San Leandro

Researchers are investigating the effectiveness of dotinurad compared to allopurinol in lowering serum uric acid (sUA) levels in adults with hyperuricemia related to gout. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial focuses on adults aged 18 to 75 who have had gout for at least one year and experienced multiple gout flares in the past year. The study aims to assess the percentage of participants achieving an sUA level below 6.0 mg/dL at 24 weeks. Participants receive either dotinurad or allopurinol as oral over-encapsulated tablets. Allopurinol doses range from 200 mg/day for those with moderate kidney impairment to 600 mg/day, with participants maintaining a stable dose for at least three months before starting the study. The trial includes a 24-week treatment period where the effects of these medications on uric acid levels are monitored and compared. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including serum uric acid measurements at screening and throughout the 24 weeks. Female participants of childbearing potential have pregnancy tests and must agree to contraception requirements. Researchers monitor safety, treatment adherence, and gout flare history to evaluate the treatments' efficacy and tolerability over the study period.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of dotinurad compared to allopurinol in lowering serum uric acid (sUA) levels at 24 weeks in adults with tophaceous gout. This condition involves the presence of measurable tophi, or deposits of uric acid crystals, in joints such as hands, wrists, feet, or ankles. The study is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial focused on adults aged 18 to 75 years who have had gout for at least one year. Participants receive either dotinurad or allopurinol in over-encapsulated tablet form, taken orally. The treatments are compared to see which better lowers sUA levels below 5.0 mg/dL after 24 weeks. The study includes a screening period before treatment begins, during which eligibility is confirmed, including measurements of tophi size and uric acid levels. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor serum uric acid levels and the size of tophi. Safety and side effects will also be monitored throughout the 24-week treatment period. The main outcome is the percentage of participants who achieve sUA levels less than 5.0 mg/dL at week 24, helping to understand the comparative efficacy and safety of the two medications.

Researchers are evaluating whether adding immunotherapy drugs brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab to standard chemotherapy, with or without radiation, can improve survival for patients aged 5 to 60 years with newly diagnosed stage I or II classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This phase III trial compares outcomes in groups based on their early response to initial chemotherapy, aiming to understand if immunotherapy can lead to better progression-free survival and overall survival compared to standard treatment alone. The study also looks at side effects, quality of life, and long-term health impacts across different patient groups. Participants first receive two cycles of standard ABVD chemotherapy every 28 days, followed by imaging to classify their response as rapid or slow early responders and their risk status as favorable or unfavorable. Based on these factors, patients are assigned to one of eight treatment arms that include either continued standard chemotherapy regimens or immunotherapy with brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab, sometimes combined with involved-site radiation therapy. Treatments are given intravenously or orally depending on the drugs, and cycles typically last 28 days. Imaging and blood samples are collected regularly throughout the study. Throughout the trial, participants undergo frequent scans such as FDG-PET, CT, MRI, and PET-CT to monitor their disease status. Blood samples and questionnaires assess treatment effects and quality of life. After completing treatment, patients have scheduled follow-up visits every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for two years, and annually up to 12 years to track long-term outcomes, side effects, and survival. The main measurements focus on progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events, and patient-reported experiences.

Researchers are evaluating two surgical procedures, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, to see how well they reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women who have BRCA1 gene mutations. The study aims to determine if removing just the fallopian tubes (bilateral salpingectomy) is almost as effective as removing both the fallopian tubes and ovaries (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) in lowering ovarian cancer risk. This trial also assesses symptoms related to estrogen loss, quality of life, sexual function, cancer-related distress, decision-making about surgery, and treatment side effects in these patients. Participants choose between two groups: one group undergoes bilateral salpingectomy and may have their ovaries removed later, while the other group undergoes bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups receive pelvic or transvaginal ultrasounds or pelvic MRI scans during screening, and blood samples are collected throughout the trial. Ancillary studies include quality-of-life assessments and questionnaires. The study also collects tissue and blood samples for future research. After surgery, participants have follow-up visits at 10 to 60 days, then at 6, 12, and 24 months, and annually for up to 20 years. Researchers monitor the time until any high-grade serous carcinomas develop, specifically ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. They also track menopausal symptoms, sexual function, quality of life, cancer distress, medical decisions about surgery, and any adverse events during this long-term follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating the ability of dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) added to standard care medications to improve moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) symptoms over the long term. This Phase 3 trial focuses on participants aged 16 and older who have active SLE with specific disease activity and serological markers. The goal is to assess clinical improvement using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004)-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) at Week 48. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) or placebo at scheduled times alongside their stable standard of care treatments. Standard medications include antimalarials combined with glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants or glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants alone if antimalarials are not suitable. The study is double-blind and placebo-controlled, ensuring unbiased comparison between the two groups. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor disease activity and treatment safety up to Week 48. Researchers will track responses based on disease activity indices and monitor for any adverse effects. The study includes careful screening and follow-up evaluations to understand the long-term effects of adding DZP to usual care in people with moderately to severely active SLE.

Researchers are evaluating the treatment outcomes of subcutaneous anifrolumab 120 mg once weekly as add-on therapy to antimalarials, with or without glucocorticoids (GCs), in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who have not previously used immunosuppressants or biologics. The study focuses on patients not in Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) at enrollment and aims to describe clinical outcomes such as achieving DORIS remission, while also understanding GC tapering and withdrawal possibilities. This is a Phase 3, open-label, single-arm study. Approximately 275 participants aged 18 to 70 will receive anifrolumab subcutaneously once weekly for 52 weeks following a screening period of up to 35 days. Participants may increase their GC dose until week 4 based on investigator recommendation, then those on more than 5 mg/day GC at entry will attempt a taper to 5 mg/day over 12 weeks between weeks 5 and 40. Participants achieving DORIS remission for two visits will then attempt complete GC withdrawal with a 12-week taper. After week 41 until study end, no further GC dose reductions will occur. Following treatment, a 12-week safety follow-up is included for those not continuing anifrolumab. Participants will undergo assessments including clinical evaluations, laboratory tests, and questionnaires to monitor disease activity, remission status, and safety. Researchers will measure attainment of DORIS remission at week 52 as the primary outcome. Study evaluations will include ANA and other antibody testing, infection screening, HPV testing, and adherence to study procedures. The total study duration is approximately 69 weeks, including screening, treatment, and follow-up periods.

Researchers are studying AZD1163, a new bispecific antibody, to assess its effectiveness and safety in adults with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who test positive for anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA). This Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involves participants already receiving standard treatments such as conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups to receive subcutaneous injections of either one of three doses of AZD1163 or a placebo, alongside their standard care, for 24 weeks. Following this treatment period, there will be a 28-week safety follow-up to monitor participants. Throughout the study, researchers will evaluate changes from baseline in disease activity scores using C-reactive protein levels at 12 weeks. Participants will undergo regular assessments including joint counts and laboratory tests to monitor disease status and safety. The total involvement in the study spans over 52 weeks, including treatment and follow-up periods.

This research aims to compare two ways of giving the drug bimekizumab to adults with active psoriatic arthritis or active axial spondyloarthritis. The study focuses on whether giving bimekizumab through an intravenous (IV) injection is not worse than giving it as a subcutaneous (under the skin) injection. The trial is designed as an open-label, randomized, parallel-group, noninferiority phase 1 study to evaluate how the drug moves and stays in the body over time. Participants will receive bimekizumab at scheduled times either through one of two intravenous regimens or a subcutaneous regimen. Each group will follow a specific dosing plan to see how the drug behaves in the body depending on the method of administration. The study treatments are given at pre-set time points, and the goal is to measure drug concentrations in the blood. During the study, participants will be monitored and assessed for the drug concentration in their blood at week 16 to understand steady-state trough levels. Researchers will also check for safety and tolerability throughout the study. The total duration and further assessments are not specified, but the focus is on comparing the drug levels and safety between the different administration methods in adults with these active conditions.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of nivolumab to the usual treatment of paclitaxel and ramucirumab in patients with advanced or locally unresectable stomach or esophageal adenocarcinoma. This phase II/III trial aims to determine if adding nivolumab improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared to paclitaxel and ramucirumab alone. The study also assesses response rates, disease control, safety, tolerability, and quality of life in participants with PD-L1 CPS 21 1 advanced gastric or esophageal cancer. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The first group receives nivolumab IV on day 1 of each 28-day cycle, ramucirumab IV on days 1 and 15, and paclitaxel IV on days 1, 8, and 15. The second group receives ramucirumab IV on days 1 and 15 and paclitaxel IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment continues every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Optional blood samples may be collected during the study. Imaging with CT and MRI is performed throughout. Participants undergo scans and assessments at baseline and during treatment to monitor cancer progression and treatment effects. They also complete questionnaires on quality of life and symptoms. After treatment ends, participants are followed up at 30, 60, and 90 days and then every 6 months for up to 3 years. Researchers measure progression-free survival and overall survival as primary outcomes, along with other safety and patient-reported measures.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of adding cemiplimab, an immunotherapy drug that blocks the PD-1 pathway to help the immune system attack tumor cells, to the usual treatment of docetaxel and ramucirumab in patients with stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. This phase II/III Expanded Lung-MAP trial compares cemiplimab combined with docetaxel and ramucirumab versus docetaxel and ramucirumab alone, aiming to improve treatment outcomes in patients who previously received platinum chemotherapy and immunotherapy but developed resistance or disease progression. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms. In Arm I, patients receive dexamethasone orally twice daily on days 0-2, ramucirumab and docetaxel intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. In Arm II, patients receive the same treatments plus cemiplimab intravenously on day 1 of each cycle. Treatment cycles continue every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Throughout the study, patients undergo regular blood sample collection and imaging scans such as CT or MRI to monitor disease status. During the study, participants are closely monitored with scans, blood tests, and physical exams to assess overall survival and other outcomes like progression-free survival, response rates, and treatment safety. Researchers also collect blood samples for future molecular studies. After completing treatment, patients are followed up every 3 to 6 months for up to 3 years to track long-term survival and health status. The study measures overall survival from randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 3 years.