Jersey City

Researchers are evaluating the safety and tolerability of Efimosfermin Alfa in adults aged 18 to 75 years who have known or suspected metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) with fibrosis at stage F2 or F3. This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study focuses on participants with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome components, aiming to better understand treatment effects in this population. Participants will receive either Efimosfermin Alfa injection or a placebo, with the study designed as a three-arm trial. The treatment will be administered according to the study protocol, though specific dosing details are not provided. The study will monitor participants over a period extending to at least 52 weeks, comparing the safety and tolerability of Efimosfermin Alfa against placebo. During the study, participants will be closely observed through clinical assessments including monitoring for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory tests to detect Grade 3 and Grade 4 abnormalities, and evaluation of any adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment. These safety and tolerability measures will be recorded at Week 52, helping researchers assess the impact of Efimosfermin Alfa over time.

Researchers are investigating whether using coronary CT angiography (CCTA) to guide calcium modification during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve treatment outcomes for patients with significant calcified coronary artery disease. This study compares the CCTA-guided approach to the current standard of care, which uses intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance. The goal is to see if the CT-based strategy can enhance procedural efficiency and stent results while maintaining similar clinical safety over 12 months. The study will enroll 700 patients with flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis and moderate-to-severe calcification. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a CCTA-guided calcium modification group or an IVUS-guided group. The CCTA-guided approach uses detailed CT imaging to plan the procedure and select plaque modification techniques before PCI, while the IVUS-guided strategy relies on intravascular ultrasound imaging during the procedure. Both groups will have their stent implantation confirmed by IVUS after the procedure. Participants will be monitored for procedural outcomes, including the final minimal stent area measured by IVUS, and clinical outcomes such as target vessel failure (cardiac death, heart attack, or need for revascularization) over 12 months. The study includes assessments of imaging quality, clinical safety, and effectiveness of the calcium modification strategies. Follow-up will ensure the safety and success of the interventions throughout the year after PCI.

Researchers are studying the effectiveness and safety of a combination inhaler containing fluticasone propionate and albuterol sulfate delivered through a multidose dry powder inhaler with an electronic module (Fp/ABS eMDPI). This Phase 3 trial focuses on people aged 12 years and older who have asthma. The study also looks at the safety and tolerability of this inhaler when used four times daily over four weeks, as well as the pharmacokinetics of the combination and its individual components after a single dose. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the Fp/ABS combination inhaler, fluticasone propionate alone, albuterol sulfate alone, or a placebo inhaler. All treatments are given as inhalation powders. The main treatment period lasts four weeks, during which the inhalers are taken four times a day. The total study duration for each participant is about 10 weeks, not counting an optional prescreening visit. Throughout the study, researchers will measure lung function changes, specifically forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), from baseline to week 4. Participants will undergo assessments including lung function tests and safety evaluations. The study monitors how the inhaler affects breathing over time and checks for any side effects or tolerability issues during the treatment period.

Researchers are investigating the long-term safety and tolerability of open-label iptacopan in adults with primary IgA nephropathy who have previously completed specific clinical trials (CLNP023X2203 or CLNP023A2301). This extension study is designed to allow participants continued access to iptacopan until certain conditions are met, such as reaching three years from the last patient first visit, loss of treatment benefit, negative benefit-risk profile, initiation of dialysis or kidney transplant, or commercial availability of the drug. The study will also assess the drug's effects on disease progression every six months. Participants who completed the prior trials and meet inclusion criteria may receive oral iptacopan capsules at a dose of 200 mg twice daily. The study is open-label and non-randomized and will continue treatment under this regimen until one of the study-defined stopping points is reached. Supportive care with ACE inhibitors or ARBs is maintained as per clinical guidelines, and vaccination against certain infections is required before enrollment. During the study, participants will be monitored for safety, including serious adverse events, adverse events of special interest, vital sign abnormalities, ECG changes, and laboratory test abnormalities from the first day of treatment until seven days after the last dose. Efficacy assessments occur every six months to evaluate clinical effects on disease progression. The study aims to collect long-term safety and tolerability data while providing ongoing treatment access until the drug becomes commercially available or other stopping criteria apply.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to standard chemotherapy, with or without radiation, can improve survival for patients aged 5 to 60 years with newly diagnosed stage I or II classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares outcomes in groups based on their early response to initial chemotherapy, aiming to understand if immunotherapy can lead to better progression-free survival and overall survival compared to standard treatment alone. The study also looks at side effects, quality of life, and long-term health impacts across different patient groups. Participants first receive two cycles of standard ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days, followed by imaging to classify their response as rapid or slow early responders and their risk status as favorable or unfavorable. Based on these factors, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continued standard chemotherapy regimens or immunotherapy with brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, sometimes combined with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are given intravenously or orally depending on the drugs, and cycles typically last 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected regularly throughout the study. Throughout the trial, participants undergo frequent scans such as FDG-PET, CT, MRI, and PET-CT to monitor their disease status. Blood samples and questionnaires assess treatment effects and quality of life. After completing treatment, patients have scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for two years, and annually up to 12 years to track long-term outcomes, side effects, and survival. The main measurements focus on progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events, and patient-reported experiences.

Researchers are evaluating two surgical procedures, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, to see how well they reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women who have BRCA1 gene mutations. The study aims to determine if removing just the fallopian tubes (bilateral salpingectomy) is almost as effective as removing both the fallopian tubes and ovaries (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) in lowering ovarian cancer risk. This trial also assesses symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, sexual function, cancer-related distress, decision-making about surgery, and treatment side effects in these patients. Participants choose between two groups: one group undergoes bilateral salpingectomy and may have their ovaries removed later, while the other group undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups receive pelvic or transvaginal ultrasounds or pelvic MRI scans during screening, and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Ancillary studies include quality-of-life assessments and questionnaires. The study also collects tissue and blood samples for future research. After surgery, participants have follow-up visits at 10 to 60 days, then at 6, 12, and 24 months, and annually for up to 20 years. Researchers monitor the time until any high-grade serous carcinomas develop, specifically ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. They also track menopausal symptoms, sexual function, quality of life, cancer distress, medical decisions about surgery, and any adverse events during this long-term follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and how the body processes AZD7760 when given as an intravenous infusion. The study includes healthy adults (Phase I) and adults with end-stage kidney disease who are receiving hemodialysis through a central venous catheter (Phase IIa). It aims to understand the occurrence of adverse events and how the drug behaves in these two groups. In Phase I, participants are randomly assigned to receive one of three doses of AZD7760 or a placebo as a single intravenous infusion. This part includes a 28-day screening period, a 3-day dosing period with the infusion given on Day 1, followed by a 12-month follow-up. In Phase IIa, participants receive either AZD7760 or placebo as two intravenous infusions spaced three months apart (Day 1 and Day 91), along with a 28-day screening period and a 12-month follow-up after the last infusion. Participants will be monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events, and special interest events from Day 1 up to 361 days in Phase I and 181 days in Phase IIa. Assessments will include safety laboratory tests, physical exams, and vital signs. Researchers will closely observe participants during follow-up to evaluate safety and gather pharmacokinetic data over the course of one year after dosing.

This research aims to increase knowledge about advance care planning (ACP) discussions and hospice care among patients with serious illnesses receiving home-based medical care. The study evaluates whether a home-ACP video can improve communication between patients and clinicians about patients' wishes for medical care and promote patient-centered care. It is a randomized clinical trial involving 500 adult patients with life-limiting illnesses. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will continue receiving usual care from their home-based care team. The other group will receive usual care plus view a video focused on advance care planning and hospice education designed to help patients understand these topics better. The video intervention is delivered at home through the Clover Health House Calls Program. During the study, participants' use of hospice services will be tracked for up to one year or until death. The research team will assess whether the video improves patient-clinician communication and affects hospice utilization. Participants must be at least 21 years old, speak English or one of 25 other available languages for the video, and have a limited prognosis. Safety and cognitive ability to participate will also be monitored.

Researchers are investigating the addition of an immunotherapy drug called durvalumab to standard chemotherapy treatment in patients with MammaPrint High 2 Risk (MP2) stage II-III hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. This phase III trial aims to compare the effectiveness of usual chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy combined with durvalumab. Immunotherapy with durvalumab may help the immune system attack cancer cells and prevent tumor growth and spread, while chemotherapy drugs like paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide work to stop cancer cells from growing or dividing. Previous studies suggest patients with an MP2 result might respond better to this combined treatment approach. Participants first undergo MammaPrint testing to confirm MP2 status before randomization into two groups. One group receives paclitaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 14 days for 6 cycles, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide intravenously on day 1 every 14 days for 4 cycles. The other group receives the same chemotherapy schedule plus durvalumab intravenously over 60 minutes on specified cycles during both chemotherapy phases. Mammography is performed during screening, and optional tissue and blood samples are collected for future studies. Throughout the study, participants are monitored through various assessments including imaging, physical exams, laboratory tests, and quality of life questionnaires focusing on fatigue and physical and mental health. Researchers track breast cancer event-free survival and other outcomes such as treatment side effects and response rates. After completing treatment, patients are followed for up to 10 years or until death to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating whether ziltivekimab can help people who were hospitalized due to a heart attack by potentially reducing the development of heart disease and preventing new heart attacks or strokes. This Phase 3 study compares ziltivekimab with a placebo, which is a dummy medicine that has no effect on the body. Both treatments are given by chance, with equal likelihood for participants to receive either ziltivekimab or placebo. Participants will inject the study medicine once a month under the skin in the stomach, thigh, or upper arm. Ziltivekimab is given as an initial loading dose followed by monthly maintenance doses. The placebo group receives a matching injection schedule. The study duration is about two years. During the study, researchers will monitor participants for the time until the first serious heart-related event, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal heart attack, or non-fatal stroke. Participants will be closely observed from the start of randomization up to 25 months. The study includes regular follow-ups to assess safety and effectiveness of the treatments throughout this period.