Chicago Ridge

Researchers are studying new treatment options for people with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer HR NMIBC, including cases with carcinoma in situ CIS. HR NMIBC affects the lining of the bladder but has not spread to muscle or beyond. The study aims to learn if adding intismeran autogene V940 to the standard Bacillus Calmette-Guerin BCG immunotherapy can improve outcomes by helping the immune system attack the cancer more effectively. Participants are divided into groups receiving different treatments. One group Cohort A receives both intismeran autogene via intramuscular injection every 3 weeks for 9 doses and BCG instillations weekly in specific weeks over about 75 weeks. Another group receives only BCG following the same weekly schedule. A third group Cohort B receives intismeran autogene alone every 3 weeks for 9 doses. The study evaluates these treatments over several years. During the study, participants will have regular treatments and follow-up visits where researchers will monitor cancer progression, recurrence, and survival for up to approximately 5 years. Assessments include event-free survival, recurrence-free survival, overall survival, response rates, time to cystectomy, and safety outcomes such as adverse events and treatment discontinuation. The study is randomized and open-label, with detailed long-term monitoring planned.

Researchers are evaluating zanidatamab for treating adults with previously treated solid tumors that overexpress the HER2 protein at a high level IHC 3. This Phase 2 study focuses on participants whose tumors have progressed after at least one prior systemic treatment and who have no other confirmed beneficial treatment options. The study excludes certain cancers like biliary tract cancer and considers prior HER2 therapy differently across tumor cohorts. Participants receive zanidatamab through intravenous infusion. The study includes a single treatment group with no placebo comparison. Treatment continues as per protocol with monitoring for responses and safety. The study collects tumor samples centrally to confirm HER2 status and requires measurable disease for evaluation. Various cohorts have specific prior treatment requirements. During the study, participants undergo assessments including tumor response evaluation by independent review and investigators using standard criteria RECIST 1.1. The trial monitors treatment safety, side effects, drug levels in the blood, and immune reactions to the drug. Participants will be followed for up to 2.5 years for response and safety, and overall survival is tracked for up to 3.5 years, with regular visits to assess health status and treatment effects.

Researchers are evaluating a new form of hormone therapy called ASP5541 for men with advanced prostate cancer that has spread to other parts of the body. This phase 2 study compares ASP5541 given by injection with the standard abiraterone acetate tablets, both combined with a steroid called prednisone or prednisolone. The study aims to assess how well ASP5541 works and its safety in men who have not previously been treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, including specific evaluation in Japanese men. Participants are divided into three groups based on their cancer type and treatment history. ASP5541 is given as a muscle injection every 12 weeks, while abiraterone acetate is taken as a daily tablet. Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer take prednisone or prednisolone twice daily, and men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer take it once daily. All groups also receive standard care such as androgen deprivation therapy. Some participants will monitor blood pressure at home weekly. During the study, men visit the clinic regularly for health checks, safety monitoring, and scans to observe any changes in their cancer. The frequency and type of visits depend on each participants health and treatment stage. Researchers will measure prostate-specific antigen PSA levels, adverse events, physical exams, ECGs, and performance status to evaluate treatment effects and safety. The study may last up to about 3 years for some outcomes, with longer follow-up for certain measures.

This research aims to compare two approaches for treating previously untreated amblyopia in children aged 3 to under 13 years. It evaluates whether using glasses and patching at the same time leads to similar improvements in vision as first using glasses alone, followed by patching only if needed. The trial focuses on children with amblyopia caused by differences in eye alignment or prescription errors. Children will be assigned randomly to one of two treatment groups one group will wear glasses full-time and add patching for 2 hours daily only if there is no improvement after glasses alone the other group will wear glasses and patch the weaker eye for 2 hours daily at the same time from the start. Vision tests will be done at baseline and follow-up visits every 8 weeks for up to 56 weeks. Participants will have their distance visual acuity measured with trial frames before and after getting their glasses to confirm eligibility. During the study, vision will be monitored to classify improvement or stability, guiding whether patching is needed in the sequential group. Outcomes include changes in vision clarity after 56 weeks and quality-of-life assessments. Regular visits help track progress and safety until study completion.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of the combination of divarasib and pembrolizumab compared with pembrolizumab combined with pemetrexed and either carboplatin or cisplatin. This study focuses on adults with previously untreated, advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that has a KRAS G12C mutation. The goal is to assess these treatments as first-line options in this specific lung cancer population. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will take divarasib orally once daily and receive pembrolizumab through an intravenous infusion every three weeks. The other group will receive pembrolizumab, pemetrexed, and either carboplatin or cisplatin via intravenous infusions every three weeks. Treatment continues with these schedules, following the study protocol for up to approximately five years of follow-up. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor their health and response to treatment. These include imaging and clinical evaluations to measure progression-free survival and overall survival for up to five years. Researchers will also track quality of life, symptom changes, treatment side effects, and adverse events using questionnaires and patient-reported outcomes. Safety monitoring and detailed evaluations will help understand the effects of the treatments over the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of Saruparib AZD5305 to standard radiation therapy RT and androgen deprivation therapy ADT for men with high-risk or very high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer who have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. The study aims to determine if Saruparib improves metastases-free survival compared to placebo when added to these treatments. This phase 3 trial involves approximately 700 adult male participants. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either Saruparib or a matching placebo alongside physicians choice of ADT, with or without abiraterone and prednisoneprednisolone, depending on their cohort. Cohort A includes those receiving RT and continuous ADT, while Cohort B includes participants receiving RT, ADT, and abiraterone. Saruparib and placebo are administered orally. Treatment continues with close monitoring throughout the study. Participants will undergo scans including CT or MRI, bone scans, and PSMA-PET after their planned RT to confirm eligibility and monitor disease status. They will be followed for survival and disease progression for up to approximately 11 years. Researchers will assess metastasis-free survival, overall survival, prostate cancer-specific survival, biochemical recurrence, physical function, and urinary symptoms. Safety and drug levels will also be monitored. An independent committee will review safety and efficacy regularly throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world use and outcomes of TAR-200, a treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer NMIBC, an early-stage bladder cancer confined to the inner lining of the bladder. The study aims to measure disease-free survival, or the time from the first TAR-200 insertion until cancer worsens or symptoms return. This observational study focuses on participants in the United States who have begun TAR-200 treatment in routine clinical practice. Participants with a confirmed diagnosis of NMIBC who started their first dose of TAR-200 within six weeks before the baseline visit will be observed for up to 24 months. No additional treatment or intervention is given as part of the study instead, participants are followed to monitor their outcomes over this period. The study collects information on various measures, including complete response rates, duration of response, overall and cancer-specific survival, time to next treatment, and treatment adherence. During the study, participants will have visits to track their health status and outcomes related to TAR-200 treatment. Researchers will collect data on adverse events, treatment patterns, time to treatment discontinuation, and bladder-intact survival. The primary outcome is disease-free survival measured up to 24 months. Secondary outcomes include many related measures monitored during this time. Participants remain under their usual care while being observed for study purposes, and the study aims to provide insight into how TAR-200 performs in everyday clinical settings.

Researchers are comparing the effectiveness of two different combinations of immunotherapy drugs with chemotherapy for adults with stage IV or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer that has PD-L1 expression of 1% or higher. This phase 3, randomized study focuses on participants who have not previously received systemic treatment for advanced disease. The goal is to determine which combination better improves overall survival and other outcomes in this patient group. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Nivolumab plus Relatlimab combined with chemotherapy or Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy. The chemotherapy drugs used include Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, or Cisplatin, given in specified doses on scheduled days. Treatment is given as first-line therapy for their cancer, with dosing details managed throughout the study period. During the study, participants will undergo imaging scans like CT or MRI to measure disease status, and blood tests to monitor safety and side effects. The main outcome measured is overall survival over up to five years, along with progression-free survival, response rates, duration of response, and adverse events. Researchers will also assess symptoms related to lung cancer over two years. Participants are monitored regularly to track these outcomes and ensure safety throughout the study duration, which may last several years.

Researchers are evaluating the disease-free survival in participants with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer HR-NMIBC who have previously received Bacillus Calmette-Gurin BCG treatment. This Phase 3 trial compares a new treatment called TAR-210 with the investigators choice of intravesical chemotherapy. The study focuses on participants with specific fibroblast growth factor receptor FGFR alterations and aims to find out which treatment better prevents cancer recurrence or progression after BCG therapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group A will have TAR-210 inserted into the bladder starting on Day 1 and continuing for about 2 years. Group B will receive either mitomycin C or gemcitabine chemotherapy, chosen by the investigator, given once weekly for 4 to 6 weeks induction, followed by monthly maintenance doses for up to 1 year, with a possible second year of maintenance at the investigators discretion. All treatments are delivered directly into the bladder intravesically. During the study, participants will be monitored for up to 5 years to track disease-free survival and other outcomes such as recurrence-free survival, time to next intervention, disease worsening, progression, and overall survival. Researchers will also assess side effects, laboratory and vital sign changes, and quality of life using specific questionnaires. The study includes regular evaluations and safety monitoring throughout the participation period, which may last several years.

Researchers are evaluating the combination of JSB462 luxdegalutamide with abiraterone compared to an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor ARPI, which includes abiraterone or enzalutamide, in adult males with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer mHSPC. This Phase II study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of two doses of JSB462 100 mg and 300 mg daily combined with abiraterone and to select the recommended dose for future Phase III trials. The study will analyze overall treatment response, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. Participants will undergo a screening period of 28 days before starting treatment. During treatment, they will receive daily oral doses of JSB462 at either 100 mg or 300 mg combined with abiraterone 1000 mg, or they will receive abiraterone 1000 mg or enzalutamide 160 mg alone. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, death, or decision by the participant or investigator. After treatment ends, there is a 30-day safety follow-up visit, followed by a long-term follow-up period to collect ongoing safety, efficacy, and survival information until the study concludes. Throughout the study, participants will have regular assessments including prostate-specific antigen PSA levels, imaging scans, adverse event monitoring, dose adjustments, and pharmacokinetic sampling. Patient-reported outcomes and various survival and response rates will be evaluated up to approximately 83 months. Safety follow-up visits occur about 30 days after treatment stops, and long-term monitoring continues until the studys end, ensuring comprehensive data collection on treatment effects and participant well-being.