Camden

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are evaluating how well elacestrant works compared to standard endocrine therapy in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer who are at high risk of the cancer returning. This is a Phase 3 global, multicenter, randomized, open-label study focusing on participants who have had early invasive breast cancer removed and meet specific receptor and risk criteria. The study aims to understand which treatment better prevents invasive breast cancer over up to five years. Participants will receive either elacestrant or one of several standard endocrine therapies, including anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, or tamoxifen, all given as oral tablets. Treatments will be administered according to the study plan, with careful monitoring throughout the trial. The study includes adults who have already received between 24 and 60 months of prior endocrine therapy, with or without certain inhibitors, and who have completed or stopped these treatments as required. During the study, participants will be monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival for up to five years. Researchers will perform regular assessments to track treatment effects, side effects, and cancer recurrence. The study also includes safety monitoring and may involve additional tests or evaluations as needed to ensure participant well-being throughout the trial.

Researchers are conducting a Phase 2, two-part study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of GEn-1124 in adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation study aims to understand the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of the investigational drug GEn-1124 when given early after ARDS diagnosis. Participants will receive GEn-1124 or placebo through a 2-hour intravenous infusion as soon as possible after diagnosis. A second dose will be given about 8 hours after the first, followed by twice daily doses for the next 5 days. The study includes careful dose escalation and monitoring by an independent Safety Review Committee. Throughout the study, participants will be followed for up to 60 days after the first dose or until death. Researchers will monitor serious adverse events and treatment-related side effects to assess safety and tolerability. The study collects data on how the drug behaves in the body and its biological effects, with close observation during dosing and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to standard chemotherapy, with or without radiation, can improve survival for patients aged 5 to 60 years with newly diagnosed stage I or II classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares outcomes in groups based on their early response to initial chemotherapy, aiming to understand if immunotherapy can lead to better progression-free survival and overall survival compared to standard treatment alone. The study also looks at side effects, quality of life, and long-term health impacts across different patient groups. Participants first receive two cycles of standard ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days, followed by imaging to classify their response as rapid or slow early responders and their risk status as favorable or unfavorable. Based on these factors, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continued standard chemotherapy regimens or immunotherapy with brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, sometimes combined with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are given intravenously or orally depending on the drugs, and cycles typically last 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected regularly throughout the study. Throughout the trial, participants undergo frequent scans such as FDG-PET, CT, MRI, and PET-CT to monitor their disease status. Blood samples and questionnaires assess treatment effects and quality of life. After completing treatment, patients have scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for two years, and annually up to 12 years to track long-term outcomes, side effects, and survival. The main measurements focus on progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events, and patient-reported experiences.

Researchers are evaluating two surgical procedures, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, to see how well they reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women who have BRCA1 gene mutations. The study aims to determine if removing just the fallopian tubes (bilateral salpingectomy) is almost as effective as removing both the fallopian tubes and ovaries (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) in lowering ovarian cancer risk. This trial also assesses symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, sexual function, cancer-related distress, decision-making about surgery, and treatment side effects in these patients. Participants choose between two groups: one group undergoes bilateral salpingectomy and may have their ovaries removed later, while the other group undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups receive pelvic or transvaginal ultrasounds or pelvic MRI scans during screening, and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Ancillary studies include quality-of-life assessments and questionnaires. The study also collects tissue and blood samples for future research. After surgery, participants have follow-up visits at 10 to 60 days, then at 6, 12, and 24 months, and annually for up to 20 years. Researchers monitor the time until any high-grade serous carcinomas develop, specifically ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. They also track menopausal symptoms, sexual function, quality of life, cancer distress, medical decisions about surgery, and any adverse events during this long-term follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of finerenone compared to a placebo in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure who have mildly reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. This international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial aims to understand how finerenone affects morbidity and mortality in this patient group. Participants will receive either oral finerenone or a matching oral placebo. The study focuses on patients currently hospitalized or recently discharged with heart failure symptoms and specific heart function measures. The trial is event-driven and will continue for up to approximately 30 months to collect sufficient data on outcomes. During the study, researchers will monitor the total number of heart failure events and cardiovascular deaths, as well as track serious adverse events and any adverse events that lead participants to stop the study drug. These ongoing assessments will help evaluate the overall safety and impact of the treatment over the duration of the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the investigational drug volixibat to treat itching (pruritus) caused by Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC), a liver disease. This study aims to learn more about how volixibat affects itching symptoms and whether it has any impact on the progression of PBC. The trial is a Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to assess the drug's safety and effectiveness. Participants will receive either volixibat oral capsules or placebo capsules that look identical but do not contain the active drug. Volixibat is taken twice daily and works as an Ileal Bile Acid Transporter (IBAT) inhibitor. The study compares volixibat to placebo over a treatment period to determine differences in itching severity and safety outcomes. During the study, participants will complete the Adult Itch Reported Outcome (Adult ItchRO) questionnaire to measure daily itch scores from the start of the trial to week 28. Researchers will monitor symptoms and adverse events throughout the study visits. Participants must comply with all scheduled visits and assessments until the study ends to provide data on the drug's effects and safety profile.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of farletuzumab ecteribulin (MORAb-202), a drug that targets folate receptor alpha, in participants with certain tumor types including ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, non-small cell lung carcinoma, and triple-negative breast cancer. The trial includes dose-escalation, dose-confirmation, and dose-optimization parts to determine safe doses and assess early signs of how well the drug works, alone or combined with lenvatinib. The study also explores the use of oral corticosteroids alongside the treatment and aims to identify the best treatment regimens for further testing. Participants receive farletuzumab ecteribulin through intravenous infusion, with some treatment plans including oral corticosteroids such as prednisone, prednisolone, or dexamethasone. In the dose-optimization phase, the drug is given alone or combined with oral lenvatinib. Treatment is given every 21 days, and the study includes multiple parts lasting up to approximately five years to find the recommended doses and evaluate safety and response. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including scans, laboratory tests, and safety monitoring to track tumor response and side effects. Researchers measure tumor shrinkage, dose-limiting toxicities, serious adverse events, and overall safety from the start of treatment through follow-up periods. Participants are monitored for up to five years to observe treatment effects and long-term safety, with detailed evaluations during each treatment cycle and after treatment ends.

Researchers are investigating a treatment approach for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), a condition with high rates of illness and death. This phase 3 trial compares therapeutic-dose heparin versus usual care pharmacological thromboprophylaxis to see if it improves patient outcomes. The study focuses on preventing complications caused by blood clots and inflammation that can worsen respiratory and organ function in CAP patients. Previous findings in COVID-19 pneumonia suggest heparin might reduce disease progression and mortality, but its effects in non-COVID-19 CAP are unknown. Participants will receive either therapeutic-dose heparin, preferably a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) like enoxaparin, dalteparin, or tinzaparin, dosed by patient weight unless contraindicated. Intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) may be used instead, especially for those with kidney issues, with dosing adjusted to specific blood clotting targets. The trial is open-label and randomized, with adaptive rules to monitor progress. Usual care pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is the comparator. Treatment and monitoring occur during hospital admission, anticipated to last at least 72 hours after randomization. During the study, patients are assessed for survival at 30 days and monitored for complications related to CAP. Researchers collect clinical data including oxygen use, laboratory tests, and adverse events, tracking safety and effectiveness. The study excludes patients with active COVID-19, recent bleeding, contraindications to anticoagulation, or those receiving critical care interventions. Overall participation depends on hospital stay length and clinical status, with follow-up to evaluate the primary outcome of survival within a month.