Woodbury

This research aims to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of the FDA-approved eCoin4 implanted tibial nerve stimulator in people with overactive bladder (OAB) who experience urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). The study is prospective, involves multiple centers, and follows a single group of participants to understand how the device performs in real-world use. Participants will receive an implant of the eCoin device, which provides subcutaneous stimulation to the tibial nerve. This stimulation is intended to help manage urgency urinary incontinence. The treatment involves implanting the device and then monitoring participants over time to evaluate its safety and effectiveness. Throughout the study, participants will complete voiding diaries and quality of life questionnaires during follow-up visits that extend up to 5 years. Researchers will monitor safety by tracking any device- or procedure-related adverse events and measure effectiveness by assessing responder rates at 12 and 24 months. The study includes ongoing evaluations of safety data even after reimplantation when applicable, ensuring comprehensive long-term monitoring.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding tucatinib to trastuzumab and mFOLFOX6 works better than the current standard treatments for people with HER2 positive metastatic colorectal cancer. This study focuses on participants whose cancer has spread or cannot be removed by surgery. The trial also monitors side effects that might occur from taking these drug combinations. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives tucatinib taken orally twice daily along with trastuzumab given intravenously every three weeks and mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy every two weeks. The other group receives standard care, which includes mFOLFOX6 alone or combined with bevacizumab or cetuximab given by intravenous infusion. The study treatments continue as per the assigned schedule. During the study, participants undergo regular scans and evaluations to measure progression-free survival and other outcomes up to approximately three years. Researchers also assess overall survival, response rates, duration of response, quality of life, and side effects for up to about six years. Safety monitoring continues for around one year after the last treatment. Participants are closely followed to understand the impact of these treatments on their cancer and well-being.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs, brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, to the standard chemotherapy treatment with or without radiation improves survival in patients with early-stage (stage I and II) classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares the standard treatment alone to the combination with immunotherapy. The study also aims to assess differences in side effects, quality of life, and long-term health outcomes among patients receiving these treatments. All patients start by receiving two cycles of ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days, followed by imaging to assess their early response. Based on their risk status and response, they are placed into groups receiving different treatments: some continue with standard chemotherapy, while others receive the immunotherapy drugs with or without radiation. Treatments are given intravenously on specific days and cycles, and patients undergo various scans and blood tests throughout the trial. Participants are closely monitored with periodic imaging tests such as PET, CT, MRI scans, and blood sample collections. Follow-up visits occur every three months for the first year, then less frequently up to 12 years to track progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment side effects, fatigue, cognitive function, and quality of life. Researchers also study tumor metabolism, patient-reported outcomes, and the impact of social factors on treatment results.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with BRAF-V600 mutant melanoma that has spread to the brain. This phase II trial compares two combinations: encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab. The study aims to determine which approach is more effective at shrinking and controlling brain metastases, and it also examines survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group takes encorafenib daily by mouth, binimetinib twice daily by mouth, and receives nivolumab through an intravenous (IV) infusion every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab IV every cycle and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes during the first four cycles, with cycles repeating every 21 days initially, then every 28 days. Treatment continues unless disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. Participants undergo brain MRI scans before enrollment and throughout the study to assess tumor response using specific criteria. After completing treatment, patients are followed every six months for two years, then yearly up to three years. The study collects tissue, blood, spinal fluid, and stool samples for future research. Researchers monitor progression-free survival as the main outcome, along with overall survival, response rates, and treatment side effects.

Researchers are evaluating two surgical procedures to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 gene mutations. This trial compares bilateral salpingectomy, which removes the fallopian tubes, with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which removes both fallopian tubes and ovaries. The study aims to see if the less extensive surgery is nearly as effective at lowering cancer risk and assesses effects on quality of life, menopausal symptoms, sexual function, and medical decision making. Participants choose between two groups: one undergoing bilateral salpingectomy with possible delayed removal of ovaries, and the other undergoing immediate removal of both fallopian tubes and ovaries. Before surgery, patients have pelvic or transvaginal ultrasounds or pelvic MRIs and blood samples collected. Follow-up visits occur at 10 to 60 days, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, then annually for up to 20 years. During the study, researchers will monitor the development of ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers over 20 years. They will also assess quality of life, cancer-related distress, menopausal and estrogen deprivation symptoms, sexual dysfunction, medical decision making, and adverse events up to 24 months after surgery. Blood samples and tissue are collected for future research. The long-term follow-up helps understand both cancer risk and patient well-being after surgery.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of the study medicine PF-07248144 combined with fulvestrant for treating hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This study focuses on participants whose breast cancer has worsened after prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapy. The trial compares PF-07248144 plus fulvestrant to the current standard treatment involving everolimus and endocrine therapy. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will take PF-07248144 tablets daily at home in 28-day cycles along with fulvestrant injections administered at the clinic. The other group will receive everolimus tablets daily plus either exemestane tablets or fulvestrant injections, based on the study doctor's choice. Treatments will continue according to the schedule for each participant. During the study, participants will undergo regular evaluations including scans to measure tumor response, lab tests, electrocardiograms, and monitoring of side effects. Researchers will track progression-free survival up to about two years, as well as overall survival and response duration up to about five years. Safety and drug levels will also be monitored throughout and after treatment. The total duration of participation may span several years depending on individual outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the medicine PF-08046054 compared to the standard treatment docetaxel for adults with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has PD-L1 expression of 1% or higher. This study focuses on participants whose cancer has spread or cannot be removed by surgery or treated with radiation, and who have progressed after treatment with PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitors, platinum chemotherapy, and targeted therapies when applicable. The study is a randomized, phase 3 trial sponsored by Pfizer. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either PF-08046054 or docetaxel. Those in the PF-08046054 group will have an intravenous infusion twice every 21 days, while those in the docetaxel group will receive one infusion every 21 days. Treatment may continue for up to five years if the cancer responds well. The treatments are given in cycles with close monitoring. During the study, participants will visit the clinic regularly for evaluations to monitor their health and response to the study treatments. Researchers will assess overall survival over about five years and track disease progression, response rates, duration of response, and quality of life measures. Safety will be monitored through adverse event reporting for up to 90 days after treatment ends. Additional blood tests will measure drug levels and antibody responses during the first year of treatment.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding the immunotherapy drug durvalumab to the usual chemotherapy treatment can improve outcomes for adults with MammaPrint High 2 Risk (MP2) stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial compares standard chemotherapy alone to chemotherapy combined with durvalumab. Previous evidence suggests patients with this specific cancer profile may respond better to chemotherapy and immunotherapy, so this study aims to see if durvalumab helps prevent cancer from returning. Participants are first screened with MammaPrint testing on tumor tissue to confirm MP2 status. Those eligible are then randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for 6 cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide every 14 days for 4 cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule plus durvalumab intravenously during specific cycles. Mammography is done during screening, and optional tumor tissue and blood samples are collected throughout the study. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including mammograms, tissue biopsies, and blood tests to monitor response and safety. Researchers measure event-free survival, pathologic complete response, residual cancer burden, distant relapse-free survival, and overall survival for up to 10 years after treatment. Quality of life is also evaluated through questionnaires during and after treatment. Participants are followed long-term to track outcomes and side effects.

Researchers are investigating treatments for patients with stage IV or recurring non-small cell lung cancer who have previously received platinum chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This phase II/III trial compares the effects of adding cemiplimab, an immune system-stimulating monoclonal antibody, to the usual combination of docetaxel and ramucirumab. The goal is to see if adding cemiplimab helps the immune system better attack tumor cells and improves survival outcomes. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives docetaxel and ramucirumab along with dexamethasone, while the other group receives these same treatments plus cemiplimab. Treatments are given in cycles every 21 days, with infusions lasting from 30 minutes to an hour depending on the drug. Patients undergo regular blood sample collections and imaging scans such as CT or MRI throughout the study. During the trial, participants are monitored for overall survival, disease progression, tumor response, and side effects. After completing treatment, follow-up visits occur every 3 to 6 months for up to 3 years. Blood tests and imaging help assess treatment effects and safety. Researchers also collect and store blood and tissue samples to support future studies.

Researchers are evaluating an Internet-based pain coping skills program combined with enhanced usual care to see if it improves pain severity and pain interference in adult cancer survivors with persistent cancer-related pain. This study also looks at other effects such as opioid medication use, quality of life, pain management confidence, fatigue, sleep, emotional distress, positive feelings, pain impact, cognitive problems, and cognitive performance. The study enrolls 250 participants who have been treated for invasive cancer and are experiencing ongoing pain. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives access to an 8-session online pain coping program plus pain education alongside their usual care, which they complete within 10 weeks and can revisit during that time. After the study ends, they retain access to the program. The other group receives pain education only at their initial clinic visit and will be offered access to the online program after completing the 6-month follow-up assessment. Each participant is involved in the study for about 9 months, from randomization through final follow-up at week 34. Researchers will assess changes in pain severity and interference primarily from baseline to 10 weeks, with additional follow-ups at 22 and 34 weeks. They will also monitor opioid use, quality of life, and pain management self-efficacy. Participants complete various questionnaires and assessments throughout, and adherence to the online program is tracked. The study aims to better understand how this Internet-based approach may help manage cancer-related pain.