Kyoto

Researchers are evaluating a new treatment called ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study compares I-DXd to chemotherapy to see if it helps people live longer overall and live longer without their cancer worsening. It is a Phase 3, open-label trial focused on patients who have progressed on prior therapies and have evidence of metastatic disease. Participants receive either I-DXd through an intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or docetaxel chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. Prednisone tablets are also given daily as part of the treatment plan. Before each I-DXd dose, premedication is provided to help prevent nausea and vomiting using a combination of drugs such as corticosteroids and anti-nausea medicines. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or other reasons to stop. During the study, researchers monitor overall survival and how long patients live without their cancer progressing, for up to about 36 months. Participants undergo tumor tissue collection, scans, and assessments to track disease status and side effects. Safety is closely watched throughout treatment. The study includes men aged 18 and older with confirmed prostate cancer and metastatic disease who have previously received certain hormone therapies but no prior taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC.

Researchers are investigating new treatments for people with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer, specifically targeting triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor (HR)-low positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. These types have little or no HER2 protein and involve hormones like estrogen or progesterone. The study aims to evaluate if the addition of sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT), a targeted therapy, combined with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy can improve outcomes compared to pembrolizumab with chemotherapy alone. Participants receive treatments including sacituzumab tirumotecan, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin and paclitaxel, all given by intravenous infusion. Rescue medications like antihistamines, acetaminophen, dexamethasone, or steroid mouthwash may be used as needed. The study is randomized and open-label, comparing sac-TMT followed by chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab to chemotherapy and pembrolizumab without sac-TMT. During the study, researchers will monitor participants up to about 30 weeks to assess the percentage of people with no remaining cancer cells at surgery. They will also follow participants for up to approximately 92 months to track event-free survival, meaning time without cancer growth, spread, or return. Participants will undergo imaging, clinical assessments, and laboratory tests to evaluate treatment effects and safety throughout the study.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous ianalumab in adults with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. This Phase 2 study compares ianalumab with a placebo in participants diagnosed according to established classification criteria, focusing on those with active disease and specific autoantibodies. The goal is to better understand ianalumab's impact on this condition over a long treatment period. The study includes several phases: up to 6 weeks for screening, followed by a 52-week initial treatment period where participants receive either ianalumab or placebo by subcutaneous injection. After this, there is a second 52-week open-label treatment period where all participants receive ianalumab. Finally, a post-treatment follow-up period lasts at least 20 weeks and can extend up to 2 years after the last dose. Participants will undergo various assessments throughout the study, including evaluations of their skin condition using the rCRISS25 response at week 52. Safety and tolerability will also be closely monitored. The study involves regular visits for clinical evaluations, laboratory tests, and monitoring of disease activity and antibody status, with the total participation potentially lasting over two years including follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of zorevunersen in patients with Dravet syndrome, a condition marked by reduced levels of the Nav1.1 protein due to mutations in the SCN1A gene. Zorevunersen is an investigational antisense oligonucleotide designed to increase the expression of the sodium channel Nav1.1 protein by boosting the production of its messenger RNA. This Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study aims to assess the potential of zorevunersen for disease modification by measuring changes in major motor seizure frequency and other health outcomes. The study has two treatment periods. In Treatment Period 1, participants assigned to zorevunersen receive the drug by intrathecal administration on Day 1, Day 57, Day 169, and Day 281 with doses of 70 mg initially and then 45 mg later. The sham group undergoes a procedure mimicking drug administration without receiving the drug. In Treatment Period 2, those initially on zorevunersen receive 45 mg doses on Day 393, Day 477, and Day 589. Participants initially in the sham group are then given zorevunersen doses of 70 mg on Day 393 and Day 477, and 45 mg on Day 589. Participants will be closely monitored throughout the study with a primary focus on seizure changes measured at Week 28. Secondary assessments include behavior, cognition, clinical status, and quality of life. The study includes an initial 8-week baseline period and a 6-week observation period to confirm seizure frequency and stability of other treatments. Patients may continue to an open-label extension study to receive zorevunersen if eligible. The study involves children aged 2 to under 18 years and tracks safety and tolerability alongside efficacy outcomes.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are conducting a global observational study to understand how molecular changes in mature T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms affect patient outcomes such as overall survival and progression-free survival. The study aims to use machine learning to identify genetic factors that influence treatment response and resistance, with the goal of moving towards personalized treatment options for these lymphoma types. The study focuses on patients who are newly diagnosed, have primary refractory disease, or have relapsed. This prospective, longitudinal study enrolls patients at their initial visit and follows them for up to four years during their clinical care. Data collected includes routine demographics, clinical features, pathology, molecular tumor information, radiology, treatment details, and quality of life measures. Molecular analysis uses next generation sequencing techniques on archived tumor samples, mononuclear cells, cell-free DNA, and saliva when feasible. The data is securely shared among participating institutions and analyzed with advanced deep learning to predict treatment responses and survival. Participants will be monitored over the course of four years with regular collection of clinical and molecular data by research teams. The study measures overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, time to disease progression, and rates of stem cell transplantation. Researchers also investigate associations between tumor-specific genetic changes and treatment outcomes. The secure, collaborative data sharing supports comprehensive analysis to improve understanding of these lymphomas and guide future therapies.

Researchers are evaluating the long-term safety and tolerability of dazodalibep in adults with Sjögren's Syndrome. This phase 3 open-label extension study focuses on participants who have previously received dazodalibep or placebo in earlier phase 3 trials and completed those studies through Week 48. Participants will receive dazodalibep intravenously during this long-term extension study. The first dose is administered around Week 48 (+28 days) following the prior phase 3 studies. The study monitors safety and tolerability over an extended period to assess treatment-emergent adverse events up to 152 weeks. During the study, participants will undergo regular evaluations to monitor their health and any side effects. Researchers will collect data on adverse events that emerge during treatment. The overall goal is to gather long-term safety information to better understand how participants tolerate dazodalibep when used over an extended time frame.

Researchers are evaluating whether the drugs retatrutide and tirzepatide can prevent major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) who are at high risk. This Phase 3 trial enrolls about 4,500 adults with MASLD identified by non-invasive tests indicating an increased likelihood of developing serious liver problems. The study aims to understand how these treatments might affect liver health over time compared to a placebo. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either retatrutide, tirzepatide, or a placebo, all given by subcutaneous injection. The study will last approximately 224 weeks, during which participants may attend 25 to 30 clinic visits for monitoring and assessment. After the main study, eligible participants can join an optional 2-year extension where all will receive either retatrutide or tirzepatide regardless of their original group. Throughout the trial, participants’ liver function and disease progression will be closely monitored through various health assessments. Researchers will track the time to the first major adverse liver event as the main outcome. Safety and health status will be evaluated regularly during clinic visits, ensuring thorough observation over the long study period.