Limoges

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of elenestinib (BLU-263) combined with symptom-directed therapy (SDT) compared to placebo plus SDT in people with indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) whose symptoms are not well controlled by SDT alone. This Phase 2/3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study includes participants with ISM and smoldering systemic mastocytosis, and also involves groups for pharmacokinetic studies and participants who previously received a selective KIT inhibitor. The study is divided into multiple parts. Parts 1 and 2 enroll participants with ISM who will receive either elenestinib oral tablets or placebo alongside their symptom-directed therapy. Participants from Part 2 may continue into Part 3, which is an open-label extension where all receive elenestinib. Part K enrolls participants with ISM who have prior experience with selective KIT inhibitors. The study tracks treatment effects and safety over time. Participants will be monitored for up to 5 years, with assessments including the number of treatment-emergent adverse events, changes in symptom scores measured by the ISM-Symptom in Assessment Form, and overall safety monitoring. Evaluations occur at baseline, 13 weeks, 49 weeks, and throughout the long-term follow-up. The study also includes detailed tracking of symptom control and adverse events to evaluate the impact of treatment on participants' health and quality of life.

Researchers are evaluating new treatment options for adults with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer that cannot be removed by surgery and has a specific KRAS G12C gene mutation. This study compares the safety and effectiveness of adding calderasib and cetuximab, both targeted therapies, to a standard chemotherapy regimen called mFOLFOX6. The goal is to see if this combination can help patients live longer without their cancer growing or spreading compared to current treatments that may include mFOLFOX6 with or without bevacizumab. The study has two parts. It involves treatment with calderasib taken as an oral tablet, cetuximab given according to standard procedures, and mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy combining oxaliplatin, leucovorin/levofolinate calcium, and 5-fluorouracil. Some participants may receive bevacizumab or a bevacizumab biosimilar as part of the comparison. The treatments are given following approved dosing schedules. This design allows researchers to assess the safety and tolerability of these drug combinations in treating this type of colorectal cancer with the KRAS G12C mutation. Participants will be monitored for side effects, treatment tolerability, and cancer progression over a period that may last up to about 44 months. Researchers will track outcomes such as how many participants experience dose-limiting toxicities or adverse events, how many stop treatment due to side effects, and progression-free survival time. Assessments include health evaluations, laboratory tests, and imaging to observe cancer status. This long-term follow-up aims to understand both safety and effectiveness of the treatment combinations.

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment called ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study compares I-DXd to chemotherapy to see if it helps people live longer overall and live longer without their cancer worsening. It is a Phase 3, open-label trial focused on patients who have progressed on prior therapies and have evidence of metastatic disease. Participants receive either I-DXd through an intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or docetaxel chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. Prednisone tablets are also given daily as part of the treatment plan. Before each I-DXd dose, premedication is provided to help prevent nausea and vomiting using a combination of drugs such as corticosteroids and anti-nausea medicines. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or other reasons to stop. During the study, researchers monitor overall survival and how long patients live without their cancer progressing, for up to about 36 months. Participants undergo tumor tissue collection, scans, and assessments to track disease status and side effects. Safety is closely watched throughout treatment. The study includes men aged 18 and older with confirmed prostate cancer and metastatic disease who have previously received certain hormone therapies but no prior taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of trontinemab in people aged 50 to 90 with early symptoms of Alzheimer's disease, ranging from mild cognitive impairment to mild dementia. This Phase III clinical trial focuses on those who show evidence of Alzheimer's pathology and have a recent history of cognitive decline. The study aims to measure changes in cognitive function over 72 weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either intravenous trontinemab or a placebo. The trial is designed as a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who receives the active drug or placebo. The treatment period lasts up to 72 weeks, during which participants will undergo various assessments to monitor their cognitive status and safety. During the study, participants will complete clinical tests including cognitive assessments and imaging such as MRI, PET scans, or cerebrospinal fluid analysis to confirm Alzheimer's pathology. A study partner will assist participants as needed. Researchers will track changes from the start of the study through week 72 using tools like the Clinical Dementia Rating. Safety monitoring and adherence to study procedures will also be closely observed throughout the trial.

Researchers are studying patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have a specific BRAFV600E mutation. This rare subtype of mCRC has poor prognosis and resistance to current treatments, especially in tumors with microsatellite stability or proficient mismatch repair. The study aims to collect detailed clinical data and biological samples to better understand treatment outcomes, resistance, and survival in real-world settings. Participants will provide blood samples and tumor tissue samples to support various research goals. The study will evaluate circulating tumor DNA during different lines of metastatic treatment to predict treatment response and resistance. It will also analyze the immune environment of BRAFV600E mCRC tumors and study specific subgroups with mismatch repair deficiencies. Clinical management data will be collected to inform future therapeutic approaches. During the study, patients will be monitored regularly with blood sample collections of 30 mL at each time point. Researchers will gather information about treatments, survival, and biological markers over time. The main outcome measured is overall survival from diagnosis up to five years. Patients must be able to comply with study procedures and provide informed consent. The study aims to improve knowledge of this aggressive cancer subtype and support development of new treatments.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating acute respiratory infections (ARI), the most common reason for community healthcare visits, in adults and children across Europe. The study aims to describe ARI cases caused by known and emerging respiratory pathogens in primary care settings, building a research infrastructure for future studies on ARI treatment, diagnosis, and prevention. This long-term observational study includes both a flexible annual audit (POS-ARI-PC AUDIT) and a detailed prospective study (POS-ARI-PC CORE) to capture comprehensive data on ARI presentation and management. The study includes two main protocols: POS-ARI-PC AUDIT, which records and benchmarks approximately 2,000 anonymous patient cases annually in primary care, and POS-ARI-PC CORE, a non-randomized prospective observational study examining patient sampling, microbiology, and outcomes over 28 days. Both protocols cover patients presenting with symptoms of lower or upper respiratory tract infections or suspected COVID-19, influenza, or RSV. An embedded observational study (POS-ARI-PC-001) focuses on respiratory infections in older adults and those with long-term health conditions. Participants provide consent and have combined throat/nose swabs collected at baseline. They report daily symptoms for 14 days via online or paper diaries, with possible telephone follow-up for diary completion. Medical records are reviewed after 28 days to collect consultation and hospital referral data. Researchers monitor initial diagnosis, illness severity, medication use, test results, and recovery progress. Some participants may join an optional qualitative study exploring experiences with ARI care. Overall participation lasts 28 days, enabling detailed assessment of ARI in primary care.

Researchers are evaluating whether the drugs retatrutide and tirzepatide can prevent major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) who are at high risk. This Phase 3 trial enrolls about 4,500 adults with MASLD identified by non-invasive tests indicating an increased likelihood of developing serious liver problems. The study aims to understand how these treatments might affect liver health over time compared to a placebo. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either retatrutide, tirzepatide, or a placebo, all given by subcutaneous injection. The study will last approximately 224 weeks, during which participants may attend 25 to 30 clinic visits for monitoring and assessment. After the main study, eligible participants can join an optional 2-year extension where all will receive either retatrutide or tirzepatide regardless of their original group. Throughout the trial, participants’ liver function and disease progression will be closely monitored through various health assessments. Researchers will track the time to the first major adverse liver event as the main outcome. Safety and health status will be evaluated regularly during clinic visits, ensuring thorough observation over the long study period.

Researchers are creating a national, prospective cohort to study children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), a rare kidney disease. The goal is to collect detailed data on patients treated in pediatric nephrology centers across France, Reunion Island, Mayotte, and eventually other French overseas territories. This structured follow-up aims to better understand the disease's characteristics and provide a foundation for future clinical trials. The study involves enrolling pediatric patients diagnosed with INS and systematically collecting clinical, biological, psychological, and social data. Biological samples such as blood, urine, hair, and nails will be gathered at disease onset before immunosuppressive treatment begins. Data will be recorded through medical records from hospital visits and consultations, supplemented by annual telephone interviews for patients without active disease. Quality of life, treatment adherence, and aesthetic impact questionnaires will also be collected and integrated into a secure database. Participants will be followed over at least two years, with data collected regularly by clinical research staff. This includes medical validation of clinical information, annual telephone follow-ups, and questionnaire assessments. The study's primary outcome is the number and characteristics of included cases over two years. This ongoing monitoring will support future nested studies and improve understanding of pediatric INS outcomes and management.

Researchers are evaluating a phase 1/2 open-label study to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical effects of an oral drug called Enzomenib (DSP-5336) in patients with acute leukemia, including relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), ambiguous lineage acute leukemia, and in certain sites, high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The study also examines Enzomenib combined with standard AML treatments such as venetoclax plus azacitidine and the intensive chemotherapy 7+3 regimen in patients newly diagnosed with AML who have specific genetic mutations (MLL rearrangement or NPM1 mutation). Participants receive oral Enzomenib either alone or combined with other drugs: venetoclax and azacitidine for a nonintensive treatment group, gilteritinib for a certain relapsed AML group, or intensive chemotherapy with cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3) for newly diagnosed AML patients. The study includes dose escalation and expansion phases to determine recommended doses for phase 2. Treatment schedules and doses are adjusted based on response and safety, with some patients enrolled in specialized cohorts according to their genetic markers. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments including clinical exams, laboratory tests, bone marrow samples for genetic analysis, and monitoring for adverse events. Researchers measure safety outcomes such as adverse and serious adverse events, determine optimal dosing for phase 2, and evaluate treatment effectiveness by tracking complete response rates. Safety is monitored up to 30 days after the last dose, with dose recommendations made within four months of treatment start and response assessed around six months. The total participation time varies based on individual treatment and study phase.