Utica

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of two drugs, eltrekibart and mirikizumab, in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This study is a phase 2 trial lasting about 4 to 5 years, aiming to understand how well these treatments work alone or together for this chronic condition. Participants will receive either eltrekibart alone, mirikizumab alone, a combination of both, or a placebo. The treatments are administered as drugs, and the study includes a screening period of up to 35 days before enrollment. The total participation time for each person is approximately 69 weeks, which includes the screening and treatment periods. During the trial, participants will be closely monitored to assess the percentage who achieve clinical remission by week 12. Researchers will conduct regular evaluations, which may include medical assessments and questionnaires, to track the safety and effects of the treatments. The study emphasizes careful follow-up to ensure participant safety and to gather detailed information about the therapies over the entire study duration.

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD) are long-term gut conditions that cause symptoms like diarrhea, inflammation, bleeding, and belly pain. This research aims to see how many participants with UC or CD achieve remission, meaning their signs and symptoms disappear, after 14 weeks of treatment with Vedolizumab. This is a Phase 4 study evaluating the use of Vedolizumab in a community setting for moderate to severely active UC or CD. Participants will receive Vedolizumab treatment for about one year. During the first 6 weeks, the medication will be given through an intravenous infusion. After this period, treatment will continue with subcutaneous injections of Vedolizumab for the remaining weeks. If a participant's condition does not improve after 14 weeks, they will stop this treatment and may switch to another therapy. Additional visits are scheduled at 26 weeks and 52 weeks, with a follow-up assessment 18 weeks after the last dose. Throughout the study, participants will visit the clinic multiple times for monitoring. Researchers will assess remission using patient-reported outcome measures at week 14. Other evaluations include clinical checks and safety monitoring during treatment and after finishing the medication. The total study involvement can last over a year, including treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of induction therapy with Afimkibart (also called RO7790121) in people aged 16 to 80 years who have moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. This Phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study focuses on how well Afimkibart works compared to placebo in improving symptoms and healing the intestine. Participants will receive Afimkibart either as an intravenous (IV) infusion or a subcutaneous (SC) injection. The study includes a placebo group receiving a matching IV infusion. Treatment is given during the induction phase to assess the initial response. During the study, participants will be monitored for clinical remission using the Crohn's Disease Activity Index and for endoscopic response at 12 weeks. Researchers will assess safety, effectiveness, and any side effects throughout the study. Participants will undergo evaluations including symptom tracking and medical tests to measure treatment outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the Integrated Cancer Repository for Cancer Research (iCaRe2), a comprehensive multi-institutional resource developed by the Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center. This resource collects and manages standardized, multi-dimensional, and longitudinal data and biospecimens from adult cancer patients, those at high risk, and normal controls. iCaRe2 includes data from a wide geographic area covering many small and rural hospitals and cancer centers, supporting studies on cancer risk factors, development, progression, and strategies for prevention, screening, early detection, and personalized treatment. iCaRe2 is a web-based, secure, HIPAA-compliant registry that integrates multiple specialized cancer collaborative registries covering a broad range of cancers such as pancreatic, breast, thyroid, thoracic, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, central nervous system, leukemia, gynecological, sarcoma, melanoma, and more. The system allows participating centers to contribute data and biospecimens like tumor samples, germ line DNA, serum, urine, and plasma. This flexible "confederation model" enables centers with different expertise and resources to collaborate on diverse research projects through a common platform. Participants include adult individuals aged 19 and older who have a cancer diagnosis or history, are at risk for cancer, have suspicious clinical findings, or have no history of cancer (normal controls). Data collection includes demographic, clinical, and biospecimen information. The registry supports multi-dimensional data mining and sharing to advance cancer research. The primary outcome is the ongoing development and implementation of this web-based cancer collaborative registry, with long-term data collection and collaboration planned over many years.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of LY4268989 when given together with mirikizumab compared to mirikizumab alone in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This Phase 2 study focuses on adults aged 18 to 80 years who have had UC diagnosed for at least 3 months and have active symptoms confirmed by specific clinical scores and endoscopic evidence. The study aims to assess clinical remission using the Modified Mayo Score at 12 weeks. Participants will receive either LY4268989 by mouth combined with mirikizumab administered first intravenously and then by subcutaneous injection, or mirikizumab alone with a placebo pill. The entire study treatment period will last about 104 weeks, with up to 21 visits planned for monitoring. Treatment schedules and dosing are designed to compare the combination therapy to mirikizumab alone. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including clinical evaluations, endoscopy, and monitoring of symptoms and safety. Researchers will track the percentage of participants achieving clinical remission by week 12 using the Modified Mayo Score. Participants will be followed closely throughout the study duration, which totals approximately 118 weeks from start to finish, including treatment and follow-up visits.

Researchers are evaluating surgical and minimally invasive treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing Medicare patients who received the MILD procedure against those who had interspinous process decompression (IPD). The study focuses on outcomes such as the rate of harms related to the initial procedure and the frequency of additional surgical or minimally invasive interventions within 24 months after treatment. Enrollment includes patients treated from January 1, 2017, onward, with continuation until the sponsor decides to stop. The MILD procedure involves percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression, performed under fluoroscopy through a dorsal approach to partially remove tissue and bone at the affected spinal level. The control group receives the IPD procedure for LSS. Both groups are monitored for a 24-month period post-index procedure using Medicare claims data to track reoperations and any harms. Participants contribute data through Medicare claims without needing prior enrollment or consent, as the study is exempt from IRB oversight. Researchers collect and analyze information on procedure-related harms and subsequent interventions over two years. This approach allows evaluation of long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients treated with either MILD or IPD.

This research evaluates anonymous, previously collected medical data to review the outcomes of different treatment methods for chronic pain. The study is a retrospective review involving multiple centers and independent patient groups to compare results across various subgroups. The study examines clinical outcomes related to the use of spinal cord stimulation, radiofrequency (RF), and other implantable device systems from Boston Scientific and other manufacturers. Multiple cohorts will be analyzed based on the type of treatment system used. Participants' medical charts will be reviewed to measure response rates through approximately two years of follow-up. The study focuses on clinical results documented in patient records without any new treatment or intervention administered during the study.

Researchers are evaluating the long-term reliability and performance of Medtronic cardiac rhythm products, including leads and devices used for pacing, sensing, or defibrillation. The study aims to analyze product survival probabilities to better understand their durability and performance over time. This research includes all Medtronic market-released leads and implantable devices for conditions such as arrhythmia, bradycardia, heart failure, and sinus tachycardia. Participants include those who have been implanted with at least one Medtronic market-released product or those who participated in qualifying Medtronic studies with complete implant and follow-up data. The study monitors these devices from the time of implant, tracking lead-related complications and device performance. If a patient exits the study, passes away, or the device is deactivated, the implant is no longer followed. During the study, researchers collect health information and monitor the devices to assess ongoing performance and complications. Follow-up is essential to confirm device status and ensure accurate data collection. The main outcome measured is lead-related complications for each lead model, with continuous observation from implant until termination due to patient or device status. Participation requires informed consent and authorization for access to health information as per institutional requirements.

This research aims to continuously evaluate and report on the safety and effectiveness of Medtronic products that are already available on the market. It addresses a wide range of conditions including cardiac rhythm disorders, neurological and cardiovascular disorders, digestive issues, respiratory therapy, and various surgical and diagnostic procedures. The registry supports patients, hospitals, clinicians, regulatory bodies, payers, and industry by simplifying the clinical monitoring process and enhancing performance assessment. Participants in this registry are those who have received or are planned to receive treatment with eligible Medtronic products. Enrollment can occur within a specific time window relative to starting therapy or retrospectively. The study does not involve specific interventions but focuses on the ongoing collection of data related to the products in use. During participation, individuals will be monitored periodically every 6 to 12 months depending on their therapy. Researchers will collect data to assess safety and effectiveness without additional procedures beyond standard care. Follow-up will continue as long as the therapy is ongoing, with the goal of providing long-term surveillance and valuable information to improve patient care and product performance.

Researchers are conducting a global, multi-center, prospective post-market study to observe the long-term effectiveness of Boston Scientific neurostimulation systems in managing pain. The study aims to gather real-world clinical outcomes, economic value, and technical performance data of these commercially approved neurostimulation devices when used in routine clinical practice. The treatment involves an initial trial period using a Boston Scientific neurostimulation device for pain relief. Participants who experience a positive response during the trial may proceed to receive a permanent implant of the neurostimulation system. The therapy is tailored individually based on the investigator's judgment and standard care practices at each study site, following specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants will be monitored throughout the trial and permanent implant phases to assess pain relief and overall treatment effectiveness. Assessments may include patient evaluations of pain and ability to complete study requirements. The study focuses on capturing comprehensive data to evaluate both clinical outcomes and device performance during regular use. Total participation duration depends on individual treatment progression from trial to permanent implant.