Study Comparing Bone Mineral Density Scores from EOSedge Versus Traditional DXA Imaging in Adults

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are conducting a study to compare bone mineral density BMD measurements from two types of low-dose X-ray exams EOSedge and traditional DXA. The study aims to determine if the T-scores calculated from these two imaging methods agree. This multi-center, prospective, controlled, cross-sectional agreement study involves participants who either need EOSedge imaging as part of their routine care or volunteers undergoing non-diagnostic imaging. Participants will undergo both EOSedge and DXA scans. EOSedge exams will be performed as usual for evaluating spinal or orthopedic conditions, while DXA exams will be done as study-prescribed or standard care, ideally on the same day as EOSedge but up to 60 days apart. Healthy volunteers will receive both imaging tests, and those receiving EOSedge imaging as standard care will also receive an additional DXA scan. During the study, participants will have demographic and diagnostic information collected via case report forms and complete a questionnaire before the DXA scan. The researchers will assess the agreement of T-scores between the two imaging methods over a period of up to 60 days. The total duration of participation covers consent through completion of image acquisition. Safety is monitored by excluding participants with conditions affecting imaging quality or safety risks.

Bone Mineral Density Agreement Study Between EOSedge™ Versus Traditional DXA