Duluth

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of pulsed field ablation (PFA) therapy for treating persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) that does not respond to medication. The study compares PFA targeting pulmonary veins plus extra-PV sources identified by electrographic flow (EGF) mapping against PFA targeting pulmonary veins plus the left atrial posterior wall (PVI + PWA). The goal is to establish safety and to show that the new method is not less effective than the current approach in patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory PersAF. Participants will receive treatment using several devices, including the FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation System, the OptiMap System for electrogram analysis, and the FARAWAVE NAV Catheter combined with the Opal HDx Mapping System for detailed heart mapping. All subjects will undergo electroanatomical mapping of the entire left atrium, followed by pulsed field ablation of the pulmonary veins, with additional ablation of either EGF-identified sources or the posterior wall, depending on the assigned treatment group. During the study, participants will be monitored for safety outcomes at 60 days and effectiveness outcomes at 365 days. They will receive a LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor to track heart rhythm continuously. Researchers will collect clinical data, imaging, and follow-up assessments to evaluate treatment impact and safety. The study includes ongoing follow-up visits to ensure thorough monitoring of heart function and study outcomes over one year.

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study to see if it can reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-PLUS) in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study compares AZD0780 to a placebo and monitors participants from randomization until the primary analysis censoring date, followed by a final study closure visit. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 or an oral placebo once daily. The treatment period lasts until the primary analysis censoring date, after which a study closure visit will occur. The study is event-driven and designed to assess the time to the first major cardiovascular event during treatment. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with various assessments to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes and safety over approximately 54 months. Researchers will track the time to first event of any component of MACE-PLUS and collect data to assess the effect of AZD0780 compared to placebo. The study includes regular visits and evaluations to ensure participant safety and adherence to treatment.

Researchers are investigating whether treating children with amblyopia using spectacles and patching at the same time leads to similar vision improvement compared to treating first with spectacles alone and then adding patching if needed. This randomized Phase 3 trial focuses on children aged 3 to under 13 years who have not been treated for amblyopia before. The study looks at amblyopia caused by differences in eye focusing (anisometropia), eye misalignment (strabismus), or both. At the start, children's vision will be tested with trial glasses based on a recent eye exam. Eligible children will receive new glasses and return for a baseline visit after wearing them for at least 10 minutes to confirm eligibility. Then they will be randomly assigned to either the sequential group (glasses first, patching added if needed) or the simultaneous group (glasses and patching together). Follow-up visits will happen every 8 weeks for up to 56 weeks, with vision tested each time to track improvement or stability. Patching will be monitored using an occlusion dose monitor (ODM). Throughout the study, vision in the amblyopic eye will be regularly measured to assess changes. Participants will be categorized as improving or stable/worsening at each visit. Those with stable or worsening vision and remaining amblyopia in the sequential group will begin patching and continue follow-up visits. Treatment adjustments will be made based on investigator judgment. The main outcome is the average change in distance visual acuity in the amblyopic eye after 56 weeks of treatment. The study ends after the final 56-week visit.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with sacituzumab govitecan-hziy compared to the standard chemotherapy treatments in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. This Phase III trial focuses on cancers that have spread to nearby tissues, lymph nodes, or other parts of the body. The study aims to compare overall survival and other outcomes such as progression-free survival, response rates, clinical benefits, duration of response, and treatment toxicity between the two treatment approaches. Quality of life and fatigue are also assessed as secondary measures. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives standard of care chemotherapy, which may include carboplatin or cisplatin combined with gemcitabine, or alternatively docetaxel or paclitaxel, administered intravenously in cycles every 21 days for up to six cycles, unless the disease progresses or side effects become unacceptable. The other group receives sacituzumab govitecan-hziy intravenously on days 1 and 8, along with pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle, continuing for up to 35 cycles or two years, unless there is disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular blood sample collections and imaging scans using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to monitor their condition. Quality of life questionnaires are also completed to assess symptoms and fatigue over time. After treatment ends, patients are followed up 30 days later and then annually for up to five years to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety. The main outcome measured is overall survival from the time of randomization up to five years.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of plixorafenib, an oral drug, in people aged 10 years and older who have various types of cancers with specific BRAF genetic changes. These include locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors with BRAF fusions, and rare BRAF V600-mutated tumors such as melanoma, thyroid cancer, and recurrent CNS tumors. The study is a Phase 2 Master Protocol designed to assess this targeted therapy in multiple subgroups based on tumor type and genetic profile. Participants receive plixorafenib oral tablets, and the study includes several subprotocols tailored to different tumor types and BRAF alterations. Subprotocols A, B, and C focus on tumors with BRAF fusions or rare BRAF mutations, while Subprotocol D enrolls adults aged 18 to 65 with solid tumors harboring BRAF V600E mutations not eligible for other subprotocols. Before starting treatment, participants provide tumor tissue or blood samples for genetic testing and scans to monitor tumor changes. Some subprotocols require stable or decreasing corticosteroid doses before treatment. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular evaluations including imaging scans, biopsies, and laboratory tests to assess tumor response and drug levels. The main outcomes measured are the objective response rate for most subprotocols and pharmacokinetics for Subprotocol D, with follow-up lasting up to approximately four years. Safety monitoring includes tracking adverse events and ensuring recovery from prior treatments, with additional assessments for heart function and infection status as needed.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of active surveillance and chemotherapy treatments in pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with low risk and standard risk germ cell tumors. This phase III trial focuses on monitoring patients after tumor removal and comparing the outcomes of carboplatin-based versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens. The study aims to maintain high overall survival rates for low risk patients and to compare event-free survival between the two chemotherapy options in standard risk patients. Additional objectives include assessing side effects such as hearing loss and neuropathy, and exploring tumor marker changes and other biological measures related to treatment outcomes. Patients with low risk stage I germ cell tumors undergo surgery followed by observation, with the option to transfer to standard risk treatment if the tumor recurs. Those with standard risk tumors are randomly assigned to one of four chemotherapy regimens combining bleomycin, etoposide, carboplatin, or cisplatin. Treatments are given intravenously on specific schedules every 21 days for up to 3 or 4 cycles, depending on the group. Throughout the trial, patients receive imaging scans, blood tests, tumor biopsies if needed, and pulmonary function tests to monitor treatment response and side effects. Participants are closely followed after treatment completion with regular visits every 2 months for the first year, then less frequently up to 10 years. Researchers collect data through imaging, blood samples, lung tests, and questionnaires to measure survival, disease recurrence, and side effects like hearing loss. The study also includes exploratory analyses of tumor markers and patient-reported outcomes to better understand treatment impacts and improve future care for germ cell tumor patients.

Researchers are investigating the addition of an immunotherapy drug called durvalumab to standard chemotherapy treatment in patients with MammaPrint High 2 Risk (MP2) stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial aims to compare the effectiveness of usual chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy combined with durvalumab. Immunotherapy with durvalumab may help the immune system attack cancer cells and prevent tumor growth and spread, while chemotherapy drugs like paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide work to stop cancer cells from growing or dividing. Previous studies suggest patients with an MP2 result might respond better to this combined treatment approach. Participants first undergo MammaPrint testing to confirm MP2 status before randomization into two groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for 6 cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide intravenously on day 1 every 14 days for 4 cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule plus durvalumab intravenously over 60 minutes on specified cycles during both chemotherapy phases. Mammography is performed during screening, and optional tissue and blood samples are collected for future studies. Throughout the study, participants are monitored through various assessments including imaging, physical exams, laboratory tests, and quality of life questionnaires focusing on fatigue and physical and mental health. Researchers track breast cancer event-free survival and other outcomes such as treatment side effects and response rates. After completing treatment, patients are followed for up to 10 years or until death to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of nivolumab to the usual treatment of paclitaxel and ramucirumab in patients with advanced or locally unresectable stomach or esophageal adenocarcinoma. This phase II/III trial aims to determine if adding nivolumab improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared to paclitaxel and ramucirumab alone. The study also assesses response rates, disease control, safety, tolerability, and quality of life in participants with PD-L1 CPS 21 1 advanced gastric or esophageal cancer. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The first group receives nivolumab IV on day 1 of each 28-day cycle, ramucirumab IV on days 1 and 15, and paclitaxel IV on days 1, 8, and 15. The second group receives ramucirumab IV on days 1 and 15 and paclitaxel IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment continues every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Optional blood samples may be collected during the study. Imaging with CT and MRI is performed throughout. Participants undergo scans and assessments at baseline and during treatment to monitor cancer progression and treatment effects. They also complete questionnaires on quality of life and symptoms. After treatment ends, participants are followed up at 30, 60, and 90 days and then every 6 months for up to 3 years. Researchers measure progression-free survival and overall survival as primary outcomes, along with other safety and patient-reported measures.