Comparing Digital and Conventional Indirect Bonding Techniques for Fixed Orthodontic Brackets in Adolescents A Randomized Trial Measuring Bonding Time and Early Bracket Failures

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating two methods of indirect bonding techniques for placing fixed orthodontic brackets in adolescents aged 12 to 18 who require treatment on both upper and lower dental arches. This randomized split-mouth clinical trial aims to compare digital and conventional bonding procedures in terms of the time needed to complete the bonding and the early performance of the brackets, specifically looking at bracket failures within the first month after placement. Participants will receive both bonding techniques, with random assignment determining which method is used on the upper arch and which on the lower arch. The digital indirect bonding uses computer-aided design with a pre-coated adhesive system and digitally produced transfer trays, while the conventional technique uses standard laboratory workflows and traditional adhesive systems. All bonding procedures and follow-up assessments occur in a clinical orthodontic setting. During the study, researchers will measure the time taken to complete bracket bonding procedures and monitor bracket failures during the first month of treatment through clinical examinations. Participants will be closely observed throughout the bonding process and early treatment period to assess the efficiency and reliability of both bonding methods.

Digital vs. Conventional Indirect Bonding.