Duluth

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 at levels of 1% or higher. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study aims to compare these treatments to improve outcomes for this patient group. Participants will receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab, each given intravenously on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle, combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy either carboplatin or cisplatin also given on Day 1 of each cycle for up to four cycles. After chemotherapy cycles, patients continue with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab monotherapy combined with pemetrexed maintenance. The study follows patients for up to approximately six years to monitor treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size, blood tests to evaluate organ function, and questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life. Researchers monitor overall survival and progression-free survival as primary outcomes, alongside other measures such as response duration and physical functioning. Safety is closely observed throughout, with study visits scheduled regularly during treatment and follow-up periods, lasting up to six years in total.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig combined with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer mNSCLC whose tumors express programmed death-ligand 1 PD-L1. This Phase III global study focuses on patients with PD-L1 tumor cell expression of 1% or higher and aims to determine which treatment provides better overall and progression-free survival. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two study groups one group will receive rilvegostomig plus carboplatin and either paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy, while the other group will receive pembrolizumab plus the same chemotherapy options. Rilvegostomig and pembrolizumab are both given intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, with chemotherapy given up to 4 cycles. Nab-paclitaxel may be administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment continues with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab until disease progression or other criteria are met. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response, laboratory tests to monitor organ function, and patient questionnaires about physical function and quality of life. Researchers will track overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, and duration of response for up to approximately 6 years. Safety and immune response to rilvegostomig will also be evaluated. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study. This trial focuses on patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ASCVD or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study aims to assess how AZD0780 compares to placebo in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, also known as MACE-PLUS, over the course of the trial. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 once daily or a matching placebo once daily. The study continues until a primary analysis censoring date, which may be up to approximately 54 months from randomization. After this, a study closure visit will be conducted as the final visit for each participant. During the study, participants will be regularly monitored for cardiovascular events including heart attacks, strokes, urgent coronary revascularizations, and other related outcomes. Researchers will track the time to first occurrence of these events as the primary outcome. Safety and other secondary outcomes like all-cause mortality will also be assessed. The total participation time can last up to about 54 months, with ongoing evaluations throughout this period.

This research aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of oral restorative microbiota therapy RMT in patients experiencing steroid-refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-related colitis IMDC. IMDC is a common side effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors used to treat solid tumors, causing significant discomfort and affecting quality of life. Current treatments include steroids and immunosuppressive agents, but data on these treatments for steroid-resistant cases is limited, and new options are needed. Evidence suggests that gut microbial diversity plays a role in both immune therapy effectiveness and side effects, and early case studies have shown promise for fecal microbiota transplant in refractory IMDC. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral RMT capsules or placebo capsules. The RMT treatment involves a loading dose on day 1 with about 5 x 10 bacteria, followed by daily doses for 6 days containing 2 x 10 bacteria. Placebo capsules look identical and follow the same schedule. Capsules are self-administered on an empty stomach with water, and food can be eaten two hours after. This is a double-blind, randomized study lasting for 7 days of treatment with follow-up. During the study, participants will be monitored for safety and feasibility of RMT over 6 months. Researchers will assess clinical remission at days 10 and 30, and track the time to remission up to 180 days. Participants will undergo regular health evaluations, laboratory tests, and symptom assessments. The study will also monitor the impact of the treatment on participants immune-related colitis symptoms and overall condition throughout the follow-up period.

This research aims to compare two approaches for treating previously untreated amblyopia in children aged 3 to under 13 years. It evaluates whether using glasses and patching at the same time leads to similar improvements in vision as first using glasses alone, followed by patching only if needed. The trial focuses on children with amblyopia caused by differences in eye alignment or prescription errors. Children will be assigned randomly to one of two treatment groups one group will wear glasses full-time and add patching for 2 hours daily only if there is no improvement after glasses alone the other group will wear glasses and patch the weaker eye for 2 hours daily at the same time from the start. Vision tests will be done at baseline and follow-up visits every 8 weeks for up to 56 weeks. Participants will have their distance visual acuity measured with trial frames before and after getting their glasses to confirm eligibility. During the study, vision will be monitored to classify improvement or stability, guiding whether patching is needed in the sequential group. Outcomes include changes in vision clarity after 56 weeks and quality-of-life assessments. Regular visits help track progress and safety until study completion.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with sacituzumab govitecan-hziy compared to standard chemotherapy treatments in patients with advanced urothelial cancer that has spread locally or to other parts of the body. This phase III trial focuses on patients whose cancer has not responded to prior anti-PDL1 therapy. The study aims to compare overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, duration of response, treatment side effects, and quality of life between the new combination therapy and usual chemotherapy care. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives standard chemotherapy options such as carboplatin or cisplatin with gemcitabine, or alternatively docetaxel or paclitaxel, given intravenously in 21-day cycles for up to six cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable side effects. The other group receives pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 and sacituzumab govitecan-hziy intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for up to 35 cycles or two years, unless disease progresses or side effects become unacceptable. Both groups undergo blood tests and imaging scans like CT or MRI throughout the study. During the trial, participants will have regular assessments including blood sample collection and imaging to monitor their cancer status and treatment effects. Researchers will also evaluate patient-reported quality of life and fatigue at multiple time points up to 12 months. After completing treatment, participants are followed up 30 days later and then annually for five years to track survival and health outcomes. This comprehensive approach helps researchers understand both the clinical outcomes and the impact on patients well-being over time.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of adding intensity-modulated post-operative radiation therapy I-PORT to standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC who still have lymph node cancer after surgery. This phase II trial aims to see if I-PORT improves disease-free survival and whether it increases serious heart or lung side effects compared to standard care alone. The study also looks at overall survival, cancer control, and patient-reported symptoms related to heart and lung health. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy alone, continuing treatment if the cancer does not progress or side effects are manageable. The other group receives I-PORT once daily Monday through Friday for 5 to 6 weeks, starting 4 to 12 weeks after surgery, followed by the same standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Imaging scans and blood samples are collected during treatment in both groups. After completing treatment, participants are followed for five years with check-ups every three months for two years, then every six months for three years. During these visits, researchers assess disease recurrence, survival, side effects, and patient symptoms. The study uses various scans including CT, MRI, and FDG-PET, along with blood tests, to monitor participants health and treatment impact over time.

This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of plixorafenib in participants with cancers that have specific BRAF gene alterations. These include locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, primary central nervous system tumors, and rare BRAF V600E-mutated solid tumors such as anaplastic thyroid, ovarian, and cholangiocarcinoma cancers. The study focuses on participants with BRAF V600E mutations or BRAF fusions and seeks to understand treatment effects across various cancer types. Participants receive plixorafenib orally in continuous 3-week cycles. Dosing may be increased as tolerated and continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or withdrawal for other reasons. The study includes different subprotocols tailored to tumor type and BRAF alteration, such as unresectable solid tumors with BRAF fusions, recurrent primary CNS tumors with BRAF V600E mutations, rare non-CNS solid tumors with BRAF V600E mutations, and other advanced solid tumors with BRAF V600E mutations. Participants will undergo scans before starting treatment to assess tumor changes, and regular monitoring will continue during treatment. Researchers will evaluate tumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment safety, and drug levels in the blood over up to approximately four years. The study tracks side effects and collects detailed pharmacokinetic data to understand how the drug is processed. Participants remain in the study until disease progression or other withdrawal criteria are met, with ongoing safety and efficacy assessments.

This trial investigates monitoring and treatment options for patients with low risk and standard risk metastatic germ cell tumors, which are cancers that start in the cells that produce sperm or eggs. The study aims to find out if active surveillance after surgical removal of low risk tumors can maintain high survival rates, and whether carboplatin or cisplatin chemotherapy works better for treating standard risk tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults. Patients with low risk tumors undergo observation after surgery and may transfer to a standard risk treatment arm if the tumor recurs. Those with standard risk tumors are randomly assigned to receive one of two chemotherapy regimens one containing carboplatin, bleomycin, and etoposide, or the other containing cisplatin, bleomycin, and etoposide. Treatments are given intravenously in cycles every 21 days for up to 3 or 4 cycles depending on the group. Throughout the study, patients have imaging scans, blood tests, tumor biopsies, and pulmonary function tests to monitor response and side effects. Participants are followed closely during treatment and afterward with regular check-ups including CT, MRI, and chest X-rays, as well as blood sample collections. Follow-up visits occur every 2 months for the first year, then every 3-6 months up to 2 years, every 6 months for years 3 to 5, and annually up to 10 years. Researchers measure overall survival, event-free survival, hearing loss, body composition, tumor markers, and patient-reported outcomes related to hearing and neuropathy. This long-term monitoring helps assess the effects and safety of chemotherapy and surveillance strategies.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding the immunotherapy drug durvalumab to the usual chemotherapy regimen can improve outcomes for patients with MammaPrint High 2 Risk MP2 stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial focuses on comparing breast cancer event-free survival and other measures between patients receiving chemotherapy alone and those receiving chemotherapy with durvalumab. Immunotherapy may help enhance the bodys immune response against cancer, while chemotherapy works to stop tumor growth in various ways. Participants are first tested for MP2 status using MammaPrint on previously collected tissue. Those with MP2 results are randomized into two groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for six cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide intravenously every 14 days for four cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule combined with durvalumab given intravenously over 60 minutes on specific cycles. Mammography and optional tumor tissue and blood sample collections occur during the study. During the study, participants undergo assessments including mammography, tumor biopsies, blood tests, and quality-of-life questionnaires. Researchers measure outcomes such as event-free survival, response rates, relapse-free survival, overall survival, treatment side effects, and patient-reported fatigue and physical health. After treatment completion, participants are followed for up to 10 years to monitor long-term outcomes and survival. Specimens are also banked for future research.