Charlotte

Researchers are conducting an open-label, multi-center, non-randomized pivotal Phase 3 study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PET imaging using [18F]PI-2620 for detecting tau protein buildup in people with Alzheimer's disease and control subjects. The study compares PET imaging results during life with brain tissue analysis obtained after death through autopsy, aiming to improve diagnosis of tau-related brain changes. Participants will receive an intravenous injection of the radioligand [18F]PI-2620 at a dose of 185 MBq 20%. The PET imaging will be performed to visualize tau deposits in the brain. This study focuses on assessing the diagnostic accuracy of this imaging method by comparing it to post-mortem histopathology findings. Throughout the study, participants will undergo PET scans and assessments to determine the presence and extent of tau pathology. The primary outcome measure is the ability of visual assessment of [18F]PI-2620 PET images to correctly distinguish tau neurofibrillary pathology associated with Alzheimer's disease, confirmed at autopsy within about one year. Safety and tolerability during imaging procedures will also be monitored, with a total participation period depending on the timing of brain autopsy after death.

Researchers are assessing the safety and effects of Ritlecitinib, a study medicine, for treating hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a condition causing long-lasting, painful red skin lumps. This phase 2 study focuses on adults with moderate to severe HS who have not responded well to or cannot tolerate antibiotics. The goal is to compare experiences and outcomes between those receiving Ritlecitinib and those receiving a placebo. Participants will be randomly assigned to take either Ritlecitinib or a placebo pill once daily at home. The treatment involves an initial loading dose of Ritlecitinib for 8 weeks, followed by an 8-week maintenance dose, totaling 16 weeks of treatment. The placebo group will receive a matching pill with no active medicine. Over approximately 24 weeks, including screening and follow-up, participants will attend around 10 clinic visits for health evaluations, including physical exams, blood and urine tests, vital signs, chest X-rays, ECGs, hearing tests, and questionnaires. They will also track their medication intake and HS symptoms daily using an electronic diary on a mobile phone. The study will measure how many patients achieve at least a 50% improvement in HS symptoms by week 16 to evaluate treatment response and safety.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of tenapanor in adults with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC) in this 26-week phase 3 study. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, involving multiple centers. It aims to compare three doses of tenapanor (5 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg taken twice daily) against a placebo, with a focus on improving spontaneous bowel movements. Participants will first undergo a 2-week screening where their eligibility is assessed through medical history, physical exams, lab tests, ECG, and self-reported constipation symptoms using an electronic diary (eDiary). Eligible patients will then be randomly assigned to receive one of the three doses of tenapanor or placebo twice daily for 26 weeks. During this treatment period, patients will continue daily and weekly symptom reporting via the eDiary and attend regular safety visits at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26. After completing the 26-week treatment, patients enter a 4-week treatment-free safety follow-up period to monitor any adverse events. A final visit occurs at the end of this follow-up to assess safety. The main outcome measured is the durable complete spontaneous bowel movements response over 12 weeks. Overall, the study involves careful monitoring of symptoms, safety, and treatment effects over approximately 32 weeks.

Researchers are studying a new treatment for HIV-1 infection that combines two medicines, islatravir and ulonivirine, taken once weekly. The goal is to see if this new study treatment works as well as the standard antiretroviral therapy (ART), which usually involves taking up to three medicines once or twice daily. This research also aims to learn about the safety and tolerability of the study treatment compared to the standard ART. The study compares the once-weekly combination of islatravir and ulonivirine with the standard daily treatment of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF). Participants will take either the study drugs or the standard drugs for 96 weeks. Some participants may receive matching placebos as part of the study design. The treatment is given orally as capsules or tablets according to the assigned group. Participants will be monitored throughout the study with regular assessments, including measuring the amount of HIV-1 virus in the blood to see if it is suppressed below 50 copies/mL at weeks 24 and 48. The study will also track any side effects or adverse events and whether participants stop the treatment due to these events. Overall, the study lasts about 96 weeks, with ongoing safety and effectiveness evaluations to understand how well the treatments work and how safe they are over time.

Researchers are evaluating molnupiravir, a study medicine designed to stop the COVID-19 virus from multiplying, to see if it can prevent severe illness from COVID-19 more effectively than a placebo. This Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study focuses on non-hospitalized adults at high risk of severe disease progression due to COVID-19. The study addresses the need for alternative treatments for people who cannot take certain COVID-19 medications due to availability or potential drug interactions. Participants will receive either molnupiravir or a placebo, both given orally as two 400 mg film-coated tablets every 12 hours for 5 days, totaling 10 doses. Some participants may also receive remdesivir as part of standard care if clinically appropriate and available. The study compares the effects of molnupiravir with placebo in preventing severe illness outcomes. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for outcomes such as hospitalization, death, or medically attended visits related to COVID-19 up to 29 days. Safety is assessed by tracking adverse events for up to about 5 months and discontinuation of study treatment due to adverse events for about 5 days. The study involves laboratory tests, symptom assessments, and safety evaluations to understand molnupiravir's impact on disease progression and participant health.

Researchers are evaluating treatments for breast cancer that is hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), specifically in cases where the cancer is either locally advanced and cannot be removed by surgery or has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic). The study aims to determine if patritumab deruxtecan (also called HER3-DXd or MK-1022) helps patients live longer overall or without the cancer growing compared to chemotherapy or trastuzumab deruxtecan. This is a Phase 3 clinical trial focusing on this particular type of breast cancer. Participants receive one of several treatments: patritumab deruxtecan through intravenous infusion, chemotherapy options like paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel via IV, oral capecitabine tablets, liposomal doxorubicin via IV, or trastuzumab deruxtecan via IV infusion. The study compares the effects of patritumab deruxtecan alone to the treatment chosen by the physician. Treatments are administered according to standard dosing schedules during the trial. During the study, participants are monitored for how long they live without the cancer progressing (up to about 45 months) and overall survival (up to about 85 months). Researchers assess disease status through imaging and other evaluations. Participants have regular check-ups to monitor health, treatment effects, and any side effects. The study tracks treatment response and safety over the extended follow-up period to understand the benefits and risks of the therapies.

Researchers are looking for ways to treat germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GCB DLBCL). DLBCL is a fast-growing blood cancer that affects B-cells. GCB is a type of DLBCL that affects young B-cells that are still maturing. The goal of this study is to learn if more people who receive zilovertamab vedotin (MK-2140) and R-CHP have the cancer respond (go away) than those who receive polatuzumab vedotin and R-CHP.

Researchers are evaluating the experimental antibody COM701 in participants with relapsed platinum sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC). This trial aims to find out if COM701, given as a maintenance treatment, can delay the progression of ovarian cancer, delay the need for new anti-cancer treatments, and to assess its safety. The study is part of an adaptive-platform trial with multiple sub-studies, focusing initially on COM701 alone compared to a placebo. Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to receive either a placebo or COM701 via intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. The trial includes a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design for the first sub-study. Future sub-studies will explore COM701 combined with other anti-cancer drugs. During the study, participants will visit the clinic every three weeks for treatment and monitoring. Health checks include physical exams, vital signs, ECGs, blood and urine tests, and pregnancy tests if applicable. Disease response will be assessed with CT or MRI scans and tumor marker tests using tumor tissue samples. The primary measure is progression-free survival, tracking time from randomization until disease progression or death, assessed up to two years.

Researchers are evaluating the effects of two different methods of giving pegloticase, a drug for uncontrolled gout, combined with methotrexate (MTX). This Phase 3 trial compares pegloticase given as an 18 mg injection under the skin every two weeks with pegloticase given as an 8 mg intravenous (IV) infusion every two weeks, both alongside weekly oral MTX. The main goal is to see which method better maintains normalized serum uric acid levels below 6 mg/dL for at least 80% of the time during the sixth month of treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive pegloticase either by subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion every two weeks, along with weekly oral doses of methotrexate. Both groups will be treated over several months while closely monitored. The study is double-blind, meaning neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is being given to maintain unbiased results. During the trial, participants will undergo regular assessments to monitor their serum uric acid levels and overall response to treatment, especially focusing on weeks 20 through 24 (Month 6). Safety and efficacy will be tracked throughout the study, including how well participants tolerate the treatments and any side effects. The study's main measure is the proportion of participants who achieve a sustained uric acid response during Month 6.

The trial investigates the use of volrustomig in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) who have not shown disease progression after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in this patient population. Participants have tumors that express PD-L1 and the study is conducted as a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center global trial. Participants are assigned to receive either volrustomig as sequential therapy following cCRT or to an observation group. The treatment period involves monitoring participants who have completed definitive cCRT but remain unresected and have no evidence of metastatic disease. The study focuses on participants with Stage III, IVA, or IVB LA-HNSCC according to AJCC criteria, who have not undergone tumor resection before cCRT and have not been treated with radiotherapy alone. During the study, participants are regularly evaluated for progression-free survival, with follow-up lasting up to approximately 8 years to assess long-term outcomes. Researchers will monitor safety and disease progression closely. The overall participation duration includes screening, treatment or observation, and extended follow-up to capture both efficacy and safety data over time.