Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Compared to Myofascial Release for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain Evaluating Pain, Function, and Back Movement

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are comparing two methods of soft tissue treatment—instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization and myofascial release—to see their effects on pain, pressure pain threshold, back function, and range of motion in adults with chronic nonspecific low back pain. This condition affects many working adults, limiting their movement and work ability, and current treatments often do not provide satisfactory relief. This study aims to clarify which technique may better help patients with this common and disabling condition. Participants will receive one of two therapies. The first group will have instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization using a specialized tool applied for 40 to 120 seconds until redness appears, followed by a 5-minute ice pack to reduce redness and discomfort. The second group will receive myofascial release, where the therapist uses a gentle cross-hand technique on each side of the lower back for 5 minutes, carefully applying pressure without force. All patients will also take part in a 6-week exercise program consisting of 12 sessions including straight leg raises, bridging, hip extensions, and abdominal curls, performed in sets with rest periods. During the study, participants’ pain levels will be measured at the start and after 6 weeks using a visual scale to assess changes. Researchers will also evaluate back function, pressure pain threshold, and range of motion. Patient comfort will be monitored during treatments, and the overall goal is to understand which therapy may better improve symptoms and function in chronic low back pain. The study includes adults aged 25 to 45 years and will last for the duration of the treatment and follow-up assessments.

Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Myofascial Release in Patients With Chronic Non¬Specific Low Back Pain