Waterford

Researchers are conducting a Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an intravitreal injection called KSI-101 in adults with macular edema caused by inflammation, known as MESI. This condition involves swelling in the central part of the retina and can affect vision. The study aims to compare KSI-101 to sham injections to understand its impact on improving vision. Participants will receive either KSI-101 or sham injections directly into the eye. The treatment is given through intravitreal injections, which deliver medication inside the eye. The study is randomized, double-masked, and sham-controlled, meaning neither participants nor doctors know who receives the active drug or sham injections. This design helps provide clear and unbiased results. Throughout the study, participants will have their vision assessed, including measuring changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 weeks. Researchers will monitor the thickness of the central retina area and check for safety and side effects. Participants will be followed regularly to track vision changes and eye health during the study period.

Researchers are conducting a Phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an investigational drug called KSI-101 for people with macular edema caused by inflammation, known as Macular Edema Secondary to Inflammation (MESI). The study focuses on participants who have specific retinal thickness and vision measurements and includes those with active or inactive non-infectious inflammation in one eye. The trial aims to understand how well KSI-101 works compared to a sham injection in improving vision. Participants will receive either KSI-101 through an injection into the eye (intravitreal injection) or a sham injection as a comparison. The study is double-masked and randomized, meaning neither the participants nor the researchers know which treatment is given. The treatment schedule and detailed dosing are not specified here, but the trial includes careful monitoring of participants over time. During the study, participants' vision will be assessed, specifically measuring the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 24 weeks. Other assessments include measuring retinal thickness with imaging technology. Researchers will monitor safety and any side effects throughout the trial. Participation involves regular visits for these evaluations, and the study is designed to gather detailed information on how the treatment affects vision and eye health over the study period.

Researchers are evaluating corneal endothelial cells in people aged 50 and older who have neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The study focuses on participants treated with the Port Delivery System (PDS) refilled every 24 weeks. This Phase IV, open-label trial aims to understand changes in corneal endothelial cell density over time in the eye receiving treatment compared to the fellow eye. The study involves delivering ranibizumab 100 mg/mL via the PDS implant. Supplemental treatment with intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.5 mg of a 10 mg/mL formulation) in the study eye may be given if needed. If participants stop the study treatment, they may receive intravitreal ranibizumab injections based on the investigator's judgment. Treatment and monitoring occur over at least 48 weeks. Participants will undergo detailed eye examinations including specular microscopy to measure corneal endothelial cell density at baseline and week 48. Historical visual acuity and imaging data will be reviewed. Researchers will monitor safety, disease activity, and treatment response through visual acuity assessments, optical coherence tomography, and other imaging techniques. The main outcome is the percent change in corneal endothelial cell density in the treated eye compared to the fellow eye after 48 weeks.

Researchers are studying the effects of two experimental drugs, pozelimab and cemdisiran, in adults aged 50 to 85 who have Geographic Atrophy (GA) caused by Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), a condition that affects central vision. The study aims to compare how quickly GA progresses in patients treated with cemdisiran alone, a combination of pozelimab and cemdisiran, or a placebo. Additional goals include monitoring possible side effects, measuring drug levels in the blood, and checking for antibodies that might reduce drug effectiveness or cause side effects. Participants receive subcutaneous injections of either pozelimab combined with cemdisiran, cemdisiran alone, or a placebo. The study is randomized, double-masked, and placebo-controlled, conducted at multiple centers. Treatment schedules and dosing are managed as described in the protocol, with vaccinations for meningococcal and pneumococcal infections required prior to participation. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular clinic visits where eye imaging using Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) tracks the progression of GA lesion area over 52 weeks. Researchers also monitor safety, side effects, and immune responses, ensuring adherence to study procedures. The main outcome measured is the growth rate of the GA lesion area over one year, helping to evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the study drugs.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a medicine called disitamab vedotin for adults with advanced breast cancer that is hard to treat and has spread in the body. This study focuses on participants whose tumors express HER2 and who have received previous treatments for their advanced breast cancer. The goal is to understand how well this medicine works and its safety in these patients through a Phase 1b/2 open-label study. All participants will receive disitamab vedotin intravenously (IV) once every two weeks at the study clinic. They will continue the treatment until they or their doctor decide to stop, which could be due to cancer progression, side effects, or personal choice. During treatment, study visits occur every two weeks. After stopping treatment, participants will have follow-up visits about every six weeks, and later follow-up phone calls approximately every twelve weeks. Participants will undergo evaluations including assessments of their cancer response by the study doctors, following recognized criteria. The study team will monitor the participants for up to about two years or until their disease progresses or they pass away. This includes safety monitoring and collecting information about the medicine’s effects to determine its safety and effectiveness.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to standard chemotherapy, with or without radiation, can improve survival for patients aged 5 to 60 years with newly diagnosed stage I or II classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares outcomes in groups based on their early response to initial chemotherapy, aiming to understand if immunotherapy can lead to better progression-free survival and overall survival compared to standard treatment alone. The study also looks at side effects, quality of life, and long-term health impacts across different patient groups. Participants first receive two cycles of standard ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days, followed by imaging to classify their response as rapid or slow early responders and their risk status as favorable or unfavorable. Based on these factors, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continued standard chemotherapy regimens or immunotherapy with brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, sometimes combined with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are given intravenously or orally depending on the drugs, and cycles typically last 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected regularly throughout the study. Throughout the trial, participants undergo frequent scans such as FDG-PET, CT, MRI, and PET-CT to monitor their disease status. Blood samples and questionnaires assess treatment effects and quality of life. After completing treatment, patients have scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for two years, and annually up to 12 years to track long-term outcomes, side effects, and survival. The main measurements focus on progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events, and patient-reported experiences.

Researchers are evaluating two surgical procedures, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, to see how well they reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women who have BRCA1 gene mutations. The study aims to determine if removing just the fallopian tubes (bilateral salpingectomy) is almost as effective as removing both the fallopian tubes and ovaries (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) in lowering ovarian cancer risk. This trial also assesses symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, sexual function, cancer-related distress, decision-making about surgery, and treatment side effects in these patients. Participants choose between two groups: one group undergoes bilateral salpingectomy and may have their ovaries removed later, while the other group undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups receive pelvic or transvaginal ultrasounds or pelvic MRI scans during screening, and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Ancillary studies include quality-of-life assessments and questionnaires. The study also collects tissue and blood samples for future research. After surgery, participants have follow-up visits at 10 to 60 days, then at 6, 12, and 24 months, and annually for up to 20 years. Researchers monitor the time until any high-grade serous carcinomas develop, specifically ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. They also track menopausal symptoms, sexual function, quality of life, cancer distress, medical decisions about surgery, and any adverse events during this long-term follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the Port Delivery System (PDS) with ranibizumab compared to standard intravitreal ranibizumab injections in adults with diabetic macular edema (DME). This Phase III, multicenter, randomized study aims to compare PDS treatment every 24 weeks with injections every 4 weeks. A substudy will assess the safety of re-implanting the updated PDS and performing refill-exchange procedures in participants previously enrolled in the main study. Participants will receive either the PDS implant pre-filled with ranibizumab or intravitreal ranibizumab injections according to their assigned group. Treatments will be administered on a set schedule specific to each arm. The substudy involves re-implantation of the updated PDS and monitoring post-procedure. The PDS refill exchange is also part of the treatment plan for some participants. Throughout the study, participants will undergo assessments including vision tests using the ETDRS chart to measure changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Safety will be monitored by tracking ocular and systemic adverse events, device-related effects, and any serious complications up to 72 weeks after treatment or re-implantation. The study evaluates both short-term and long-term safety and efficacy outcomes over the full duration of participation.

Researchers are investigating the addition of an immunotherapy drug called durvalumab to standard chemotherapy treatment in patients with MammaPrint High 2 Risk (MP2) stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial aims to compare the effectiveness of usual chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy combined with durvalumab. Immunotherapy with durvalumab may help the immune system attack cancer cells and prevent tumor growth and spread, while chemotherapy drugs like paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide work to stop cancer cells from growing or dividing. Previous studies suggest patients with an MP2 result might respond better to this combined treatment approach. Participants first undergo MammaPrint testing to confirm MP2 status before randomization into two groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for 6 cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide intravenously on day 1 every 14 days for 4 cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule plus durvalumab intravenously over 60 minutes on specified cycles during both chemotherapy phases. Mammography is performed during screening, and optional tissue and blood samples are collected for future studies. Throughout the study, participants are monitored through various assessments including imaging, physical exams, laboratory tests, and quality of life questionnaires focusing on fatigue and physical and mental health. Researchers track breast cancer event-free survival and other outcomes such as treatment side effects and response rates. After completing treatment, patients are followed for up to 10 years or until death to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of nivolumab to the usual treatment of paclitaxel and ramucirumab in patients with advanced or locally unresectable stomach or esophageal adenocarcinoma. This phase II/III trial aims to determine if adding nivolumab improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared to paclitaxel and ramucirumab alone. The study also assesses response rates, disease control, safety, tolerability, and quality of life in participants with PD-L1 CPS 21 1 advanced gastric or esophageal cancer. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The first group receives nivolumab IV on day 1 of each 28-day cycle, ramucirumab IV on days 1 and 15, and paclitaxel IV on days 1, 8, and 15. The second group receives ramucirumab IV on days 1 and 15 and paclitaxel IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment continues every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Optional blood samples may be collected during the study. Imaging with CT and MRI is performed throughout. Participants undergo scans and assessments at baseline and during treatment to monitor cancer progression and treatment effects. They also complete questionnaires on quality of life and symptoms. After treatment ends, participants are followed up at 30, 60, and 90 days and then every 6 months for up to 3 years. Researchers measure progression-free survival and overall survival as primary outcomes, along with other safety and patient-reported measures.