The Association Between Olfactory Function and Cognition in Aging African American and Caucasian Men With HIV: A Pilot Study.
David E Vance, Shameka L Cody, W Chance Nicholson...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31259847/Actively Recruiting
Led by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Updated on 2026-06-11
80
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
26 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are evaluating two types of smell training interventions in adults aged 40 and older living with HIV who have cognitive complaints. The study aims to determine if participants find the interventions acceptable and feasible, and whether these interventions improve their sense of smell and cognitive function. Participants are recruited primarily from a large HIVAIDS clinic and will be randomized into two groups. One group will receive conventional olfactory training using a kit with four different scents representing floral, resinous, aromatic, and fruity odors. They will sniff each scent twice daily for 8 weeks. The other group will use scented markers with various scents and choose four to sniff twice daily for 8 weeks. Both groups will keep daily diaries to record their experiences and any side effects. The study includes baseline and post-intervention assessments. Participants will visit the clinic for initial and post-intervention testing, which includes smell identification tests, cognitive assessments, and questionnaires about their health and quality of life. The study team will monitor adherence through diaries and weekly phone calls, and participants will receive reminders via text messages. The primary outcomes measured are feasibility and acceptability of the interventions, with additional assessments of olfactory and cognitive function. Total participation lasts about 8 weeks.
CONDITIONS
Boosting Olfactory and Sensory Training Study (BOOST)
D
David E Vance, PhD
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Standard Odorant Smell Training | Scented Marker Smell Training |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A structured smell training protocol using a kit of four core odorants (flowery, resinous, aromatic, and fruity odors) delivered in vials. Participants sniff each for 10–20 seconds twice daily over 8 weeks. | A smell training method using commercially available scented markers (such as cherry or grape). Participants select four markers, sniff each for 10–20 seconds twice daily for 8 weeks. |
| Role in trial | One of two experimental arms. Used as the reference smell training approach for comparison. | The alternative experimental smell training arm used to evaluate feasibility and acceptability versus conventional smell training. |
| Primary use | To test the feasibility and acceptability of standardized smell training for improving olfactory and cognitive outcomes. | To test feasibility and acceptability of a scent marker-based alternative for olfactory and cognitive training. |
| How it is given or performed | Participants receive a box with four odorant vials and are instructed to sniff each odor for 10–20 seconds, twice daily for 8 weeks. A diary tracks adherence and any side effects. | Participants receive a set of scented markers, choose four, and sniff each for 10–20 seconds twice a day for 8 weeks. A diary captures experiences and side effects. |
| Evidence status | Olfactory training with standardized odorants has shown some preliminary evidence for improving cognition and olfactory function, but definitive benefits in adults with HIV are not yet established. More robust, targeted evidence is needed. | Scented marker-based olfactory training is considered experimental, with no large-scale published evidence supporting its use for improving olfactory or cognitive outcomes in adults with HIV. |
| Important limitations | Efficacy in improving cognition or olfaction among adults with HIV is not established. Feasibility and acceptability are still under investigation. Small sample sizes and limited data apply. | There is no published evidence that scent marker training improves olfaction or cognition in people with HIV. Its effectiveness and usability require evaluation. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Duration - 8 weeks
Participants are randomly assigned to one of two smell training groups and use the assigned intervention at home twice daily for 8 weeks while keeping a daily diary.
2 visits (baseline and posttest)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
David E Vance, Shameka L Cody, W Chance Nicholson...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31259847/David E Vance, Victor A Del Bene, Vidyulata Kamath...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36725781/Vidyulata Kamath, Victor A Del Bene, Christopher Collette...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36406043/David E Vance, Shameka L Cody, Chance Nicholson...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30676359/David Vance, Joe Burrage
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16863045/University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead Sponsor