Joinville

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of trontinemab in people with early symptomatic Alzheimers disease, ranging from mild cognitive impairment to mild dementia due to Alzheimers. This Phase III trial aims to understand how trontinemab affects cognitive decline and disease progression in this population. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either intravenous trontinemab or a placebo in a parallel-group design. Treatment is administered by IV infusion, and the effects are compared over a period of 72 weeks. The study includes comprehensive safety and efficacy assessments throughout this period. During the 72 weeks of the study, participants will undergo various evaluations including cognitive tests such as the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes CDR-SB, Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scales, brain imaging with PET and MRI scans, and biomarker measurements in cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Safety monitoring includes tracking adverse events, infusion reactions, and antibody development. The study requires participants to have a study partner and to complete all study procedures over this time.

Researchers are evaluating the combination of baxdrostat and dapagliflozin in people with chronic kidney disease CKD and high blood pressure hypertension. This Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to assess whether this combination reduces the risk of serious kidney damage, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death compared to dapagliflozin alone. The study includes participants with CKD and hypertension who meet specific kidney function and blood pressure criteria. Participants who are not already taking SGLT2 inhibitors will first complete a 4-week dapagliflozin run-in period. Then, they will be randomly assigned to receive either baxdrostat plus dapagliflozin or a placebo plus dapagliflozin. Baxdrostat dosing may start low and be increased if needed. Study visits will occur at 2, 4, 8, 16, 34, and 52 weeks after randomization, and then approximately every four months until the study ends, which is based on the number of key kidney or heart-related events. Throughout the study, participants will have regular assessments including blood tests to monitor kidney function and potassium levels, blood pressure measurements, and evaluations of heart and kidney health. If participants stop the blinded study drug early, they will continue dapagliflozin if possible and remain in the study for ongoing visits and monitoring. The main outcome is whether the combination treatment reduces the risk of a 50% sustained decline in kidney function, kidney failure, heart failure events, or cardiovascular death over up to 37 months.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in patients who cannot undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. This Phase 3 study compares two drug combinations belantamab mafodotin with lenalidomide and dexamethasone BRd versus daratumumab with lenalidomide and dexamethasone DRd. The goal is to see if BRd extends progression-free survival and improves minimal residual disease negative status compared to DRd. Participants receive either BRd or DRd treatment, continuing until disease progression, death, unacceptable side effects, withdrawal, or study end. Both treatment arms involve the administration of lenalidomide and dexamethasone alongside either belantamab mafodotin or daratumumab. Treatment duration may last up to approximately seven years. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including monitoring disease progression, response to treatment, and side effects. Measurements include progression-free survival, overall survival, and the number achieving minimal residual disease negative status. Quality of life questionnaires and blood tests will also be conducted. Safety monitoring includes eye exams and tracking adverse events throughout the study duration.

Researchers are studying the use of bempedoic acid alone or combined with ezetimibe in adult patients who have primary hypercholesterolemia both heterozygous familial and non-familial types or mixed dyslipidemia. This observational study aims to collect real-world data from Asian and Latin American patients to better understand the risks and benefits of these treatments, as current efficacy and safety information in these populations is limited. Participants in this study receive routine clinical care where they may be treated with bempedoic acid alone or its fixed-dose combination with ezetimibe. No experimental drugs are administered as this is a non-interventional study. The study follows patients for one year after starting the treatment to observe outcomes in their usual care setting. Throughout the one-year follow-up, researchers collect data on patient characteristics, adverse drug reactions, and adverse events related to the treatments. They also assess cardiovascular risk, cholesterol levels including LDL-C, inflammatory markers, uric acid levels, and the attainment of cholesterol goals. This information is gathered from medical records and routine clinical assessments to monitor the safety and effects of the treatments over time.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of BGB-16673 compared with the investigators choice of treatments in participants with chronic lymphocytic leukemia CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma SLL who have previously been treated with both Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors BTKi and B-cell leukemialymphoma 2 protein inhibitors BCL2i. This study addresses the urgent need for new treatments to extend life and control symptoms such as enlarged lymph nodes, spleen, or liver, night sweats, weight loss, and fever in these patients. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either BGB-16673 once daily or the investigators choice of treatment, which includes idelalisib plus rituximab for CLL only, bendamustine plus rituximab, or venetoclax plus rituximab retreatment. Treatments will continue until criteria for stopping treatment are met. This is a Phase 3, open-label, randomized study conducted globally with about 250 participants. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor disease progression and response to treatment. Researchers will evaluate progression-free survival, overall survival, response rates, duration of response, and quality of life measures over approximately 24 to 36 months. Safety will be closely monitored by tracking treatment-emergent adverse events. Participants involvement includes receiving study medication, regular visits, and various evaluations to assess treatment effects and side effects.

Researchers are evaluating Dostarlimab compared to a placebo in adults with locally advanced unresected Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma HNSCC. This phase 3 trial aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of Dostarlimab as a sequential therapy following chemoradiation treatment in participants with this type of cancer. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either Dostarlimab or a placebo, both given as intravenous infusions. The study is double-blind, meaning neither the participants nor the researchers know which treatment is being given. The treatments follow completion of chemoradiation with cisplatin and radiotherapy intended to cure the cancer. During the study, participants will be monitored for up to approximately 5 years. Researchers will evaluate event-free survival and overall survival, with safety assessments including treatment-emergent adverse events and laboratory tests. Blood samples will be taken to measure drug levels and immune responses. This long-term follow-up will help understand the effects and safety of Dostarlimab after chemoradiation therapy.

Researchers are evaluating elritercept TAK-226, KER-050, an investigational drug, for treating anemia in adults with very low, low, or intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes MDS who need regular red blood cell RBC transfusions. The study is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to assess how well elritercept reduces the need for RBC transfusions and to evaluate its safety and tolerability over time. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 21 ratio to receive either elritercept or a matching placebo, both given as subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks. The study includes a Primary Phase lasting 24 weeks and a Secondary Phase lasting an additional 24 weeks, during which participants continue their assigned treatments. Eligible participants may also enter an Extension Phase to continue treatment until individual discontinuation or study unblinding. After treatment ends, a Safety Follow-Up Period of 8 weeks and a long-term follow-up lasting up to 5 years will monitor participants. During the study, participants will have visits approximately every 2 weeks initially, then every 4 weeks, to assess treatment effects and safety. Researchers will evaluate the percentage of participants achieving transfusion independence and monitor adverse events, laboratory values, vital signs, and heart tests. Long-term follow-up will continue through regular check-ins for up to five years or until the participant withdraws or the study ends.

Researchers are evaluating pasritamig JNJ-78278343 combined with best supportive care BSC compared to placebo with BSC in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer mCRPC, a form of prostate cancer that has spread and no longer responds to hormone therapies. This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind study aims to assess overall survival, measuring how long participants live from the start of the study until death from any cause. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either pasritamig or placebo through intravenous infusion. The dosing starts with step-up doses on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Day 8, followed by a target dose on Day 15. Subsequent cycles of treatment occur every 6 weeks, with Cycle 1 lasting 8 weeks and later cycles lasting 6 weeks each. All participants may also receive best supportive care, which includes treatments like radiation, steroids, pain medication, and other palliative procedures, at the physicians discretion. Treatment continues until disease progression, intolerable side effects, withdrawal, death, or end of study. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor overall survival and other outcomes such as progression-free survival, symptomatic progression, skeletal-related events, and time to pain or fatigue worsening. Laboratory tests and monitoring for adverse events will occur up to 2 years and 8 months. Participants will receive ongoing evaluation to track treatment effects and safety throughout the trial duration, which spans until August 2028.

Researchers are evaluating how well elritercept works to improve anemia in adults with myelofibrosis MF who are already taking ruxolitinib. The study compares elritercept to a placebo and aims to see if elritercept can reduce tiredness, improve MF-related symptoms, and help participants perform physical activities more easily. It also looks at elritercepts effects on bone marrow, spleen size, antibody development, and long-term safety. Participants receive either elritercept or a placebo by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks during a 36-week double-blinded treatment period. The starting dose of elritercept is 3.75 mgkg, with a possible increase to 5.0 mgkg after the second cycle based on response and safety. After 36 weeks, participants who took placebo may switch to receive elritercept in an extended open-label phase. During the study, participants undergo assessments including blood transfusion independence, symptom and fatigue questionnaires, spleen imaging, and bone marrow evaluation. Researchers monitor safety, antibody formation, and survival for up to 7 years. The main outcome is the proportion of participants who become independent from red blood cell transfusions for at least 12 consecutive weeks during the 36-week treatment. Participants are involved in regular visits and evaluations throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating elritercept for its ability to reduce the need for red blood cell RBC transfusions and its safety compared to epoetin alfa in adults with very low, low, or intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes MDS who require regular blood transfusions. The study aims to understand if elritercept improves tiredness, lowers transfusion burden, enhances quality of life, and elicits an immune response. Participants receive either elritercept or epoetin alfa injections. Elritercept is given as a subcutaneous injection starting at 3.75 mgkg every 4 weeks, with possible dose increases to 5.0 mgkg. Epoetin alfa is administered as a subcutaneous injection starting at 450 IUkg once weekly, with possible dose escalation up to 1050 IUkg. The study follows participants for approximately 5 years to monitor treatment effects and safety. During the trial, participants are regularly assessed for transfusion independence, hemoglobin levels, fatigue, quality of life, and hematological improvements. Researchers monitor blood samples for drug concentration and immune response. Safety is evaluated through medical history, lab tests, and adverse event tracking. The main outcome is the proportion of participants achieving RBC transfusion independence for at least 12 weeks during the first 24 weeks. The study uses questionnaires and clinical assessments to measure fatigue and quality of life.