week treatment and follow-up period.

The trial investigates the effects of a combination treatment using Fluticasone Furoate FF, Umeclidinium UMEC, and Vilanterol VI on lung function compared to a combination of FF and VI alone. The study focuses on adolescents aged 12 to 17 years with asthma that is not adequately controlled despite stable maintenance therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists. The research aims to assess efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics over a 24-week period in this age group. Participants receive either the FFUMECVI combination or the FFVI combination, both administered via the ELLIPTA inhaler. The study is randomized, double-blind, and conducted in parallel groups. Treatments are given daily, and the trial lasts for 24 weeks to monitor the effects on lung function and asthma control. During the study, participants undergo lung function tests measuring forced expiratory volume in 1 second FEV1 at the start and after 24 weeks. Additional assessments include asthma control questionnaires at baseline and week 24 to evaluate changes in symptoms. Safety and tolerability are monitored throughout, with the total participation lasting 24 weeks.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of elismetrep, an oral drug, compared with a placebo for the acute treatment of migraine in adults aged 18 to 75. This phase 3, double-blind, randomized study is conducted at multiple centers to assess the drugs safety, tolerability, and effectiveness in relieving migraine symptoms quickly. Participants receive either 10 mg or 20 mg of elismetrep or a placebo orally as part of the trial. The study uses a parallel design where participants are randomly assigned to one of these groups and neither the participants nor the researchers know which treatment is given until the study ends. During the trial, participants will be monitored for migraine pain relief and freedom from bothersome symptoms two hours after dosing, among other outcomes. Researchers will also assess pain relief at various time points, use of rescue medication, and safety by tracking any adverse events. Participants will complete questionnaires and use an eDiary app to record their experiences. The study is expected to last until February 2027.

Researchers are evaluating the effects and safety of solriamfetol in adults with binge eating disorder BED. This Phase 3 trial compares two doses of solriamfetol 150 mg and 300 mg with a placebo to better understand their impact on BED symptoms. Participants must be aged 18 to 55 with a diagnosis of BED based on DSM-5 criteria. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either solriamfetol 150 mg, solriamfetol 300 mg, or placebo tablets, all taken once daily for 12 weeks. This randomized, double-blind study will assess how these treatments affect binge eating episodes over the course of the trial. During the 12 weeks, participants will be monitored for changes in the number of binge eating episodes. Safety and efficacy will be evaluated through regular assessments. All study-related care, including medication and visits, will be provided at no cost, and the total participation duration is approximately 12 weeks.

This research aims to compare the effects of two inhalers, budesonidealbuterol metered-dose inhaler BDA MDI and albuterol sulfate metered-dose inhaler AS MDI, both used as needed, in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years with asthma. The study focuses on their impact on the annual rate of severe asthma attacks in participants who have a documented diagnosis of asthma and at least one severe exacerbation in the past year. This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase IIIb trial. Participants are randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive either BDA MDI 160180 micrograms 2 puffs of 8090 micrograms or AS MDI 180 micrograms 2 puffs of 90 micrograms as needed, alongside their usual maintenance asthma therapy. The study includes a 7 to 28-day screening period, a 52-week treatment period, and a safety follow-up lasting 7 to 14 days after treatment ends. Additionally, a pharmacokinetic sub-study involves a single dose of open-label BDA MDI administered at a separate visit after safety follow-up. During the study, participants will be monitored through regular assessments including lung function tests such as peak expiratory flow, evaluation of asthma exacerbations, and safety checks for adverse events. The main outcome measured is the annualized rate of severe asthma exacerbations over the 52-week treatment. Safety follow-up and pharmacokinetic evaluations will further assess drug concentrations and participant well-being. Overall participation lasts from screening through safety monitoring after treatment completion.

Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections CLABSIs are a serious problem in U.S. hospitals, leading to higher death rates, longer hospital stays, and increased costs. This research evaluates whether a machine learning ML model that predicts possible CLABSI risk can help Infection Preventionists IPs reduce infection rates compared to usual practices. The study is a prospective, multi-center, cluster-randomized trial conducted in 20 hospitals with the highest CLABSI rates. In this trial, hospitals are split into early and late groups. Early hospitals get access to the ML model via a daily dashboard that flags high-risk patients. Infection Preventionists use this information to provide targeted education and recommend best practices for central line care, including line removal when appropriate. The model was built using extensive patient data and predicts infection risk with high accuracy. The control hospitals continue with routine clinical practice without access to the model during the study period. Participants are hospitalized adults with central lines, and the model scores patients daily if their line has been in place for over 48 hours. Researchers monitor CLABSI rates per 1,000 central line-days, central line removals within 48 hours of alerts, positive blood culture rates, and IP intervention frequencies. Safety outcomes such as pneumothorax and hemorrhage are also tracked. The study duration is about five months with interim and final analyses planned to assess the impact of providing the ML model to Infection Preventionists.

Researchers are comparing the rates of surgical and minimally invasive interventions, as well as any harms, in Medicare beneficiaries treated with the MILD procedure versus those treated with interspinous process decompression IPD for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. This observational study uses Medicare claims data to follow patients for 24 months after their initial procedure starting from January 1, 2017. The purpose is to evaluate outcomes between these two types of procedures without requiring prior patient enrollment or consent. The study includes two groups patients who received MILD, which is a percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression performed under fluoroscopic guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine, and patients who received IPD, a different device-based decompression procedure. Data on reoperations and complications will be collected for both groups over a 24-month follow-up period using Medicare claims. Enrollment continues until the sponsor decides to stop. Participants involvement is passive as the study uses existing Medicare claims data. Researchers will monitor rates of harms related to the initial procedure and subsequent surgical or minimally invasive interventions over two years. No direct patient visits or interventions are conducted, and the study is exempt from institutional review board oversight. The total study duration extends to December 2026, covering cases treated since early 2017.

This research aims to collect information on the use of the HistoSonics Edison System, a device used for histotripsy treatment of liver tumors. The study is observational and seeks to understand how different patient and procedural factors may influence treatment success measured within 36 hours after the procedure. It also includes sub-studies focusing on specific patient groups or clinical questions with more detailed follow-up. Participants receive histotripsy treatment with the HistoSonics Edison System to partially or completely destroy liver tumors. The study does not dictate specific treatment plans but collects real-world data on how the system is used by different physicians across various clinical settings. Participants may also join sub-studies with stricter criteria alongside the main study. Throughout the study, participants are followed according to standard clinical care for up to 5 years or until their sub-study follow-up ends. Imaging is performed within 36 hours after treatment to assess success. Researchers review adverse event data regularly and gather information before, during, and after treatment to evaluate outcomes and monitor safety over time.