Kiel

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of delgocitinib cream 20 mgg applied twice daily compared to a cream vehicle in treating adults with mild to severe palmoplantar pustulosis PPP. This trial is a phase 2a, double-blind study focusing on this skin condition characterized by pustules on the palms and soles. The main goal is to see how well delgocitinib cream improves symptoms over a 16-week treatment period. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups one group will apply delgocitinib cream twice a day for 16 weeks, while the other group will use a matching vehicle cream twice daily for the same duration. The study includes a total of approximately 18 weeks for each participant, involving around 9 visits. The trial compares the active cream to the placebo cream to assess efficacy and safety. During the study, participants will attend scheduled visits to monitor their condition and collect data on skin symptoms, pustule counts, and quality of life measures. Researchers will assess the improvement in PPP severity using specific scales such as the PPP Area and Severity Index PPPASI. Safety is monitored through reports of any treatment-emergent side effects. Overall participation lasts about 18 weeks, including screening and treatment phases.

Many patients receiving radiation therapy for head and neck cancer develop painful mouth sores called oral mucositis, causing severe pain that lasts through and beyond treatment. This study evaluates whether BupiZenge, a lozenge containing the long-acting pain reliever bupivacaine, provides better pain control than lidocaine solution. The trial aims to see if improved pain management with BupiZenge enhances quality of life and reduces opioid use in adults aged 18 to 80 with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either BupiZenge lozenges or lidocaine oral solution. BupiZenge is taken as one lozenge that dissolves slowly in the mouth with a dosing interval of at least 3 hours, up to 8 lozenges per day. Lidocaine is used as an oral solution held in the mouth, also every 3 hours as needed, with a maximum daily dose of 120 mL. The study includes a combined screening and run-in period up to five weeks, followed by treatment during radiotherapy and for up to six weeks total if pain and sores persist after radiotherapy. Participants will record their mouth pain daily using a 0 to 10 scale, with primary measurement focusing on pain reduction over 3 hours after taking the study treatment on the last day of radiotherapy. Additional assessments include pain at other time points, opioid use, quality of life questionnaires, laboratory tests, and safety monitoring. After treatment, there is a 30-day follow-up period to evaluate lasting effects and safety outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the effect of Xeomin injections compared to placebo injections for preventing chronic migraine. This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial includes an extension period and aims to measure changes in the number of monthly migraine days. Participants have chronic migraine and meet specific criteria related to headache frequency and migraine history. Participants receive Xeomin or placebo injections into muscles of the head and neck at pericranial and cervical points. The study includes two Xeomin dose groups and a placebo group during the controlled period, with all groups receiving Xeomin in the extension phase. Four treatments are given approximately 12 weeks apart over a total study duration of 52 to 55 weeks. Participants take part in 14 visits over the study period, with the first, last, and four treatment visits conducted in person and the remaining eight visits by phone or video call. Researchers collect headache and migraine data from diaries and assess changes in monthly migraine days as the primary outcome. Safety is monitored by tracking treatment-related adverse events throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the use of Xeomin injections to prevent episodic migraine. This Phase 3 clinical trial compares Xeomin to placebo injections in the muscles of the head and neck to measure changes in the number of monthly migraine days. Participants have episodic migraine with or without aura, and the study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of different Xeomin doses over time. Participants receive a series of four Xeomin or placebo injections spaced about 12 weeks apart. The study includes two experimental groups receiving different Xeomin doses and a placebo group, followed by an extension period where some participants receive Xeomin. Injections are given at specific points around the head and neck. The trial lasts approximately 52 to 55 weeks, starting with a 4 to 5 week screening period. Participants attend about 14 visits, including the first and last visits and four treatment visits conducted on-site, with other visits done remotely by phone or video call. Researchers monitor changes in monthly migraine days, headache days, and medication use, as well as any treatment-related side effects throughout the study.

The trial investigates the use of EscharEx, a proteolytic enzyme gel, compared to a placebo gel in treating venous leg ulcers VLU in adults. The goal is to evaluate how well EscharEx works and how safe it is for removing dead tissue debridement and preparing the wound bed for healing. This study involves adult patients who have VLUs with specific size and duration criteria. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either EscharEx EX-03 5% formulation or a placebo gel. The treatment involves applying a gel made by mixing a sterile powder with water to the wound area. The study lasts up to 29 weeks and includes several phases a screening period, up to 8 daily visits for debridement within 2 weeks, weekly wound management visits for up to 12 weeks including wound closure confirmation, and monthly visits over 12 weeks to monitor wound closure durability. During the study, patients will undergo regular clinical assessments of the wound, including visual checks for complete debridement and wound closure, as well as evaluations of healthy tissue growth. The study measures the time taken for complete wound closure and the presence of healthy tissue. Safety and wound healing progress are closely monitored throughout the treatment and follow-up periods, ensuring adherence to the protocol and proper wound management.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 at levels of 1% or higher. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study aims to compare these treatments to improve outcomes for this patient group. Participants will receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab, each given intravenously on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle, combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy either carboplatin or cisplatin also given on Day 1 of each cycle for up to four cycles. After chemotherapy cycles, patients continue with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab monotherapy combined with pemetrexed maintenance. The study follows patients for up to approximately six years to monitor treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size, blood tests to evaluate organ function, and questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life. Researchers monitor overall survival and progression-free survival as primary outcomes, alongside other measures such as response duration and physical functioning. Safety is closely observed throughout, with study visits scheduled regularly during treatment and follow-up periods, lasting up to six years in total.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig combined with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer mNSCLC whose tumors express programmed death-ligand 1 PD-L1. This Phase III global study focuses on patients with PD-L1 tumor cell expression of 1% or higher and aims to determine which treatment provides better overall and progression-free survival. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two study groups one group will receive rilvegostomig plus carboplatin and either paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy, while the other group will receive pembrolizumab plus the same chemotherapy options. Rilvegostomig and pembrolizumab are both given intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, with chemotherapy given up to 4 cycles. Nab-paclitaxel may be administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment continues with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab until disease progression or other criteria are met. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response, laboratory tests to monitor organ function, and patient questionnaires about physical function and quality of life. Researchers will track overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, and duration of response for up to approximately 6 years. Safety and immune response to rilvegostomig will also be evaluated. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and effectiveness of APG777 in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who have completed treatment in a previous APG777 study. This phase 2 extension study involves participants who, according to their doctors, would benefit from continued treatment with APG777. The study is designed as a multicenter, double-blind trial to assess ongoing treatment outcomes and safety over several years. Participants in this study will continue receiving APG777 through three main periods a screening visit coinciding with the last visit of the prior studys maintenance period, an extended treatment period, and a post-treatment follow-up period. Participants who met certain skin improvement criteria and did not use topical rescue medication during the prior study will maintain their previous dose and injection frequency. Those who did not meet these criteria or used rescue medication will receive APG777 according to a specific dosing plan in an open-label escape arm. During the study, participants will be closely monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events up to 3 years. The research team will also measure skin improvements using tools such as the Eczema Area and Severity Index EASI and the Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis vIGA-AD, as well as tracking itch severity, use of rescue therapy, and serum drug concentrations. The overall participation time includes up to 3 years of follow-up to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and patient compliance of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. This observational study also compares ribociclib treatment with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy and endocrine therapy alone, aiming to better understand treatment decisions and clinical adoption in routine practice. The study is conducted across breast centers and gynecological practices to represent typical healthcare settings. Participants receive treatment based on their physicians clinical judgment without randomization or intervention assignment. The study collects data from patients treated with ribociclib plus aromatase inhibitor with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone LHRH, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, or endocrine therapy alone with or without LHRH. Baseline data and follow-up information on adverse events, quality of life, treatment adherence, and socio-economic factors are gathered over time. During the study, participants undergo assessments including evaluation of invasive disease-free survival up to 36 months, quality of life questionnaires, medication adherence reports, and monitoring of adverse events and treatment changes. Data on reasons for treatment decisions, patient perceptions, and healthcare provider involvement are also collected. The study duration extends up to 39 months to provide a comprehensive overview of treatment impact and patient experience in real-world clinical settings.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of three different dose regimens of MORF-057, a small molecule drug, in adults with moderately to severely active Crohns disease CD. This Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study aims to compare these doses with a matching placebo during an induction treatment period. The study includes adult participants who have active symptoms of CD and have not adequately responded to other treatments. Participants will first undergo a 14-week induction period where they receive either one of the three blinded MORF-057 dose regimens or a matching placebo, all taken orally. Following this, all participants enter a 38-week maintenance period receiving open-label MORF-057. Those who complete this 52-week treatment phase may have the chance to continue treatment for an additional 52 weeks during a long-term extension. MORF-057 is designed to selectively inhibit integrin 47. During the study, participants will have their disease activity monitored using endoscopic assessments and clinical symptom scores, such as the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohns Disease SES-CD and the Crohns Disease Activity Index CDAI. Researchers will assess the proportion of participants showing endoscopic response and clinical remission at Week 14. Safety and adherence will be closely followed throughout the treatment and extension phases. The entire study spans up to 6 years, allowing for long-term evaluation.