Camden

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 at levels of 1% or higher. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study aims to compare these treatments to improve outcomes for this patient group. Participants will receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab, each given intravenously on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle, combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy either carboplatin or cisplatin also given on Day 1 of each cycle for up to four cycles. After chemotherapy cycles, patients continue with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab monotherapy combined with pemetrexed maintenance. The study follows patients for up to approximately six years to monitor treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size, blood tests to evaluate organ function, and questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life. Researchers monitor overall survival and progression-free survival as primary outcomes, alongside other measures such as response duration and physical functioning. Safety is closely observed throughout, with study visits scheduled regularly during treatment and follow-up periods, lasting up to six years in total.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig combined with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer mNSCLC whose tumors express programmed death-ligand 1 PD-L1. This Phase III global study focuses on patients with PD-L1 tumor cell expression of 1% or higher and aims to determine which treatment provides better overall and progression-free survival. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two study groups one group will receive rilvegostomig plus carboplatin and either paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy, while the other group will receive pembrolizumab plus the same chemotherapy options. Rilvegostomig and pembrolizumab are both given intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, with chemotherapy given up to 4 cycles. Nab-paclitaxel may be administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment continues with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab until disease progression or other criteria are met. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response, laboratory tests to monitor organ function, and patient questionnaires about physical function and quality of life. Researchers will track overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, and duration of response for up to approximately 6 years. Safety and immune response to rilvegostomig will also be evaluated. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are conducting a Phase 3 randomized trial to evaluate how well azenosertib works and how safe it is compared to chemotherapy chosen by the doctor for women with platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers that test positive for cyclin E1 protein. This cancer type relies on WEE1 for cell cycle control, and azenosertib targets this pathway to increase tumor cell damage and death. The study compares two treatment groups one receives azenosertib orally at 400 mg daily on a schedule of 5 days on and 2 days off, while the other group receives chemotherapy selected by the investigator according to protocol guidelines. The chemotherapy options include paclitaxel, gemcitabine, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin PLD, or topotecan, all given intravenously. Treatments continue as per the study plan to assess their effects. Participants will be closely monitored for up to about 24 months after the last person enrolls. Researchers will perform regular assessments including tumor measurements using RECIST criteria, quality of life questionnaires, and tracking of side effects or adverse events. The main outcome measured is progression-free survival, with additional evaluations of overall survival and response rates. Safety and quality of life changes will also be followed throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating elacestrant compared to standard endocrine therapies in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive ER, HER2-negative early breast cancer who are at high risk of cancer returning. The study focuses on those who have had prior endocrine therapy and aims to measure how well elacestrant may prevent invasive breast cancer recurrence over five years. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either 345 mg of elacestrant daily for five years or continue their prior standard endocrine therapy, which may include an aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane or tamoxifen. The trial is open-label, meaning both participants and researchers know which treatment is given. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor cancer recurrence, survival, side effects, and quality of life. Evaluations include questionnaires on health status and physical functioning at baseline, six months, and annually for up to five years. Safety is tracked through adverse event reporting up to five years plus 28 days. The total participation duration can last up to five years with ongoing monitoring and data collection.

Researchers are conducting a two-part Phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of GEn-1124 in adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled with dose escalation to assess how the drug behaves in the body and its effects compared to placebo. An independent Safety Review Committee will monitor data throughout the study to ensure participant safety. Participants will receive GEn-1124 or placebo as a 2-hour intravenous infusion as soon as possible after ARDS diagnosis. A second dose will be given about 8 hours after the first, followed by twice daily dosing for five days. The study includes low and high dose groups in the first part and additional dosing in the second part depending on earlier results. During the study, participants will be closely monitored for safety and tolerability for up to 60 days after the first dose or until death if earlier. Researchers will assess serious adverse events and other side effects. The study involves multiple visits for treatment and follow-up, with data collected on how participants respond to the drug over time.

Ovarian cancer is a serious disease with a high number of new cases and deaths worldwide. This study evaluates the safety and disease activity changes of mirvetuximab soravtansine combined with carboplatin, bevacizumab, or bevacizumab alone in female participants with ovarian cancer confirmed to express folate receptor alpha FR. The trial is a Phase 2 study involving approximately 400 participants worldwide, assessing different treatment combinations given by intravenous infusion. Participants will be assigned to one of three substudies and receive treatment in groups called arms. Substudy 1 includes arms where participants receive one of two doses of mirvetuximab soravtansine with bevacizumab or bevacizumab alone. Substudy 2 involves mirvetuximab soravtansine with carboplatin followed by mirvetuximab soravtansine alone. Substudy 3 combines mirvetuximab soravtansine, bevacizumab, and carboplatin followed by mirvetuximab soravtansine with bevacizumab. Treatments are given by intravenous infusion, and the study duration ranges up to approximately 40 months depending on the substudy. Participants will attend regular visits at hospitals or clinics where they will receive infusions and undergo medical assessments including blood tests and scans. Researchers will monitor treatment-emergent adverse events, ocular events, overall response, progression-free survival, and other outcomes up to about 40 months. The study includes careful safety monitoring and evaluation of disease activity during and after treatment to assess the effects and safety of these drug combinations.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to the standard treatment of chemotherapy with or without radiation improves survival for patients aged 5 to 60 with early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares progression-free survival and overall survival between the standard therapy and the immunotherapy-enhanced approach, as well as patient-reported outcomes and long-term side effects. Participants initially receive two cycles of ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days and then undergo imaging to classify their early response. Based on risk level and response, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continuing standard chemotherapy, receiving immunotherapy drugs, or combinations with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are delivered intravenously or orally in cycles lasting 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Participants are monitored regularly with PET scans, CT or MRI imaging, and blood tests. Follow-up visits occur every 3 months in the first year, then every 6 months for years two and three, and annually up to 12 years from registration. Researchers assess survival outcomes, adverse events, patient-reported symptoms and quality of life, and metabolic tumor burden. Long-term effects such as cardiovascular and pulmonary health are also evaluated using questionnaires and clinical assessments.

Researchers are studying two surgical procedures to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 genetic mutations. This trial compares bilateral salpingectomy, which removes only the fallopian tubes, with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which removes both fallopian tubes and ovaries. The goal is to find out if removing just the fallopian tubes with delayed ovary removal is nearly as effective as removing both from the start. Participants choose between two groups one undergoes bilateral salpingectomy with the option of later ovary removal, and the other undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups have imaging tests like pelvic ultrasounds or pelvic MRIs during screening and provide blood samples throughout the study. Follow-up visits occur at multiple time points, including 10 to 60 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and then yearly for up to 20 years. During the study, researchers track if ovarian or related cancers develop and assess symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, cancer-related distress, sexual function, menopausal symptoms, medical decision making, and any adverse events. Various questionnaires and imaging tests support these evaluations. Long-term safety and cancer risk reduction are monitored for up to two decades after surgery.

Researchers are studying finerenone to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure who have mildly reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. This international trial is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, focusing on how finerenone compares to placebo in reducing heart failure events and cardiovascular death. Participants receive either oral finerenone or a matching placebo while hospitalized or recently discharged for heart failure. The study monitors patients over approximately 30 months to assess the total heart failure events, cardiovascular death, and adverse events related to the treatment. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments including symptom scoring using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, monitoring for serious adverse events, and evaluation of heart failure outcomes. The study tracks safety and efficacy data over the long term, with follow-up visits scheduled to measure the impact of treatment on morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients.

Researchers are evaluating the investigational drug volixibat for treating itching pruritus caused by Primary Biliary Cholangitis PBC, a liver disease. This Phase 2 clinical trial aims to learn more about volixibats effects on itching and its potential impact on PBC disease progression. The study is sponsored by Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Participants are randomly assigned to one of several groups receiving either volixibat capsules at doses of 20mg or 80mg twice daily, or placebo capsules without the active drug, also taken twice daily. The trial includes two parts, with some participants receiving volixibat 20mg twice daily and others receiving matching placebo capsules. The study is double-blind, meaning neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given. During the study, participants itching levels are monitored using the Adult Itch Reported Outcome questionnaire over 28 weeks. Researchers also assess quality of life, fatigue, sleep disturbance, liver function tests, bile acid levels, and adverse events. Participants will attend regular visits for assessments, and the main outcome measured is the change in daily itch scores from baseline to week 28. The study excludes healthy volunteers and focuses on adults aged 18 years and older with confirmed PBC.