Regensburg

This research aims to evaluate the effects of litifilimab (BIIB059), a monoclonal antibody, in adults with active subacute or chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Participants have active skin symptoms of CLE that have not improved with antimalarial therapy or had difficulties continuing that treatment. The study focuses on reducing skin disease activity using several scores including CLA-IGA-R and CLASI, while also assessing safety, immune response, and quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either litifilimab or a placebo injection under the skin every four weeks during a 24-week double-blind period where neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given. After this, all participants will receive litifilimab injections every four weeks for an additional 28 weeks. Those who complete the treatment may join a long-term extension study or enter a follow-up safety period lasting up to 24 weeks. Total participation may last up to 80 weeks. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor skin disease activity using the CLA-IGA-R erythema score and the CLASI-A activity score to see how many participants improve. They will also assess safety, tolerability, immune system effects, and participants' quality of life using questionnaires. These evaluations occur regularly during both treatment periods and follow-up to understand the impact of litifilimab on CLE symptoms and overall health.

Researchers are studying the safety and early effectiveness of a new cell therapy called CLDN6 CAR-T, with or without an RNA-based vaccine, in patients who have CLDN6-positive advanced solid tumors that have returned or not responded to prior treatments. This Phase I, first-in-human, open-label trial involves multiple sites and focuses on patients with tumors expressing the CLDN6 protein at a high level. The study aims to find the best dose of these therapies and gather initial evidence of their activity against these difficult cancers. The trial has two main parts. The first part tests increasing doses of CLDN6 CAR-T cells made using manual and automated processes to determine the maximum tolerated dose or recommended dose for future studies. The second part adds the CLDN6 RNA-based vaccine to the CAR-T cells, exploring dose levels to optimize treatment effects. The CAR-T cells and RNA vaccines are given through intravenous infusions or injections at scheduled times. An optional dose decrease may be evaluated to further assess safety and effectiveness. Participants will be followed for up to 25 months in the main trial, with ongoing assessments of side effects, dose adjustments, and treatment tolerability. After the main study, patients may join a long-term follow-up period lasting up to 15 years to monitor delayed effects and long-term outcomes. Researchers will collect medical information through scans, lab tests, and clinical evaluations to measure safety events, including serious and dose-limiting toxicities, as well as treatment responses over time.

Researchers are studying oligodendrogliomas, a type of brain tumor identified by specific genetic changes such as IDH1 or IDH2 mutations and 1p/19q co-deletion. These tumors are classified as CNS WHO grade 2 or 3, and the study aims to determine the best treatment approach to improve survival while preserving brain function and quality of life. This phase 3 trial compares current standard treatments because existing data is unclear about the best timing and combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for these tumors. The study compares two treatment approaches for adults with newly diagnosed grade 2 or 3 oligodendrogliomas. One group receives an initial chemotherapy regimen of lomustine and temozolomide (CETEG) with delayed radiotherapy plus PCV chemotherapy at progression. The other group receives standard radiotherapy followed by PCV chemotherapy. Radiotherapy doses vary based on tumor grade. The study plans to assess if delaying radiotherapy and adjusting chemotherapy can maintain survival while reducing side effects. Participants will undergo regular monitoring including MRI scans every three months, neurological assessments, quality of life questionnaires, and annual cognitive testing. Researchers will measure qualified overall survival, defined as survival without decline in function, cognition, or quality of life. The study will last up to 10 years, with close tracking of side effects, tumor response, and patients' well-being to determine the best balance of treatment effectiveness and quality of life.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of combining durvalumab and domvanalimab compared to durvalumab plus placebo in adults with locally advanced (Stage III), unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease has not worsened after definitive platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study involves multiple centers. Participants receive intravenous infusions of durvalumab and domvanalimab or durvalumab and placebo. The treatments are given after patients have completed concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy with a total radiation dose of approximately 60 Gy. The study monitors patients over time to assess treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor tissue analysis for PD-L1 status, performance status assessments, and monitoring of organ and marrow function. The main outcome measured is progression-free survival up to 8 years after randomization. Researchers also monitor for any adverse effects and disease progression throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating various approved injectable and oral disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) in Germany. This observational, non-interventional, multicenter, open-label study collects primary data prospectively over up to four years, alongside retrospective data. The study captures medical history, disease duration, laboratory values, disability scores (EDSS), MRI results, and relapse information to provide real-world insights into treatment use and outcomes. Patients receiving routine medical treatment with any approved injectable or selected oral DMTs—including ofatumumab, glatiramer acetate, interferon 21, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, and diroximel fumarate—are enrolled without treatment allocation by the study. Two cohorts are observed: one treated primarily with injectable DMTs and another with injectable or oral DMTs. The core study period lasts about two years, with an optional extension providing an additional two years of observation, totaling up to four years. Follow-up visits and monitoring happen at the investigator's discretion and may include telemedicine. During the study, participants provide data through questionnaires and electronic case report forms. Routine clinical care procedures, such as diagnostic tests and monitoring, continue as usual. Researchers measure the proportion of patients continuing their baseline treatment at 24 months and collect ongoing clinical and imaging data. The study emphasizes real-world treatment patterns, safety, and disease activity over the extended follow-up period.

Researchers are evaluating the clinical utility of serum neurofilament light (sNfL) as a prognostic marker for disease activity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). This prospective, multicenter, observational, non-interventional study in Germany aims to understand how sNfL values can influence patient management and treatment decisions. The study focuses on patients treated with category 1 disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) who have incorporated sNfL testing into their care. Participants will either continue their current category 1 DMT, which includes therapies such as dimethylfumarate, glatiramer acetate, interferon beta, and teriflunomide, or switch to ofatumumab based on their physician’s clinical judgment. There is no treatment allocation by the study itself. Data collection will cover up to 24 months, and the frequency of visits and assessments will follow routine clinical practice without a fixed protocol. During the study, baseline and follow-up data will be gathered according to standard care recommendations, including clinical evaluations and sNfL measurements. Researchers will monitor the proportion of patients with high sNfL levels over time to assess disease activity. The observational period is flexible and guided by the treating physician, with no additional diagnostic or monitoring procedures beyond standard care. Participants will be followed for up to two years to better understand how sNfL influences treatment management in relapsing MS.

Researchers are evaluating the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ribociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy, for adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The study also compares data from patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy with or without LHRH, and those receiving endocrine monotherapy with or without LHRH. This observational study aims to understand treatment decisions and clinical use of ribociclib after its approval, collecting socio-economic data, quality of life, and patient compliance information. Participants receive treatment based on their physician's clinical judgment without study-assigned interventions. The treatments observed include ribociclib with an aromatase inhibitor LHRH, abemaciclib with endocrine therapy LHRH, or endocrine monotherapy LHRH. The study is conducted in various breast cancer centers and gynecological practices in Germany and Austria to represent local healthcare settings. Participants undergo assessments to monitor treatment effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and adherence to therapy over time. Data collected include clinical outcomes, adverse events, socio-economic status, and patient-reported compliance. The primary outcome measured is invasive disease-free survival over 36 months. This information will help inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for patients with early breast cancer in routine practice.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effects of fosmanogepix, a study medicine, for treating candidemia and invasive candidiasis, which are serious fungal infections caused by Candida species. This Phase 3 clinical trial compares fosmanogepix to the standard treatment of caspofungin followed by fluconazole, aiming to show that fosmanogepix is not worse than the standard therapy by a margin of 15%. The study includes adult patients diagnosed with these infections. Participants will receive either fosmanogepix or caspofungin as an intravenous infusion daily at the study clinic. After the initial infusion phase, patients may switch to oral tablets of fosmanogepix or fluconazole capsules, which can be taken at the clinic or at home if discharged. Treatment duration varies by individual, lasting up to six weeks depending on infection clearance and symptom improvement. A follow-up visit will take place six weeks after stopping treatment. During the study, patients will undergo multiple visits to monitor their health and treatment response. Researchers will assess outcomes such as the proportion of patients alive at 30 days and the overall treatment success at the end of study treatment, up to day 42. Safety will be closely monitored throughout the study and during follow-up, ensuring comprehensive evaluation of the treatments over the entire participation period.