Harrison Township

Researchers are evaluating the effects of a triple therapy inhaler combining budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate BGF MDI 32014.49.6 g compared to a dual therapy inhaler with glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate GFF MDI 14.49.6 g on heart and lung outcomes in adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease COPD who have a higher risk for heart and lung events. This Phase III study is randomized, double-blind, and conducted at multiple centers, focusing on participants with COPD and elevated cardiopulmonary risk. Participants will receive either the triple therapy inhaler or the dual therapy inhaler, both administered twice daily. The study compares these two inhalers over a period of up to three years, monitoring for serious cardiac or COPD events. The trial includes careful evaluation of various heart and lung-related health events during this period. During the study, participants will be closely monitored through regular visits, assessments, and tests to measure lung function, heart events, and COPD exacerbations. Researchers will track the time until the first severe cardiac or COPD event and evaluate other cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes over up to three years. Participants will also be assessed for their ability to properly use the inhaler and adherence to the study protocol throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating ziltivekimab, a new medicine not yet approved anywhere, to see if it can help people who were hospitalized due to a heart attack. The study aims to find out if ziltivekimab can reduce the development of heart disease and prevent future heart attacks or strokes. This is a Phase 3 clinical trial comparing ziltivekimab to a placebo in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Participants will receive an initial loading dose of ziltivekimab or matching placebo by injection under the skin as soon as possible after an invasive heart procedure, within 36 hours for STEMI or 48 hours for NSTEMI patients. After the loading dose, they will get monthly injections of the same study medicine for up to two years, in addition to their standard care. During the study, participants will be monitored for major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death. Researchers will also track other heart-related outcomes and safety measures over a period of up to 25 months. The study involves regular visits for injections, assessments, and laboratory tests to evaluate the medicines effects and patient health throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating whether ataciguat can slow the progression of moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis CAVS in adults aged 50 and older. This study is conducted in two parts Part A focuses on whether ataciguat reduces calcium buildup in the aortic valve over 24 weeks, while Part B examines if the drug slows narrowing of the valve area and improves peak oxygen consumption over 48 weeks. Safety, tolerability, and how the body processes ataciguat are also assessed. Participants receive either ataciguat or a placebo daily for up to 156 weeks. Part A enrolls about 132 participants, and Part B will begin after Part A completes, enrolling around 1144 participants. Part B includes additional evaluation of heart function and ability to exercise. The study uses a randomized, double-blind design, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who receives the drug or placebo. During the study, participants undergo imaging tests like CT scans and echocardiograms to measure valve calcium and valve area. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing CPET is used to assess peak oxygen consumption. Researchers also monitor heart function, symptoms, and quality of life using questionnaires. Assessments occur mainly at baseline, Week 24, and Week 48, with long-term follow-up to 156 weeks for safety and efficacy. The studys total duration extends to 2030.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for older adults aged 70 and above with advanced stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer that expresses PD-L1 in 1-49% of tumor cells. This phase III trial compares the effects of adding chemotherapy to immunotherapy with pembrolizumab against pembrolizumab alone. The study aims to assess improvements in overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, toxicity, quality of life, and explore geriatric assessment factors and gut microbiome correlations. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. Arm A receives pembrolizumab intravenously every 21 days for four cycles, followed by maintenance pembrolizumab every 21 or 42 days for up to two years. Arm B receives the same pembrolizumab schedule plus one of several chemotherapy regimens, including combinations of pemetrexed, carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, or paclitaxel administered intravenously on different schedules for four cycles, followed by pembrolizumab maintenance. Imaging with MRI, CT, and PET scans is performed at baseline and throughout the trial. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to monitor disease status, blood tests, and quality of life questionnaires. After treatment completion, follow-up visits occur every three months for up to two years and then every six months up to five years. Researchers measure overall survival as the primary outcome and also track progression-free survival, response rates, adverse events, and patient-reported quality of life. Safety and tolerability are closely monitored along with exploratory analyses of chemotherapy dose intensity and microbiome factors.

Researchers are evaluating ivonescimab as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC whose tumors show high PD-L1 expression. This phase 3 study compares ivonescimab to pembrolizumab, focusing on overall survival and progression-free survival to understand which treatment may better support patients with this condition. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either ivonescimab or pembrolizumab through intravenous injection. The study is double-blinded and multiregional, involving continuous treatment and monitoring for up to approximately 36 months. Both groups receive their assigned treatment regularly during this period, with careful observation of treatment responses and side effects. During the trial, participants will undergo evaluations including scans to measure tumor size, laboratory tests, and assessments of adverse events. Researchers will track overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, disease control, and duration of response. Safety monitoring will continue for up to 24 months after the last dose. The total study period extends until June 2029, allowing long-term data collection on treatment effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the Freenome Multiomics Blood Test as a new way to screen for lung cancer in people at high risk. This observational study includes adults aged 50 and older who are current or former smokers with a significant smoking history. The goal is to see how well this blood test works alongside the standard Low-Dose Computed Tomography LDCT screening to detect lung cancer early. Participants will provide a blood sample of 50 ml that will be tested and stored by Freenome or its designee. They will also undergo a standard LDCT chest scan, ideally on the same day as the blood draw or within 45 days afterward. The study collects additional information such as medical history, lifestyle, environmental exposures, and results from diagnostic tests related to lung cancer detection. Participants will be monitored for at least 24 months following their baseline chest CT scan to track health outcomes. Researchers will review clinical data, imaging reports, and lab results during this period. The main outcome measured is the blood tests sensitivity and specificity in detecting lung cancer at 12 months, with additional measurements at 24 months. The study may end early if participants withdraw or pass away.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from people with and without cancer to help evaluate new tests that could detect cancer early. This study aims to create a set of blinded blood samples from both cancer and non-cancer patients to validate these tests, focusing on multiple cancer types and stages. The goal is to improve early cancer detection through laboratory research. Participants complete a questionnaire at the start and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Those diagnosed with cancer may also have tissue samples collected at these times. The study includes patients with various cancer types and stages, as well as individuals without cancer, with some allowing enrollment before full cancer confirmation under specific conditions. During the study, researchers review the collected samples and questionnaire data to assess test performance by tumor type and clinical stage at diagnosis. Participants are followed for one year after completing the study. Key measurements include the provision of a blinded reference set of cancer versus non-cancer blood samples to support future clinical trials focused on blood-based multi-cancer early detection.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Olvimulogene nanivacirepvec Olvi-Vec, an intravenously delivered oncolytic vaccinia virus, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy and a physicians choice of immune checkpoint inhibitor ICI compared to docetaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer NSCLC. This Phase 2, open-label, randomized study focuses on patients who have shown first disease progression while on front-line or maintenance ICI therapy following platinum-doublet chemotherapy. The study aims to test if Olvi-Vec can activate the immune system and make tumors more responsive to chemotherapy in NSCLC patients without certain targetable genetic alterations. Participants will be assigned to one of several groups. Initial cohorts receive varying doses of Olvi-Vec over 3 or 4 consecutive days, followed 2 to 3 weeks later by platinum-doublet chemotherapy combined with a physician-chosen ICI. The experimental arm will use the Olvi-Vec dose and schedule selected from these cohorts, followed by platinum-based chemotherapy plus ICI. The comparator arm receives docetaxel starting in week 0 and continuing until disease progression is confirmed. Patients in the comparator arm with disease progression may cross over to receive the experimental treatment if eligible. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response and progression-free survival up to 12 months after randomization. Researchers will monitor treatment safety and side effects for up to 36 months. Additional measures include overall survival, disease control rate, and treatment response duration. Scheduled visits will involve laboratory tests, imaging, and clinical evaluations to track health and disease status throughout the trial.

Researchers are comparing the rates of surgical and minimally invasive interventions, as well as any harms, in Medicare beneficiaries treated with the MILD procedure versus those treated with interspinous process decompression IPD for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. This observational study uses Medicare claims data to follow patients for 24 months after their initial procedure starting from January 1, 2017. The purpose is to evaluate outcomes between these two types of procedures without requiring prior patient enrollment or consent. The study includes two groups patients who received MILD, which is a percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression performed under fluoroscopic guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine, and patients who received IPD, a different device-based decompression procedure. Data on reoperations and complications will be collected for both groups over a 24-month follow-up period using Medicare claims. Enrollment continues until the sponsor decides to stop. Participants involvement is passive as the study uses existing Medicare claims data. Researchers will monitor rates of harms related to the initial procedure and subsequent surgical or minimally invasive interventions over two years. No direct patient visits or interventions are conducted, and the study is exempt from institutional review board oversight. The total study duration extends to December 2026, covering cases treated since early 2017.

Researchers are evaluating whether simply observing patients after surgery is as effective as continuing pembrolizumab treatment in preventing cancer recurrence in people with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer TNBC who had a complete response after receiving chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab before surgery. This Phase III trial aims to determine if stopping pembrolizumab post-surgery can maintain recurrence-free survival while potentially improving quality of life and reducing treatment burden. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups after finishing chemotherapy with pembrolizumab and surgery. One group continues pembrolizumab intravenously every 3 or 6 weeks for 27 weeks. The other group undergoes observation without further pembrolizumab for the same period. Throughout the study, patients have tumor biopsies and blood collected, along with imaging such as mammography, breast ultrasound, or MRI during follow-up. Participants will be monitored for recurrence-free survival and overall survival for up to 10 years. The study also assesses adverse events, quality of life, financial impact, and work productivity at about 27 weeks after starting the assigned treatment or observation. Safety and treatment effects are tracked through biopsies, imaging, blood tests, and patient questionnaires during the study and follow-up.