Wurzburg

Researchers are evaluating treatments for germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma GCB DLBCL, a fast-growing blood cancer affecting immature B-cells. The study compares two treatment combinations to see if more people respond to zilovertamab vedotin MK-2140 plus R-CHP versus polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHP. This Phase 2 trial aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of these regimens in participants with newly diagnosed GCB DLBCL. Participants receive either zilovertamab vedotin along with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone R-CHP, or polatuzumab vedotin combined with R-CHP. Treatments are given by intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for up to 6 cycles, approximately 4 months, with prednisone or prednisolone taken orally for 5 days of each cycle. For participants with high-risk DLBCL, up to 2 additional cycles of rituximab or biosimilar are given. During the study, participants are monitored for response to treatment using Lugano Response Criteria, with follow-up lasting up to about 31 months for the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, overall survival, event-free survival, duration of complete response, adverse events, and quality of life assessments. Safety and health status are regularly checked through exams, lab tests, and questionnaires over several years, with total study participation extending up to 7 years.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous ianalumab in adults with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, a condition characterized by skin thickening and other systemic symptoms. This Phase 2 study compares ianalumab to a placebo to understand its impact on this disease, aiming to provide new treatment options for affected individuals. The study is sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals and employs a randomized, double-blind design to ensure reliable results. Participants receive either ianalumab or placebo through subcutaneous injections during the initial 52-week treatment period. After this, all participants enter a second 52-week open-label phase where they receive ianalumab. Following treatment, there is a post-treatment follow-up lasting at least 20 weeks and up to 2 years to monitor long-term effects. The study includes a screening period lasting up to 6 weeks before treatment begins. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments including measuring response based on the rCRISS25 scale at Week 52, lung function tests, skin scoring, and disability index evaluations. Blood samples are taken periodically to measure drug levels and antibodies. Safety is closely monitored through adverse event reporting up to Week 208. The total participation time can extend over several years including treatment and follow-up phases.

Researchers are investigating treatments for oligodendrogliomas, a type of brain tumor classified by specific genetic markers including mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase IDH and co-deletion of chromosomes 1p19q. This trial focuses on adults with newly diagnosed grade 2 or 3 gliomas, aiming to improve survival without loss of brain function, cognition, or quality of life. The study compares two treatment approaches to determine the best timing and combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either standard chemoradiation with procarbazine, CCNU lomustine, and vincristine PCV combined with radiotherapy, or an experimental approach starting with chemotherapy using lomustine and temozolomide CETEG followed by radiotherapy and PCV at tumor progression. Radiotherapy is delivered over about 5 to 6 weeks, with doses adjusted for tumor grade. Chemotherapy cycles last 6 weeks and include specified doses of oral and intravenous drugs. During the study, participants undergo regular magnetic resonance imaging MRI scans every three months, neurological assessments, quality of life questionnaires, and cognitive testing annually. The main outcome measured is qualified overall survival, which tracks survival without significant cognitive or functional decline. The study lasts up to 10 years, with ongoing monitoring of tumor progression, treatment response, and patient wellbeing. Safety and side effects are carefully assessed throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, and therapeutic effects of BNT113 combined with pembrolizumab compared to pembrolizumab alone as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma HNSCC positive for human papilloma virus 16 HPV16 and expressing the protein PD-L1 with a combined positive score of 1 or higher. This is an open-label, multi-site, Phase IIIII clinical trial consisting of two parts an initial safety run-in phase and a randomized phase. In the safety run-in phase Part A, patients receive BNT113 in combination with pembrolizumab to confirm safety and tolerability at selected dose levels. The randomized phase Part B compares BNT113 combined with pembrolizumab against pembrolizumab monotherapy. Treatments are given by intravenous injection or infusion and continue for up to 24 months. An optional pre-screening phase allows tumor samples to be tested for HPV16 DNA and PD-L1 expression before the main trial screening. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the study. Assessments include safety evaluations, tumor response, and survival outcomes such as overall survival and progression-free survival. Tumor tissue samples must be provided for testing. Researchers will measure treatment-emergent adverse events, response rates, duration of response, and disease control. The study may last up to 48 months, with ongoing safety and efficacy monitoring during and after treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics PK, and pharmacodynamics PD of KK8123 in adults with X-linked hypophosphatemia XLH through a Phase 12, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study. This first-in-human study aims to better understand how KK8123 behaves in the body and its effects on patients with this condition. The study is sponsored by Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd. and includes an optional safety extension period. The study includes a Screening Period of up to 28 days, followed by Part 1, which is a Dose Escalation Period consisting of a planned Treatment Period and an Observation Period lasting 32 to 44 weeks. Part 2 is an optional Extension Period for additional safety evaluation. Participants receive subcutaneous doses of KK8123 at different levels, including low dose single dose, mild dose multiple doses, and high dose multiple doses, with dosing confirmed for later cohorts. The study groups include several cohorts receiving escalating doses and an extension group. Participants will undergo multiple assessments during the study, including laboratory tests for hematology and clinical chemistry, measurement of serum phosphorus levels, echocardiograms, renal ultrasounds, and monitoring of vital signs such as heart rate and blood pressure. Researchers will track treatment-emergent adverse events TEAEs and measure KK8123 drug concentrations over time. Follow-up periods last up to 44 weeks in Part 1 and up to 52 weeks in Part 2. Participants are expected to adhere to study visit schedules and complete all assessments throughout their involvement.

Researchers are evaluating KUP-101A in patients with selected advanced solid tumors such as cutaneous melanoma, mucosal melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma of skin, and basal cell carcinoma of skin. The study aims to find the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended Phase 2 dose of KUP-101A. It also seeks to assess the drugs safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics while gathering initial data on its efficacy in these patients. Participants receive intravenous infusions of KUP-101A at various dose levels, progressing sequentially to determine the best dose for further study. There are multiple experimental dose levels ranging from dose level 1 to dose level 7. The study follows a non-randomized design without blinding. Treatment continues while monitoring for dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events. During the trial, participants undergo evaluations for adverse events, laboratory tests including hematology and clinical chemistry, urinalysis, and vital signs, as well as 12-lead ECG monitoring. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as drug concentration and elimination half-life are measured up to three weeks, with safety assessments extending to three months after the last dose. The total participation timeline includes enrollment, treatment, and follow-up periods for safety and pharmacodynamic assessments.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer mNSCLC whose tumors express high levels of PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter global study focuses on patients with mNSCLC without certain genetic mutations who are suitable for this treatment approach. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two drugs over repeated treatment cycles as first-line therapy. Both treatments are biological agents given by infusion, and the study is designed to monitor their effects over up to approximately five years. During the trial, participants will undergo regular assessments including physical exams, imaging scans such as CT or MRI to measure tumor lesions, and laboratory tests to evaluate organ function. Researchers will closely monitor overall survival, progression-free survival, treatment response, duration of response, and patient-reported outcomes on physical functioning and quality of life. Safety and immunogenicity of rilvegostomig will also be evaluated. Participants are followed and assessed for up to five years to gather comprehensive data on treatment effects and long-term outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 at levels of 1% or higher. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study aims to compare these treatments to improve outcomes for this patient group. Participants will receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab, each given intravenously on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle, combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy either carboplatin or cisplatin also given on Day 1 of each cycle for up to four cycles. After chemotherapy cycles, patients continue with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab monotherapy combined with pemetrexed maintenance. The study follows patients for up to approximately six years to monitor treatment effects and safety. During the study, participants undergo assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size, blood tests to evaluate organ function, and questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life. Researchers monitor overall survival and progression-free survival as primary outcomes, alongside other measures such as response duration and physical functioning. Safety is closely observed throughout, with study visits scheduled regularly during treatment and follow-up periods, lasting up to six years in total.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig combined with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer mNSCLC whose tumors express programmed death-ligand 1 PD-L1. This Phase III global study focuses on patients with PD-L1 tumor cell expression of 1% or higher and aims to determine which treatment provides better overall and progression-free survival. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two study groups one group will receive rilvegostomig plus carboplatin and either paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy, while the other group will receive pembrolizumab plus the same chemotherapy options. Rilvegostomig and pembrolizumab are both given intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, with chemotherapy given up to 4 cycles. Nab-paclitaxel may be administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment continues with rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab until disease progression or other criteria are met. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor response, laboratory tests to monitor organ function, and patient questionnaires about physical function and quality of life. Researchers will track overall survival, progression-free survival, response rates, and duration of response for up to approximately 6 years. Safety and immune response to rilvegostomig will also be evaluated. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma LA-HNSCC who have not progressed after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy cCRT. This phase III, randomized, open-label global study aims to assess whether volrustomig can improve outcomes in this patient population. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups those who receive volrustomig as sequential therapy, and those who undergo observation without additional treatment. The study compares these two approaches following prior curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The trial includes long-term follow-up to monitor patient outcomes. During the study, participants will be regularly assessed for progression-free survival, overall survival, physical functioning, and quality of life. Researchers will also monitor for the presence of anti-drug antibodies and adverse events related to volrustomig. Follow-up evaluations may continue for up to approximately eight years to fully understand the treatment impact and safety profile.