Normal

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with sacituzumab govitecan-hziy compared to the standard chemotherapy treatments in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. This Phase III trial focuses on cancers that have spread to nearby tissues, lymph nodes, or other parts of the body. The study aims to compare overall survival and other outcomes such as progression-free survival, response rates, clinical benefits, duration of response, and treatment toxicity between the two treatment approaches. Quality of life and fatigue are also assessed as secondary measures. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives standard of care chemotherapy, which may include carboplatin or cisplatin combined with gemcitabine, or alternatively docetaxel or paclitaxel, administered intravenously in cycles every 21 days for up to six cycles, unless the disease progresses or side effects become unacceptable. The other group receives sacituzumab govitecan-hziy intravenously on days 1 and 8, along with pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle, continuing for up to 35 cycles or two years, unless there is disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular blood sample collections and imaging scans using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to monitor their condition. Quality of life questionnaires are also completed to assess symptoms and fatigue over time. After treatment ends, patients are followed up 30 days later and then annually for up to five years to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety. The main outcome measured is overall survival from the time of randomization up to five years.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of KT-621, an oral drug, in adults and adolescents aged 12 to 75 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), a common form of eczema. This phase 2b study aims to assess how well KT-621 reduces the severity and extent of AD, its safety and tolerability, how the drug behaves in the body, and the body's response to the drug. The study includes a 16-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period followed by a 52-week open-label phase. Participants will receive either KT-621 or a matching oral placebo during the initial 16-week double-blind period. Following this, all participants have the option to enter a 52-week open-label period where they receive KT-621. During these phases, participants will continue their regular use of moisturizers twice daily and adhere to the treatment plan. The study is conducted across multiple centers and includes dose-ranging to evaluate different doses of KT-621. Throughout the study, participants will have scheduled visits for assessments including clinical evaluations of eczema severity using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, which measures changes from baseline through week 16. Other evaluations include questionnaires, laboratory tests, and adherence monitoring via an electronic diary. Safety and tolerability are closely monitored, and participants are expected to comply with all study procedures over the entire duration of the trial, including both the double-blind and open-label periods.

This trial investigates treatments for children aged 2 to less than 12 years with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, a skin condition causing rash and itching due to inflammation. It compares oral upadacitinib, a drug approved for patients 12 years and older, with subcutaneous dupilumab, focusing on safety, adverse events, and changes in disease activity. The study is phase 3, open-label, and efficacy-assessor-blinded, enrolling about 675 participants worldwide who require systemic anti-inflammatory treatment beyond topical therapies. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive upadacitinib daily as oral tablets or oral solution for 160 weeks, or dupilumab by injection according to its approved dosing every 2 or 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Participants are stratified by disease severity, age, and previous treatment response. After completing treatment, follow-up visits occur for 30 days after upadacitinib and at least 12 weeks after dupilumab. The trial may involve more treatment visits than standard care. Throughout the study, participants attend regular hospital or clinic visits for clinical assessments, blood tests, and questionnaires to monitor disease severity and side effects. Researchers measure the percentage of participants achieving significant improvement in eczema severity by week 16 and track adverse events up to about week 172. This careful monitoring helps evaluate the safety and efficacy of the treatments over the long term.

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream in children and adolescents (6 to \<18 Years Old) with moderate atopic dermatitis.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of a combination treatment of Fluticasone Furoate (FF), Umeclidinium (UMEC), and Vilanterol (VI) on lung function in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years with asthma that is not well controlled by current treatments. This Phase 3 study compares this three-drug combination with a two-drug combination of FF and VI over a 24-week period to assess their impact on breathing ability and safety. Participants will receive either the FF/UMEC/VI combination or the FF/VI combination, both delivered using the ELLIPTA inhaler device. The treatment will be administered consistently over 24 weeks, with the study designed as a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial to fairly compare the two therapies. The goal is to observe differences in lung function and other health effects during this treatment period. During the study, participants will undergo evaluations including lung function tests measuring forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at the start and after 24 weeks of treatment. Researchers will monitor safety, tolerability, and how well participants respond to the therapies. The total participation time spans these 24 weeks of treatment, with assessments to track changes and effects throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating two surgical procedures, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, to see how well they reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women who have BRCA1 gene mutations. The study aims to determine if removing just the fallopian tubes (bilateral salpingectomy) is almost as effective as removing both the fallopian tubes and ovaries (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) in lowering ovarian cancer risk. This trial also assesses symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, sexual function, cancer-related distress, decision-making about surgery, and treatment side effects in these patients. Participants choose between two groups: one group undergoes bilateral salpingectomy and may have their ovaries removed later, while the other group undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups receive pelvic or transvaginal ultrasounds or pelvic MRI scans during screening, and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Ancillary studies include quality-of-life assessments and questionnaires. The study also collects tissue and blood samples for future research. After surgery, participants have follow-up visits at 10 to 60 days, then at 6, 12, and 24 months, and annually for up to 20 years. Researchers monitor the time until any high-grade serous carcinomas develop, specifically ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. They also track menopausal symptoms, sexual function, quality of life, cancer distress, medical decisions about surgery, and any adverse events during this long-term follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of remibrutinib compared to dupilumab in adults with moderate to severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) that is not adequately controlled by second generation H1-antihistamines (sgH1-AHs). This Phase 3b, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study is conducted in the US and focuses on early treatment effects at 4 weeks and earlier. The study includes a screening period of up to 4 weeks, followed by a 12-week core treatment period where about 400 participants are randomly assigned to receive either remibrutinib (25 mg twice daily by mouth) with a placebo injection or dupilumab (a 600 mg loading dose followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks by injection) with a placebo tablet. All participants continue their stable dose of sgH1-AH during this period, with the option to add rescue doses if needed, not exceeding four times the standard dose per day. After the core period, participants may join an optional open-label extension to receive remibrutinib for an additional 12 weeks if the drug is not commercially available. Participants will complete daily diaries and regular assessments to track urticaria symptoms and treatment effects. Researchers will measure changes in the Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) from the start to Week 4. Safety follow-up will occur for 12 weeks after treatment ends, with phone calls and site visits as needed, continuing longer if participants join the extension. The total study duration includes screening, treatment, optional extension, and safety follow-up phases.

Researchers are investigating the addition of an immunotherapy drug called durvalumab to standard chemotherapy treatment in patients with MammaPrint High 2 Risk (MP2) stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial aims to compare the effectiveness of usual chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy combined with durvalumab. Immunotherapy with durvalumab may help the immune system attack cancer cells and prevent tumor growth and spread, while chemotherapy drugs like paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide work to stop cancer cells from growing or dividing. Previous studies suggest patients with an MP2 result might respond better to this combined treatment approach. Participants first undergo MammaPrint testing to confirm MP2 status before randomization into two groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for 6 cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide intravenously on day 1 every 14 days for 4 cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule plus durvalumab intravenously over 60 minutes on specified cycles during both chemotherapy phases. Mammography is performed during screening, and optional tissue and blood samples are collected for future studies. Throughout the study, participants are monitored through various assessments including imaging, physical exams, laboratory tests, and quality of life questionnaires focusing on fatigue and physical and mental health. Researchers track breast cancer event-free survival and other outcomes such as treatment side effects and response rates. After completing treatment, patients are followed for up to 10 years or until death to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of adding cemiplimab, an immunotherapy drug that blocks the PD-1 pathway to help the immune system attack tumor cells, to the usual treatment of docetaxel and ramucirumab in patients with stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. This phase II/III Expanded Lung-MAP trial compares cemiplimab combined with docetaxel and ramucirumab versus docetaxel and ramucirumab alone, aiming to improve treatment outcomes in patients who previously received platinum chemotherapy and immunotherapy but developed resistance or disease progression. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms. In Arm I, patients receive dexamethasone orally twice daily on days 0-2, ramucirumab and docetaxel intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. In Arm II, patients receive the same treatments plus cemiplimab intravenously on day 1 of each cycle. Treatment cycles continue every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Throughout the study, patients undergo regular blood sample collection and imaging scans such as CT or MRI to monitor disease status. During the study, participants are closely monitored with scans, blood tests, and physical exams to assess overall survival and other outcomes like progression-free survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Researchers also collect blood samples for future molecular studies. After completing treatment, patients are followed up every 3 to 6 months for up to 3 years to track long-term survival and health status. The study measures overall survival from randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 3 years.

Researchers are evaluating an Internet-based pain coping skills program combined with enhanced usual care to see if it improves pain severity and pain interference among adult cancer survivors experiencing persistent cancer-related pain. The study also investigates how this program affects opioid and other pain medication use, quality of life, self-confidence in managing pain, and other factors such as fatigue, sleep, emotional distress, and cognitive function. The study plans to enroll 250 participants who have had invasive cancer treated with surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or other therapies. Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to either receive the 8-session Internet-based pain management program along with enhanced usual care or receive enhanced usual care alone. The program is designed to help participants better manage their cancer-related pain through online sessions. Each participant will be involved for about 9 months, from the initial randomization to the final follow-up assessment at week 34. During the study, participants will complete assessments evaluating pain severity and pain interference using the Brief Pain Inventory. Researchers will also measure medication use, quality of life, pain management confidence, and other health factors through questionnaires and interviews. Participants are expected to complete follow-up assessments at 22 and 34 weeks. The study includes monitoring for safety and adherence to the pain management program, and those without reliable internet access may receive tablets to participate.