Kansas City

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of tenapanor in adults with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC) in this 26-week phase 3 study. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, involving multiple centers. It aims to compare three doses of tenapanor (5 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg taken twice daily) against a placebo, with a focus on improving spontaneous bowel movements. Participants will first undergo a 2-week screening where their eligibility is assessed through medical history, physical exams, lab tests, ECG, and self-reported constipation symptoms using an electronic diary (eDiary). Eligible patients will then be randomly assigned to receive one of the three doses of tenapanor or placebo twice daily for 26 weeks. During this treatment period, patients will continue daily and weekly symptom reporting via the eDiary and attend regular safety visits at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26. After completing the 26-week treatment, patients enter a 4-week treatment-free safety follow-up period to monitor any adverse events. A final visit occurs at the end of this follow-up to assess safety. The main outcome measured is the durable complete spontaneous bowel movements response over 12 weeks. Overall, the study involves careful monitoring of symptoms, safety, and treatment effects over approximately 32 weeks.

Researchers are studying a new treatment for HIV-1 infection that combines two medicines, islatravir and ulonivirine, taken once weekly. The goal is to see if this new study treatment works as well as the standard antiretroviral therapy (ART), which usually involves taking up to three medicines once or twice daily. This research also aims to learn about the safety and tolerability of the study treatment compared to the standard ART. The study compares the once-weekly combination of islatravir and ulonivirine with the standard daily treatment of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF). Participants will take either the study drugs or the standard drugs for 96 weeks. Some participants may receive matching placebos as part of the study design. The treatment is given orally as capsules or tablets according to the assigned group. Participants will be monitored throughout the study with regular assessments, including measuring the amount of HIV-1 virus in the blood to see if it is suppressed below 50 copies/mL at weeks 24 and 48. The study will also track any side effects or adverse events and whether participants stop the treatment due to these events. Overall, the study lasts about 96 weeks, with ongoing safety and effectiveness evaluations to understand how well the treatments work and how safe they are over time.

Researchers are investigating new treatments for people with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer, specifically targeting triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor (HR)-low positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. These types have little or no HER2 protein and involve hormones like estrogen or progesterone. The study aims to evaluate if the addition of sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT), a targeted therapy, combined with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy can improve outcomes compared to pembrolizumab with chemotherapy alone. Participants receive treatments including sacituzumab tirumotecan, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin and paclitaxel, all given by intravenous infusion. Rescue medications like antihistamines, acetaminophen, dexamethasone, or steroid mouthwash may be used as needed. The study is randomized and open-label, comparing sac-TMT followed by chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab to chemotherapy and pembrolizumab without sac-TMT. During the study, researchers will monitor participants up to about 30 weeks to assess the percentage of people with no remaining cancer cells at surgery. They will also follow participants for up to approximately 92 months to track event-free survival, meaning time without cancer growth, spread, or return. Participants will undergo imaging, clinical assessments, and laboratory tests to evaluate treatment effects and safety throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating tulisokibart as a potential treatment for radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA), a type of arthritis causing pain, stiffness, and inflammation in the spine and pelvis joints, visible on X-rays. This Phase 2b study aims to determine if different doses of tulisokibart improve symptoms better than a placebo, which looks like the study medicine but contains no active drug. The study has two main parts: a 16-week placebo-controlled period where participants receive either tulisokibart or placebo through subcutaneous injections, followed by a 124-week long-term extension divided into a 40-week main extension and an 84-week optional extension. This allows researchers to assess both the short-term and longer-term effects and safety of tulisokibart. Participants will be monitored for their response using the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 response at week 16 as the primary outcome. Throughout the study, researchers will evaluate disease activity and safety while tracking symptoms and any side effects. The total involvement spans up to 140 weeks, including both initial treatment and extension phases.

Researchers are investigating new treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a condition where current therapies like methotrexate (MTX) may not fully control symptoms for many people. This Phase 2b study evaluates a medicine called tulisokibart to see if it can better reduce RA symptoms in individuals already taking MTX. The trial aims to determine if one or more doses of tulisokibart work better than a placebo, which looks like the medicine but contains no active drug. The study includes a 12-week period where participants receive either tulisokibart or a placebo by subcutaneous injection while continuing their MTX treatment, which can be given by injection or orally. Following this, there is a long-term extension lasting 116 weeks, composed of a 44-week main extension and a 72-week optional extension, to further assess the medication's effects and safety over time. Participants will undergo assessments to measure treatment response, including the American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria at week 12 to gauge symptom improvement. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor for safety and effectiveness, with evaluations extending through the long-term extension periods, totaling over two years of participation.

This research aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of a new artificial tear formulation called ABBV-444 with Refresh Optive Unit Dose in adults diagnosed with Dry Eye Disease (DED), a chronic condition caused by insufficient or poor-quality tear production. The study is a Phase 3, multicenter, double-masked, randomized trial involving around 250 adult participants across approximately 20 sites in the United States. Participants begin the study with a 7-day run-in period using REFRESH PLUS eye drops. Those who meet eligibility criteria are then randomly assigned to receive either ABBV-444 eye drops or REFRESH OPTIVE Unit Dose eye drops. Both groups will use their assigned treatment for a 90-day period. These are topical eye drop treatments administered regularly during the study. During the study, participants will attend multiple visits at the study sites for medical assessments and to complete questionnaires. Researchers will monitor changes in symptoms using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score from baseline to day 90 and track any adverse events. The study includes detailed eye tests such as tear breakup time and staining assessments to evaluate treatment effects and safety over the 90-day treatment period.

Researchers are conducting a Phase I/II, multi-site, open-label study to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and optimal dosing of the investigational treatments BNT323 combined with BNT327 in adults with advanced breast cancer. This includes those with hormone receptor-positive or negative types, HER2-positive, HER2-low, HER2-ultralow, HER2-null breast cancer, or triple-negative breast cancer. The study aims to understand how these treatments work alone and together in this patient population. The study has two parts: Part 1 involves dose escalation where participants with chemotherapy-pretreated advanced breast cancer receive BNT323 and BNT327 together to find the recommended Phase 2 dose. Part 2 is an expansion phase that tests the safety and effectiveness of the chosen dose, including randomized comparisons of combination therapy at different doses and monotherapies. Participants may be assigned to one of four treatment arms, with dosing administered via intravenous infusion. Participants will be monitored for dose-limiting toxicities during the first 21 days of treatment, as well as adverse events up to 90 days after the last dose. Tumor response will be assessed for up to 36 months. Evaluations include heart function tests, tumor imaging, safety assessments, and tracking of side effects. The study carefully monitors treatment safety, effectiveness, and participant health throughout the trial duration.

This research aims to determine whether a home-based virtual reality (VR) neurofeedback program is practical and acceptable for adolescents aged 10 to 16 years who have migraine. The study explores if it is possible to enroll, randomize, and keep participants engaged, and whether the VR program may help improve headache-related disability and symptoms. It compares Immersive Neurofeedback Self-Regulation Training (INSeRT), which uses brain activity from a wearable EEG headband to guide the VR experience, with a VR imagery program that provides immersive scenes without neurofeedback or relaxation guidance. Participants will first complete a 4-week baseline period including headache logs, questionnaires, and a laboratory EEG assessment to measure brain activity. Then they will be randomly assigned to either the INSeRT group or the comparison VR group. Both groups will perform VR sessions at home three times per week for four weeks, with each session lasting about 8 minutes. After the treatment phase, participants will complete questionnaires and repeat the laboratory EEG assessment. Researchers will also follow up approximately three months later. Throughout the study, participants will track their headache patterns and complete surveys to assess symptoms and treatment adherence. Researchers will measure how well recruitment, randomization, and treatment initiation work, along with the number and duration of VR sessions completed. They will also assess usability, cybersickness symptoms, and retention up to three months after baseline. These findings will help guide future larger trials focused on the efficacy of this VR neurofeedback intervention for youth with migraine.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are evaluating the use of a histamine pharmacodynamic biomarker called Histamine Lontophoresis with Laser Doppler monitoring (HILD) to guide treatment in children aged 6 to 17 years with uncontrolled persistent allergic asthma. This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study focuses on African American/Black and Caucasian/White children who have either hyper-responsive or hypo-responsive HILD phenotypes. The study aims to determine whether children with a hyper-responsive HILD profile show better asthma control when Levocetirizine is added to their standard asthma treatment compared to placebo, and to develop a predictive model for therapeutic response. Participants will be randomized to receive either Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride oral solution or placebo, added to their current asthma regimen. Dosage is based on age, with 2.5 mg for children 6-11 years and 5 mg for those older than 11 years. The study includes an initial HILD assessment, followed by treatment periods with Levocetirizine and placebo in a crossover design. Each treatment phase lasts 6 weeks, with assessments before and after treatment periods to evaluate response. During the approximate 17-week study, participants will undergo asthma control testing using the Asthma Control Test (ACT) or Child-Asthma Control Test (C-ACT), depending on age, at screening and multiple visits. Additional assessments will measure asthma impairment, risk, and quality of life. Blood tests, allergy testing, and safety laboratory evaluations will be conducted. The study will monitor therapeutic response, safety, and adherence throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.