New Baltimore

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of two different doses of remibrutinib compared to a placebo in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). This phase 3 study aims to determine how well remibrutinib works in treating this chronic skin condition characterized by painful abscesses and inflammatory nodules. The study lasts a total of 76 weeks and includes several phases: up to 4 weeks for screening, followed by a 16-week double-blind treatment period where participants receive either remibrutinib Dose A, Dose B, or a matching placebo. After this, there is a 52-week treatment period where all participants receive remibrutinib (Dose A or Dose B). Finally, a 4-week safety follow-up period occurs without treatment. Participants who stop treatment early are encouraged to stay in the study and complete the safety follow-up. During the study, participants will be regularly assessed for clinical response to treatment, focusing on the proportion achieving a 50% improvement in HS symptoms by week 16. Researchers will monitor safety and tolerability throughout the study, including during the follow-up period. Various evaluations such as physical exams and clinical assessments will be conducted to measure treatment effects and ensure participant safety over the entire 76-week duration.

This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two different dose schedules of pegozafermin compared to a placebo in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) who have liver fibrosis at stage F2 or F3. This phase 3 study focuses on improving liver fibrosis and steatohepatitis in this patient group, which involves chronic liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction. Participants will receive either pegozafermin or a placebo through subcutaneous injections. The study compares two doses of pegozafermin to assess their impact on liver fibrosis and steatohepatitis. The treatment period lasts up to 52 weeks, with outcomes measured at this time point. During the study, participants will be monitored for improvements in liver fibrosis and resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening fibrosis by week 52. Researchers will also track the time until any disease progression occurs, up to 5 years. Throughout the trial, safety and efficacy will be carefully assessed through clinical evaluations and laboratory tests to ensure participant well-being.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, effectiveness, and tolerability of upadacitinib in adolescents and adults with severe alopecia areata (AA), a condition where the immune system attacks hair follicles causing hair loss on the head, face, or other body parts. This phase 3 study involves about 1500 participants worldwide and compares upadacitinib to a placebo to assess treatment impact on severe AA. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either upadacitinib or placebo oral tablets once daily for up to 160 weeks. There is a chance for re-randomization at weeks 24 and 52 based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores. Those completing initial studies may join an extension study to receive upadacitinib for up to an additional 108 weeks. Follow-up occurs for 30 days after the last dose. Throughout the study, participants attend regular visits at hospitals or clinics for medical assessments, blood tests, side effect monitoring, and questionnaires. Researchers measure the percentage of participants achieving a SALT score of 20 or less at week 24 and track adverse events up to 164 weeks. The study may involve a higher treatment burden compared to usual care due to frequent visits and evaluations.

Researchers are investigating multi-cancer detection (MCD) tests as a new way to screen for multiple cancers at once in adults aged 45 to 75 without cancer. This study is a feasibility trial called the Vanguard Study designed to explore how well these MCD tests work as cancer screening tools and to understand how patients and doctors decide on care based on the test results. The study will compare two different MCD tests to a control group, aiming to provide early information on their performance and impact. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: one group will have blood collected for the Shield MCD test, another for the Avantect MCD test, and a control group will have blood collected without MCD testing. Blood samples are collected at enrollment and again after one year. Some sites will share test results with participants, while others will keep results blinded. After the intervention period, participants will be followed passively for up to 10 years. During the study, participants complete baseline and follow-up questionnaires within 60 days, provide blood samples for MCD testing within 90 days, and allow researchers to collect health data from medical records. The study measures enrollment feasibility, follow-up completion, diagnostic resolution of abnormal results, test accuracy, and participant anxiety related to the testing process. Safety and long-term outcomes such as cancer incidence and mortality are also monitored throughout the study period.