Waterloo

Researchers are evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, and global study focuses on participants with stage IV mNSCLC who do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements and are eligible for systemic therapy. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The study compares these two biological treatments given as monotherapy. Both groups will be monitored over time to assess treatment impact and safety. Throughout the study, participants undergo evaluations including tumor measurements by CT or MRI, performance status assessments, and organ function tests. Researchers will measure overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Tumor samples are collected before treatment for central testing, and participants’ health and treatment responses are closely followed during the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as initial treatments for patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1. This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global study focuses on patients whose tumors meet the PD-L1 expression threshold of 1% or higher and do not have certain genetic mutations or rearrangements that would require other targeted therapies. Participants receive either rilvegostomig or pembrolizumab intravenously on the first day of each 21-day treatment cycle. Both groups also receive platinum-based chemotherapy drugs such as carboplatin or cisplatin, administered intravenously up to four cycles, along with pemetrexed given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle. The study monitors these treatments as first-line therapy for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. During the study, participants undergo regular assessments including imaging scans to measure tumor size and response, as well as evaluations of organ and bone marrow function. Researchers track overall survival and progression-free survival for up to approximately five years. Safety is closely monitored throughout, and patients are followed long-term to assess outcomes related to treatment effectiveness and tolerability.

This is a Phase III, two-arm, randomized, double-blind, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared to pembrolizumab, both in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, as a first-line (1L) treatment for patients with squamous metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor cells (TC) ≥ 1%).

Researchers are evaluating AZD0780, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study to see if it can reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-PLUS) in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or those at high risk for a first ASCVD event. The study compares AZD0780 to a placebo and monitors participants from randomization until the primary analysis censoring date, followed by a final study closure visit. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either oral AZD0780 or an oral placebo once daily. The treatment period lasts until the primary analysis censoring date, after which a study closure visit will occur. The study is event-driven and designed to assess the time to the first major cardiovascular event during treatment. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with various assessments to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes and safety over approximately 54 months. Researchers will track the time to first event of any component of MACE-PLUS and collect data to assess the effect of AZD0780 compared to placebo. The study includes regular visits and evaluations to ensure participant safety and adherence to treatment.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness and safety of brenipatide when given along with standard care compared to a placebo with standard care in adults with bipolar disorder. This Phase 2 study aims to see if brenipatide can delay the worsening of bipolar symptoms. The trial includes participants aged 18 to 75 years and involves a careful assessment of how well the treatment works and its safety profile. The trial has three main periods: a screening period lasting about one month, a treatment period of at least six months, and a follow-up period of around two months. Participants receive either brenipatide or placebo, both given by subcutaneous injection, alongside their usual bipolar disorder medications. The study may end earlier if symptoms worsen or if participants withdraw for any reason. Participants will be asked to self-inject the study medication, maintain diaries, complete questionnaires, and attend regular visits throughout the study. Researchers will monitor the time to relapse, defined as the number of days from randomization until symptoms worsen according to specific criteria, over at least six months. Safety and adherence to treatment will also be closely observed during the study.

Researchers are studying the safety and effectiveness of brenipatide, given alongside standard treatment, compared to a placebo with standard treatment, to see if it can delay the return of symptoms in adults with major depressive disorder. This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study involving adult participants aged 18 to 75 years. The trial is designed to assess how long it takes for depression symptoms to relapse after starting the adjunctive treatment. Participants will receive either brenipatide or placebo, both administered by subcutaneous injection, in addition to their stable standard of care medication. The study has three main periods: a screening period lasting about one month, followed by a treatment phase of at least 12 months where participants receive the assigned injections, and finally a follow-up period of roughly two months. The total time in the study can be shorter if symptoms worsen or if a participant withdraws. During the trial, participants will need to attend scheduled visits, self-inject the study drug, maintain study diaries, and complete questionnaires. Researchers will monitor participants closely to determine the time until relapse of major depressive disorder symptoms occurs. Safety and adherence to study procedures will be tracked throughout the trial, with the primary outcome measuring the number of days from randomization until relapse.

This multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duvakitug in participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's Disease. The study includes three sub-studies focusing on induction treatment, with specific co-primary endpoints assessing clinical remission and endoscopic response at 12 weeks. Participants will receive either duvakitug or a placebo via subcutaneous injection during the treatment periods. The study duration can last up to 35 weeks and consists of a screening period of up to 5 weeks, followed by a 12-week induction phase in either Sub-Study 1 (open-label feeder induction) or Sub-Study 2 (pivotal induction). Non-responders may enter a 12-week extended induction phase in Sub-Study 3. After treatment, participants not enrolling in the maintenance study will have a 6-week follow-up period. Throughout the study, participants will have scheduled visits for assessments, including monitoring of clinical remission and endoscopic response using standardized scoring systems at 12 weeks. The total number of visits varies depending on sub-study participation, with up to 15 visits for those in Sub-Study 3. Safety and treatment effects will be closely monitored during these visits and follow-up periods.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of duvakitug in people with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis (UC). This multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 study aims to see if duvakitug can help achieve clinical remission in this condition. The study targets participants aged 16 to 80 years with a confirmed diagnosis of active UC for at least 3 months who have not responded well or are intolerant to other treatments. Participants will receive either duvakitug or a placebo as a solution injected under the skin (subcutaneous injection). The study includes up to 35 weeks with multiple periods: a screening period, a 12-week induction phase (either open-label or randomized), a 12-week extended induction for those who do not respond initially, and a 45-day follow-up for those not continuing into the maintenance study. During these phases, participants may have up to 8 to 15 on-site visits depending on their sub-study group. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored closely with scheduled visits for assessments including clinical evaluations related to UC activity and response to treatment. The main outcome measured is the proportion of participants who achieve clinical remission by week 12. Safety and tolerability will also be tracked during and after the treatment period, with follow-up visits to ensure participant well-being.

Researchers are evaluating whether ziltivekimab can help people who were hospitalized due to a heart attack by potentially reducing the development of heart disease and preventing new heart attacks or strokes. This Phase 3 study compares ziltivekimab with a placebo, which is a dummy medicine that has no effect on the body. Both treatments are given by chance, with equal likelihood for participants to receive either ziltivekimab or placebo. Participants will inject the study medicine once a month under the skin in the stomach, thigh, or upper arm. Ziltivekimab is given as an initial loading dose followed by monthly maintenance doses. The placebo group receives a matching injection schedule. The study duration is about two years. During the study, researchers will monitor participants for the time until the first serious heart-related event, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal heart attack, or non-fatal stroke. Participants will be closely observed from the start of randomization up to 25 months. The study includes regular follow-ups to assess safety and effectiveness of the treatments throughout this period.

Researchers are evaluating the Integrated Cancer Repository for Cancer Research (iCaRe2), a comprehensive multi-institutional resource developed by the Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center. This resource collects and manages standardized, multi-dimensional, and longitudinal data and biospecimens from adult cancer patients, those at high risk, and normal controls. iCaRe2 includes data from a wide geographic area covering many small and rural hospitals and cancer centers, supporting studies on cancer risk factors, development, progression, and strategies for prevention, screening, early detection, and personalized treatment. iCaRe2 is a web-based, secure, HIPAA-compliant registry that integrates multiple specialized cancer collaborative registries covering a broad range of cancers such as pancreatic, breast, thyroid, thoracic, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, central nervous system, leukemia, gynecological, sarcoma, melanoma, and more. The system allows participating centers to contribute data and biospecimens like tumor samples, germ line DNA, serum, urine, and plasma. This flexible "confederation model" enables centers with different expertise and resources to collaborate on diverse research projects through a common platform. Participants include adult individuals aged 19 and older who have a cancer diagnosis or history, are at risk for cancer, have suspicious clinical findings, or have no history of cancer (normal controls). Data collection includes demographic, clinical, and biospecimen information. The registry supports multi-dimensional data mining and sharing to advance cancer research. The primary outcome is the ongoing development and implementation of this web-based cancer collaborative registry, with long-term data collection and collaboration planned over many years.