Brookfield

This trial focuses on adults with moderate to severe mid-face volume loss, a common sign of aging caused by decreased collagen, elastin, and glycosaminoglycans. It aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of NOA VOLUME, a crosslinked hyaluronic acid injectable gel with lidocaine, in restoring mid-face volume. The study compares NOA VOLUME to an established treatment, JUVÉDERM VOLUMA XC, to determine which better improves facial fullness. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive injections of either NOA VOLUME or VOLUMA XC in the cheek area on the first day of the study. They may receive an optional touch-up injection on Day 31 and an optional repeat treatment at Month 18. The treatments are delivered through injections designed to restore volume and rejuvenate the mid-face area. Throughout the study, which lasts up to 31 months, participants will be monitored for safety and effectiveness. Researchers will assess changes in mid-face volume using a live facial volume deficit scale at Month 6 and track any adverse events throughout the study period. Follow-ups will help evaluate long-term outcomes and participant response to the treatments.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of cannabis and cannabinoid use on cancer-related symptoms in adults newly diagnosed with breast, colorectal, melanoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or non-small cell lung cancer. This study focuses on patients who are planning to receive or have recently started systemic cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4. The goal is to understand how cannabis use may be associated with symptom changes over time. Participants are enrolled in a non-interventional study where no experimental treatment is given. They complete surveys about their symptoms and cannabis use, and their medical records are reviewed regularly. The study tracks cancer-related symptoms monthly for up to 12 months after enrollment, allowing researchers to observe symptom patterns during ongoing cancer treatment. An optional substudy is available at select sites for patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving paclitaxel and ICIs. During the study, participants complete online surveys in English or Spanish at their convenience, either at home or in clinic. Medical records are examined to gather information on treatments and health status. The main outcome measured is cancer-related symptoms, assessed monthly for one year. Safety monitoring includes ensuring participants have an expected life expectancy of at least six months and are not enrolled in hospice. The study aims to enroll 2000 patients across multiple sites in the United States.

This research collects data and biological samples from patients who have experienced side effects from immunotherapy treatments for cancer. The goal is to create a national collection of these samples and clinical information to help future studies understand, predict, prevent, and treat serious immune-related side effects, rare infections, or rapid tumor growth after immunotherapy. Participants provide tissue and blood samples when they join the study and again one month later. Some patients may also provide stool samples if they have certain side effects like colitis. Researchers also review participants' medical records for up to one year to gather detailed health information related to their treatment and side effects. During the study, patients undergo sample collections and have their health records examined. The main outcome measured is the establishment of a national biorepository containing these samples and data, which will be used in future research over the course of one year. This study aims to support better understanding and management of immunotherapy side effects in cancer treatment.

Researchers are evaluating how to best recommend chemotherapy for patients with colon cancer after surgery by using the presence or absence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood. This approach aims to identify microscopic residual tumor cells and may provide better risk prediction for cancer recurrence compared to traditional methods. The trial focuses on patients with Stage IIB, IIC, or III colon cancer who have undergone complete tumor removal. Participants will have their tumor tissue and blood tested centrally using the Signatera assay to determine ctDNA status. Patients without detectable ctDNA may avoid chemotherapy, while those with detectable ctDNA are considered at higher risk and will be randomly assigned to receive different chemotherapy regimens, including mFOLFOX6, CAPOX, or mFOLFIRINOX, given intravenously or orally over periods ranging from 3 to 6 months. The study includes initial screening, treatment, and possible second randomization for patients whose ctDNA status changes during monitoring. During the study, participants will undergo various assessments including blood tests, imaging scans, and performance evaluations to monitor their health and response to therapy. Researchers will track the time to ctDNA positivity and disease-free survival for up to 3 and 5 years, respectively. Safety and treatment effects will be closely observed throughout the study duration, ensuring thorough follow-up and monitoring for all participants.

Researchers are evaluating the Cost Communication and Financial Navigation (CostCOM) program to see how it affects cancer patients' ability to stick to their care plans and manage financial stress caused by high out-of-pocket medical costs. Financial hardship from cancer treatment can cause delays or stops in care and lower quality of life. This study compares usual care with CostCOM, which offers financial counseling, education, and resource connections to reduce financial barriers and ease financial burden. Patients with newly diagnosed solid cancers are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives a brochure about financial navigation services, while the other group receives the usual financial care plus CostCOM counseling sessions lasting about one hour, given within 30 days after enrollment and then again at 3, 6, and 12 months. Non-patient participants involved in the study complete surveys and participate in in-depth interviews 15 to 39 months after the first patient enrollment. Participants are monitored for 12 months after completing the intervention. Researchers collect patient-reported information on care adherence affected by costs, financial hardship, worry about finances, quality of life, and satisfaction with care. They also assess patient and provider experiences with the CostCOM program, the accuracy of cost estimates communicated, and neighborhood characteristics. The study aims to understand how CostCOM impacts patients over time and their use of financial navigation resources.

Researchers are evaluating the incidence of colorectal cancer in people aged 45 to 70 who have 1 to 2 non-advanced adenomas, which are small precancerous polyps without high-risk features. The study compares outcomes between those who have surveillance colonoscopies every 5 years versus every 10 years. This is important because current guidelines recommend follow-up colonoscopy but lack clear evidence on the best timing for patients with non-advanced adenomas. Participants will undergo colonoscopies at either 5 and 10 years or just at 10 years after their initial qualifying colonoscopy. All colonoscopies, including any unscheduled ones, will follow standard quality procedures and preparation instructions. The initial colonoscopy must have fully visualized the cecum and completely removed all polyps. Sessile serrated polyps without advanced features are also included as non-advanced adenomas. During the trial, researchers will monitor participants through colonoscopy exams and collect data on the incidence of colorectal cancer over a 10-year period. The main measurement is the rate of colorectal cancer occurrence. The study also includes assessments to ensure adherence to colonoscopy quality standards and will follow participants long term to observe safety and effectiveness of the surveillance intervals.

Researchers are evaluating how factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect the development of side effects in patients with malignant solid tumors receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The study aims to develop and validate a risk prediction model for serious immune-related side effects during the first year of ICI treatment. Additional goals include tracking the occurrence of various side effects, quality of life, patient-reported symptoms, and treatment patterns over 12 months, along with studying biological markers that may predict side effect risk. Participants will have tissue samples collected at the start of their cancer treatment and will complete questionnaires at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. Blood samples may also be collected at multiple times during the study. The study focuses on patients receiving standard-of-care ICI therapy for solid tumors, without combination chemotherapy or other non-ICI treatments. During the study, participants will complete patient-reported outcome forms and health questionnaires to assess side effects and quality of life. Researchers will monitor the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and evaluate biological markers from blood and tissue samples. The study also assesses the use of electronic methods for collecting patient data. Total participation includes assessments over approximately one year following treatment start.

Researchers are studying cancer cachexia (CC), a syndrome involving weight, muscle, and fat loss in patients with advanced colorectal, lung, or pancreatic cancer that cannot be removed by surgery or is at stage IV. This study aims to identify different diagnostic subtypes of CC based on host characteristics such as symptoms, physical activity, blood biomarkers, and body composition. The goal is to better understand the varied causes of CC to improve diagnosis and develop more effective treatments tailored to individual patients. Participants will complete surveys and physical function tests that each take about 30 minutes. They will provide blood and archived tumor samples and wear a device called an actigraph for 7 days to monitor sleep and activity. Standard care scans like CT or PET/CT will be done during the study. Data will be collected at the start and again at 3 months, with continued review of medical records up to 1 year. These procedures help researchers study changes in CC characteristics over time and explore tumor factors linked to this condition. During the study, patients will undergo assessments of weight, muscle loss, symptoms, physical activity, and function. Researchers will analyze blood samples, tumor tissue, and medical images while reviewing health records. The main outcome is identifying distinct CC subtypes and their association with survival. Follow-ups occur at 3 months and 1 year to track changes and outcomes. The study involves no treatment but focuses on observation and data collection to support future CC diagnosis and therapy improvements.

Researchers are evaluating a screening and multi-sub-study randomized phase II/III trial called Lung-MAP, designed for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. The trial aims to establish a genomic screening method to assign patients to biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies. Depending on the cancer biomarker type, participants may receive new targeted cancer therapies or combinations compared to standard care, with the goal of approving new treatments. An optional ancillary study explores patient and physician attitudes about returning genetic findings related to germline mutations. The study involves testing patient specimens to determine eligibility for various sub-studies under the Lung-MAP protocol. Patients undergo screening to analyze tumor tissue and blood samples for biomarkers including PD-L1 and c-MET. Those requiring a fresh biopsy also submit blood for circulating tumor DNA testing. Sub-study assignment depends on the molecular profile results. This screening process includes both patients progressing after prior therapy and those pre-screened before progression on current treatment. Participants provide informed consent and tumor tissue that meets quality standards for testing. Researchers collect clinical data including smoking history and performance status. Outcomes focus on screening success, such as adequate tissue submission and matching to biomarker-driven sub-studies, tracked for up to three years. The study also monitors patient and physician knowledge and preferences regarding genomic findings. Participation duration varies based on screening and sub-study assignment.

Researchers are evaluating a connected customized treatment platform called CONCURxP to help patients with metastatic breast cancer adhere to their CDK4/6 inhibitor medication schedules. The study compares CONCURxP, which combines a WiseBag medication monitoring device with personalized text message reminders and healthcare provider follow-ups, to enhanced usual care where patients only use the WiseBag and receive educational materials. This research aims to improve medication adherence, symptom management, quality of life, and communication between patients and providers over a 12-month period. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: Arm A uses the WiseBag and receives educational materials every four weeks for 12 months, while Arm B uses the WiseBag along with personalized text message reminders and healthcare provider follow-ups as part of the CONCURxP program. Patients in Arm B may also complete an interview within six months after study completion. A separate group, Arm C, includes non-patient participants who complete an interview 15 to 39 months after the first patient enrollment. After the intervention period, patients may be monitored for an additional six months. During the study, participants' medication adherence is tracked electronically using the WiseBag at 12 months after starting medication. Researchers also assess self-reported adherence, symptom burden, quality of life, patient-provider communication, self-efficacy for symptom management, financial worry, healthcare use, and survival outcomes. Patient interviews and electronic health record reviews support the collection of these data. The study involves surveys, text messaging, medication tracking, and follow-ups to understand and improve adherence and overall patient experience.