Blackfoot

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of tenapanor in adults with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC) in this 26-week phase 3 study. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, involving multiple centers. It aims to compare three doses of tenapanor (5 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg taken twice daily) against a placebo, with a focus on improving spontaneous bowel movements. Participants will first undergo a 2-week screening where their eligibility is assessed through medical history, physical exams, lab tests, ECG, and self-reported constipation symptoms using an electronic diary (eDiary). Eligible patients will then be randomly assigned to receive one of the three doses of tenapanor or placebo twice daily for 26 weeks. During this treatment period, patients will continue daily and weekly symptom reporting via the eDiary and attend regular safety visits at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26. After completing the 26-week treatment, patients enter a 4-week treatment-free safety follow-up period to monitor any adverse events. A final visit occurs at the end of this follow-up to assess safety. The main outcome measured is the durable complete spontaneous bowel movements response over 12 weeks. Overall, the study involves careful monitoring of symptoms, safety, and treatment effects over approximately 32 weeks.

Researchers are evaluating the effect and safety of different doses of a new medicine called NNC0662-0419 in people living with type 2 diabetes. This study compares NNC0662-0419 to a placebo or to semaglutide, an approved medication for type 2 diabetes. The goal is to determine if NNC0662-0419 is effective and safe for treating this condition in a phase 2 dose-finding study. Participants will receive one of the three treatments: NNC0662-0419, semaglutide, or placebo, all given by weekly subcutaneous injections. The treatment assignment is randomized, meaning participants are assigned to their group by chance. The study tests different doses of NNC0662-0419 to find the best dose for treating type 2 diabetes. During the study, researchers will monitor changes in participants' blood sugar levels by measuring glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at weeks 16, 28, and 40 compared to the start of the study. Participants will be regularly assessed for safety and treatment effects. The study includes adults aged 18 to 75 years and tracks the impact of the treatments over several months.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of NNC0487-0111 for people with excess body weight and knee osteoarthritis. This Phase 3 study compares NNC0487-0111 to a placebo, a treatment with no active medicine, to see if it helps reduce weight and knee pain. Participants have knee osteoarthritis diagnosed by specific clinical and radiographic criteria and experience ongoing knee pain. Participants receive weekly injections under the skin using a pre-filled pen injector. The injections, either NNC0487-0111 or placebo, are given in the thigh, abdomen, or upper arm. The study treatments include two dose levels of NNC0487-0111. Treatment assignment is randomized and blinded, meaning participants receive either the medicine or placebo by chance, not by choice. During the study, participants will be monitored for changes in body weight and knee pain using a standardized pain questionnaire over about 80 weeks. They will follow specific instructions about pain medication before assessments. Researchers will track treatment effects, safety, and any side effects throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of muvalaplin on reducing cardiovascular risk in adults with elevated lipoprotein(a) levels who either have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or are at risk for a heart attack or stroke. This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study focuses on adults with high Lp(a) levels and prior or potential cardiovascular events. The study aims to assess the time to the first major adverse cardiovascular event over about 5.25 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either muvalaplin or a placebo, both administered orally. The study includes individuals with Lp(a) levels of at least 175 nanomoles per liter who have had a prior cardiovascular event within 10 years or are at risk for a first event due to conditions such as coronary artery disease, carotid stenosis, peripheral artery disease, high coronary artery calcium score, reduced kidney function with diabetes, or other high-risk factors. The treatment period lasts through the study duration, with close monitoring. During the study, participants will be regularly evaluated to track the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and strokes. Safety assessments will monitor blood pressure, kidney function, and heart failure status among other health indicators. The primary outcome measures the time to the first major cardiovascular event from baseline up to the end of the study, which spans approximately 5.25 years.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.