Salem

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are evaluating ASTX030, a combination of azacitidine and cedazuridine, as a treatment for myeloid neoplasms including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This multi-phase study includes Phase 1 through Phase 3 monotherapy arms and Phase 1 and Phase 2 combination therapy arms with venetoclax. The study aims to assess pharmacokinetics, safety, efficacy, and drug interactions over an approximate duration of 8 years. The study treatments involve oral administration of ASTX030 and azacitidine, with some arms including subcutaneous azacitidine for comparison. Phase 1 monotherapy includes dose escalation and expansion stages, while Phase 2 and Phase 3 monotherapy arms are randomized crossover studies comparing oral ASTX030 to subcutaneous azacitidine. The combination therapy arms explore ASTX030 combined with venetoclax in participants with treatment-nafve AML, either in an open-label randomized exploratory setting or a single-arm study. Participants undergo evaluations including pharmacokinetic measurements such as total cycle area under the curve (AUC) for drug exposure, assessment of treatment-emergent adverse events, and investigator-assessed complete response rates. Monitoring occurs at multiple timepoints up to 36 months in some study arms. Safety, efficacy, and drug interaction assessments are integral throughout the study, with follow-up periods extending up to 8 years.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, alone or in combination, in people with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) whose tumors show specific biomarkers. This open-label, exploratory Phase I/Ib study assigns participants to treatment groups based on their tumor biomarker test results. The goal is to understand how well these treatments work and how safe they are for different patient subgroups defined by biomarker status. Participants may receive various study drugs, including oral medications like Inavolisib, SY-5609, and Divarasib, or intravenous drugs such as Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, Atezolizumab, Tiragolumab, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI. The specific treatment and schedule depend on the assigned study arm and the participant's biomarker profile. Biomarker testing is done using validated tests, including the FoundationOne Liquid CDx blood test, to guide treatment allocation. During the study, participants will be monitored for safety and treatment response over approximately 84 months, focusing on the objective response rate. Evaluations include tumor measurements using RECIST criteria, collection of tumor tissue samples for biomarker research, and regular assessments of organ function and overall health. Safety is closely tracked, and participants must be able to follow the study protocol and attend scheduled visits throughout their participation.

Researchers are evaluating how well elacestrant works compared to standard endocrine therapy in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer who are at high risk of the cancer returning. This is a Phase 3 global, multicenter, randomized, open-label study focusing on participants who have had early invasive breast cancer removed and meet specific receptor and risk criteria. The study aims to understand which treatment better prevents invasive breast cancer over up to five years. Participants will receive either elacestrant or one of several standard endocrine therapies, including anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, or tamoxifen, all given as oral tablets. Treatments will be administered according to the study plan, with careful monitoring throughout the trial. The study includes adults who have already received between 24 and 60 months of prior endocrine therapy, with or without certain inhibitors, and who have completed or stopped these treatments as required. During the study, participants will be monitored for invasive breast cancer-free survival for up to five years. Researchers will perform regular assessments to track treatment effects, side effects, and cancer recurrence. The study also includes safety monitoring and may involve additional tests or evaluations as needed to ensure participant well-being throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the drug exposure levels of tislelizumab given by subcutaneous injection compared to intravenous infusion as first-line treatment in adults with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This Phase 3 study includes approximately 351 patients and aims to understand how the drug behaves in the body depending on the administration method. The study consists of three main periods: screening, treatment, and follow-up. Participants will receive tislelizumab either as a subcutaneous injection or as an intravenous infusion combined with chemotherapy drugs including cisplatin, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, or capecitabine. The treatments are delivered according to the assigned group, with chemotherapy given by infusion or oral administration depending on the drug. The study monitors the drug concentrations at specific times after dosing to assess steady state and overall exposure. During the study, participants will undergo assessments to measure tumor response and provide tumor tissue for biomarker analysis. Performance status and organ function will be evaluated, along with safety monitoring throughout treatment and follow-up. The primary outcomes focus on measuring the predicted drug concentrations at 21 and 85 days after the first dose. The total participation includes time for screening, treatment, and post-treatment follow-up to ensure comprehensive monitoring.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of adding cemiplimab, an immunotherapy drug that blocks the PD-1 pathway to help the immune system attack tumor cells, to the usual treatment of docetaxel and ramucirumab in patients with stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. This phase II/III Expanded Lung-MAP trial compares cemiplimab combined with docetaxel and ramucirumab versus docetaxel and ramucirumab alone, aiming to improve treatment outcomes in patients who previously received platinum chemotherapy and immunotherapy but developed resistance or disease progression. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms. In Arm I, patients receive dexamethasone orally twice daily on days 0-2, ramucirumab and docetaxel intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. In Arm II, patients receive the same treatments plus cemiplimab intravenously on day 1 of each cycle. Treatment cycles continue every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Throughout the study, patients undergo regular blood sample collection and imaging scans such as CT or MRI to monitor disease status. During the study, participants are closely monitored with scans, blood tests, and physical exams to assess overall survival and other outcomes like progression-free survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Researchers also collect blood samples for future molecular studies. After completing treatment, patients are followed up every 3 to 6 months for up to 3 years to track long-term survival and health status. The study measures overall survival from randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 3 years.

The goal of this trial is to determine the efficacy of advanced cognitive training for cancer survivors suffering from cancer- and cancer-treatment-related cognitive dysfunction. For millions of cancer survivors, cognitive dysfunction is a prevalent, severe, and persistent problem that has long been associated with poor work-related and health-related outcomes. Evidence suggests that a significant subset of breast cancer survivors (BCS) incur cognitive changes that may persist for years after treatment. Unfortunately, the scientific basis for managing these cognitive changes is extremely limited. Available evidence from pilot studies, including our work, suggests that advanced cognitive training, which is based on the principles of neuroplasticity (ability of brain neurons to re-organize and form new neural networks), may be a viable treatment option. However, previous trials to date have been limited by lack of attention-controlled designs, small samples of BCS, or limited outcome measures. Therefore, to overcome limitations of past studies and build on our pilot results, the purpose of this 2-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial is to conduct a full-scale efficacy trial to compare advanced cognitive training to attention control in BCS.

Researchers are evaluating the correlation between Molecular Residual Disease (MRD) detected through circulating tumor DNA tests and pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in women with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This prospective, multicenter, observational study aims to improve MRD detection, which may help enhance disease outcomes for future patients with this breast cancer subtype. The study uses the NeXT Personal Clinical Trial Assay, a patient-specific, tumor-informed device that detects MRD from circulating free DNA (cfDNA). This method involves whole genome sequencing from tumor and normal samples to create a personalized DNA target panel. Plasma samples are then sequenced using next generation sequencing technology to analyze cfDNA and determine MRD status. Participants will provide blood samples before and during NAC treatment to monitor MRD. The study measures the correlation between MRD and pCR through study completion, averaging six months. Researchers will assess blood samples, biopsy tissue, and clinical outcomes while monitoring safety and treatment response throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of fenofibrate compared with placebo in preventing worsening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) over six years in people with mild to moderately severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) without center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) at the start. The study also aims to test a model where ophthalmologists collaborate with primary care providers like internists or endocrinologists to safely prescribe and monitor the drug. Additionally, the study will assess how blood sugar variability relates to DR outcomes and will include additional studies to understand functional and structural eye changes in participants. Participants will receive either fenofibrate or placebo daily with food, with the dose (either 160mg or 54mg) chosen based on kidney function measured at screening. The dose may be adjusted during follow-up according to the study protocol. The trial is randomized and includes a comparison between the fenofibrate and placebo groups. During the study, participants will be monitored for worsening of diabetic retinopathy over six years. Eye health will be assessed through specialized grading of fundus photographs and visual acuity tests. Kidney function and blood sugar variability will also be tracked. The main outcome measured is the progression of diabetic retinopathy. Researchers will observe safety and effectiveness while participants remain in the study for the full six-year period.