Efficacy of hysteroscopy in improving reproductive outcomes of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Costantino Di Carlo, Silvia Minozzi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27008893Actively Recruiting
Led by University Hospital, Angers · Updated on 2025-07-23
250
Participants Needed
9
Research Sites
52 weeks
Total Duration
Cesarean sections have been increasing worldwide, raising the risk of obstetrical complications such as uterine defects called isthmoceles. These defects involve scarring with thinning of the uterine wall and may cause symptoms like abnormal bleeding or pelvic pain. This study aims to explore how a significant isthmocele, defined by a residual myometrial thickness of less than 3 mm measured by hysterosonography, might affect the success rates of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in women with a history of cesarean section. The study is observational, multicentric, and prospective, enrolling women with previous cesarean sections undergoing ART. Participants undergo a hysterosonography to detect the presence or absence of an isthmocele, and then are grouped accordingly. Researchers will collect data during the ART treatment process including ovarian stimulation, embryo transfer, and pregnancy tests. The study does not involve surgical intervention but focuses on the measurement and impact of isthmoceles detected by ultrasound. Participants attend scheduled ART consultations where medical history, examinations, and hysterosonography are performed. Blood tests for pregnancy hormone levels and ultrasound scans are conducted after embryo transfer to monitor pregnancy progress. Delivery data are collected when possible either from hospital records or follow-up phone calls. The main outcome is the clinical pregnancy rate at 12 months, defined by ultrasound confirmation of a viable pregnancy. Secondary outcomes include other IVF success criteria related to isthmocele presence. The study duration allows for comprehensive monitoring of fertility outcomes after ART.
CONDITIONS
The Impact of Cesarean Scar Defects on the Success of Assisted Human Reproduction
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person) during the initial ART consultation
Duration - Within the screening period
Participants undergo hysterosonography to determine the presence or absence of a cesarean scar defect called isthmocele as part of their pre-ART assessment.
1 hysterosonography visit (in-person)
Duration - Up to 12 months following ART procedure
Participants receive standard assisted reproductive treatments and are monitored through blood tests and ultrasounds to assess pregnancy progress and outcomes.
Multiple visits including blood HCG tests 14 days after embryo transfer, repeated as needed, and ultrasound at 6 to 7 weeks after oocyte puncture
Duration - Up to 12 months after pregnancy confirmation
For participants who achieve pregnancy, obstetrical data is collected during pregnancy and delivery, with follow-up by telephone one year after a positive pregnancy test if delivery occurs outside the study hospital.
Follow-up contact by telephone and review of obstetrical records
Total: 9 locations
1
UH Angers
Angers, France, 49933
Actively Recruiting
2
University Hospital of Brest
Brest, France
Actively Recruiting
3
Hospital Center Sud Francilien
Corbeil-Essonnes, France
Actively Recruiting
4
Creteil University Hospital
Créteil, France
Actively Recruiting
5
University Hospital of Nimes
Nîmes, France
Actively Recruiting
6
Tenon Hospital Paris
Paris, France
Actively Recruiting
7
La Sagesse Clinic
Rennes, France
Actively Recruiting
8
University Hospital of Rennes
Rennes, France
Actively Recruiting
9
University Hospital of Saint Etienne
Saint-Etienne, France
Actively Recruiting
G
Guillaume LEGENDRE, MD PhD
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Masking
N/A
Allocation
N/A
Model
N/A
Primary Purpose
N/A
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Costantino Di Carlo, Silvia Minozzi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27008893A J M Bij de Vaate, L F van der Voet, O Naji...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23996650Olivier Donnez, Pascale Jadoul, Jean Squifflet...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17624346O Vikhareva Osser, L Jokubkiene, L Valentin
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19499514B Jeremy, C Bonneau, E Guillo...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24094595Audrey Astruc, Delphine Deseine, Andrew Spiers...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39645254