SSM Health Good Samaritan

Researchers are studying how certain factors like age, gender, other medical conditions, and the type of immunotherapy affect whether patients with malignant solid tumors develop mild or serious side effects from immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments. This observational study aims to develop and validate a model that predicts severe immune-related side effects during the first year of immunotherapy, while also assessing quality of life and adverse events over 12 months. The study is sponsored by the SWOG Cancer Research Network and includes translational medicine goals such as evaluating cytokine levels as predictors and establishing a tissue and blood sample repository. Participants will provide a tissue sample at the start of their routine cancer treatment and complete questionnaires at multiple time points at treatment start, and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. They may also provide optional blood samples during the study. This design allows researchers to monitor immune-related side effects and patient-reported outcomes over time. During the study, participants will complete various questionnaires to report their quality of life, cognitive function, and side effects. Blood and tissue samples will be analyzed to explore predictive markers of toxicity. Researchers will track the occurrence of severe immune-related side effects over 52 weeks and assess changes in patient-reported outcomes. The study includes ongoing monitoring and data collection, with participation lasting approximately one year from treatment start.

Researchers are studying adults newly diagnosed with breast, colorectal, melanoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or non-small cell lung cancer who are planning to receive systemic cancer therapies such as chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors ICIs. The study aims to understand how cannabis and cannabinoid use relates to cancer-related symptoms over one year. This observational research includes patients treated in community oncology clinics and is sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Participants complete surveys and allow medical record reviews throughout the study. The study tracks cannabis and cannabinoid use as well as perceived benefits, harms, and adverse effects monthly for 12 months following enrollment. An optional sub-study is available at select sites for patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving specific chemotherapy with ICIs. During the study, participants fill out monthly surveys about their symptoms and cannabis use. Researchers also review medical records to assess cancer-related symptoms and treatment progress. The main measure is cancer-related symptoms assessed monthly for up to one year. Secondary measures include cannabis use patterns and adverse effects. Participation involves ongoing survey completion and record review, with the total study duration lasting 12 months post-enrollment.

Researchers are evaluating a text-based program designed to help rural cancer survivors who smoke to quit smoking. This phase III trial compares an eight-week scheduled gradual reduction SGR intervention delivered via personalized text messages combined with the National Cancer Institutes Smokefree.TXT service to a control group receiving a smoking cessation booklet. The study aims to assess how effective these approaches are in achieving biochemically validated smoking cessation six months after quitting, as well as their impact on quality of life. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group follows a personalized eight-week gradual reduction schedule, supported by cessation messages sent by text for 12 weeks. The second group receives the NCI Clearing the Air booklet to assist in planning gradual smoking cessation. After completing the interventions, participants are followed for a total of six months post-quit date to evaluate outcomes. During the study, participants will provide urine samples and complete questionnaires to measure smoking status and quality of life at baseline, 30 days, and six months after quitting. The research team uses biochemical validation to confirm smoking cessation. Participants must have texting capability on a cell phone or smartphone and be able to read and speak English. The total participation includes the intervention period plus follow-up to monitor smoking cessation and quality of life changes.

This research aims to evaluate how well amivantamab given by subcutaneous injection works in treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer that has extra copies of the MET gene. This phase II Expanded Lung-MAP treatment trial focuses on patients with MET amplification-positive non-small cell lung cancer. The goal is to see if amivantamab-SC can reduce tumor growth or spread by targeting the extra MET gene copies in these tumors. Participants receive amivantamab subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 during the first 28-day cycle, then on days 1 and 15 of subsequent 28-day cycles as long as the disease does not progress or unacceptable side effects occur. Throughout the trial, patients have regular CT or MRI scans and blood samples taken to monitor treatment effects and disease status. After completing treatment, patients are followed for up to 3 years to assess long-term outcomes. During the study, researchers evaluate how many patients respond to the treatment, how long responses last, progression-free survival, overall survival, and the frequency and severity of side effects. Blood samples are collected before treatment, during therapy, and at disease progression to study tumor DNA and build a tissue and blood repository. Safety labs, physical exams, and performance status assessments are also conducted. The total participation can last up to 3 years including follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of pembrolizumab immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy for patients with stage IIA, IIB, IIIA, or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC that has been completely removed by surgery. This phase III trial aims to compare disease-free survival and overall survival among different treatment approaches, including chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. The study also assesses quality of life and adverse event rates in these patient groups. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups. One group receives only chemotherapy with observation afterward. The other two groups receive chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. Chemotherapy involves one of four platinum doublet regimens administered every 21 days for four cycles, depending on the physicians choice. Pembrolizumab is given intravenously over 25-40 minutes, either after chemotherapy or alongside it, repeated every 21 days or every 6 weeks for multiple cycles. Patients also undergo heart ultrasound, MRI, CT scans, and blood sample collections as part of the study. During the trial, participants have regular medical assessments including imaging and blood tests to monitor their health. Follow-up visits occur 6 weeks after treatment, then every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for years 2-4, and annually up to 10 years from randomization. Researchers measure disease-free survival as the main outcome, tracking the time until cancer recurrence or death. They also evaluate overall survival, side effects, drug tolerability, and patient-reported quality of life over time.

Researchers are investigating treatments for men with prostate cancer that has returned after surgery, focusing on those who experience a rise in prostate-specific antigen PSA levels, indicating biochemical recurrence. The study examines whether adding enhanced systemic therapy apalutamide combined with abiraterone and prednisone to standard care, which includes prostate radiation therapy and short-term androgen deprivation, improves outcomes. Additionally, for patients whose cancer has spread beyond the pelvis as detected by PET imaging, the study evaluates the benefit of adding metastasis-directed radiation therapy. Participants undergo baseline PETCT or PETMR scans to determine the extent of cancer spread. Based on these results, they are randomized into one of four treatment arms standard radiation with androgen deprivation, enhanced therapy including apalutamide, or enhanced therapy plus targeted radiation for metastatic disease. Treatments involve various forms of radiation therapy, androgen deprivation drugs, and oral apalutamide, administered over six months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable side effects. Some patients may receive repeat PET scans to assess treatment response. During the study, participants have scheduled assessments including imaging, blood tests measuring PSA levels, and quality-of-life questionnaires over up to ten years. Follow-up visits occur every three months for the first two years, then less frequently up to ten years. Researchers monitor progression-free survival, overall survival, event-free survival, PSA progression, adverse events, and quality of life measures including cognitive function and fatigue. This long-term monitoring aims to determine the effectiveness of the added therapies compared to standard treatment alone.

Researchers are investigating targeted therapies directed by genetic testing for patients with locally advanced or advanced solid tumors that have spread or progressed after standard treatments. This Phase 2 screening trial, called ComboMATCH, aims to match patients to specific combination treatments based on genetic mutations found in their tumor cells. The study seeks to improve treatment planning by using genetic information to guide therapy choices. Patients undergo tumor genetic screening using previously collected samples or a new biopsy if eligible and aged 18 or older. Based on their tumors genetic profile, patients are assigned to one of multiple treatment subprotocols involving different drug combinations. Treatments include oral, intravenous, and intramuscular drugs such as selumetinib, olaparib, fulvestrant, binimetinib, and others. Treatment cycles generally repeat every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may also undergo biopsies, blood collection, imaging scans CT, MRI, PET, echocardiograms, and bone marrow procedures as part of the study. Throughout the trial, participants have regular assessments including tumor biopsies, blood draws, imaging tests, and heart function monitoring. These evaluations occur during screening, treatment, and follow-up periods. Researchers measure patient enrollment, assignment to treatment arms, and treatment outcomes over up to 8 years. Safety is monitored via clinical evaluations and diagnostic tests. This comprehensive approach aims to evaluate responses to targeted therapies guided by tumor genetics for advanced solid tumors.

Researchers are studying colorectal cancer CRC in participants aged 45 to 70 who have 1 to 2 non-advanced adenomas, which are small colon polyps without high-risk features. The trial compares two surveillance colonoscopy schedules one group receives colonoscopy at 5 and 10 years after polyp detection, while the other group has colonoscopy only at 10 years. This study aims to provide randomized data to guide optimal timing for follow-up colonoscopies to help reduce CRC incidence and improve clinical practices. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups the first group undergoes surveillance colonoscopy at both 5 and 10 years following their qualifying colonoscopy, and the second group undergoes colonoscopy at 10 years only. All colonoscopies, including any unscheduled ones, follow current quality guidelines and institutional preparation standards. The qualifying colonoscopy must have been complete and performed within 4 years before randomization, with all polyps fully removed. During the study, participants will undergo colonoscopies according to their assigned schedules. Researchers will monitor the incidence of colorectal cancer over 10 years as the primary outcome. Participants must be able to understand English or Spanish to complete required procedures. The study may last up to several decades, with ongoing monitoring to assess long-term cancer incidence and the effectiveness of different surveillance intervals.

Researchers are evaluating a master screening protocol called Lung-MAP for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. This phase IIIII trial aims to develop a genomic screening method for large cancer populations and assign participants to appropriate sub-studies based on specific cancer biomarkers. The goal is to compare new targeted therapies designed to block cancer growth or spread with standard care, including sub-studies for patients not eligible for biomarker-driven treatments. The study involves screening patient specimens to determine eligibility for various biomarker-driven or non-matched sub-studies within the Lung-MAP umbrella protocol. This is a screening study without direct interventions instead, patients are assigned to different treatment sub-studies, each operating independently. The protocol also includes an optional ancillary study evaluating attitudes about the return of somatic mutation findings suggestive of germline mutations. Participants provide tumor tissue for biomarker testing, including molecular profiling and PD-L1 analysis, and may submit fresh biopsies and blood samples for circulating tumor DNA testing. Researchers will monitor screening success rates up to three years and collect patient and physician feedback on genetic findings. Participation involves signing informed consent, providing smoking history, and possibly completing surveys. The study duration and assessments vary depending on sub-study assignment and patient progression.

Researchers are evaluating a mentorship and education program called COACH-APP to improve advanced practice providers APPs confidence in participating in clinical research. APPs are skilled healthcare professionals involved in cancer care but may not always be integrated into research teams at community oncology sites. This program aims to provide focused education and structured mentorship to better involve APPs in research, potentially enhancing patient care and access to clinical trials. The study compares APPs who receive the COACH-APP intervention, which includes completing a six-module clinical research workshop and five mentoring sessions over 12 months, to APPs who receive education only, with access to the workshop and a clinical trials manual. Mentors and research care team members will also participate to assess the programs impact. The intervention group receives both education and mentorship, while the control group receives education alone. Participants will engage in workshops, mentoring sessions, and surveys over the course of 12 months, with some participating in recorded interviews about their experiences. Researchers will measure changes in research self-efficacy, engagement in research programs, integration within research teams, and practice-level study activity. The study also evaluates the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of the COACH-APP intervention and explores its effects on team functioning and patient access to clinical trials.