Bolivar

Researchers are evaluating the safety and potential benefits of VHB937 in people aged 50 to 85 years with early Alzheimer's disease, including those diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer's or mild Alzheimer's disease. This Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to assess how VHB937 affects memory, thinking abilities, daily activities, and brain changes, while also studying how the body processes and responds to the treatment. The study includes an initial 72-week double-blind phase followed by an extension period. Participants will receive either VHB937 solution for infusion or a placebo solution through infusion during the 72-week double-blind phase. The study compares these two groups to evaluate the effects and safety of VHB937 in early Alzheimer's disease. After the double-blind phase, participants may continue in an extension period for further observation. Treatment involves regular infusions under controlled conditions throughout the study. During the study, participants and their study partners will attend visits for assessments including memory and cognitive tests, evaluations of daily functioning, brain imaging, and biomarker analysis from cerebrospinal fluid or PET scans. Researchers will monitor safety, record any side effects, and track changes using the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR) over 72 weeks. The study requires a reliable partner to accompany participants to visits, and overall participation includes monitoring during treatment and the extension phase to thoroughly assess VHB937's effects and safety.

Researchers are evaluating repotrectinib in adults and adolescents with advanced or metastatic solid tumors that have specific gene rearrangements (ALK, ROS1, NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3). The study includes a Phase 1 dose escalation to determine safe dosage levels and side effects, and a Phase 2 expansion to assess the drug's overall response rate in different patient groups. The trial also investigates the drug's effect on liver enzymes in a substudy and measures outcomes like duration of response and survival. The treatment involves oral repotrectinib capsules given to participants. Phase 1 focuses on finding the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose for Phase 2 by monitoring toxicities within 28 days of dosing. Phase 2 enrolls subjects into six groups based on prior treatments and tumor gene status, including those who are new to ROS1 or TRK targeted therapies and those who have received previous therapies. Each group receives repotrectinib to evaluate its effects in their specific conditions. Participants will undergo assessments including tumor measurements by imaging reviewed independently, laboratory tests, and monitoring for side effects. Researchers will track dose-limiting toxicities, response rates over two to three years, and survival outcomes. Safety and tolerability are closely observed during treatment. The study requires ongoing follow-up, including confirmation of tumor gene status and evaluation of response and progression over time.

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream in children and adolescents (6 to \<18 Years Old) with moderate atopic dermatitis.

Researchers are evaluating two treatment combinations for patients with melanoma that has spread to the brain and has a specific BRAF-V600 mutation. This phase II trial compares encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab against ipilimumab and nivolumab to determine which approach better controls and shrinks brain metastases from melanoma. The study also aims to assess overall survival, response rates, treatment duration, and side effects of each regimen. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives encorafenib orally once daily, binimetinib orally twice daily, and nivolumab intravenously every 28 days. The other group receives nivolumab intravenously and ipilimumab intravenously during the first four cycles, with cycles every 21 days initially, then every 28 days thereafter. Treatment continues unless the disease worsens or side effects become unacceptable. After treatment ends, participants have follow-up visits every six months for two years, then yearly until three years after starting the study. During the trial, participants undergo brain MRIs to monitor tumor response using standardized criteria. Imaging, tumor tissue, spinal fluid, stool, and blood samples are collected for research. Safety and effectiveness are carefully assessed through scans, physical exams, lab tests, and side effect monitoring. Progression-free survival up to three years after randomization is the main outcome. Participants remain in the study for about three years with periodic evaluations to track their health and disease status.

Researchers are evaluating an Internet-based pain coping skills program combined with enhanced usual care to see if it improves pain severity and pain interference among adult cancer survivors experiencing persistent cancer-related pain. The study also investigates how this program affects opioid and other pain medication use, quality of life, self-confidence in managing pain, and other factors such as fatigue, sleep, emotional distress, and cognitive function. The study plans to enroll 250 participants who have had invasive cancer treated with surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or other therapies. Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to either receive the 8-session Internet-based pain management program along with enhanced usual care or receive enhanced usual care alone. The program is designed to help participants better manage their cancer-related pain through online sessions. Each participant will be involved for about 9 months, from the initial randomization to the final follow-up assessment at week 34. During the study, participants will complete assessments evaluating pain severity and pain interference using the Brief Pain Inventory. Researchers will also measure medication use, quality of life, pain management confidence, and other health factors through questionnaires and interviews. Participants are expected to complete follow-up assessments at 22 and 34 weeks. The study includes monitoring for safety and adherence to the pain management program, and those without reliable internet access may receive tablets to participate.

Researchers are evaluating the addition of olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, as maintenance therapy following surgery and chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer that has been surgically removed and who have a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 genes. This phase II randomized, double-blind study aims to determine if olaparib can improve relapse-free survival compared to placebo in these patients, who have completed perioperative chemotherapy and have no evidence of recurrent disease. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either olaparib or a placebo orally twice daily in 28-day cycles for up to 12 cycles, as long as there is no disease progression or unacceptable side effects. Throughout the treatment period, patients undergo imaging tests such as CT scans or MRI and blood sample collections. After completing the treatment cycles, patients are followed up at 30 days, every 4 months for the first year, and then every 6 months for up to 10 years after randomization to monitor their health and disease status. During the study, researchers assess relapse-free survival by documenting any return of cancer or death from 22 to 44 months after randomization. They also collect blood samples and perform imaging tests to monitor the disease and evaluate treatment effects. Safety is carefully monitored, and patients must have recovered from previous treatments before starting the study. The study includes long-term follow-up to observe survival outcomes and any differences based on genetic mutations or prior chemotherapy regimens.

Researchers are evaluating how well chemotherapy given before surgery and radiation therapy works compared to surgery and radiation therapy alone in treating patients with nasal and paranasal sinus squamous cell carcinoma that can be removed by surgery. This phase II randomized trial focuses on patients with locally advanced resectable tumors classified as T3 or T4a stages, aiming to preserve important structures like the skull base and orbit, and to improve overall survival. The study also examines additional outcomes such as progression-free survival, the accuracy of imaging predictions, and the effects of tobacco use on treatment and symptoms. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group undergoes standard surgery followed by image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) daily for 30 treatments starting 4-6 weeks after surgery, with additional chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin) if certain high-risk features are present. The other group receives up to three cycles of chemotherapy including docetaxel and cisplatin (or carboplatin if cisplatin is not suitable), followed by surgery within six weeks. After surgery, they receive the same radiation therapy and additional chemotherapy as needed. The study includes correlative biomarker and questionnaire analyses. Throughout the study, participants have evaluations including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans before registration and during treatment. After completing therapy, patients are followed every three months for up to two years, then every six months up to five years to monitor structure preservation and survival outcomes. Researchers also assess treatment side effects, physical and psychological symptoms, and tobacco use behaviors during this time.

The goal of this trial is to determine the efficacy of advanced cognitive training for cancer survivors suffering from cancer- and cancer-treatment-related cognitive dysfunction. For millions of cancer survivors, cognitive dysfunction is a prevalent, severe, and persistent problem that has long been associated with poor work-related and health-related outcomes. Evidence suggests that a significant subset of breast cancer survivors (BCS) incur cognitive changes that may persist for years after treatment. Unfortunately, the scientific basis for managing these cognitive changes is extremely limited. Available evidence from pilot studies, including our work, suggests that advanced cognitive training, which is based on the principles of neuroplasticity (ability of brain neurons to re-organize and form new neural networks), may be a viable treatment option. However, previous trials to date have been limited by lack of attention-controlled designs, small samples of BCS, or limited outcome measures. Therefore, to overcome limitations of past studies and build on our pilot results, the purpose of this 2-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial is to conduct a full-scale efficacy trial to compare advanced cognitive training to attention control in BCS.

Researchers are collecting blood and tissue samples from people with and without cancer to study and evaluate tests that could help detect cancer early. The goal is to create a blinded reference set of samples to validate blood-based tests for early detection of multiple types of cancer, including leukemia, lymphoma, breast, lung, and others. The study also aims to assess how well these tests perform at the time of initial cancer diagnosis, considering different tumor types and cancer stages. Participants complete a baseline questionnaire and provide blood samples at registration and again 12 months later. Those diagnosed with cancer may also provide tissue samples at these times. The study includes patients aged 40 to 75 years, with cancer diagnoses at various stages or individuals without cancer. Special procedures are in place for patients with high suspicion of certain cancers before confirmation. During the study, researchers collect detailed information through questionnaires, blood draws, and tissue sampling to analyze test accuracy. Participants are monitored for up to one year after registration to follow outcomes. The primary measure is providing this blinded set of blood samples to help validate future cancer detection tests, supporting research that could improve early diagnosis and treatment.

Researchers are collecting and storing tissue and blood samples from patients with various types of cancer to create models that help study cancer and test new treatments. This observational study focuses on patients with confirmed or suspected cancer diagnoses, including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, to improve laboratory research and drug development. The study involves obtaining tumor tissue and blood samples during medically necessary procedures related to the patient's cancer treatment. These samples will be preserved using xenograft models (transplantation into another species) or cell cultures for future analysis. Sample collection is timed carefully around treatment cycles to ensure tissue viability. Participants will undergo tissue and blood collection as part of their clinical care, with no additional procedures solely for the study. Researchers will review pathology and flow cytometry reports to confirm viable cancer cells in the samples. The main outcome is the successful procurement and storage of these biological materials for research over a follow-up period of up to five years.