High Wycombe

Researchers are evaluating two different methods of pacing the heart in patients with slow heart rates (bradycardia). This multi-center randomized controlled trial, called PROTECT-HF, aims to compare the standard right ventricular pacing approach with a newer physiological pacing technique, which includes His bundle and left bundle area pacing. The study will enroll 2600 patients to assess differences in outcomes related to heart function and survival. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either right ventricular pacing or physiological pacing through pacemaker implantation. The physiological pacing method may involve His bundle pacing or left bundle pacing, with biventricular pacing used if these are not possible. Both treatments will be performed at participating centers, with patients and outcome assessors blinded to the treatment allocation. A subgroup of 500 patients will also take part in an optional echocardiographic sub-study to observe heart changes over 24 months. During the study, participants will be monitored from the time of consent for up to 78 months. Evaluations will occur at the start and every six months afterward to track mortality and heart failure-related health events. Researchers will gather data on heart function, treatment effects, and safety. The main analysis will consider all patients as originally assigned, and additional analysis will assess those who received the assigned treatment.

Researchers are investigating how CDR132L, a potential new medicine, affects the structure and function of the heart in people living with heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction and left ventricular hypertrophy. This Phase 2 study compares CDR132L to a placebo, where participants receive either treatment randomly. The study aims to evaluate changes in a specific biomarker, microRNA-132-3p, over 24 weeks, with the total study duration lasting about 60 weeks. Participants will receive either CDR132L or a placebo through an intravenous infusion once every 4 weeks for a total of 48 weeks. The treatments are given under a double-blind design, meaning neither the participants nor the researchers know who receives which treatment until the study ends. This allows for a fair comparison of the effects of CDR132L versus placebo on heart structure and function. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including laboratory tests to measure heart-related biomarkers and imaging tests such as echocardiography to monitor heart structure and function. Researchers will track changes from baseline to week 24 in microRNA-132 levels and continue monitoring participants through the 60-week study period to evaluate safety and treatment effects. Ongoing clinical evaluations and safety checks will help ensure participant well-being throughout the trial.

Researchers are evaluating how CDR132L, a potential new medicine, affects the structure and function of the heart in people living with heart failure who have preserved ejection fraction and left ventricular hypertrophy. This phase 2 study compares different doses of CDR132L with a placebo, which is an inactive treatment. The study aims to understand the safety and effectiveness of CDR132L in reversing heart remodeling in this population. Participants will receive either CDR132L or placebo administered intravenously once every 4 weeks. The study treatment period lasts about 24 weeks, followed by additional assessments leading up to a total study duration of approximately 60 weeks. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, meaning neither participants nor researchers know who receives the active treatment or placebo during the main phase. During the study, participants will undergo various evaluations including heart imaging via echocardiography to measure heart function and structure, laboratory tests including NT-proBNP levels, and monitoring of heart failure symptoms. The main outcome measured is the change in normalized microRNA-132-3p levels from baseline to week 24. Researchers will also monitor safety and treatment effects throughout the study, which includes regular visits and assessments over the full 60-week period.

Researchers are evaluating ziltivekimab as a treatment for people living with heart failure and inflammation. This Phase 3 study compares ziltivekimab to a placebo in participants with heart failure who have mild to preserved ejection fraction and systemic inflammation. The study aims to assess the effect of ziltivekimab on cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or urgent heart failure visits over a period of up to 4 years. Participants will receive monthly injections of either ziltivekimab or a placebo using a pre-filled syringe or a pen-injector. The study medication is administered subcutaneously once a month for up to 4 years. The trial includes up to 20 clinic visits during which participants will be monitored and assessed. During the study, participants will use a study app on their phone to record all injections and complete questionnaires. Researchers will monitor participants for key outcomes like cardiovascular events and heart failure episodes from the time of randomization until the end of the study. Safety and health status will be regularly evaluated throughout the study period, which may last up to 48 months.

This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two different dose schedules of pegozafermin compared to a placebo in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) who have liver fibrosis at stage F2 or F3. This phase 3 study focuses on improving liver fibrosis and steatohepatitis in this patient group, which involves chronic liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction. Participants will receive either pegozafermin or a placebo through subcutaneous injections. The study compares two doses of pegozafermin to assess their impact on liver fibrosis and steatohepatitis. The treatment period lasts up to 52 weeks, with outcomes measured at this time point. During the study, participants will be monitored for improvements in liver fibrosis and resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening fibrosis by week 52. Researchers will also track the time until any disease progression occurs, up to 5 years. Throughout the trial, safety and efficacy will be carefully assessed through clinical evaluations and laboratory tests to ensure participant well-being.

Researchers are studying the immune response and safety of mRNA-1018-H5, a pandemic influenza vaccine, in adults aged 18 years and older. The trial aims to assess how well two doses of this vaccine trigger antibody production and to monitor any side effects or reactions. This is a Phase 3, randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study focused on the influenza virus. Participants will receive either the mRNA-1018-H5 vaccine or a placebo, both provided as sterile liquid injections. The study involves two doses and includes detailed monitoring for immune response and side effects after vaccination. The trial compares the vaccine to a placebo to evaluate its immunogenicity and safety. During the study, individuals will undergo medical evaluations including physical exams and pregnancy testing if applicable. Researchers will measure antibody levels at Day 43 and record any local or systemic reactions up to Day 29 after injections, as well as any adverse events up to Day 205. The study tracks serious and medically-attended adverse events to ensure careful safety monitoring throughout the participation period.

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of verekitug (UPB-101) in adults with moderate-to-severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), a long-term inflammatory lung condition. This global, multicenter Phase 2b study aims to understand how well verekitug works compared to a placebo, alongside participants' usual COPD medications. Participants must have a confirmed COPD diagnosis and meet specific lung function and symptom criteria to join the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of two doses of verekitug or a matching placebo, in addition to their regular COPD background treatments. The study includes a screening period of about 4 weeks, followed by treatment lasting between 60 and 108 weeks. After treatment, there is a 16-week follow-up period to monitor participants after their last dose. Throughout the study, participants will undergo various assessments including lung function tests and symptom evaluations. Researchers will track the annual rate of moderate or severe COPD flare-ups from the start of treatment through week 108. Safety and tolerability will be closely monitored during the treatment and follow-up periods to ensure participants' well-being over the course of the trial.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of astegolimab compared to a placebo in adults aged 40 to 80 years who have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The study focuses on participants who are former or current smokers with a history of frequent COPD flare-ups. This phase III trial aims to determine how well astegolimab reduces moderate and severe COPD exacerbations over one year. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous astegolimab every two or four weeks or a placebo every two weeks. All participants will continue their optimized COPD maintenance treatments, which may include combinations of inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta-agonists, and long-acting muscarinic antagonists. Study treatments will be administered over a 52-week period. Throughout the study, researchers will monitor the annual rate of moderate and severe COPD exacerbations. Participants will undergo lung function tests, chest imaging, and assessments of breathlessness and lung health. The study will also carefully track the safety of the treatments, including any infections or heart-related problems. The total participation time is 52 weeks, during which the effectiveness and safety of astegolimab will be evaluated.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics of two different dose levels of solrikitug compared to placebo in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). This Phase 2 study includes participants who have had COPD for at least 12 months and have elevated blood eosinophil levels. The trial aims to understand how solrikitug affects blood eosinophil counts and other health measures related to COPD. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either low-dose solrikitug, high-dose solrikitug, or a placebo. These treatments are given by subcutaneous injection at the study site over a 12-week period. After treatment, there is a 16-week follow-up period to monitor participants for any lasting effects or safety concerns. During the study, participants will have regular assessments including lung function tests, blood tests to measure eosinophil counts, and evaluations of COPD symptoms. Researchers will monitor safety and tolerability closely throughout the treatment and follow-up periods. The total time commitment for participants covers the 12 weeks of treatment plus the 16 weeks of follow-up, totaling 28 weeks.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, effectiveness, and tolerability of upadacitinib in adolescents and adults with severe alopecia areata (AA), a condition where the immune system attacks hair follicles causing hair loss on the head, face, or other body parts. This phase 3 study involves about 1500 participants worldwide and compares upadacitinib to a placebo to assess treatment impact on severe AA. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either upadacitinib or placebo oral tablets once daily for up to 160 weeks. There is a chance for re-randomization at weeks 24 and 52 based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores. Those completing initial studies may join an extension study to receive upadacitinib for up to an additional 108 weeks. Follow-up occurs for 30 days after the last dose. Throughout the study, participants attend regular visits at hospitals or clinics for medical assessments, blood tests, side effect monitoring, and questionnaires. Researchers measure the percentage of participants achieving a SALT score of 20 or less at week 24 and track adverse events up to 164 weeks. The study may involve a higher treatment burden compared to usual care due to frequent visits and evaluations.