Lone Tree

Researchers are evaluating new treatment options for adults with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer that cannot be removed by surgery and has a specific KRAS G12C gene mutation. This study compares the safety and effectiveness of adding calderasib and cetuximab, both targeted therapies, to a standard chemotherapy regimen called mFOLFOX6. The goal is to see if this combination can help patients live longer without their cancer growing or spreading compared to current treatments that may include mFOLFOX6 with or without bevacizumab. The study has two parts. It involves treatment with calderasib taken as an oral tablet, cetuximab given according to standard procedures, and mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy combining oxaliplatin, leucovorin/levofolinate calcium, and 5-fluorouracil. Some participants may receive bevacizumab or a bevacizumab biosimilar as part of the comparison. The treatments are given following approved dosing schedules. This design allows researchers to assess the safety and tolerability of these drug combinations in treating this type of colorectal cancer with the KRAS G12C mutation. Participants will be monitored for side effects, treatment tolerability, and cancer progression over a period that may last up to about 44 months. Researchers will track outcomes such as how many participants experience dose-limiting toxicities or adverse events, how many stop treatment due to side effects, and progression-free survival time. Assessments include health evaluations, laboratory tests, and imaging to observe cancer status. This long-term follow-up aims to understand both safety and effectiveness of the treatment combinations.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

The trial investigates the use of volrustomig in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) who have not shown disease progression after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in this patient population. Participants have tumors that express PD-L1 and the study is conducted as a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center global trial. Participants are assigned to receive either volrustomig as sequential therapy following cCRT or to an observation group. The treatment period involves monitoring participants who have completed definitive cCRT but remain unresected and have no evidence of metastatic disease. The study focuses on participants with Stage III, IVA, or IVB LA-HNSCC according to AJCC criteria, who have not undergone tumor resection before cCRT and have not been treated with radiotherapy alone. During the study, participants are regularly evaluated for progression-free survival, with follow-up lasting up to approximately 8 years to assess long-term outcomes. Researchers will monitor safety and disease progression closely. The overall participation duration includes screening, treatment or observation, and extended follow-up to capture both efficacy and safety data over time.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, how the body processes, and effectiveness of TERN-701, a selective allosteric inhibitor targeting BCR-ABL1, in adults with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) who have been previously treated. The study is divided into two parts: Part 1 focuses on dose escalation to find safe dosage levels, and Part 2 involves randomized dose expansion to further assess the chosen doses and includes a mutation cohort for participants with certain resistance mutations. Participants in both parts will take TERN-701 orally once daily in 28-day cycles. Part 1 involves sequential dose escalation cohorts, while Part 2 evaluates two recommended dose levels selected from Part 1. The mutation cohort (Part 2m) will assess a specific 500 mg dose in participants with particular resistance mutations. Scheduled visits occur frequently during the first treatment cycle and then regularly throughout the study to monitor treatment effects. During the study, participants will have regular visits for evaluations including safety checks and laboratory tests. Researchers will measure dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events, hematologic response, molecular response, and changes in BCR-ABL1 transcript levels up to three years. The trial plans to enroll about 180 participants, with up to 80 in Part 1, about 80 in Part 2, and around 20 in the mutation cohort. All participants will receive the active treatment throughout the study duration.

Researchers are evaluating the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of EIK1001 combined with standard treatments in adults with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not previously received vein-based treatment for their advanced disease. This phase 2, open-label, multicenter trial includes participants with confirmed stage 4 squamous or non-squamous NSCLC without mutations suitable for first-line targeted therapy. The study aims to find appropriate dosing and monitor adverse events alongside treatment response. Participants receive EIK1001, a Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist, together with pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, and chemotherapy drugs such as paclitaxel, pemetrexed, or carboplatin. These treatments are combined as part of the standard care for stage 4 NSCLC. The trial assesses safety and efficacy over the treatment period, including a dose-finding phase to determine the best dose of EIK1001. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including tumor measurements based on RECIST 1.1 criteria, organ function tests, and monitoring of performance status. Researchers track the percentage of participants experiencing safety events throughout up to two years of treatment. Follow-up includes ongoing evaluation of side effects and effectiveness to understand the treatment impact and participant well-being over the course of the trial.

Researchers are conducting a phase 3 open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter study to compare petosemtamab with investigator's choice monotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who have incurable metastatic or recurrent disease. This study focuses on patients with progressive disease after anti-PD-1 therapy and platinum-containing therapy and aims to evaluate the treatments as second- or third-line options. Participants will receive either petosemtamab or one of the investigator's choice monotherapies, including cetuximab, methotrexate, or docetaxel. The study involves treatment administration under controlled conditions with monitoring for efficacy and safety. The goal is to assess the treatments over time with a focus on response rates and overall survival. During the study, participants will undergo regular assessments including radiologic imaging to measure tumor response, and evaluations of overall survival up to approximately three years. The primary outcomes include objective response rate assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival. Researchers will monitor patient health, side effects, and treatment effectiveness throughout the study duration.

Researchers are conducting a prospective study to investigate outcomes after transferring a mosaic embryo, which contains both chromosomally normal and abnormal cells, screened through preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Typically, mosaic embryos are not offered for transfer, but some studies have shown they can lead to healthy live births. This study aims to better understand how mosaic embryo biopsies relate to fetal chromosome composition and to evaluate if such embryos should be routinely transferred. Participants will undergo a procedure where a mosaic embryo is transferred to the uterus. The embryos have been previously screened using PGT, which involves testing a small number of pre-placental cells. Only a single mosaic embryo will be transferred per participant, following standard clinic protocols. During the study, researchers will track implantation rates approximately 3 to 4 weeks after embryo transfer and monitor live birth rates within 9 to 12 months post-transfer. Participants include infertile women aged 18 to 45 who have completed an IVF cycle with PGT at the Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine. The study will involve clinical evaluations and follow-up to assess pregnancy outcomes and safety.

This research investigates the effects of AP301, a new iron-based phosphate binder, in patients with chronic kidney disease who are receiving maintenance dialysis and have high blood phosphate levels. The study aims to find out if AP301 can lower blood phosphate and how it influences serum calcium, calcium times phosphate levels, and parathyroid hormone levels. Researchers also want to understand what side effects or discomfort patients might experience and whether AP301 improves quality of life in Chinese patients. The trial is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multi-regional study comparing AP301 with a low-dose version of the same drug that acts as a placebo-like comparator. Participants will first stop all phosphate-lowering drugs. Then, they will take either AP301 or the low-dose comparator three times daily with meals for 8 weeks. After that, all participants will take AP301 three times daily for 24 weeks. Finally, they will take either AP301 or the comparator for 3 weeks. During the first 32 weeks, the dose of AP301 may be adjusted up or down based on blood phosphate levels and the study doctor's judgment. Additional treatment may be given if phosphate levels become too high or too low. Throughout the study, patients will be monitored for changes in serum phosphate levels, calcium levels, and parathyroid hormone levels. Researchers will also assess side effects and quality of life. The main outcome measured is the change in serum phosphate concentration from the start of the study to the end of week 8. Participation requires patients to be on dialysis for at least 3 months and to meet certain blood phosphate and calcium criteria, and the study will last at least 35 weeks with various assessments.

Researchers are evaluating alisertib monotherapy in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who have already undergone treatment with a platinum-based chemotherapy and an anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy. This Phase 2 study aims to identify biomarker-defined subgroups that might benefit most from alisertib and to assess the drug's effectiveness, safety, and how it is processed by the body. Participants may have received up to two prior systemic anti-cancer therapies for SCLC. The study involves giving patients alisertib in the form of enteric-coated tablets. The study focuses on a specific group of patients who have progressed after previous treatments. There are no details provided about dosing schedules or additional treatment periods within the source. During the study, researchers will measure outcomes such as objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, all assessed within biomarker-defined subgroups up to 36 months from the first dose. Participants will be monitored throughout this period to evaluate these outcomes and to observe safety and pharmacokinetics.

The primary purpose of the study is to assess how well amivantamab in combination with lazertinib or in combination with chemotherapy works (antitumor activity) in participants with epidermal growth factor receptor mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; that is one of the major types of lung cancer).