Biddeford

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of a new medicine called NNC0487-0111 in people who have Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction HFpEF or Heart Failure with mildly reduced Ejection Fraction HFmrEF and excess body weight. This phase 3 clinical trial aims to find out if NNC0487-0111 is safe and effective for treating these conditions compared to a placebo. Participants have HFpEF or HFmrEF and a body mass index of 30 or above. The study is sponsored by Novo Nordisk AS and uses a randomized, quadruple-masked design. Participants will receive either NNC0487-0111 or a matching placebo by injection under the skin once a week. The NNC0487-0111 is given in increasing doses over time. The study is parallel in design, meaning participants are randomly assigned to one of the two groups and receive that treatment throughout the trial. This treatment period extends for up to about 165 weeks. The study evaluates the time to certain heart failure events, hospitalizations, cardiovascular deaths, and other major cardiovascular events. During the study, participants will be monitored regularly to assess heart failure outcomes and kidney function, as well as quality of life using questionnaires like the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Safety and effectiveness are assessed through hospital visits, heart failure event tracking, and blood tests including kidney function and blood sugar levels. The total participation spans over three years, with ongoing evaluations to measure the time to heart failure events and cardiovascular outcomes. Participants receive close medical monitoring throughout the study period.

Researchers are studying adults newly diagnosed with breast, colorectal, melanoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or non-small cell lung cancer who are planning to receive systemic cancer therapies such as chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors ICIs. The study aims to understand how cannabis and cannabinoid use relates to cancer-related symptoms over one year. This observational research includes patients treated in community oncology clinics and is sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Participants complete surveys and allow medical record reviews throughout the study. The study tracks cannabis and cannabinoid use as well as perceived benefits, harms, and adverse effects monthly for 12 months following enrollment. An optional sub-study is available at select sites for patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving specific chemotherapy with ICIs. During the study, participants fill out monthly surveys about their symptoms and cannabis use. Researchers also review medical records to assess cancer-related symptoms and treatment progress. The main measure is cancer-related symptoms assessed monthly for up to one year. Secondary measures include cannabis use patterns and adverse effects. Participation involves ongoing survey completion and record review, with the total study duration lasting 12 months post-enrollment.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from people with and without cancer to help evaluate new tests that could detect cancer early. This study aims to create a set of blinded blood samples from both cancer and non-cancer patients to validate these tests, focusing on multiple cancer types and stages. The goal is to improve early cancer detection through laboratory research. Participants complete a questionnaire at the start and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Those diagnosed with cancer may also have tissue samples collected at these times. The study includes patients with various cancer types and stages, as well as individuals without cancer, with some allowing enrollment before full cancer confirmation under specific conditions. During the study, researchers review the collected samples and questionnaire data to assess test performance by tumor type and clinical stage at diagnosis. Participants are followed for one year after completing the study. Key measurements include the provision of a blinded reference set of cancer versus non-cancer blood samples to support future clinical trials focused on blood-based multi-cancer early detection.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or Stage III colon cancer based on the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA ctDNA after surgery. This Phase IIIII trial explores whether ctDNA status can help guide decisions about the need for adjuvant chemotherapy and identify the optimal chemotherapy regimen for those at high risk of recurrence. Circulating tumor DNA is a promising biomarker that may detect microscopic residual cancer cells that traditional methods might miss. Participants are assigned to groups based on their ctDNA results after surgery. Those without detectable ctDNA ctDNA- may undergo serial monitoring without treatment or receive different chemotherapy regimens such as mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX for 3 to 6 months. Patients with detectable ctDNA ctDNA who have a higher risk of recurrence are randomized to receive either standard chemotherapy regimens like mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX for 6 months or a more intensive regimen called mFOLFIRINOX for 6 months. Central ctDNA testing is performed using the Signatera test to guide these assignments. During the study, participants have blood samples collected for ctDNA testing and undergo imaging scans to check for cancer recurrence. Researchers assess disease-free survival, overall survival, and chemotherapy compliance over several years. The study includes monitoring for safety and treatment effects, with follow-up planned for up to 5 years after randomization. Participants health status, laboratory tests, and tumor markers are regularly evaluated throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are studying premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, focusing on tumors with specific gene recurrence scores. The trial aims to find out if adding chemotherapy to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy improves invasive breast cancer-free survival compared to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy alone. This Phase III trial addresses the need for better treatments in younger women, given their higher risk and past conflicting study results on ovarian suppression and chemotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving ovarian function suppression combined with an aromatase inhibitor for five years, and the other receiving adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same ovarian function suppression and aromatase inhibitor regimen. Choices for the aromatase inhibitor and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist are made by the investigator, with options including drugs such as goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin. Endocrine treatment beyond five years is at the investigators discretion, and bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. During the study, participants are monitored over 11 years from randomization, with measurements including invasive breast cancer-free survival as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include disease-free survival, overall survival, recurrence intervals, menopausal symptoms, and pain during aromatase inhibitor therapy. Safety and treatment effects are assessed through regular evaluations, and participants continue to be followed long term to understand the impact of treatments on their breast cancer outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating a master screening protocol called Lung-MAP for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. This phase IIIII trial aims to develop a genomic screening method for large cancer populations and assign participants to appropriate sub-studies based on specific cancer biomarkers. The goal is to compare new targeted therapies designed to block cancer growth or spread with standard care, including sub-studies for patients not eligible for biomarker-driven treatments. The study involves screening patient specimens to determine eligibility for various biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies within the Lung-MAP umbrella protocol. This is a screening study without direct interventions instead, patients are assigned to different treatment sub-studies, each operating independently. The protocol also includes an optional ancillary study evaluating attitudes about the return of somatic mutation findings suggestive of germline mutations. Participants provide tumor tissue for biomarker testing, including molecular profiling and PD-L1 analysis, and may submit fresh biopsies and blood samples for circulating tumor DNA testing. Researchers will monitor screening success rates up to three years and collect patient and physician feedback on genetic findings. Participation involves signing informed consent, providing smoking history, and possibly completing surveys. The study duration and assessments vary depending on sub-study assignment and patient progression.

Researchers are investigating targeted therapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration FDA for patients with advanced cancers that have specific genetic changes. This study, called the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry TAPUR Study, aims to understand how safely and effectively these targeted drugs work when prescribed in real-world settings for cancers with actionable genomic variants. The study also collects data on molecular testing choices and helps generate ideas for future clinical trials. Participants receive one of several FDA-approved targeted anticancer drugs, chosen based on specific genetic features of their tumors. These drugs include palbociclib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, trastuzumab with pertuzumab, vemurafenib with cobimetinib, regorafenib, olaparib, nivolumab with ipilimumab, abemaciclib, talazoparib, atezolizumab with talazoparib, tucatinib with trastuzumab, futibatinib, dabrafenib with trametinib, and fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki. Each treatment follows the approved dosing schedule and duration. Different genetic alterations qualify patients for different drugs, and the study covers a wide range of tumor types, including advanced solid tumors, multiple myeloma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including physical exams and imaging tests to measure tumor response using standard criteria. The main outcome measured is the percentage of patients with tumor shrinkage or stable disease after 16 weeks of treatment. Researchers also monitor overall survival for up to three years. Safety and organ function are closely tracked through laboratory tests. Participants must provide informed consent and meet specific eligibility criteria, including measurable disease and acceptable organ function. The study does not use random assignment, and results are shared publicly as they become available and at study completion.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of pembrolizumab immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy for patients with stage IIA, IIB, IIIA, or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that has been completely removed by surgery. This phase III trial aims to compare disease-free survival and overall survival among different treatment approaches, including chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. The study also assesses quality of life and adverse event rates in these patient groups. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups. One group receives only chemotherapy with observation afterward. The other two groups receive chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. Chemotherapy involves one of four platinum doublet regimens administered every 21 days for four cycles, depending on the physicians choice. Pembrolizumab is given intravenously over 25-40 minutes, either after chemotherapy or alongside it, repeated every 21 days or every 6 weeks for multiple cycles. Patients also undergo heart ultrasound, MRI, CT scans, and blood sample collections as part of the study. During the trial, participants have regular medical assessments including imaging and blood tests to monitor their health. Follow-up visits occur 6 weeks after treatment, then every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for years 2-4, and annually up to 10 years from randomization. Researchers measure disease-free survival as the main outcome, tracking the time until cancer recurrence or death. They also evaluate overall survival, side effects, drug tolerability, and patient-reported quality of life over time.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of adding durvalumab, an immunotherapy drug, to chemotherapy before surgery in patients with high-grade upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. This phase IIIII clinical trial aims to compare outcomes between patients receiving chemotherapy alone and those receiving chemotherapy combined with durvalumab. The study focuses on improving event-free survival and pathologic complete response rates before surgery. Participants are assigned to one of three groups based on eligibility for cisplatin chemotherapy. Cisplatin-eligible patients are randomized to receive either durvalumab with accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin aMVAC chemotherapy, or aMVAC chemotherapy alone. Cisplatin-ineligible patients receive durvalumab combined with gemcitabine. Treatments are given intravenously in cycles every 14 or 21 days for up to four cycles. Surgery is scheduled within 21 to 60 days following treatment completion for patients without metastatic or unresectable disease. During the study, participants undergo tissue biopsies, blood sample collection, and imaging scans such as CT or MRI to monitor their cancer. After treatment and surgery, follow-up visits occur within 30 days and then every 3 to 6 months for up to five years. Researchers measure event-free survival, pathologic complete response, overall survival, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, kidney function, and safety outcomes throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding stereotactic ablative radiotherapy SABR to standard immunotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic or unresectable renal cell carcinoma that cannot be surgically removed. This phase II trial compares SABR combined with immunotherapy against immunotherapy alone. The study focuses on nephrectomy and radiographic progression-free survival as primary measures and also assesses safety, response rates, overall survival, and other outcomes over up to 8 years. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives standard immunotherapy regimens, including combinations of drugs such as nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, avelumab, axitinib, cabozantinib, or lenvatinib administered intravenously or orally at specified intervals. The other group receives SABR on three days over 1 to 3 weeks plus the same immunotherapy options. Imaging scans such as CT or MRI, and sometimes bone scans and blood collections, are done throughout the trial. Participants undergo regular assessments including imaging and blood tests to monitor the cancers response and safety of treatments. After treatment completion, follow-up visits occur every 6 months for 5 years, then annually for 3 more years, totaling up to 8 years of monitoring. Researchers measure outcomes such as progression-free survival, response rates, nephrectomy rates, and adverse events during this time to evaluate the treatments.