Loveland

Researchers are evaluating the effects of the drug imlunestrant LY3484356 in premenopausal women with early estrogen receptor-positive ER, HER2-negative breast cancer. The study includes two groups one that explores imlunestrant alone or combined with ovarian suppression, and another that studies imlunestrant without ovarian suppression. The trial compares imlunestrants impact on breast cancer cells and ovarian function to tamoxifen, a known treatment. Participants in Cohort 1 will receive imlunestrant orally either alone or with goserelin a drug given by injection to suppress ovarian function for up to 29 days. Some in this group will take tamoxifen orally as a comparator. Cohort 2 participants will take imlunestrant or tamoxifen orally for up to 6 months without ovarian suppression. The study is open-label, randomized, and phase 2, designed to assess treatment effects in parallel groups. During the study, participants will provide tumor samples before and during treatment, and researchers will monitor changes in specific cancer markers like Ki-67, estrogen receptor ER, and progesterone receptor PR expression. They will also track the rate of ovarian cysts up to 180 days. Participants must attend scheduled visits for evaluations, including performance status checks and safety assessments. The trial is expected to continue until December 2029.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of Tersolisib LY4064809STX-478 to other anti-cancer drugs as a first treatment for adults with advanced hormone receptor-positive HRhuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative HER2- breast cancer that has a PIK3CA mutation. This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aims to understand the efficacy and safety of this combination compared to placebo, focusing on improving outcomes for patients with this specific genetic change. Participants receive LY4064809 orally in one of two doses combined with a CDK46 inhibitor such as Ribociclib, Palbociclib, or Abemaciclib and endocrine therapy ET administered orally or via intramuscular injection. The comparison group receives a placebo combined with the same CDK46 inhibitor and ET. The study includes two parts Part 1 explores dose optimization, and Part 2 evaluates the treatment combinations effectiveness and safety as a first-line therapy. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor cancer response, progression, and safety over an estimated period of up to 5 years or more. Researchers will measure outcomes such as overall response rate, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and quality of life. Treatment continues as long as the cancer benefits without intolerable side effects. Safety monitoring, laboratory tests, and quality of life questionnaires are part of the participant involvement throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to the standard treatment of chemotherapy with or without radiation improves survival for patients aged 5 to 60 with early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares progression-free survival and overall survival between the standard therapy and the immunotherapy-enhanced approach, as well as patient-reported outcomes and long-term side effects. Participants initially receive two cycles of ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days and then undergo imaging to classify their early response. Based on risk level and response, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continuing standard chemotherapy, receiving immunotherapy drugs, or combinations with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are delivered intravenously or orally in cycles lasting 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Participants are monitored regularly with PET scans, CT or MRI imaging, and blood tests. Follow-up visits occur every 3 months in the first year, then every 6 months for years two and three, and annually up to 12 years from registration. Researchers assess survival outcomes, adverse events, patient-reported symptoms and quality of life, and metabolic tumor burden. Long-term effects such as cardiovascular and pulmonary health are also evaluated using questionnaires and clinical assessments.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with BRAF-V600 mutant melanoma that has spread to the brain. This phase II trial compares two combinations encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab. The study aims to determine which approach is more effective at shrinking and controlling brain metastases, and it also examines survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group takes encorafenib daily by mouth, binimetinib twice daily by mouth, and receives nivolumab through an intravenous IV infusion every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab IV every cycle and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes during the first four cycles, with cycles repeating every 21 days initially, then every 28 days. Treatment continues unless disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. Participants undergo brain MRI scans before enrollment and throughout the study to assess tumor response using specific criteria. After completing treatment, patients are followed every six months for two years, then yearly up to three years. The study collects tissue, blood, spinal fluid, and stool samples for future research. Researchers monitor progression-free survival as the main outcome, along with overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects.

Researchers are studying two surgical procedures to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 genetic mutations. This trial compares bilateral salpingectomy, which removes only the fallopian tubes, with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which removes both fallopian tubes and ovaries. The goal is to find out if removing just the fallopian tubes with delayed ovary removal is nearly as effective as removing both from the start. Participants choose between two groups one undergoes bilateral salpingectomy with the option of later ovary removal, and the other undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups have imaging tests like pelvic ultrasounds or pelvic MRIs during screening and provide blood samples throughout the study. Follow-up visits occur at multiple time points, including 10 to 60 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and then yearly for up to 20 years. During the study, researchers track if ovarian or related cancers develop and assess symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, cancer-related distress, sexual function, menopausal symptoms, medical decision making, and any adverse events. Various questionnaires and imaging tests support these evaluations. Long-term safety and cancer risk reduction are monitored for up to two decades after surgery.

This trial investigates monitoring and treatment options for patients with low risk and standard risk metastatic germ cell tumors, which are cancers that start in the cells that produce sperm or eggs. The study aims to find out if active surveillance after surgical removal of low risk tumors can maintain high survival rates, and whether carboplatin or cisplatin chemotherapy works better for treating standard risk tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults. Patients with low risk tumors undergo observation after surgery and may transfer to a standard risk treatment arm if the tumor recurs. Those with standard risk tumors are randomly assigned to receive one of two chemotherapy regimens one containing carboplatin, bleomycin, and etoposide, or the other containing cisplatin, bleomycin, and etoposide. Treatments are given intravenously in cycles every 21 days for up to 3 or 4 cycles depending on the group. Throughout the study, patients have imaging scans, blood tests, tumor biopsies, and pulmonary function tests to monitor response and side effects. Participants are followed closely during treatment and afterward with regular check-ups including CT, MRI, and chest X-rays, as well as blood sample collections. Follow-up visits occur every 2 months for the first year, then every 3-6 months up to 2 years, every 6 months for years 3 to 5, and annually up to 10 years. Researchers measure overall survival, event-free survival, hearing loss, body composition, tumor markers, and patient-reported outcomes related to hearing and neuropathy. This long-term monitoring helps assess the effects and safety of chemotherapy and surveillance strategies.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding the immunotherapy drug durvalumab to the usual chemotherapy regimen can improve outcomes for patients with MammaPrint High 2 Risk MP2 stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial focuses on comparing breast cancer event-free survival and other measures between patients receiving chemotherapy alone and those receiving chemotherapy with durvalumab. Immunotherapy may help enhance the bodys immune response against cancer, while chemotherapy works to stop tumor growth in various ways. Participants are first tested for MP2 status using MammaPrint on previously collected tissue. Those with MP2 results are randomized into two groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for six cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide intravenously every 14 days for four cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule combined with durvalumab given intravenously over 60 minutes on specific cycles. Mammography and optional tumor tissue and blood sample collections occur during the study. During the study, participants undergo assessments including mammography, tumor biopsies, blood tests, and quality-of-life questionnaires. Researchers measure outcomes such as event-free survival, response rates, relapse-free survival, overall survival, treatment side effects, and patient-reported fatigue and physical health. After treatment completion, participants are followed for up to 10 years to monitor long-term outcomes and survival. Specimens are also banked for future research.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of nivolumab to the usual treatment of paclitaxel and ramucirumab compared to paclitaxel and ramucirumab alone in patients with advanced stomach or esophageal adenocarcinoma. This phase IIIII trial aims to see if nivolumab improves progression-free survival and overall survival in these patients. Nivolumab is an immunotherapy monoclonal antibody that may help the immune system attack cancer, while ramucirumab may prevent tumor blood vessel growth, and paclitaxel stops cancer cells from dividing. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives nivolumab intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle, combined with ramucirumab on days 1 and 15, and paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15. The other group receives only ramucirumab and paclitaxel on the same schedule without nivolumab. Treatment cycles continue unless the disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. During the study, patients undergo CT scans and MRI imaging, and may optionally provide blood samples. Throughout the trial, participants are monitored with regular imaging and optional blood tests. After treatment ends, patients have follow-up visits at 30, 60, and 90 days, then every six months for up to three years. Researchers assess progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, disease control, safety, and quality of life using questionnaires and patient-reported symptoms. This comprehensive monitoring helps evaluate treatment effects and patient well-being over time.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN X4X4S Transcatheter Heart Valve THV in people with failing aortic bioprosthetic valves who are at high or greater surgical risk. This prospective, single-arm, multicenter study focuses on treating aortic valve insufficiency and stenosis using a balloon-expandable valve system designed for patients needing valve replacement. Participants receive a transcatheter aortic valve replacement TAVR using the SAPIEN X4 or X4S valve. The study includes two groups those with failing aortic surgical valves and those with failing aortic transcatheter heart valves. The valve implantation is done as a device procedure during the treatment phase. During the study, participants are monitored for one year to assess outcomes including death and stroke. Other evaluations include heart function assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and New York Heart Association functional class at 30 days and one year after the procedure. The study involves follow-up visits to monitor safety and effectiveness over this period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN X4 and X4S Transcatheter Heart Valves THV in people with symptomatic, severe, calcific aortic stenosis. This is a prospective, single group, multicenter study that also includes a separate registry for participants with bicuspid aortic valve morphology. Participants will undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement TAVR using the SAPIEN X4 or X4S valves. Those with bicuspid aortic valves will be enrolled in a distinct registry but will also undergo TAVR. The study focuses on implantation of these balloon-expandable heart valves as the main intervention. During the study, participants will be monitored for safety and outcomes like death and stroke over one year. Researchers will assess heart function through the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and check for complications such as paravalvular leak and the need for a permanent pacemaker within 30 days. The total participation time includes follow-up assessments up to one year after valve implantation.