Midland

Researchers are evaluating ziltivekimab, a new medicine not yet approved anywhere, to see if it can help people who were hospitalized due to a heart attack. The study aims to find out if ziltivekimab can reduce the development of heart disease and prevent future heart attacks or strokes. This is a Phase 3 clinical trial comparing ziltivekimab to a placebo in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Participants will receive an initial loading dose of ziltivekimab or matching placebo by injection under the skin as soon as possible after an invasive heart procedure, within 36 hours for STEMI or 48 hours for NSTEMI patients. After the loading dose, they will get monthly injections of the same study medicine for up to two years, in addition to their standard care. During the study, participants will be monitored for major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death. Researchers will also track other heart-related outcomes and safety measures over a period of up to 25 months. The study involves regular visits for injections, assessments, and laboratory tests to evaluate the medicines effects and patient health throughout the trial.

Researchers are studying adults newly diagnosed with breast, colorectal, melanoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or non-small cell lung cancer who are planning to receive systemic cancer therapies such as chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors ICIs. The study aims to understand how cannabis and cannabinoid use relates to cancer-related symptoms over one year. This observational research includes patients treated in community oncology clinics and is sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Participants complete surveys and allow medical record reviews throughout the study. The study tracks cannabis and cannabinoid use as well as perceived benefits, harms, and adverse effects monthly for 12 months following enrollment. An optional sub-study is available at select sites for patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving specific chemotherapy with ICIs. During the study, participants fill out monthly surveys about their symptoms and cannabis use. Researchers also review medical records to assess cancer-related symptoms and treatment progress. The main measure is cancer-related symptoms assessed monthly for up to one year. Secondary measures include cannabis use patterns and adverse effects. Participation involves ongoing survey completion and record review, with the total study duration lasting 12 months post-enrollment.

This research evaluates telerehabilitation compared to in-office care for individuals with low vision who use magnification devices or visual assistive mobile apps. The study aims to improve quality of life by enhancing daily activities like reading. It also explores using Bluetooth low energy beacon sensors to monitor device use and detect if patients stop using their magnification devices, helping provide timely rehabilitation support. This study is conducted by the University of California, Los Angeles, focusing on adults with vision loss from various ocular diseases. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive follow-up training either remotely through videoconferencing or in-person at a clinic. Training involves evaluation and use of magnification or visual assistive devices such as hand-held optical magnifiers, portable electronic video magnifiers, or high near add powers. The study includes multiple follow-up visits over about one year, with sessions and training tailored to device use and rehabilitation needs. During the study, participants will complete various reading tests and satisfaction surveys at baseline and at intervals up to 13 months. Researchers will monitor how often and how long participants use their magnification devices, and informant surveys will be collected from close acquaintances to assess progress. Outcome measures include the Activity Inventory and several reading assessments. The study also collects environmental data via sensors to track device adherence. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the study period to evaluate changes and support rehabilitation.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from people with and without cancer to help evaluate new tests that could detect cancer early. This study aims to create a set of blinded blood samples from both cancer and non-cancer patients to validate these tests, focusing on multiple cancer types and stages. The goal is to improve early cancer detection through laboratory research. Participants complete a questionnaire at the start and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Those diagnosed with cancer may also have tissue samples collected at these times. The study includes patients with various cancer types and stages, as well as individuals without cancer, with some allowing enrollment before full cancer confirmation under specific conditions. During the study, researchers review the collected samples and questionnaire data to assess test performance by tumor type and clinical stage at diagnosis. Participants are followed for one year after completing the study. Key measurements include the provision of a blinded reference set of cancer versus non-cancer blood samples to support future clinical trials focused on blood-based multi-cancer early detection.

This research aims to establish a national biorepository by collecting research data and samples from patients who experience side effects from immunotherapy treatments used in cancer care. It focuses on patients who have serious immune-related reactions, rare infections, or accelerated tumor growth after receiving immuno-oncology therapies. The goal is to help researchers better predict, prevent, and treat these side effects in the future. Participants will have tissue and blood samples collected within 72 hours after confirmation of a serious immune-related side effect and again one month later. For patients experiencing colitis, stool samples may also be collected. Alongside sample collection, medical records will be reviewed for up to one year. This study is observational and involves no experimental treatments. During the study, participants will provide biospecimens at two time points and allow access to their medical records for a year. Researchers will analyze these samples and clinical data to build a resource for future studies on immune-related adverse events. The main outcome is the establishment of this biorepository, which will be maintained for up to one year after enrollment.

This research aims to compare two methods of monitoring pancreatic cysts and to identify biomarkers that may help detect the risk of these cysts turning into pancreatic cancer. The study evaluates whether more frequent monitoring or less frequent monitoring leads to better patient outcomes and explores various blood and imaging biomarkers for improved risk prediction. Participants are observed through two different surveillance approaches that were previously randomized but are now closed to new enrollment. One approach involves lower intensity monitoring with MRI, CT, or endoscopic ultrasound EUS scans spaced out over years, while the other involves higher intensity monitoring with more frequent imaging based on cyst size. Throughout the study, patients may also provide blood samples and undergo biopsies, fine needle aspirations, or surgery as needed. Participants are followed up regularly for five years from registration, with imaging and blood tests at intervals depending on their assigned monitoring method. Researchers collect data on clinical features, anxiety, quality of life, financial distress, healthcare costs, and outcomes such as the development of concerning pancreatic cyst features or pancreatic cancer. The study uses these measures to assess the effectiveness of monitoring strategies and the predictive value of biomarkers.

Researchers are evaluating the use of the ClotTriever System compared to standard anticoagulation therapy for treating symptomatic unilateral iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis DVT. This trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study that aims to compare clinical outcomes between an interventional device strategy and conservative medical management. The study will enroll approximately 300 participants and collect detailed data on demographics, comorbidities, DVT diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcomes through a six-month follow-up. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups the ClotTriever Intervention Arm, where the ClotTriever System device is used for mechanical thrombectomy to restore and maintain vessel openness, or the Conservative Medical Management Arm, where patients receive anticoagulation therapy alone with medications such as heparin, warfarin, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. The study compares these two approaches to determine their effects on treatment outcomes in symptomatic unilateral iliofemoral DVT. During the study, participants will undergo assessments including clinical evaluations at specified time points up to 180 days to measure a composite clinical endpoint using a win ratio method. Additional evaluations will include assessment of post-thrombotic syndrome severity and monitoring for safety and treatment effects. Participants must be willing and able to attend follow-up visits over the six-month period to provide data for the studys outcome measures.

Researchers are evaluating two digital mindfulness-based interventions to improve mental health and well-being in younger breast cancer survivors who have elevated depressive symptoms. This phase III randomized trial focuses on women diagnosed at or before age 50, who completed primary cancer treatments at least six months earlier. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of live instructor-led sessions via Zoom and a self-paced app-based program, exploring which approach best supports psychological health in this population. Participants will be assigned to one of three groups the live online mindfulness sessions MAPs LO conducted weekly for 6 weeks via Zoom, the MAPs App delivering the same content in shorter sessions over 6 weeks, or a meditation-only control group accessing guided audio meditations. Both English and Spanish speakers can participate in the live online and meditation groups, while the app is only available in English. Tablets and internet hotspots are provided if needed. All groups have access to the UCLA MARC mindfulness meditation app throughout the 6-month follow-up. During the study, participants will attend weekly sessions for the live group or engage with app content at home, with usage tracked to measure intervention dose. Researchers will assess depressive symptoms shortly after the intervention and again up to 6 months later, along with fatigue symptoms. They will also investigate factors influencing intervention effects, such as baseline distress and social determinants, and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the programs. The total study duration includes a 6-week intervention period plus follow-up assessments out to 6 months.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of dalcetrapib on cardiovascular risk in people recently hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome ACS who have a specific genetic profile AA genotype. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study focuses on adults aged 45 years and older, aiming to assess the time to first occurrence of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction over an average of 30 months from randomization. The study will continue until around 200 participants experience a primary event, or until stopped at an interim analysis. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either dalcetrapib 600 mg daily, two 300 mg tablets or matching placebo tablets once daily. Screening includes genetic testing for the AA genotype using a specialized Genotype Assay Test. Enrollment can begin during hospitalization or after discharge, but randomization must occur within 12 weeks of the ACS event. After randomization, follow-up visits will be virtual when possible or in clinic every three months until the study ends. Assessments will continue every three months for participants who stop the study medication early. Participants will undergo medical history review and genetic testing before enrollment. During the study, researchers will monitor cardiovascular events such as heart attacks and strokes through regular assessments every three months. Safety evaluations and collection of study endpoints will continue for the duration of participation, which may last approximately 30 months or until the study stops. This includes ongoing monitoring for adverse effects and overall health status.

Researchers are studying premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer that is estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, focusing on tumors with specific gene recurrence scores. The trial aims to find out if adding chemotherapy to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy improves invasive breast cancer-free survival compared to ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy alone. This Phase III trial addresses the need for better treatments in younger women, given their higher risk and past conflicting study results on ovarian suppression and chemotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving ovarian function suppression combined with an aromatase inhibitor for five years, and the other receiving adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same ovarian function suppression and aromatase inhibitor regimen. Choices for the aromatase inhibitor and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist are made by the investigator, with options including drugs such as goserelin, leuprolide, or triptorelin. Endocrine treatment beyond five years is at the investigators discretion, and bilateral oophorectomy may be used instead of ovarian suppression if preferred. During the study, participants are monitored over 11 years from randomization, with measurements including invasive breast cancer-free survival as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include disease-free survival, overall survival, recurrence intervals, menopausal symptoms, and pain during aromatase inhibitor therapy. Safety and treatment effects are assessed through regular evaluations, and participants continue to be followed long term to understand the impact of treatments on their breast cancer outcomes.