Leesburg

Researchers are evaluating overall survival in men with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This phase 3 study compares the combination of xaluritamig plus abiraterone with the investigators choice of treatment, which includes docetaxel, cabazitaxel, or abiraterone. The trial aims to assess which approach may affect survival outcomes in this patient population. Participants are assigned randomly to one of two groups. One group receives xaluritamig administered intravenously combined with oral abiraterone acetate daily. The other group receives the investigators choice of treatment oral abiraterone acetate daily, intravenous docetaxel every three weeks, or intravenous cabazitaxel every three weeks. Treatment continues with regular monitoring throughout the study. During the study, participants undergo various assessments including imaging scans and laboratory tests to track disease progression and response. Patient-reported outcomes on pain and quality of life are collected using standardized questionnaires. Researchers monitor adverse events and measure multiple outcomes such as progression-free survival, response rates, and prostate-specific antigen levels for up to approximately 51 months. The total study duration extends until August 2032.

Researchers are evaluating Afimkibart RO7790121 for people with moderately to severely active Crohns disease. This Phase III clinical trial aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of both induction and maintenance therapy using this drug compared to a placebo. The study is designed as a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across multiple centers. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either Afimkibart via intravenous infusion followed by subcutaneous injection or matching placebo treatments. The study involves continuous treatment through induction and maintenance phases to compare outcomes at weeks 12 and 52. The trial includes a placebo group to provide a comparison for evaluating Afimkibarts effects. During the study, participants will have regular visits for assessments including clinical remission rates, endoscopic response, symptomatic remission, stool frequency, abdominal pain, and quality of life questionnaires. Researchers will monitor various outcomes over 52 weeks and track adverse events for up to 70 weeks after baseline. This long-term follow-up helps evaluate both the treatments impact and safety throughout the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of induction therapy using Afimkibart also called RO7790121 in people with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis UC. This Phase III study is designed as a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare Afimkibart with a placebo. The study aims to understand how well Afimkibart works to induce remission in UC and its safety profile. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive Afimkibart through an intravenous IV infusion followed by a subcutaneous SC injection, while the other group will receive matching placebo infusions and injections. The treatment period lasts 12 weeks, during which researchers will assess the effects of the therapies. Throughout the study, participants will undergo various assessments including evaluations of clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, histologic changes, and symptom severity at specified time points such as baseline, Week 2, and Week 12. Safety will be monitored by tracking adverse events for up to 30 weeks after starting treatment. The total participation duration spans the treatment and follow-up periods to gather comprehensive data on outcomes and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a study drug called elecoglipron compared with oral semaglutide in adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus T2DM who have an increased risk of cardiovascular events. The study focuses on adults whose diabetes is not adequately controlled by lifestyle changes or stable treatment with other glucose-lowering medications. This is a phase III randomized trial sponsored by AstraZeneca, aiming to compare these two oral medications in managing T2DM and cardiovascular risk. Participants will be assigned to receive either elecoglipron or semaglutide, both administered orally once daily at specified doses. The study runs in parallel groups, with one group receiving elecoglipron and the other receiving semaglutide. Treatment and observation will continue for 52 weeks, during which the effects on blood sugar control and other health indicators will be evaluated. Throughout the 52-week study period, participants will undergo regular assessments including measurements of Hemoglobin A1c HbA1c, body weight, and blood pressure. Researchers will monitor changes from baseline to week 52 to understand the drugs impact on diabetes control and cardiovascular risk factors. The study also tracks safety and tolerability to ensure participant wellbeing during the trial.

Research shows that women undergoing pelvic radiation therapy for endometrial cancer often experience fatigue that affects daily activities. Although exercise is known to help reduce fatigue in cancer patients and survivors, no studies have specifically focused on exercise for women receiving pelvic radiation therapy. This research aims to evaluate whether an activity coaching program can improve treatment-related fatigue in this group of women. Participants will join an exercise coaching program with ten weekly check-ins led by a certified exercise coach. They will set weekly activity goals and choose enjoyable, easy activities to increase their movement. Check-ins can be scheduled in person or virtually. All participants will receive a Fitbit to monitor their activity, heart rate, and steps. Two groups will be formed one starting the coaching during radiation therapy and continuing after, and another starting 6 to 8 weeks post-radiation and continuing for 16 to 19 weeks. The study will last about six months. During the study, participants will complete four surveys and undergo a 6-minute walking test four times to assess heart and lung response to exercise. An interview will be conducted at the end to gather feedback. Researchers will monitor adherence to coaching sessions as the main outcome and also assess changes in fatigue, bowel and urinary symptoms, quality of life, cognitive function, sexual satisfaction, self-efficacy, and walking distance. The study is sponsored by Inova Health Care Services and plans to enroll 16 patients.

Researchers are comparing two types of radiation therapy, proton beam radiation therapy PBT and intensity modulated photon radiotherapy IMRT, to treat patients with stage I to IVA esophageal cancer. The study aims to find out whether PBT improves overall survival and causes fewer serious heart and lung side effects compared to IMRT. Additional goals include examining symptom burden, quality of life, tumor response, cost-effectiveness, hospitalization length, lymphocyte levels, and rates of treatment failures and complications. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives PBT over 28 treatment sessions, five days a week for 5.5 weeks, combined with chemotherapy chosen by the patient and their doctor. The other group receives IMRT on the same schedule with similar chemotherapy options. After chemoradiation, patients may have surgery to remove the esophagus tumor if they are eligible. Throughout the study, blood samples and imaging scans PETCT or CT are collected. Participants are closely monitored during treatment and followed for up to eight years. Follow-up visits occur every 3 to 6 months for the first three years and annually thereafter. The study measures overall survival, heart and lung side effects, symptom changes, tumor response, hospitalization time, immune cell counts, and quality-adjusted life years. The study also collects biospecimens for future research on treatment complications and assesses economic factors related to each radiation therapy.

This research aims to compare two methods of monitoring pancreatic cysts and to identify biomarkers that may help detect the risk of these cysts turning into pancreatic cancer. The study evaluates whether more frequent monitoring or less frequent monitoring leads to better patient outcomes and explores various blood and imaging biomarkers for improved risk prediction. Participants are observed through two different surveillance approaches that were previously randomized but are now closed to new enrollment. One approach involves lower intensity monitoring with MRI, CT, or endoscopic ultrasound EUS scans spaced out over years, while the other involves higher intensity monitoring with more frequent imaging based on cyst size. Throughout the study, patients may also provide blood samples and undergo biopsies, fine needle aspirations, or surgery as needed. Participants are followed up regularly for five years from registration, with imaging and blood tests at intervals depending on their assigned monitoring method. Researchers collect data on clinical features, anxiety, quality of life, financial distress, healthcare costs, and outcomes such as the development of concerning pancreatic cyst features or pancreatic cancer. The study uses these measures to assess the effectiveness of monitoring strategies and the predictive value of biomarkers.

Researchers are evaluating two digital mindfulness-based interventions to improve mental health and well-being in younger breast cancer survivors who have elevated depressive symptoms. This phase III randomized trial focuses on women diagnosed at or before age 50, who completed primary cancer treatments at least six months earlier. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of live instructor-led sessions via Zoom and a self-paced app-based program, exploring which approach best supports psychological health in this population. Participants will be assigned to one of three groups the live online mindfulness sessions MAPs LO conducted weekly for 6 weeks via Zoom, the MAPs App delivering the same content in shorter sessions over 6 weeks, or a meditation-only control group accessing guided audio meditations. Both English and Spanish speakers can participate in the live online and meditation groups, while the app is only available in English. Tablets and internet hotspots are provided if needed. All groups have access to the UCLA MARC mindfulness meditation app throughout the 6-month follow-up. During the study, participants will attend weekly sessions for the live group or engage with app content at home, with usage tracked to measure intervention dose. Researchers will assess depressive symptoms shortly after the intervention and again up to 6 months later, along with fatigue symptoms. They will also investigate factors influencing intervention effects, such as baseline distress and social determinants, and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the programs. The total study duration includes a 6-week intervention period plus follow-up assessments out to 6 months.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for patients with high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes. This Phase III trial compares adding induction chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab before standard chemotherapy, radiation, and pembrolizumab maintenance against the standard treatment of chemotherapy, radiation, and pembrolizumab maintenance alone. The study aims to investigate whether this induction approach improves progression-free survival and overall survival, while assessing treatment toxicity and biomarker effects. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the standard care group, patients receive weekly cisplatin and pembrolizumab every three weeks alongside daily radiation therapy for 5 weeks, followed by brachytherapy for 4 to 5 treatments, and then pembrolizumab maintenance every six weeks for up to 15 cycles. In the experimental group, patients first receive induction chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel weekly for 3 weeks, plus pembrolizumab every three weeks for 2 cycles, then receive the same chemoradiation and pembrolizumab maintenance schedule, with radiation delivered in weeks 7 to 13. Treatment is given unless disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Throughout the trial, participants undergo imaging scans including PET, CT, chest x-ray, and MRI, along with blood sample collection to monitor disease and biomarkers. After completing treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for up to 3 more years. Researchers measure progression-free survival as the primary outcome and assess overall survival, adverse events, treatment completion, biomarker levels, and radiation quality. Safety and treatment effects are closely monitored during the study period lasting several years.

Researchers are evaluating the Glide prosthesis control system to see if it reduces the burden of use for patients with upper limb amputations and their clinical care teams compared to the Pattern Recognition-based advanced myoelectric control. The goal is to fill gaps in knowledge that will help guide prosthesis prescriptions and rehabilitation. This trial focuses on people with unilateral trans-radial or trans-humeral limb loss who are candidates for advanced myoelectric prostheses with two or more degrees of freedom. Participants will use both a Glide-controlled upper limb prosthesis and a Pattern Recognition-based upper limb prosthesis in a randomized order. One group starts with the Glide system and then switches to Pattern Recognition, while the other group begins with Pattern Recognition and then switches to Glide. These control systems use different methods to translate muscle signals into prosthetic movements, with Glide using a 2-D cursor map and Pattern Recognition using machine learning to classify muscle activation patterns. During the study, participants will be monitored weekly for 168 days from the delivery of the prosthesis. Researchers will track the daily number of control adjustments, clinical follow-up interventions, socket comfort, pain levels, satisfaction, functional ability, and daily prosthesis wear time. This comprehensive monitoring aims to assess the long-term stability and usability of each control strategy to inform future prosthetic care.