Harrison Township

Researchers are evaluating ziltivekimab as a treatment for people living with heart failure and inflammation. This Phase 3 study compares ziltivekimab to a placebo in participants with heart failure who have mild to preserved ejection fraction and systemic inflammation. The study aims to assess the effect of ziltivekimab on cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or urgent heart failure visits over a period of up to 4 years. Participants will receive monthly injections of either ziltivekimab or a placebo using a pre-filled syringe or a pen-injector. The study medication is administered subcutaneously once a month for up to 4 years. The trial includes up to 20 clinic visits during which participants will be monitored and assessed. During the study, participants will use a study app on their phone to record all injections and complete questionnaires. Researchers will monitor participants for key outcomes like cardiovascular events and heart failure episodes from the time of randomization until the end of the study. Safety and health status will be regularly evaluated throughout the study period, which may last up to 48 months.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of a triple therapy inhaler called BGF MDI containing budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate compared with a dual therapy inhaler called GFF MDI containing glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have a higher risk of heart and lung problems. This Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group study takes place at multiple centers and focuses on cardiopulmonary outcomes in these patients. Participants receive either the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily or the GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 micrograms twice daily. The treatments are inhaled using metered dose inhalers. The study compares these two therapies over time to see how they affect the time until the first severe heart or lung event occurs. The study design ensures that neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given to reduce bias. During the study, participants will have regular visits to the study site or virtual visits to complete assessments. Researchers will monitor lung function, symptoms, and blood tests, including blood eosinophil counts and COPD assessment test scores. The main outcome measured is the time to the first severe cardiac or COPD event, with follow-up lasting up to three years. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating whether ziltivekimab can help people who were hospitalized due to a heart attack by potentially reducing the development of heart disease and preventing new heart attacks or strokes. This Phase 3 study compares ziltivekimab with a placebo, which is a dummy medicine that has no effect on the body. Both treatments are given by chance, with equal likelihood for participants to receive either ziltivekimab or placebo. Participants will inject the study medicine once a month under the skin in the stomach, thigh, or upper arm. Ziltivekimab is given as an initial loading dose followed by monthly maintenance doses. The placebo group receives a matching injection schedule. The study duration is about two years. During the study, researchers will monitor participants for the time until the first serious heart-related event, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal heart attack, or non-fatal stroke. Participants will be closely observed from the start of randomization up to 25 months. The study includes regular follow-ups to assess safety and effectiveness of the treatments throughout this period.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of ataciguat on slowing the progression of moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) in adults. This study is divided into two parts: Part A focuses on whether ataciguat reduces aortic valve calcium buildup, and Part B investigates whether ataciguat slows loss of aortic valve area and improves peak oxygen consumption. The study also assesses safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ataciguat in these participants. Participants will receive either ataciguat or a placebo daily for up to 156 weeks. Part A will enroll about 132 adults with moderate CAVS, while Part B will enroll approximately 1144 participants following completion of Part A. The study is randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled, designed to provide detailed information on ataciguat's effects over time. Throughout the study, participants will undergo non-contrast CT scans to measure aortic valve calcium, echocardiograms to assess valve area, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing to evaluate peak oxygen consumption. Safety and tolerability will be monitored continuously. The primary outcomes include changes in aortic valve calcium at 24 weeks, and changes in aortic valve area and peak oxygen consumption at 48 weeks, with long-term participation lasting up to 156 weeks.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of adding chemotherapy to immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) compared to using immunotherapy alone in treating older adults aged 70 and above with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIB-IV). This phase III trial aims to determine if combining chemotherapy with pembrolizumab improves overall survival and other outcomes like progression-free survival, response rates, toxicity, and quality of life in this vulnerable patient group. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. In the immunotherapy-alone group, patients receive pembrolizumab intravenously every 21 days for four cycles, followed by maintenance pembrolizumab every 21 or 42 days for up to two years if there is no disease progression or unacceptable side effects. In the combination group, patients receive pembrolizumab plus a chemotherapy regimen chosen by their doctor, including drugs such as pemetrexed, carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, or paclitaxel, given intravenously on specific schedules for four cycles, followed by the same pembrolizumab maintenance. Imaging scans like MRI, CT, and PET are performed at baseline and throughout the study. During the study, participants undergo various assessments including imaging scans, laboratory tests, and questionnaires to evaluate treatment effects, side effects, and quality of life. Researchers monitor overall survival for up to five years from randomization, with follow-up visits every three months for the first two years and every six months thereafter until five years. Additional exploratory analyses include safety, tolerability, and correlations with gut microbiome and geriatric assessments to better understand treatment outcomes in this population.

Researchers are evaluating ivonescimab as a first-line treatment option for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors show high PD-L1 expression. This phase 3 randomized, double-blinded study compares ivonescimab with pembrolizumab to assess overall survival and progression-free survival in this patient group. Participants will receive either ivonescimab or pembrolizumab as intravenous injections. The study is designed to monitor these treatments over time to determine which may provide better outcomes in controlling metastatic NSCLC in patients with high PD-L1 levels. The study includes patients with measurable non-brain lesions and no prior systemic treatment for metastatic NSCLC. During the trial, patients will be closely followed for up to approximately 36 months to measure overall survival and progression-free survival. Researchers will assess the safety and effectiveness of the treatments through regular evaluations, including monitoring for disease progression and survival status. This long-term follow-up ensures comprehensive understanding of treatment impact over time.

Researchers are evaluating the Freenome Multiomics Blood Test as a tool to help detect lung cancer earlier in people at high risk. This prospective, multi-center observational study involves participants eligible for standard lung cancer screening using a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan. The study collects blood samples and compares the test's results with routine screening to see how well the blood test detects lung cancer over time. Participants who qualify and consent will have 50 ml of blood drawn for analysis by Freenome or its designee. Blood collection is done within 30 days of consent, and ideally on the same day as the LDCT screening, but up to 45 days after blood collection is allowed for the scan. The study collects detailed clinical and demographic information, including medical history, lifestyle, family history, and exposure risks, along with diagnostic and follow-up imaging and pathology reports related to lung cancer diagnosis. Participants will be followed for at least 24 months from their initial screening CT scan or until early study exit due to withdrawal or death. The researchers will monitor the sensitivity and specificity of the blood test in detecting lung cancer during this period. All clinical data, imaging, lab tests, and outcomes related to lung cancer diagnosis will be carefully recorded and analyzed to evaluate the blood test's performance.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from people with and without cancer to study and evaluate tests that could help detect cancer early. The goal is to create a blinded reference set of samples to validate blood-based tests for early detection of multiple types of cancer, including leukemia, lymphoma, breast, lung, and others. The study also aims to assess how well these tests perform at the time of initial cancer diagnosis, considering different tumor types and cancer stages. Participants complete a baseline questionnaire and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Those diagnosed with cancer may also provide tissue samples at these times. The study includes patients aged 40 to 75 years, with cancer diagnoses at various stages or individuals without cancer. Special procedures are in place for patients with high suspicion of certain cancers before confirmation. During the study, researchers collect detailed information through questionnaires, blood draws, and tissue sampling to analyze test accuracy. Participants are monitored for up to one year after registration to follow outcomes. The primary measure is providing this blinded set of blood samples to help validate future cancer detection tests, supporting research that could improve early diagnosis and treatment.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.

Researchers are investigating whether observation is as effective as continuing pembrolizumab treatment in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer who achieved a complete response after preoperative chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. This phase III trial aims to evaluate recurrence-free survival and quality of life, as well as the value of reducing immunotherapy treatment after surgery in these patients. The study also examines differences in adverse events, overall survival, and financial impacts between treatment approaches. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pembrolizumab and surgery. One group receives pembrolizumab intravenously as adjuvant therapy, while the other group undergoes observation without further treatment. Both groups have tumor biopsies and blood samples collected on study and during follow-up. Additional assessments include questionnaires and quality-of-life evaluations. During the study, researchers monitor participants for up to 10 years to measure recurrence-free survival. They assess quality of life using validated tools, track adverse events, and evaluate financial toxicity and work productivity. The study includes tumor tissue analysis, blood sample collection, and patient-reported outcomes to understand the long-term effects and value of treatment de-escalation in breast cancer care.