Actively Recruiting
Traditional Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy vs Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
Led by National Taiwan University Hospital · Updated on 2024-09-20
200
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
228 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (the procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids, PPH) with anoplasty versus traditional Ferguson method for the treatment of patients with grade III /IV hemorrhoids.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Traditional Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy vs Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Aged between 25 and 75 years with subjective, severe hemorrhoidal symptoms
- Grade III or IV hemorrhoid diagnosis
- Condition suitable for hemorrhoidectomy surgery
- ASA status less than or equal to 3
You will not qualify if you...
- Severe liver cirrhosis
- Chronic renal disease
- Coagulopathy
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
Jin-Tung LIANG
Taipei, Taiwan, 100
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
J
Jin-Tung LIANG, MD
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here