Utica

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the drugs eltrekibart and mirikizumab in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis UC, a chronic inflammatory bowel disease. This Phase 2 study aims to find out how these treatments work alone or in combination to improve UC symptoms and health. The study is sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company and will last about 4 to 5 years, including screening. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of several treatments eltrekibart with a placebo, mirikizumab with a placebo, both drugs together, or placebo alone. The study is double-blinded, meaning neither the participants nor the researchers know which treatment is given to ensure unbiased results. The treatment period includes dosing with the study drugs or placebo, and participants will be monitored for safety and response. Participants will be involved in the trial for around 69 weeks, including a screening period of up to 35 days before starting treatment. Throughout the study, they will undergo assessments to measure clinical remission, response, endoscopic improvement, and quality of life using questionnaires. Blood samples will be taken to study drug levels, and researchers will monitor safety and disease activity regularly. The main outcome is the percentage of participants achieving clinical remission at Week 12, with additional measures assessed up to Week 52.

Researchers are evaluating the use of Vedolizumab in adults with moderate to severely active Ulcerative Colitis UC or Crohns Disease CD, which are chronic gut conditions causing symptoms such as diarrhea, inflammation, bleeding, and abdominal pain. The study aims to measure how many participants achieve remission, meaning their symptoms disappear, after 14 weeks of treatment. This is a Phase 4 treatment study sponsored by Takeda, focusing on the effectiveness of Vedolizumab administered in a community setting. Participants with either UC or CD will receive Vedolizumab intravenously IV during the first 6 weeks, with doses given at Weeks 0 and 2, and possibly an additional IV dose at Week 6. After this initial period, participants may switch to subcutaneous under the skin injections of Vedolizumab every two weeks from Week 6 until Week 50. If the treatment does not appear effective by Week 14, participants may stop Vedolizumab and switch to another therapy. Additional required visits occur at 26 weeks and 52 weeks, with a final check 18 weeks after the last Vedolizumab dose. Throughout the study, participants will visit the clinic multiple times for treatment and monitoring. Assessments include patient-reported symptom measures at Weeks 6, 14, and 52, clinical response evaluations, and endoscopic examinations to observe mucosal healing. Blood and stool tests will measure inflammation markers like C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin. Safety monitoring will track serious infections up to 72 weeks. Overall, participants are involved for about one year of treatment plus follow-up to evaluate the long-term effects of Vedolizumab.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of Afimkibart also known as RO7790121 as an induction therapy in people aged 16 to 80 with moderately to severely active Crohns disease. This Phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to compare Afimkibart with placebo to understand its potential benefits and risks for this condition. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Afimkibart through an intravenous infusion followed by a subcutaneous injection, or a placebo infusion followed by Afimkibart subcutaneous injection. The study treatment is given to assess the impact on Crohns disease activity over a 12-week period. During the study, participants will have their symptoms and disease activity monitored using assessments like the Crohns Disease Activity Index CDAI, endoscopic evaluations, stool and abdominal pain tracking, and quality of life questionnaires. Safety will be closely observed up to 30 weeks after starting treatment. This study helps to measure remission rates and responses to treatment over time.

Researchers are establishing the Integrated Cancer Repository for Cancer Research iCaRe2 as a multi-institutional resource to collect and manage standardized, multi-dimensional, and longitudinal data and biospecimens from adult cancer patients, individuals at high risk, and normal controls. This resource covers a wide geographical area including small and rural hospitals and cancer centers. The goal is to advance comprehensive studies on cancer risk factors and enable development of new strategies for cancer prevention, screening, early detection, and personalized treatment. The iCaRe2 resource collects data and biospecimens such as tumor samples, germline DNA, serum, urine, and plasma from participants across multiple cancer registries covering various cancer types. It operates as a web-based, HIPAA-compliant platform allowing centers with different expertise to contribute and collaborate. This repository supports cohort and population studies by providing a secure, standardized, and interoperable system for cancer-related data collection and sharing. Participants include adult patients with cancer, individuals at risk, and normal controls who can provide informed consent. Data collected includes clinical information, biospecimens, and longitudinal follow-up. The study measures include the development and implementation of the web-based registry and banking of biological materials for future research. Participation involves consent and data contribution, with monitoring and data validation ensuring quality. The repository enables ongoing research collaborations to study cancer biology, genetics, epidemiology, and patient care.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of LY4268989 combined with mirikizumab compared to mirikizumab alone in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. This phase 2 study aims to understand if the combination can better manage the condition. The study is sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company and involves a randomized, double-blind design with parallel groups. Participants receive either LY4268989 orally along with mirikizumab given intravenously and then subcutaneously, or mirikizumab with a placebo pill matching LY4268989. Responders to treatment will be re-randomized for a second study period. Treatment lasts approximately 104 weeks with up to 21 visits planned throughout the study. During the study, participants undergo assessments including clinical remission evaluation using the modified Mayo Score at weeks 12, 24, and 48, endoscopic improvement, and symptomatic remission measurements. Safety and response are closely monitored through scheduled visits. Overall participation lasts about 118 weeks, allowing researchers to gather long-term data on the treatments being studied.

Researchers are comparing the rates of surgical and minimally invasive interventions, as well as any harms, in Medicare beneficiaries treated with the MILD procedure versus those treated with interspinous process decompression IPD for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. This observational study uses Medicare claims data to follow patients for 24 months after their initial procedure starting from January 1, 2017. The purpose is to evaluate outcomes between these two types of procedures without requiring prior patient enrollment or consent. The study includes two groups patients who received MILD, which is a percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression performed under fluoroscopic guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine, and patients who received IPD, a different device-based decompression procedure. Data on reoperations and complications will be collected for both groups over a 24-month follow-up period using Medicare claims. Enrollment continues until the sponsor decides to stop. Participants involvement is passive as the study uses existing Medicare claims data. Researchers will monitor rates of harms related to the initial procedure and subsequent surgical or minimally invasive interventions over two years. No direct patient visits or interventions are conducted, and the study is exempt from institutional review board oversight. The total study duration extends to December 2026, covering cases treated since early 2017.

Researchers are reviewing anonymous medical records from multiple centers to understand the outcomes of different treatments for chronic pain. This study includes several groups to assess how various approaches work in distinct patient subgroups. The focus is on patients who have had or may have spinal cord stimulation systems or other treatments like radiofrequency RF or intradiscal therapies IDS. The study looks at patients who have previously received spinal cord stimulation or other therapies and those who have switched to different treatments afterward. Treatments under review include Boston Scientific devices and non-Boston Scientific systems such as spinal cord stimulation, RF, and IDS. The data is retrospective, meaning it examines past patient experiences without introducing new treatments. Participants involvement consists of the analysis of their de-identified medical charts, with no active treatment or visits required. Researchers will measure responder rates approximately two years from the start of data collection to evaluate treatment outcomes. The study spans from April 2012 to December 2030, focusing on long-term clinical results in chronic pain management.

Researchers are evaluating the long-term performance and reliability of Medtronics market-released cardiac rhythm therapy products, including leads and devices used for pacing, sensing, or defibrillation. This observational study aims to analyze how well these cardiac devices function over time by measuring survival probabilities and tracking device-related complications. The study applies to patients with conditions such as arrhythmia, bradycardia, heart failure, and sinus tachycardia. The study includes all Medtronic market-released cardiac leads and implantable devices such as pacemakers IPG, implantable cardioverter defibrillators ICD, and cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT devices. Participants either have a new implant or are within 30 days post-implantation. Data from prior qualifying Medtronic studies with complete follow-up may also be included. The study continuously monitors these products from the time of implant until the lead is no longer in use due to patient exit, death, or device deactivation. Participants provide consent for data access and use, and their health information is tracked over the long term. Researchers evaluate lead-related complications and product survival throughout the study period, which began in 1983 and is ongoing until 2040. The study does not involve additional treatments but collects follow-up data to assess device performance and safety over time.

This registry study is designed to continuously evaluate and periodically report the safety and effectiveness of Medtronic medical products that are already available on the market. It aims to support patients, hospitals, clinicians, regulatory bodies, payers, and industry by simplifying clinical surveillance and promoting advanced performance assessments with minimal burden. Participants include patients who have or are planned to receive an eligible Medtronic product. Enrollment can occur at any time relative to therapy start or retrospectively. The study involves ongoing data collection related to the use of these products in routine clinical care. Throughout participation, patients are monitored for safety and effectiveness outcomes approximately every 6 to 12 months, depending on the therapy. Data gathered helps assess product performance over time while minimizing additional visits or procedures. Follow-up continues until the studys completion, which extends to the year 2040.

Researchers are conducting a global, prospective, multi-center observational study to gather real-world data on the long-term effectiveness, economic value, and technical performance of Boston Scientifics commercially approved neurostimulation systems for pain management. The study focuses on patients using these neurostimulation devices according to their approved instructions for use in routine clinical practice. Participants will first undergo a neurostimulation trial period using any commercially approved Boston Scientific neurostimulator for pain. Those who experience a positive outcome from this trial may then receive a permanent implant of the neurostimulation system. Treatment customization will be guided by the investigators judgment and routine care practices at each site. During the study, participants will be observed to collect information on clinical outcomes, technical device performance, and economic factors related to neurostimulation therapy. The research team will monitor participants over the long term to assess how well the therapy manages pain and its associated benefits. The study is expected to continue until May 2035, with ongoing follow-up and data collection throughout this period.