Arezzo

Researchers are studying advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that has returned after prior adjuvant therapy. The trial aims to find out if treatment with belzutifan and zanzalintinib helps patients live longer and delays disease progression compared to treatment with cabozantinib. This is a Phase 3 randomized study focusing on participants with recurrent advanced RCC who have previously received anti-PD-1/L1 therapy. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of two oral drug regimens: either belzutifan combined with zanzalintinib, both taken once daily, or cabozantinib alone, also taken once daily. The study compares these treatments to assess their effects on disease control and overall survival. During the study, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival and overall survival for up to approximately 73 months. Researchers will evaluate how well the cancer responds to treatment and track any changes in health status over time. Safety and effectiveness of the treatments will be closely followed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment called ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study compares I-DXd to chemotherapy to see if it helps people live longer overall and live longer without their cancer worsening. It is a Phase 3, open-label trial focused on patients who have progressed on prior therapies and have evidence of metastatic disease. Participants receive either I-DXd through an intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or docetaxel chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. Prednisone tablets are also given daily as part of the treatment plan. Before each I-DXd dose, premedication is provided to help prevent nausea and vomiting using a combination of drugs such as corticosteroids and anti-nausea medicines. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or other reasons to stop. During the study, researchers monitor overall survival and how long patients live without their cancer progressing, for up to about 36 months. Participants undergo tumor tissue collection, scans, and assessments to track disease status and side effects. Safety is closely watched throughout treatment. The study includes men aged 18 and older with confirmed prostate cancer and metastatic disease who have previously received certain hormone therapies but no prior taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC.

Researchers are evaluating new treatments for people with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HR NMIBC), a type of bladder cancer that has not spread to the muscle but has a high chance of worsening or returning. This cancer type may include carcinoma in situ (CIS), which is a flat, surface-level bladder cancer. The study aims to learn whether adding intismeran autogene (V940), a treatment designed to boost the immune system's attack on cancer, to the standard Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) immunotherapy can help people live longer without the cancer growing, spreading, or coming back. Participants will receive either the combination of V940 with BCG or BCG alone. BCG is given as a bladder instillation, while V940 is given as an intramuscular injection. The study is phase 2, open-label, and randomized. As of a 2026 amendment, outcome measures for a monotherapy arm of V940 are no longer primary or secondary. Treatment is focused on Cohort A, which includes people with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer who are BCG-naïve or meet specific recurrence criteria. During the study, participants will be monitored for event-free survival for up to approximately 5 years. Researchers will assess how long participants live without the cancer worsening or returning. The study includes regular evaluations, imaging, and safety monitoring. The total duration of participation depends on individual outcomes and follow-up but includes long-term observation to assess treatment effects and safety.

This research focuses on men with prostate cancer who have previously participated in an enzalutamide clinical study sponsored by Astellas or Medivation. It aims to gather long-term safety information from participants who continue to benefit from enzalutamide treatment. This is a Phase 2 open-label extension study designed to monitor ongoing treatment effects after the initial study has completed its primary analysis or evaluation period. Participants will continue their previous treatment regimens, which may include enzalutamide taken orally once daily. Some may also receive abiraterone acetate with prednisone or leuprolide acetate depending on their prior study enrollment. Dose adjustments are allowed with medical monitor approval. The first visit of this study should occur within seven days of the last visit of the prior study unless treatment is temporarily paused. Participants are asked to return to their study site every 24 weeks for safety reviews, including adverse event monitoring and medication checks. At visits every 12 weeks, participants return unused study drugs and receive new supplies if needed. Safety data, including all adverse events and serious adverse events, are collected from consent until study completion, which may last up to 96 months. The study follows local standard care guidelines and includes a post-marketing phase in South Korea.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of Saruparib (AZD5305) compared to placebo when added to a standard radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) regimen in men with high-risk and very high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer who have a BRCA gene mutation. This phase III study aims to assess whether Saruparib can improve metastasis-free survival in this population. About 700 adult male participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Saruparib or placebo along with ADT. There are two groups: Cohort A includes 400 participants with newly diagnosed high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer treated with primary RT or with high-risk biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy receiving salvage RT. Cohort B includes 300 participants with very high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer receiving primary RT combined with ADT and abiraterone. Saruparib and placebo will be given orally, and standard ADT and abiraterone with prednisone/prednisolone will be administered as per the regimen. Participants will be followed for up to about 93 months to monitor metastasis-free survival and overall safety. Assessments include imaging scans like CT, MRI, bone scans, and PSMA-PET to confirm disease status. The study also monitors organ function, performance status, and treatment adherence. An independent committee will review safety and efficacy data throughout the trial to ensure participant well-being and study integrity.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of the drug BMS-986365 compared to the investigator's choice of therapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This Phase 3 study aims to measure the length of time participants live without radiographic disease progression, using established criteria for bone and soft tissue cancer progression. The study focuses on patients who have already been treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and have metastatic prostate cancer confirmed by imaging. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either one of two dose levels of BMS-986365 or the investigator's choice of treatment, which may include Docetaxel plus Prednisone/Prednisolone, Abiraterone plus Prednisone/Prednisolone, or Enzalutamide. The study has two parts: initially, participants are assigned to one of three groups including two BMS-986365 doses or comparator therapy, followed by a second part where they are randomized to either the selected BMS-986365 dose or the comparator treatment. During the study, participants will be monitored for disease progression through scans and evaluations using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group criteria, with follow-up lasting up to four years. Safety and treatment effects will be assessed regularly, and participants' symptoms and quality of life will be closely observed. This long-term follow-up helps researchers understand the treatment's impact on cancer progression and patient well-being.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of TAR-210 compared to a single-agent intravesical chemotherapy in adults with intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who have specific fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) mutations or fusions. This phase 3 randomized study aims to compare disease-free survival between these treatments. Eligible participants must have a confirmed diagnosis of intermediate-risk NMIBC with certain risk factors and be willing to undergo multiple cystoscopies and assessments throughout the study. Participants will receive either TAR-210, which is delivered directly into the bladder, or one of the investigator-chosen intravesical chemotherapy drugs, including Gemcitabine or MMC, also administered into the bladder. Prior to randomization, visible tumors must be fully removed, and the absence of disease confirmed. The study includes a main study group and a substudy group with slightly different eligibility criteria based on tumor grade and risk factors. During the study, participants will be closely monitored through cystoscopies and surgical assessments (TURBT) to evaluate cancer recurrence or progression. The primary outcome measure is disease-free survival, tracked from randomization until the first documented cancer recurrence, progression, or death, over approximately four years and two months. Safety and treatment adherence will also be assessed throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the changes in symptoms and functional limitations in adults with symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), including both obstructive and non-obstructive types. This Phase 3 trial aims to compare the effects of sotagliflozin, an oral medication, to a placebo in these participants. The study focuses on how these treatments affect heart-related quality of life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ CSS) over 26 weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either sotagliflozin tablets or matching placebo tablets once daily. The study includes participants with specific heart function criteria, including left ventricular outflow tract gradients for obstructive or non-obstructive HCM and stable background therapy. The treatment period lasts 26 weeks, during which participants take the assigned tablets daily. Throughout the study, participants will undergo assessments including symptom evaluations and functional status measurements. Researchers will monitor changes from the start of the study to week 26 using the KCCQ CSS to evaluate treatment effects on heart symptoms and quality of life. Safety and adherence to medication will also be observed during this time.

Researchers are conducting an observational, prospective, multicenter study in Italian cardiology centers to evaluate how well patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) follow guideline-recommended treatments. The study also aims to assess the safety of these treatments, monitor treatment patterns in patients with acute heart failure, and observe treatment approaches in all chronic heart failure patients regardless of their ejection fraction levels. The study involves two phases of educational interventions and data collection. Initially, healthcare providers will receive education on guideline recommendations and treatment patterns, followed by 3 months of patient data collection or up to 30 consecutive patients with chronic or acute heart failure. After 6 months, treatment modifications and outcomes will be evaluated. Then, a second educational session will highlight gaps between guidelines and practice, followed by another 3 months of data collection. Patients will be followed for 12 months total, with ongoing monitoring of treatment changes and outcomes. Participants will be assessed at enrollment and during the follow-up periods through clinical evaluations and data collection on treatment adherence and safety. The main outcome measured is adherence to guideline-directed medical therapies over 6 months. The study includes evaluations at 6 and 12 months after enrollment, with close monitoring of treatment patterns and patient health status throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating patients who have experienced athero-thrombotic events such as coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral artery disease. The study aims to assess how well patients follow guideline recommendations, particularly focusing on improving cholesterol levels and other modifiable risk factors to reduce the chance of cardiovascular event recurrence. This observational and prospective study takes place across multiple cardiology centers in Italy to represent a broad patient population. The study includes several phases starting with an educational intervention to discuss guideline recommendations for secondary prevention. Following this, data is collected for three months or until 30 patients with documented cardiovascular conditions are enrolled, using a web-based case record form that identifies when guidelines are not followed and records reasons for non-adherence. After six months, primary and secondary outcomes are evaluated. A second educational intervention then shares findings from the first phase to highlight gaps in clinical practice, followed by another three-month data collection period and a further six-month outcome assessment. Finally, all patients are followed for 12 months to monitor longer-term results. Participants provide informed consent and are monitored through data collection forms that track adherence to guidelines and clinical outcomes. The main outcome measured is adherence to cholesterol management guidelines over six months. Additional assessments include adherence to recommendations for other cardiovascular risk factors. Throughout the study, researchers gather data to understand how guideline adherence affects patient health and to identify barriers to following best practices, with continuous follow-up over a year to evaluate sustained effects.