Thiruvananthapuram

Glycogen storage disorders (GSDs) are inherited metabolic conditions caused by enzyme defects affecting glycogen production or breakdown, commonly impacting the liver and muscles in children. These disorders range from mild cases with normal lifespans to severe forms that can be fatal in infancy. This research focuses on genetically confirmed pediatric hepatic GSDs in Indian children, aiming to describe their clinical presentation, genetic variations, natural progression, and how these relate to patient outcomes. The study addresses the current lack of comprehensive multicenter data on the genetic and clinical spectrum of GSDs in India. The study is a multicentric retrospective analysis combined with ongoing prospective data collection from genetically confirmed pediatric hepatic GSD patients. It involves collecting previous clinical and genetic data from participating centers, with retrospective data analysis and manuscript preparation planned between May 2024 and April 2025. New centers can join and submit their data at any time, with follow-up retrospective data requested every 6 to 12 months. Prospective data collection will continue for new patients diagnosed at these centers. Participants will undergo genetic confirmation of hepatic GSD subtypes including types 0a, I, III, IV, VI, IX, and XI based on specific gene variants. Researchers will evaluate long-term clinical outcomes such as native liver survival or post-liver transplant survival over a five-year period. The study involves continuous data gathering to better understand genotype-phenotype correlations and treatment responses, ultimately guiding personalized management and healthcare policy decisions for Indian children with GSDs.

The trial investigates the use of volrustomig in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) who have not shown disease progression after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in this patient population. Participants have tumors that express PD-L1 and the study is conducted as a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center global trial. Participants are assigned to receive either volrustomig as sequential therapy following cCRT or to an observation group. The treatment period involves monitoring participants who have completed definitive cCRT but remain unresected and have no evidence of metastatic disease. The study focuses on participants with Stage III, IVA, or IVB LA-HNSCC according to AJCC criteria, who have not undergone tumor resection before cCRT and have not been treated with radiotherapy alone. During the study, participants are regularly evaluated for progression-free survival, with follow-up lasting up to approximately 8 years to assess long-term outcomes. Researchers will monitor safety and disease progression closely. The overall participation duration includes screening, treatment or observation, and extended follow-up to capture both efficacy and safety data over time.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) with or without durvalumab compared to the investigator's choice chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab in patients who have PD-L1 positive locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This Phase III, randomized, open-label, international study aims to see if adding durvalumab to Dato-DXd can help patients live longer without their cancer worsening or simply live longer compared to standard chemotherapy with pembrolizumab. The study also examines how the treatments and cancer impact patients' quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: Dato-DXd plus durvalumab, Dato-DXd alone, or investigator's choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or gemcitabine plus carboplatin) combined with pembrolizumab. All treatments are given by intravenous infusion. The study design includes stratification based on geographic location, disease-free interval history, and prior PD-1/PD-L1 treatment for early-stage TNBC. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor their disease status using RECIST 1.1 criteria and undergo imaging reviewed by blinded independent central review. Researchers will track progression-free survival, quality of life, safety, and other health measures over an anticipated period of up to 33 months. Participants must provide tumor samples for PD-L1 testing, and safety monitoring will continue throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating efruxifermin (EFX) in adults aged 18 to 80 who have compensated cirrhosis caused by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of EFX in improving liver health and delaying disease progression in this population. The study focuses on subjects with advanced liver fibrosis (stage 4) but without liver decompensation. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either efruxifermin or a placebo, both administered by subcutaneous injection. The study includes two cohorts: Cohort 1 requires biopsy confirmation of liver fibrosis and specific metabolic features, while Cohort 2 allows biopsy or non-invasive diagnosis. Treatment and observation continue over an extended period to evaluate changes in liver fibrosis and clinical events. During the study, researchers will monitor the time until significant clinical events such as disease progression or liver decompensation occur, with a follow-up of up to five years. For Cohort 1, the proportion of participants showing improvement in fibrosis without worsening steatohepatitis will be assessed at 96 weeks. Participants will undergo regular evaluations including clinical assessments and laboratory tests to track liver function and safety throughout the study period.

Researchers are investigating the safety and effectiveness of efruxifermin in people with non-cirrhotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) who have moderate to advanced liver fibrosis (stage 2 or 3). This Phase 3 study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, enrolling a total of 1650 participants in two groups to evaluate treatment outcomes. Participants will receive either efruxifermin or a placebo by subcutaneous injection. The study involves two cohorts, with Cohort 1 including patients who have biopsy-confirmed NASH or MASH and specific liver fibrosis and activity scores. The treatment period and detailed dosing schedules are not provided but the study compares the effects of the active drug against placebo. During the study, participants will be monitored for improvement in liver disease status, including resolution of NASH/MASH and at least a one-stage improvement in liver fibrosis after 52 weeks for Cohort 1. Long-term outcomes such as event-free survival will be observed over 240 weeks. Safety and efficacy assessments will be conducted throughout the study period, including evaluations of liver histology and metabolic health.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of a combination treatment including adagrasib, pembrolizumab, and platinum-doublet chemotherapy compared to a placebo combined with pembrolizumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy. This study focuses on adults with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has a KRAS G12C mutation. The trial is a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study designed to provide insights into treatment options for this specific lung cancer type. Participants receive either adagrasib plus pembrolizumab alongside platinum-doublet chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin and pemetrexed, or they receive a placebo plus pembrolizumab and the same chemotherapy regimen. The dosages and schedules of these drugs are specified and administered on predetermined days. The trial compares these two treatment groups to understand better the impact of adding adagrasib to the existing pembrolizumab and chemotherapy treatment. Throughout the study, participants are closely monitored for progression-free survival and overall survival, assessed up to seven years using standardized criteria for tumor response. Regular imaging scans such as CT or MRI are used to measure disease status. Safety and tolerability are also evaluated during the study, with ongoing assessments to track adverse effects and treatment response. The total duration of follow-up allows for long-term observation of treatment outcomes and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of adding LY3537982 (olomorasib) to standard anti-cancer drugs compared to standard treatment alone in participants with untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has a specific KRAS G12C gene mutation. This pivotal Phase 3 trial includes participants with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and considers their programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels. The study includes multiple parts: Dose Optimization, Part A, and Part B are randomized, while Safety Lead-In for Part B and Part C are non-randomized. Treatments being assessed include LY3537982 taken orally, pembrolizumab administered intravenously, and standard chemotherapy drugs such as cisplatin, carboplatin, and pemetrexed given intravenously. Participants receive these treatments according to their assigned groups based on their PD-L1 expression and tumor histology. Participants will be monitored with regular assessments including measuring disease progression, safety evaluations, and treatment emergent adverse events for up to approximately one year, with overall study participation potentially lasting up to three years depending on individual response and health status. Outcome measures focus on progression-free survival and safety, capturing any adverse events from the start of treatment until disease progression or death.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of a new combination treatment using Surovatamig (AZD0486), a fully human bispecific monoclonal IgG4 antibody, together with rituximab. This Phase III, global, randomized, open-label study focuses on participants with untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) to see if this combination offers added benefits compared to three standard chemoimmunotherapy regimens chosen by the investigator. The study has two parts: a safety run-in and the main Phase III comparison. The first part, the Safety Run-in, compares different dose levels of Surovatamig plus rituximab to find the recommended Phase III dose (RP3D). The second part, Phase III, involves three groups: two groups receiving different schedules of Surovatamig plus rituximab, and one group receiving one of three standard regimens (R-CVP with rituximab maintenance, R-CHOP with rituximab maintenance, or Bendamustine plus rituximab maintenance) as chosen by the investigator. Treatment schedules and doses are monitored closely through the study. Participants will be followed for up to 10 years to monitor the occurrence and severity of side effects, treatment discontinuations, dose changes, and overall safety. The main goal is to assess whether the new combination is superior to standard treatments. Regular evaluations include safety assessments and monitoring treatment effects over time, with attention to both short-term and long-term outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the safety of teclistamab given as a single treatment in Indian adults with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, a type of blood cancer that returns after treatment or does not respond to treatment. Participants must have previously undergone at least three prior therapies, including an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 antibody, with disease progression after the last treatment. This study is a Phase IV, open-label, multicenter trial focused on assessing treatment safety in a real-world clinical setting. Teclistamab will be administered by subcutaneous injection to the participants. The study does not mention comparator groups or specific dosing schedules in the provided information. The treatment period and any extension or follow-up phases are not described further. Participants will receive this drug as monotherapy during the study. During the study, participants will be monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events for up to approximately 2 years and 1 month. Safety assessments and evaluations will be conducted to track any side effects or complications. The study involves regular clinical monitoring to understand the safety profile of teclistamab in this patient population over the specified timeframe.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of the drug BMS-986365 compared to the investigator's choice of therapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This Phase 3 study aims to measure the length of time participants live without radiographic disease progression, using established criteria for bone and soft tissue cancer progression. The study focuses on patients who have already been treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and have metastatic prostate cancer confirmed by imaging. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either one of two dose levels of BMS-986365 or the investigator's choice of treatment, which may include Docetaxel plus Prednisone/Prednisolone, Abiraterone plus Prednisone/Prednisolone, or Enzalutamide. The study has two parts: initially, participants are assigned to one of three groups including two BMS-986365 doses or comparator therapy, followed by a second part where they are randomized to either the selected BMS-986365 dose or the comparator treatment. During the study, participants will be monitored for disease progression through scans and evaluations using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group criteria, with follow-up lasting up to four years. Safety and treatment effects will be assessed regularly, and participants' symptoms and quality of life will be closely observed. This long-term follow-up helps researchers understand the treatment's impact on cancer progression and patient well-being.